Pediatric Duodenal Atresia and Stenosis Surgery Treatment & Management

  • Author: Nicola Lewis, MBBS, FRCS (Paed Surg); Chief Editor: Marleta Reynolds, MD   more...
 
Updated: Aug 24, 2010
 

Surgical Therapy

The operative management of duodenal atresia is determined by the anatomic findings and associated anomalies noted upon laparotomy. Bypass procedures for duodenal atresia or stenosis include duodenoduodenostomy or duodenojejunostomy. Type 1 duodenal atresia can also be managed by simple duodenotomy with web excision.

Next

Preoperative Details

Orogastric decompression of the stomach and fluid resuscitation should be promptly initiated. Orogastric losses are monitored and replaced. Broad-spectrum antibiotics and 1 mg vitamin K are administered. Parenteral nutrition is instituted on the first day of life via a peripherally inserted central catheter. When stable, the infant is taken to the operating room.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

  • Following precautions against hypothermia, the abdomen is entered via a transverse right upper quadrant incision. The stomach and first part of the duodenum are usually dilated and thickened and require decompression via the orogastric tube.
  • The gallbladder and spleen are examined. The viscera are examined for other anomalies, including malrotation, an anterior portal vein, and an annular pancreas. The liver is padded and gently retracted superiorly.
  • The duodenum is mobilized via Kocher maneuver.
  • The site of obstruction is detected by the discrepancy in the size of the bowel above and below the obstruction and by passing the orogastric tube down to the level of the obstruction.
  • In patients with a windsock web, an indentation at a site proximal to the site of obstruction may be observed. This marks the site of origin of the web and the location where the duodenotomy should be made.
  • The papilla of Vater is identified following duodenotomy by gently pressing on the gallbladder and observing the proximal and distal segments. In patients with type 3 defects, dual biliary ducts may be present.
  • Following documentation that no distal obstruction is present, proximal transverse to distal longitudinal (diamond-shaped) anastomosis may be performed using interrupted stitches (see following image). A direct duodenoduodenostomy is believed to result in a relatively earlier recovery of anastomotic function when compared with results following duodenojejunostomy.[7] During the diamond-shaped anastomosis, the midpoint of the proximal incision is approximated to the end of the distal incision.[4] This creates a larger stoma and allows the proximal duodenum to overlie the distal duodenum. As an alternative, a standard side-to-side duodenoduodenostomy may be performed. During the diamond-shaped anastomosis, a proximal During the diamond-shaped anastomosis, a proximal transverse to distal longitudinal anastomosis is performed; the midpoint of the proximal incision is approximated to the end of the distal incision.
  • Alternatively, type 1 defects may be treated by excising the web. An anterior duodenotomy is performed, and the web is opened along the lateral side. The web is carefully excised, leaving the medial portion containing the papilla in situ.
  • When the proximal duodenum is floppy and dilated, an antimesenteric duodenoplasty may be performed either by excising excess tissue or by plicating the anterior wall with interrupted sutures over a dilator. This is believed to decrease the complications of a megaduodenum.[20]
  • If an annular pancreas is present, it should not be divided. The anastomosis is formed anterior to the pancreatic mass.
  • In patients with malrotation, a Ladd procedure is performed; Ladd peritoneal bands are divided, the small bowel mesentery is widened, an appendectomy is performed, and the cecum and colon are placed on the left.
  • Few case reports or case series look at short-term outcome for laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy.[21, 22] The basic principles described above for the open technique are carried out; however, this procedure requires advanced laparoscopic skills. This approach is facilitated by the use of 3-mm short instruments, better visualization at laparoscopy, use of Nitinol U-clips (Medtronic Surgical, Minneapolis, Minn), and the decompressed distal bowel associated with the atresia. Theoretically, assessment of the distal bowel for associated atresias is more difficult; however, there are no reports of missed distal atresias using the laparoscopic approach. Long-term outcomes and the ease with which other pediatric surgeons adopt this approach will determine how widely available laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy becomes in the future.
Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

The orogastric tube is left on free drainage. The patient is not given oral feedings until bowel sounds are heard, stool is passed, and the gastric drainage is limited (< 1 mL/kg/h of clear or pale-green fluid). This may take 7-10 days but can be prolonged in the premature infant with other significant anomalies that require venous access for parenteral nutrition.

Oral feedings are gradually introduced, commencing with clear fluids and aspirating the stomach prior to each feed. These infants can be placed right-side down after feeds to enhance gastroduodenal emptying.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Poor peristalsis in the proximal duodenum leads to functional obstruction in some patients. This may predispose the patient to blind loop syndrome and duodenogastric reflux. Alkaline biliary reflux leads to gastritis and peptic ulceration.

Reports of functional obstructions occurring more than 2 decades after primary repair suggest that survivors of duodenal atresia should receive the following long-term follow-up care:

  • Clinical examination: Special attention is paid to the abdominal examination and the nutritional status of the patient.
  • Radiologic examination: A barium meal may demonstrate the following:
    • Mildly dilated duodenum
    • Megaduodenum
    • Delayed emptying
    • Diminished peristalsis
    • Slight luminal narrowing
    • Bezoars
  • Endoscopy: Findings on esophagogastroduodenoscopy include the following:
    • Esophageal irritation
    • Reflux gastritis
    • Megaduodenum
    • Delayed emptying
Previous
Next

Complications

Early postoperative complications are frequently related to prematurity, coexisting congenital anomalies, and parenteral nutrition. Intestinal obstruction secondary to adhesions may also occur in the early postoperative period.

Long-term complications occur at any time from a few months to years following the primary procedure. Hence, long-term follow-up is compulsory for infants treated for intrinsic duodenal obstruction. Late complications include the following:[20, 23, 24]

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

Current survival rates for infants with duodenal atresia or stenosis are 90-95%. Higher mortality rates are associated with prematurity and multiple congenital abnormalities.

Postoperative complications are reported in 14-18% of patients; some require reoperation.[2] Possible indications for reoperation include anastomotic leak, functional duodenal obstruction, adhesions, and missed atresias.

Long-term follow-up of these patients reveals that most of these patients are asymptomatic with a normal nutritional status. In a 1988 study, Kokkonen et al found a poor correlation between symptoms and radiologic and endoscopic findings; the megaduodenum failed to return to normal caliber, and duodenogastric reflux and duodenal dysmotility persisted decades after the initial surgery in asymptomatic patients.[23] Approximately 12% of patients develop late complications. Late deaths occur in approximately 6% of patients, and 50% of these are related to complex cardiac conditions. Less than 10% of patients require fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux, and less than 10% require revision of the initial repair.[25]

Dysmotility disorders associated with megaduodenum can be managed with an antimesenteric tapering duodenoplasty or duodenal plication.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Duodenal webs can be diagnosed and excised by an expert surgical endoscopist. This is feasible in patients who present after the neonatal period with duodenal stenosis. The morbidity and complications associated with a megaduodenum may require further surgical intervention.

Transanastomotic feeding tubes or gastrostomies were used in the past but have been demonstrated to offer no clear advantage and, instead, result in a delay in establishing oral feedings and an increase in the duration of hospitalization.[26, 3, 27]

Soutter and Askew (2003) reported successful results with a transumbilical approach to duodenal atresia.[28]

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Nicola Lewis, MBBS, FRCS (Paed Surg)  Specialist Registrar, Department of Surgery, Birmingham Children's Hospital, UK

Nicola Lewis, MBBS, FRCS (Paed Surg) is a member of the following medical societies: British Association of Paediatric Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Philip Glick, MD, MBA  Professor, Departments of Surgery, Pediatrics, and Gynecology and Obstetrics, Vice-Chairperson for Finance and Development, Department of Surgery, State University of New York at Buffalo

Philip Glick, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, American Thoracic Society, Association for Academic Surgery, Association for Surgical Education, Central Surgical Association, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Medical Society of the State of New York, Phi Beta Kappa, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Royal College of Surgeons of England, Sigma Xi, Society for Pediatric Research, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Society of Critical Care Medicine, and Society of University Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Robert K Minkes, MD, PhD  Professor of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Southwestern Medical School; Medical Director and Chief of Surgical Services, Children's Medical Center of Dallas-Legacy Campus

Robert K Minkes, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mary L Windle, PharmD  Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Andre Hebra, MD  Chief, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina College of Medicine; Surgeon-in-Chief, Medical University of South Carolina Children's Hospital

Andre Hebra, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, Children's Oncology Group, Florida Medical Association, International Pediatric Endosurgery Group, Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons, Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, South Carolina Medical Association, Southeastern Surgical Congress, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

H Biemann Othersen Jr, MD  Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics, Emeritus Head, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina

H Biemann Othersen Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American Burn Association, American Cancer Society, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, American Surgical Association, American Thoracic Society, British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Society of Critical Care Medicine, South Carolina Medical Association, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Southern Medical Association, Southern Society for Pediatric Research, and Southern Thoracic Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Marleta Reynolds, MD  Professor of Surgery, Northwestern University, The Feinberg School of Medicine; Head, Department of Surgery and Surgeon in Chief, Head, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital of Chicago

Marleta Reynolds, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Pediatric Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Fonkalsrud EW, DeLorimier AA, Hays DM. Congenital atresia and stenosis of the duodenum. A review compiled from the members of the Surgical Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. Jan 1969;43(1):79-83. [Medline].

  2. Bailey PV, Tracy TF Jr, Connors RH, et al. Congenital duodenal obstruction: a 32-year review. J Pediatr Surg. Jan 1993;28(1):92-5. [Medline].

  3. Mooney D, Lewis JE, Connors RH, Weber TR. Newborn duodenal atresia: an improving outlook. Am J Surg. Apr 1987;153(4):347-9. [Medline].

  4. Kimura K, Mukohara N, Nishijima E, et al. Diamond-shaped anastomosis for duodenal atresia: an experience with 44 patients over 15 years. J Pediatr Surg. Sep 1990;25(9):977-9. [Medline].

  5. Mishalany HG, Der Kaloustian VM, Ghandour MH. Familial congenital duodenal atresia. Pediatrics. Mar 1971;47(3):633-4. [Medline].

  6. Boyden EA, Cope JG, Bill AH Jr. Anatomy and embryology of congenital intrinsic obstruction of the duodenum. Am J Surg. Aug 1967;114(2):190-202. [Medline].

  7. Grosfeld JL, Rescorla FJ. Duodenal atresia and stenosis: reassessment of treatment and outcome based on antenatal diagnosis, pathologic variance, and long-term follow-up. World J Surg. May-Jun 1993;17(3):301-9. [Medline].

  8. Harberg FJ, Pokorny WJ, Hahn H. Congenital duodenal obstruction. A review of 65 cases. Am J Surg. Dec 1979;138(6):825-8. [Medline].

  9. Kimble RM, Harding J, Kolbe A. Additional congenital anomalies in babies with gut atresia or stenosis: when to investigate, and which investigation. Pediatr Surg Int. 1997;12(8):565-70. [Medline].

  10. Spitz L, Ali M, Brereton RJ. Combined esophageal and duodenal atresia: experience of 18 patients. J Pediatr Surg. Feb 1981;16(1):4-7. [Medline].

  11. Hancock BJ, Wiseman NE. Congenital duodenal obstruction: the impact of an antenatal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg. Oct 1989;24(10):1027-31. [Medline].

  12. Feingold M, Hall BD, Lacassie Y, Martínez-Frías ML. Syndrome of microcephaly, facial and hand abnormalities, tracheoesophageal fistula, duodenal atresia, and developmental delay. Am J Med Genet. Mar 31 1997;69(3):245-9. [Medline].

  13. Phelps S, Fisher R, Partington A, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of gastrointestinal malformations. J Pediatr Surg. Mar 1997;32(3):438-40. [Medline].

  14. al-Salem AH, Khwaja S, Grant C, Dawodu A. Congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction: problems in the diagnosis and management. J Pediatr Surg. Dec 1989;24(12):1247-9. [Medline].

  15. Reid IS. Biliary tract abnormalities associated with duodenal atresia. Arch Dis Child. Dec 1973;48(12):952-7. [Medline].

  16. Britton JR, Britton HL. Gastric aspirate volume at birth as an indicator of congenital intestinal obstruction. Acta Paediatr. Aug 1995;84(8):945-6. [Medline].

  17. Stringer MD, Brereton RJ, Drake DP, Wright VM. Double duodenal atresia/stenosis: a report of four cases. J Pediatr Surg. May 1992;27(5):576-80. [Medline].

  18. Keckler SJ, St Peter SD, Spilde TL, Ostlie DJ, Snyder CL. The influence of trisomy 21 on the incidence and severity of congenital heart defects in patients with duodenal atresia. Pediatr Surg Int. Aug 2008;24(8):921-3. [Medline].

  19. Tashjian DB, Moriarty KP. Duodenal atresia with an anomalous common bile duct masquerading as a midgut volvulus. J Pediatr Surg. Jun 2001;36(6):956-7. [Medline].

  20. Ein SH, Kim PC, Miller HA. The late nonfunctioning duodenal atresia repair--a second look. J Pediatr Surg. May 2000;35(5):690-1. [Medline].

  21. Spilde TL, St Peter SD, Keckler SJ, Holcomb GW 3rd, Snyder CL, Ostlie DJ. Open vs laparoscopic repair of congenital duodenal obstructions: a concurrent series. J Pediatr Surg. Jun 2008;43(6):1002-5. [Medline].

  22. Kay S, Yoder S, Rothenberg S. Laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy in the neonate. J Pediatr Surg. May 2009;44(5):906-8. [Medline].

  23. Kokkonen ML, Kalima T, Jaaskelainen J, Louhimo I. Duodenal atresia: late follow-up. J Pediatr Surg. Mar 1988;23(3):216-20. [Medline].

  24. Spigland N, Yazbeck S. Complications associated with surgical treatment of congenital intrinsic duodenal obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. Nov 1990;25(11):1127-30. [Medline].

  25. Escobar MA, Ladd AP, Grosfeld JL, et al. Duodenal atresia and stenosis: long-term follow-up over 30 years. J Pediatr Surg. Jun 2004;39(6):867-71; discussion 867-71. [Medline].

  26. Berger D, Roulet M. Early postoperative enteral feeding through a needle catheter jejunostomy. Z Kinderchir. Oct 1984;39(5):328-31. [Medline].

  27. Upadhyay V, Sakalkale R, Parashar K, Mitra SK, Buick RG, Gornall P, et al. Duodenal atresia: a comparison of three modes of treatment. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Apr 1996;6(2):75-7. [Medline].

  28. Soutter AD, Askew AA. Transumbilical laparotomy in infants: a novel approach for a wide variety of surgical disease. J Pediatr Surg. Jun 2003;38(6):950-2. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Three anatomic types of duodenal atresia are recognized. In type 1 atresia, a membrane traverses the internal diameter of the duodenum. This membrane may be elongated, giving rise to the windsock type 1 duodenal atresia. In type 2 atresia, the atretic ends of the duodenum are connected by a fibrous cord. In type 3 atresia, the atretic segments are completely separated.
This is a radiograph of a 1-day-old infant presenting with duodenal atresia. Note the distended stomach and first part of the duodenum and the absence of air distal to the duodenal bubble.
During the diamond-shaped anastomosis, a proximal transverse to distal longitudinal anastomosis is performed; the midpoint of the proximal incision is approximated to the end of the distal incision.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.