eMedicine Specialties > Pediatrics: Surgery > General Surgery

Management of Spina Bifida, Hydrocephalus and Shunts: Treatment

Author: Lynne C Kramer, MD, Fellow in Developmental Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Kenneth Azarow, MD, Program Director, Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital and University of Nebraska Medical Center; Professor, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences; Brett A Schlifka, DO, Consulting Staff, Department of Neurosurgery, Madigan Army Medical Center; Spyros Sgouros, MD, FRCS(SN)(Glasg), Senior Lecturer, Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Section of Pediatrics, University of Birmingham, England
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Nov 19, 2009

Treatment

Medical Therapy

In general, medical therapy of hydrocephalus is far inferior to surgical management of the condition. Medical therapy has been used with limited success in an attempt to avoid shunting in patients with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Prenatal administration of antenatal steroids may modestly reduce the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) in premature infants. Postnatal use of indomethacin has been shown to reduce severe IVH in some studies, although improvement in cognitive functioning has not been documented. Diuretic therapy, such as the use of acetazolamide and furosemide, was invalidated as a therapy in one recent study of 177 infants. In this study, the medications did not affect rates of shunt placement and may have impaired neurologic outcome. Fibrinolytic therapy is currently under investigation.

Serial lumbar puncture has been frequently performed after IVH to prevent or manage developing hydrocephalus, but no clear guidelines indicate when to initiate treatment and no explicit evidence of effectiveness has been reported. Early use of lumbar puncture (prior to evidence of head expansion) has been shown by meta-analysis to have no benefit.

Surgical Therapy

In most cases, surgical treatment of hydrocephalus consists of ventricular shunt insertion. The shunt is an artificial device, made mostly of plastic (although some parts may be metal), that includes a catheter inserted in the ventricle of the brain (a one-way valve that allows the unidirectional flow of cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] out of the brain) and a distal catheter that drains the CSF to an extracranial location in the body. The most preferred distal site remains the peritoneum. However, other sites are available (eg, right atrium, pleura, gall bladder, ureter, bladder, sagittal sinus) in patients with other coexisting abdominal problems. In current practice, the overwhelming majority of shunts are ventriculoperitoneal.

All shunts are designed to maintain normal intracranial pressure. More than a dozen different commercial shunts are currently available. The design of the valve is controversial. Essentially, 2 types of shunts are available: the pressure-regulating shunt and the flow-regulating shunt (as well as 2 brands of programmable shunt valves). The pressure-regulating shunts are designed to maintain a difference of pressure between their inlet and outlet and allow flow of CSF once the preset pressure has been reached. The flow-regulating shunts are designed to allow a constant flow of CSF, simulating the normal flow. Despite different designs, large randomized trials have been unable to demonstrate differences between the various types. Different types of valves are seemingly associated with different types of complications. For example, the pressure-regulating valves are more prone to cause overdrainage complications, whereas the flow-regulating valves are more prone to cause valve obstruction.

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) was first performed by Walter Dandy in the 1910s with moderate success and has recently experienced resurgence. The endoscopic equipment has improved, which has resulted in increased use of the procedure. ETV has a success rate of 70% when used in patients with aqueductal stenosis and is regarded by many as the procedure of choice in these patients. Endoscopic cyst fenestration can be used in the presence of arachnoid cysts in various locations (ie, suprasellar, interhemispheric, posterior fossa) with variable success.

Third ventriculostomy has been recently performed to treat hydrocephalus in children with myelomeningocele. However, the reported success rates are only approximately 30-40%. One possible explanation for the low success rate of third ventriculostomy is that most patients are infants or neonates when they receive initial treatment and do not have fully developed subarachnoid spaces. A frontal ventricular catheter attached to a blind reservoir or an Ommaya reservoir can be left in place and can be converted to a ventriculoperitoneal shunt if the third ventriculostomy fails. ETV can be used in children who have already received shunting and who present with shunt malfunction at an older age.

The reported success rate is approximately 50%. In such patients, an external ventricular drain should be used for the first few days following third ventriculostomy (especially if the shunt has been removed) to allow emergency decompression if the third ventriculostomy does not function adequately and the patient’s condition rapidly deteriorates.

ETV may be more effective if it is combined with choroid plexus cauterization. Improved outcomes were reported in a recent study of select patients younger than one year. However, cauterization is not routinely performed and remains a controversial option; further study is needed.

Kulkarni et al have developed and validated a model to predict the probability of success of ETV in the treatment of hydrocephalus.1 Analysis of 618 ETVs performed consecutively on children at 12 international institutions identified predictors of ETV success at 6 months. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed on 70% of the dataset and was validated on 30% (validation set). The model contained patient age, cause of hydrocephalus, and previous cerebrospinal fluid shunt. ETVs were successful and the model maintained good fit (Hosmer-Lemeshow, P = .45), discrimination (C statistic = 0.68), and calibration (calibration slope = 0.88) on 64.4% of the validation set. Kulkarni et al conclude that this model can be used to identify children in whom ETV is most likely to succeed and who can thus be spared the long-term complications of CSF shunting.

Premature infants with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus may benefit from placement of a subgaleal ventricular reservoir (an Ommaya reservoir), subgaleal shunt (which drains into a subgaleal pocket created during surgery), serial lumbar punctures, or external ventricular drainage as a temporizing measure. Placement of a permanent shunt may be avoided in as many as 25% of these children.

Preoperative Details

Anesthetic factors must be considered, particularly those relative to respiratory function and reserve. Many of these patients are premature neonates who have poor respiratory reserve and may be experiencing physiologic jaundice when surgery is required. Because the magnitude of the surgery is not extensive, the circulating blood volume is usually not problematic, and a blood transfusion is likely to be unnecessary during shunt insertion or endoscopic ventriculostomy, unless a preexisting problem is present.

Intraoperative Details

The importance of avoiding hypothermia and excessive blood loss in pediatric patients cannot be overemphasized; especially in neonates. Also, having a dedicated pediatric anesthesia team and operating room team are equally important. In addition, limiting operating room traffic during these procedures can be helpful in decreasing infections.

In most cases, shunt insertion involves making a posterior parietal or frontal burr hole through a small linear or curved skin incision. The peritoneal cavity is entered through a small linear incision either in the upper midline epigastric region or in the right upper quadrant. The distal tube is advanced from the cranial to the abdominal wound using a purpose-designed tubular dissector advanced in the subcutaneous fat. In typical cases, if a posterior parietal burr hole is used, the shunt valve is situated behind the ear, avoiding the need for a step incision, and is usually easily palpable by the patient and parents. Administering prophylactic antibiotics, usually cephalosporin or vancomycin, is common at the commencement of the operation to lessen the likelihood of shunt infection.

In children born with open spina bifida who undergo simultaneous shunting and myelomeningocele closure, additional precautions should be taken to maintain sterility of the surgical fields. Most neurosurgeons prefer to close the myelomeningocele with the child prone and subsequently turn the child on his or her back for the shunt placement while adequately protecting the newly repaired spinal wound with ample padding.

ETV is traditionally performed through a frontal burr hole situated just anteriorly to the coronal suture. A rigid or flexible endoscope is preferred. The third ventricle floor is perforated using a purpose-designed monopolar diathermy with retractable tip or another similar purpose-designed dissector. After formation, the stoma is commonly dilated using some kind of purpose-designed balloon dilator.

Perforation of the third ventricle floor is the most delicate and important phase because perforation of the adjacent basilar artery is a risk. ETV can be particularly difficult in children with myelomeningocele because the ventricular anatomy is often abnormal, the third ventricle floor is thicker and more difficult to penetrate, the size of the third ventricle is smaller in these children than in those with aqueductal stenosis, or the septum pellucidum is absent, which can lead to disorientation in the inexperienced operator. In general, inexperienced operators should avoid ETV in children with hydrocephalus caused by myelomeningocele. Apart from damage to the basilar artery, another potential source of intraoperative difficulty is damage to the choroid plexus, which can lead to hemorrhage that clouds the operative field. Most nonarterial bleeding stops with gentle warm irrigation.

Failure to perforate the Liliequist membrane may also result in ETV failure. Preoperative MRI is very important because it reveals the bowing of the third ventricle floor and its relationship to the basilar artery. Bowing of the third ventricle floor correlates with a pressure gradient between the ventricular system and the extraventricular CSF spaces. If the third ventricle floor is not bowed, the success rate of ETV is significantly decreased.

In cases of shunt revision or shunt removal after successful ventriculostomy, rupture of the choroid plexus during retrieval of the ventricular catheter is common and can lead to life-threatening hemorrhage. Different techniques can be used to avoid this complication; the most common of these techniques involves insertion of a stylet into the catheter lumen, allowing for coagulation with the diathermy before the catheter is retrieved. However, if the ventricular catheter is not easily removed, it should be left in place and an additional catheter should be placed. Image guidance can also be very helpful in ventricular catheter placement, especially in patients with loculated hydrocephalus and cannulating complex cysts.

Spina bifida is a midline defect in the mesenchymal-derived tissues and is classified as closed or open neural tube defects (NTDs). Closed NTDs do not involve exposed neural tissue and do not leak CSF. Open NTDs are subclassified into myelomeningocele (most common), myeloschisis, or hemimyelomeningocele (most rare). The goals of surgery are to preserve neural function, to prevent infection, and to prevent long-term complications such as an epidermal or dermal inclusion cyst and cord tethering.

Operative correction starts with anesthesia and positioning. Heat and blood loss are of vital importance in pediatric operative correction because both account for significant morbidity and mortality. The anesthetic can be modified if electrophysiologic monitoring and intraoperative nerve testing are desired.

The patient is usually placed prone on the operating room table, with sufficient padding of all pressure points. Open NTDs are cleansed with either sterile normal saline or lactated ringers; Betadine and other neurotoxic agents should be avoided. The wound is prepared and draped in a sterile fashion, and CSF is obtained for culture.

The neural placode is circumferentially incised, and every attempt is made to identify and separate all layers to allow for a multilayered closure that can be performed with fine running absorbable sutures. Inclusion of the epidermal tissue in the deep layers of the closure should be avoided because this can lead to late formation of a dermal inclusion cyst, an epidermal inclusion cyst, or both. The dura mater should be widely mobilized and closed without constricting the intradural contents, which can increase the likelihood of arachnoid adhesions and tethering.

Tissue should be conserved and trimmed only after it is definitively not needed for the closure. Working in conjunction with a plastic surgeon is helpful when myofascial flaps, rotational skin flaps, partial-thickness skin grafts, or flank-relaxing incisions are needed to close the defect. Closure in a transverse direction is preferable to a horizontal direction because the former offers better cosmesis and keeps the wound farther from the anus. In patients with severe hydrocephalus, placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt first theoretically decreases the risk of shunt contamination.

Postoperative Details

After successful completion of shunt insertion or revision in patients in whom a differential-pressure valve has been implanted, elevation into the upright position is commonly avoided to prevent shunt overdrainage and subdural hematomata formation. In contrast, patients in whom a flow-regulating shunt has been implanted are commonly elevated to 30° or more the day after the implantation to promote CSF drainage. The efficacy of these practices is unclear. Feeding of very young babies can commence soon after surgery.

Patients who undergo shunt revision tend to recover quickly, and they are usually discharged home a few days after surgery.

Follow-up

Postoperative follow-up a few weeks after shunt placement is usually necessary to ensure that the wound is healing well and that the head circumference is decreasing accordingly. Performing a CT scan and shunt series before discharge is customary to verify the position of the ventricular tube and to serve as future reference in case of possible shunt malfunction.

The issue of repeat scanning in the months after shunt insertion or ventriculostomy remains controversial. Certainly, satisfactory shunt function should be verified with at least one scan during the first year. In patients who undergo third ventriculostomy, cine phase-contrast MRI is mandatory to verify patency of the ETV stoma. Customarily, some surgeons perform yearly scanning, but the use of such routines is not universally accepted.

Currently, shunt malfunctions cannot be detected before they manifest clinically. Attempts to visualize CSF flow using ultrasonography or other imaging techniques have not been met with universal acceptance because they are associated with some false-negative and false-positive results.

Spina bifida requires ongoing follow-up for life because problems unrelated to hydrocephalus appear at various stages and necessitate treatment. Patients with spina bifida have continuing urologic problems due to neuropathic bladder. Neurogenic bowel can cause debilitating social problems. Although neurogenic bowel and bladder are initially managed medically with medication, retrograde scheduled enemas, and routine clean intermittent catheterization, some patients and physicians opt for surgical treatment such as the Malone procedure for antegrade colonic enemas (MACE) and the Mitrofanoff procedure for ease of catheterization.

  • In the Malone procedure, a section of bowel (typically the appendix) is made into a conduit from the colon to the abdominal wall. This is then used for daily antegrade enemas to maximize bowel continence.
  • The Mitrofanoff procedure is similar in that a section of bowel (again, usually the appendix) is made into a conduit from the bladder to the abdominal wall for daily catheterizations.

These procedures are performed in the hope of increasing independence and quality of life in patients with spina bifida. Although the specific indications and quantitative benefits of these procedures have not been well documented, improvements in health and well being have been suggested.

Another option for bowel continence is the use of a cecostomy, wherein a synthetic tube is inserted into the cecum and becomes the conduit for antegrade enemas. This may be used in patients without an appendix or in patients who have undergone a Mitrofanoff procedure in which the appendix was used.

Retethering of the cord occurs in 15-20% patients with myelomeningocele and is characterized by progressive weakness of one or both legs, onset or progression of scoliosis, change in gait, change in bowel or bladder control or function, or lower back pain. This condition may be confused with shunt malfunction.

Orthopedic problems, such as scoliosis and foot deformities, also require careful follow-up because they are likely to necessitate surgical treatment. A consideration particular to children with myelomeningocele is the relationship between hydrocephalus and scoliosis, which is present in a very high proportion of these patients. Scoliosis deteriorates in the presence of untreated hydrocephalus and improves following successful shunting. Active hydrocephalus is postulated to exacerbate the compressive effect of the hindbrain hernia on the descending pathways at the craniovertebral junction, inducing neuromuscular imbalance.

Another consideration specific to hydrocephalus related to myelomeningocele is the high incidence of precocious puberty among female patients (as many as 16%). The mechanism may be hypothalamic dysfunction caused by congenital deformity of the midbrain. Precocious puberty does not appear to affect intellectual development. 

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Brain and Nervous System Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Spina Bifida.

Complications

The patient and the doctor must have an ongoing commitment to manage the complications associated with shunting. Shunt complications can be divided into 3 categories: mechanical, infective, and overdrainage-related. As many as 80% of shunts develop mechanical complications at some stage, and one third to one half of these complications occur within the first year of shunt placement. An additional 15% of shunts fail in the second year, and 1-7% shunts per year fail after the second year. On average, each patient is likely to undergo 2-3 operations throughout childhood for shunt revision. The mortality rate associated with initial insertion is approximately 0.1%; mortality due to shunt failure ranges from 1-4%.

Infective complications occur in 5-10% of all shunt operations and are more common in younger patients, especially in those younger than 6 months. Most shunt infections manifest in the first 3 months after insertion, and almost all present within the first 6 months. Staphylococcus is the most common offending organism. The use of shunts impregnated with antistaphylococcal antibiotics may reduce the incidence of shunt infection.

Symptoms of shunt infection include redness and swelling along the surgical incision site, tenderness over the reservoir, swelling or drainage, nuchal rigidity, or abdominal pain. During the 1970s, when ventriculoatrial shunts were commonly used, an appreciable number of patients experienced bacterial endocarditis and shunt nephritis caused by direct bacteremia due to bacterial colonization of the shunt lumen. The change from ventriculoatrial to ventriculoperitoneal shunts substantially decreased complications of shunting.

Most shunt obstructions are related to obstruction of the ventricular catheter by glioependymal tissue, which grows into the lumen from the ventricular wall through the draining holes. In many shunt revision operations, as many as 30% of intraventricular hemorrhages occur during removal of the old catheter because of rupture of the choroid plexus, which has grown into the shunt lumen. Symptoms of acute shunt obstruction include headache, nausea and vomiting, papilledema, cranial nerve VI palsy, change in personality, and the setting sun sign (lack of upward gaze) in infants. Chronic failure may be heralded by accelerated head growth, loss of milestones, papilledema, optic atrophy, and change in seizure frequency.

A significant late complication is fracture or destruction of the shunt tube due to material degradation and fatigue (see Media file 7).

Damaged shunt valve removed during shunt revision...

Damaged shunt valve removed during shunt revision from a 22-year-old woman with hydrocephalus and spina bifida. The material of the valve has dramatically disintegrated.

Damaged shunt valve removed during shunt revision...

Damaged shunt valve removed during shunt revision from a 22-year-old woman with hydrocephalus and spina bifida. The material of the valve has dramatically disintegrated.


Common locations for distal tube fracture include the occipitocervical junction, the root of the neck, and the junction between the inferior border of the ribs and the abdominal wall. These are points of maximal mechanical stress where the material is degraded most.

Overdrainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is another significant shunt complication that is difficult to counteract. Early overdrainage leads to formation of subdural hematomas, which are difficult to treat, and ligation of the shunt is sometimes necessary. Late chronic overdrainage leads to the development of slit ventricles and mostly affects patients with differential pressure valves, which drain excess CSF when the patients assume the upright position, because of the siphoning effect of the column of fluid in the distal tube. Chronic overdrainage leads to collapse of the ventricles and intermittent shunt obstruction.

Siphoning is due to a pressure gradient between the proximal and distal ends and is a factor of the height multiplied by the mass of CSF multiplied by the acceleration of gravity. Siphoning usually becomes apparent when patients come out of recumbency. Antisiphon devices of different types have been developed to overcome overdrainage and are incorporated in many shunt systems, with variable success. Over the years, technical aspects of the shunt valves and the development of flow-regulating valves have improved the frequency of adverse effects related to overdrainage and mechanical complications.

Endoscopic treatment of hydrocephalus carries the risk of complications similar to those of intraoperative and immediate postoperative shunt insertion (ie, a 10% risk of infection or hemorrhage, basilar artery injury, and hypothalamic or pituitary dysfunction) but does not carry the long-term problems and complications of shunts and is not associated with overdrainage. However, a rare complication of late rapid deterioration can occur up to 7 years after the surgery and is not well understood but is thought to be a result of stoma scarring. This can result in coma and possible death due to obstructive hydrocephalus.

Leaving an Ommaya reservoir in place can be helpful, especially in patients who are in areas where access to neurosurgical care is limited. Tapping the Ommaya reservoir and aspirating CSF can serve as a bridge to definitive treatment. An element of underdrainage is present even in successful cases because the ventricles remain larger than in shunted patients. The mortality rate of ETV is approximately 1%.

Some adolescents with myelomeningocele and shunted hydrocephalus develop focal discomfort at the shunt valve or along the distal catheter in the posterior triangle of the neck. This had been termed shuntalgia and is characterized by tenderness with a palpable firm fibrotic sheath of scar tissue in the area of pain. This may be related to the adolescent growth spurt and, although resistant to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), is usually self-limiting.

Lastly, 20-40% of children with myelomeningocele have an allergy to latex. Care must be exercised to avoid contact with latex products during surgery and postoperative hospitalization to minimize the risk of anaphylactic reactions.

More on Management of Spina Bifida, Hydrocephalus and Shunts

Overview: Management of Spina Bifida, Hydrocephalus and Shunts
Workup: Management of Spina Bifida, Hydrocephalus and Shunts
Treatment: Management of Spina Bifida, Hydrocephalus and Shunts
Follow-up: Management of Spina Bifida, Hydrocephalus and Shunts
Multimedia: Management of Spina Bifida, Hydrocephalus and Shunts
References

References

  1. [Best Evidence] Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr. Aug 2009;155(2):254-9.e1. [Medline].

  2. Adelberg A, Blotzer A, Koch G, et al. Impact of maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele on the progression of ventriculomegaly in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2005;193(3 Pt 1):727-31. [Medline].

  3. Andeweg J. Intracranial venous pressures, hydrocephalus and effects of cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Childs Nerv Syst. Oct 1989;5(5):318-23. [Medline].

  4. Babcook CJ, Goldstein RB, Barth RA, et al. Prevalence of ventriculomegaly in association with myelomeningocele: correlation with gestational age and severity of posterior fossa deformity. Radiology. Mar 1994;190(3):703-7. [Medline].

  5. Bannister CM, Russell SA, Rimmer S. Pre-natal brain development of fetuses with a myelomeningocele. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Dec 1998;8 Suppl 1:15-7. [Medline].

  6. Bier JA, Morales Y, Liebling J, et al. Medical and social factors associated with cognitive outcome in individuals with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol. Apr 1997;39(4):263-6. [Medline].

  7. Boch AL, Hermelin E, Sainte-Rose C, Sgouros S. Mechanical dysfunction of ventriculoperitoneal shunts caused by calcification of the silicone rubber catheter. J Neurosurg. Jun 1998;88(6):975-82. [Medline].

  8. Bourgeois M, Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, et al. Epilepsy in children with shunted hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. Feb 1999;90(2):274-81. [Medline].

  9. Brockmeyer D, Abtin K, Carey L, Walker ML. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: an outcome analysis. Pediatr Neurosurg. May 1998;28(5):236-40. [Medline].

  10. Bruner JP, Tulipan N, Paschall RL, et al. Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA. Nov 17 1999;282(19):1819-25. [Medline].

  11. Bruner JP, Tulipan N, Reed G, et al. Intrauterine repair of spina bifida: preoperative predictors of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 2004;190(5):1305-12. [Medline].

  12. Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C, La Marca F. Shunt complications in the first postoperative year in children with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst. Dec 1996;12(12):748-54. [Medline].

  13. Choux M. Consensus: treatment. Child Nerv Syst. 1994;10:74-75.

  14. Davis BE, Daley CM, Shurtleff DB, et al. Long-term survival of individuals with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg. Jul-Aug 2005;41(4):186-91. [Medline].

  15. Davis SL, Tooley WH, Hunt JV. Developmental outcome following posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in preterm infants. Comparison of twins discordant for hydrocephalus. Am J Dis Child. Nov 1987;141(11):1170-4. [Medline].

  16. Dennis M, Fitz CR, Netley CT, et al. The intelligence of hydrocephalic children. Arch Neurol. Oct 1981;38(10):607-15. [Medline].

  17. Di Rocco C, Marchese E, Velardi F. A survey of the first complication of newly implanted CSF shunt devices for the treatment of nontumoral hydrocephalus. Cooperative survey of the 1991-1992 Education Committee of the ISPN. Childs Nerv Syst. Jul 1994;10(5):321-7. [Medline].

  18. Dias MS, McLone DG. Hydrocephalus in the child with dysraphism. Neurosurg Clin N Am. Oct 1993;4(4):715-26. [Medline].

  19. Donders J, Canady AI, Rourke BP. Psychometric intelligence after infantile hydrocephalus. A critical review and reinterpretation. Childs Nerv Syst. May 1990;6(3):148-54. [Medline].

  20. Drake J, Chumas P, Kestle J, et al. Late rapid deterioration after endoscopic third ventriculostomy: additional cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. Aug 2006;105(2):118-26. [Medline].

  21. Drake JM. Ventriculostomy for treatment of hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Clin N Am. Oct 1993;4(4):657-66. [Medline].

  22. Drake JM, Kestle JR, Milner R, et al. Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. Aug 1998;43(2):294-303; discussion 303-5. [Medline].

  23. Drake JM, Kestle JR, Tuli S. CSF shunts 50 years on--past, present and future. Childs Nerv Syst. Nov 2000;16(10-11):800-4. [Medline].

  24. Elias ER, Sadeghi-Nejad A. Precocious puberty in girls with myelodysplasia. Pediatrics. Mar 1994;93(3):521-2. [Medline].

  25. Epstein NE, Rosenthal AD, Zito J, Osipoff M. Shunt placement and myelomeningocele repair: simultaneous vs sequential shunting. Review of 12 cases. Childs Nerv Syst. 1985;1(3):145-7. [Medline].

  26. Fernell E, Hagberg G, Hagberg B. Infantile hydrocephalus in preterm, low-birth-weight infants--a nationwide Swedish cohort study 1979-1988. Acta Paediatr. Jan 1993;82(1):45-8. [Medline].

  27. Fletcher JM, Copeland K, Frederick JA, et al. Spinal lesion level in spina bifida: a source of neural and cognitive heterogeneity. J Neurosurg. Apr 2005;102(3 Suppl):268-79. [Medline].

  28. Garton HJ, Piatt JH. Hydrocephalus. Pediatr Clin North Am. Apr 2004;51(2):305-25. [Medline].

  29. Govender ST, Nathoo N, van Dellen JR. Evaluation of an antibiotic-impregnated shunt system for the treatment of hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. Nov 2003;99(5):831-9. [Medline].

  30. Hall P, Lindseth R, Campbell R, et al. Scoliosis and hydrocephalus in myelocele patients. The effects of ventricular shunting. J Neurosurg. Feb 1979;50(2):174-8. [Medline].

  31. Hirsch JF. Consensus: long-term outcome in hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. Jan 1994;10(1):64-9. [Medline].

  32. Hislop JE, Dubowitz LM, Kaiser AM, et al. Outcome of infants shunted for post-haemorrhagic ventricular dilatation. Dev Med Child Neurol. Aug 1988;30(4):451-6. [Medline].

  33. Hubballah MY, Hoffman HJ. Early repair of myelomeningocele and simultaneous insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt: technique and results. Neurosurgery. Jan 1987;20(1):21-3. [Medline].

  34. Hunt GM, Poulton A. Open spina bifida: a complete cohort reviewed 25 years after closure. Dev Med Child Neurol. Jan 1995;37(1):19-29. [Medline].

  35. Iborra J, Pages E, Cuxart A, et al. Increased intracranial pressure in myelomeningocele (MMC) patients never shunted: results of a prospective preliminary study. Spinal Cord. Aug 2000;38(8):495-7. [Medline].

  36. Jamjoom AB, Khalaf NF, Mohammed AA, et al. Factors affecting the outcome of foetal hydrocephaly. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(11):1121-5. [Medline].

  37. Jansen J. A retrospective analysis 21 to 35 years after birth of hydrocephalic patients born from 1946 to 1955. An overall description of the material and the criteria used. Acta Neurol Scand. Jun 1985;71(6):436-47. [Medline].

  38. Johnson MP, Gerdes M, Rintoul N, et al. Maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2006;194(4):1145-50; discussion 1150-2. [Medline].

  39. Johnson MP, Sutton LN, Rintoul N, et al. Fetal myelomeningocele repair: short-term clinical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Aug 2003;189(2):482-7. [Medline].

  40. Jones RF, Kwok BC, Stening WA, Vonau M. The current status of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of non-communicating hydrocephalus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. Sep 1994;37(1):28-36. [Medline].

  41. Kaufman BA. Neural tube defects. Pediatr Clin North Am. Apr 2004;51(2):389-419. [Medline].

  42. Kennedy CR, Ayers S, Campbell MJ, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of acetazolamide and furosemide in posthemorrhagic ventricular dilation in infancy: follow-up at 1 year. Pediatrics. Sep 2001;108(3):597-607. [Medline][Full Text].

  43. Kestle J, Drake J, Milner R, et al. Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial. Pediatr Neurosurg. Nov 2000;33(5):230-236. [Medline].

  44. Keucher TR, Mealey J. Long-term results after ventriculoatrial and ventriculoperitoneal shunting for infantile hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. Feb 1979;50(2):179-86. [Medline].

  45. Kokkonen J, Serlo W, Saukkonen AL, Juolasmaa A. Long-term prognosis for children with shunted hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. Aug 1994;10(6):384-7. [Medline].

  46. Laurence KM, Coates S. The natural history of hydrocephalus. Detailed analysis of 182 unoperated cases. Arch Dis Child. Aug 1962;37:345-62. [Medline].

  47. Liptak GS. Evidence-Based Practice in Spina Bifida: Developing a Research Agenda. May 9-10, 2003: Washington, DC.

  48. Liptak GS, Bolander HM, Langworthy K. Screening for ventricular shunt function in children with hydrocephalus secondary to meningomyelocele. Pediatr Neurosurg. Jun 2001;34(6):281-5. [Medline].

  49. Lorber J, Pucholt V. When is a shunt no longer necessary? An investigation of 300 patients with hydrocephalus and myelomeningocele: 11-22 year follow up. Z Kinderchir. Dec 1981;34(4):327-9. [Medline].

  50. Martinez-Lage JF, Poza M, Lluch T. Craniosynostosis in neural tube defects: a theory on its pathogenesis. Surg Neurol. Nov 1996;46(5):465-9; discussion 469-70. [Medline].

  51. McCullough DC, Balzer-Martin LA. Current prognosis in overt neonatal hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. Sep 1982;57(3):378-83. [Medline].

  52. McCullough DC, Johnson DL. Myelomeningocele repair: technical considerations and complications. 1988. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1994;21(1):83-9; discussion 90. [Medline].

  53. McLone DG. Care of the neonate with a myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Clin N Am. Jan 1998;9(1):111-20. [Medline].

  54. McLone DG. Continuing concepts in the management of spina bifida. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1992;18(5-6):254-6. [Medline].

  55. McLone DG, Aronyk KE. An approach to the management of arrested and compensated hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. Mar-Apr 1993;19(2):101-3. [Medline].

  56. Miller PD, Pollack IF, Pang D, Albright AL. Comparison of simultaneous versus delayed ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in children undergoing myelomeningocele repair. J Child Neurol. Sep 1996;11(5):370-2. [Medline].

  57. Mirzai H, Ersahin Y, Mutluer S, Kayahan A. Outcome of patients with meningomyelocele: the Ege University experience. Childs Nerv Syst. Mar 1998;14(3):120-3. [Medline].

  58. Morrow JD, Wachs TD. Infants with myelomeningocele: visual recognition memory and sensorimotor abilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. Jun 1992;34(6):488-98. [Medline].

  59. Naidich TP, McLone DG, Fulling KH. The Chiari II malformation: Part IV. The hindbrain deformity. Neuroradiology. 1983;25(4):179-97. [Medline].

  60. Naidich TP, Pudlowski RM, Naidich JB. Computed tomographic signs of Chiari II malformation. II: Midbrain and cerebellum. Radiology. Feb 1980;134(2):391-8. [Medline].

  61. Naidich TP, Pudlowski RM, Naidich JB. Computed tomographic signs of the Chiari II malformation. III: Ventricles and cisterns. Radiology. Mar 1980;134(3):657-63. [Medline].

  62. Naidich TP, Pudlowski RM, Naidich JB, et al. Computed tomographic signs of the Chiari II malformation. Part I: Skull and dural partitions. Radiology. Jan 1980;134(1):65-71. [Medline].

  63. Parent AD, McMillan T. Contemporaneous shunting with repair of myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;22(3):132-5; discussion 136. [Medline].

  64. Renier D, Sainte-Rose C, Pierre-Kahn A, Hirsch JF. Prenatal hydrocephalus: outcome and prognosis. Childs Nerv Syst. Aug 1988;4(4):213-22. [Medline].

  65. Rintoul NE, Sutton LN, Hubbard AM, et al. A new look at myelomeningoceles: functional level, vertebral level, shunting, and the implications for fetal intervention. Pediatrics. Mar 2002;109(3):409-13. [Medline][Full Text].

  66. Riva D, Milani N, Giorgi C, et al. Intelligence outcome in children with shunted hydrocephalus of different etiology. Childs Nerv Syst. Jan 1994;10(1):70-3. [Medline].

  67. Sainte-Rose C. Shunt obstruction: a preventable complication?. Pediatr Neurosurg. May-Jun 1993;19(3):156-64. [Medline].

  68. Sainte-Rose C, Piatt JH, Renier D, et al. Mechanical complications in shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1991-1992;17(1):2-9. [Medline].

  69. Saukkonen AL, Serlo W, von Wendt L. Epilepsy in hydrocephalic children. Acta Paediatr Scand. Feb 1990;79(2):212-8. [Medline].

  70. Schmidt B, Davis P, Moddemann D, et al. Long-term effects of indomethacin prophylaxis in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. Jun 28 2001;344(26):1966-72. [Medline].

  71. Sgouros S, John P, Walsh AR, Hockley AD. The value of colour Doppler imaging in assessing flow through ventriculo-peritoneal shunts. Childs Nerv Syst. Aug 1996;12(8):454-9. [Medline].

  72. Sgouros S, Malluci C, Walsh AR, Hockley AD. Long-term complications of hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;23(3):127-32. [Medline].

  73. Shurtleff DB. 44 years experience with management of myelomeningocele: presidential address, Society for Research into Hydrocephalus and Spina Bifida. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Dec 2000;10 Suppl 1:5-8. [Medline].

  74. Shurtleff DB, Foltz EL, Loeser JD. Hydrocephalus. A definition of its progression and relationship to intellectual function, diagnosis, and complications. Am J Dis Child. May 1973;125(5):688-93. [Medline].

  75. Steinbok P, Irvine B, Cochrane DD, Irwin BJ. Long-term outcome and complications of children born with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst. Mar 1992;8(2):92-6. [Medline].

  76. Strahl EW, Dg M, Nahser C, Nau HE. Long-term follow-up studies in hydrocephalus patients with spina bifida or encephalocele. Adv Neurosurg. 1980;8:247-251.

  77. Sutton LN, Adzick NS, Bilaniuk LT, et al. Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA. Nov 17 1999;282(19):1826-31. [Medline].

  78. Swank M, Dias L. Myelomeningocele: a review of the orthopaedic aspects of 206 patients treated from birth with no selection criteria. Dev Med Child Neurol. Dec 1992;34(12):1047-52. [Medline].

  79. Talwar D, Baldwin MA, Horbatt CI. Epilepsy in children with meningomyelocele. Pediatr Neurol. Jul 1995;13(1):29-32. [Medline].

  80. Teo C, Jones R. Management of hydrocephalus by endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg. Aug 1996;25(2):57-63; discussion 63. [Medline].

  81. Tortori-Donati P, Rossi A, Biancheri R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal dysraphism. Top Magn Reson Imaging. Dec 2001;12(6):375-409. [Medline].

  82. Tubbs RS, Chambers MR, Smyth MD, et al. Late gestational intrauterine myelomeningocele repair does not improve lower extremity function. Pediatr Neurosurg. Mar 2003;38(3):128-32. [Medline].

  83. Tulipan N. Intrauterine myelomeningocele repair. Clin Perinatol. Sep 2003;30(3):521-30. [Medline].

  84. Tulipan N, Bruner JP, Hernanz-Schulman M, et al. Effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on central nervous system structure and function. Pediatr Neurosurg. Oct 1999;31(4):183-8. [Medline].

  85. Tulipan N, Hernanz-Schulman M, Bruner JP. Reduced hindbrain herniation after intrauterine myelomeningocele repair: A report of four cases. Pediatr Neurosurg. Nov 1998;29(5):274-8. [Medline].

  86. Tulipan N, Sutton LN, Bruner JP, et al. The effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. Jan 2003;38(1):27-33. [Medline].

  87. Vachha B, Adams R. Language differences in young children with myelomeningocele and shunted hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. Oct 2003;39(4):184-9. [Medline].

  88. Van Roost D, Solymosi L, Funke K. A characteristic ventricular shape in myelomeningocele-associated hydrocephalus? A CT stereology study. Neuroradiology. Jul 1995;37(5):412-7. [Medline].

  89. Warf BC. Comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy alone and combined with choroid plexus cauterization in infants younger than 1 year of age: a prospective study in 550 African children. J Neurosurg. Dec 2005;103(6 Suppl):475-81. [Medline].

  90. Wilson RD, Johnson MP, Flake AW, et al. Reproductive outcomes after pregnancy complicated by maternal-fetal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2004;191(4):1430-6. [Medline].

  91. Yashon D. Prognosis in infantile hydrocephalus: past and present. J Neurosurg. Feb 1963;20:105-11. [Medline].

  92. Yeates KO, Enrile BG, Loss N, et al. Verbal learning and memory in children with myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Psychol. Dec 1995;20(6):801-15. [Medline].

  93. Young HF, Nulsen FE, Weiss MH, Thomas P. The relationship of intelligence and cerebral mantle in treated infantile hydrocephalus. (IQ potential in hydrocephalic children). Pediatrics. Jul 1973;52(1):38-44. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

hydrocephalus, infantile hydrocephalus, hydrocephaly, ventriculomegaly, aqueductal stenosis, intraventricular hemorrhage, spina bifida aperta, spina bifida occulta, hydrocele spinalis, schistorrhachis, myelomeningocele, Arnold-Chiari II malformation, Dandy-Walker syndrome  

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Lynne C Kramer, MD, Fellow in Developmental Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Madigan Army Medical Center
Lynne C Kramer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Phi Beta Kappa
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Kenneth Azarow, MD, Program Director, Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital and University of Nebraska Medical Center; Professor, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Kenneth Azarow, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Pediatric Surgical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Brett A Schlifka, DO, Consulting Staff, Department of Neurosurgery, Madigan Army Medical Center
Brett A Schlifka, DO is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Osteopathic Surgeons, American Osteopathic Association, and Philadelphia County Medical Society
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Spyros Sgouros, MD, FRCS(SN)(Glasg), Senior Lecturer, Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Section of Pediatrics, University of Birmingham, England
Spyros Sgouros, MD, FRCS(SN)(Glasg) is a member of the following medical societies: British Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Robert Kelly, MD, Chairman, Department of Surgery, Departments of Surgery and Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters; Associate Professor, Eastern Virginia Medical School
Robert Kelly, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, American Society of Abdominal Surgeons, Medical Society of Virginia, Norfolk Academy of Medicine, and Southern Medical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Pfizer Inc Stock Investment from financial planner; Avanir Pharma Stock Investment from financial planner ; WebMD Salary and stock Employment and investment from financial planner

Managing Editor

Deborah F Billmire, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Indiana University Medical Center
Deborah F Billmire, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Pediatric Surgical Association, Phi Beta Kappa, and Society of Critical Care Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

H Biemann Othersen Jr, MD, Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics, Emeritus Head, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina
H Biemann Othersen Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American Burn Association, American Cancer Society, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, American Surgical Association, American Thoracic Society, British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Society of Critical Care Medicine, South Carolina Medical Association, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Southern Medical Association, Southern Society for Pediatric Research, and Southern Thoracic Surgical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Marleta Reynolds, MD, Professor of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; Interim Head, Department of Surgery and Surgeon in Chief, Head, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital of Chicago
Marleta Reynolds, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Pediatric Surgical Association
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.