Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma Surgery Treatment & Management

  • Author: Holly L Neville, MD; Chief Editor: Marleta Reynolds, MD   more...
 
Updated: Jun 7, 2011
 

Medical Therapy

Current recommendations stem from IRS-V, in which treatment is stratified according to risk: low, intermediate, and high, based on the risk of disease recurrence and overall survival. Patients are then staged based on the site of the primary tumor. Favorable sites include the orbit, nonparameningeal head/neck, and genitourinary nonbladder/prostate sites; all other sites are unfavorable. Staging continues based on the size of the primary tumor (< 5 cm or >5 cm), regional lymph node involvement, distant metastases, and histologic subtype. Alveolar subtypes are now stratified based on gene fusion status.

Low-risk patients receive vincristine weekly for 9 doses and actinomycin D with or without cyclophosphamide (VAC regimen) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 4 doses every 12 weeks (at weeks 0, 12, 24, and 36). Radiation therapy is added in patients with residual localized disease. The protocol for intermediate-risk patients includes radiation therapy and either VAC or VAC and topotecan (according to randomized assignment) for nearly 1 year. A 2008 pilot study suggests that a regimen of alternating vincristine, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide with ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC/IE) is also effective.[8] High-risk patients begin therapy with irinotecan followed by VAC and radiation therapy.

Recent investigations using the vinca alkaloid vinorelbine have been instituted for use in recurrent, advanced rhabdomyosarcoma.[9] The VDC/IE regimen and irinotecan are being explored for use in high-risk tumors.

Radiation therapy

Radiation therapy is administered to patients who are at increased risk for local tumor recurrence. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) or brachytherapy, implemented at the time of surgical intervention, has played a valuable role in patients whose tumors have positive or questionable margins.

Patients with group II disease (microscopic residual disease) have a high risk of local recurrence if prescribed radiotherapy is omitted or reduced, as demonstrated by Million et al. They noted that more than half the patients who relapsed at the original tumor site received nonstandard radiation therapy, and, of these, three quarters died of their disease.[10]

Using clinical, chemotherapeutic, and radiotherapeutic data, another study reviewed the outcomes of 4230 patients who were at least 5-year survivors of secondary carcinomas, sarcomas, and hematological malignancies occurring after childhood cancer. After a median follow-up of 28 years, the results found that only the patients who received the highest dose of radiation (dose >150 joules) had a higher risk of mortality due to a sarcoma or second carcinoma; the risk of death due to carcinoma and sarcoma as second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) was 5.2-fold and 12.5-fold higher, respectively.[11]

Next

Surgical Therapy

First, the surgeon must obtain a tissue diagnosis. The initial surgical intervention may consist of wide local excision or incisional or excisional biopsy. Complete excision should be attempted only when the tumor is clearly resectable, with negative margins. Incisional biopsies should be planned to ensure that the scar does not impede later attempts at resection, particularly when dealing with extremity tumors. Thus, biopsy incisions on the extremity should always be longitudinal. Patients who have unknown or positive margins should be considered for re-excision.

Proper orientation of the biopsy allows complete rProper orientation of the biopsy allows complete resection at second operation.

Anesthetic administration should be planned to incorporate any procedures that the child will need. For example, the surgeon should discuss the possible need for a central venous line, bone marrow aspiration, lymph node evaluation, and biopsy with the oncologist, the patient, and the family, so that, if needed, all procedures can be performed on the same day.

Thorough preoperative planning is essential because of the various surgical options that may be necessary in children with rhabdomyosarcoma, and the surgeon should take into consideration the possibility of obtaining clear margins when determining the initial surgical approach. In the event of resection after chemotherapy and radiation, if the surgeon is unsure that complete excision can be obtained safely, the placement of brachytherapy catheters or the administration of intraoperative radiotherapy may be discussed prior to operative intervention. Unlike with adult sarcomas, pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma may be present in the lymphatics in approximately 40% of cases.

It is important to evaluate the lymphatics in all children with rhabdomyosarcoma. This is best performed at the time of the initial procedure, particularly if lymphatic mapping with sentinel node biopsy is planned, as prior biopsy and/or excision may disrupt the lymphatics. Surgical options for evaluating the lymphatics include aggressive node sampling or sentinel node biopsy. Formal lymph node dissection is not recommended because it has not been shown to significantly improve survival, even in patients with histologically positive nodes.

Sentinel node biopsy after lymphatic mapping in a Sentinel node biopsy after lymphatic mapping in a child with rhabdomyosarcoma. Notice that the incision is oriented to allow extension or incorporation of the incision should further dissection be necessary. The sentinel node should be blue and should have high counts of radioactive tracer signal when checked with the gamma probe.

Exceptions to wide local excision include head and neck tumors, vaginal/uterine tumors, and bladder tumors.

Previous
Next

Preoperative Details

Preoperatively, all radiographic studies should be reviewed for evidence of metastases or signs of local invasion that may complicate resection. The surgeon should be prepared to perform a complete resection, when indicated, in order to afford the child the best possible prognosis.

Previous
Next

Intraoperative Details

Regardless of the tumor site, the surgeon should strive for a complete resection, without causing mutilation or disability. When the margins are in doubt, send frozen sections for analysis. Frequently, major neurovascular structures are in the resection field. When these structures are essential, a careful resection should be undertaken to remove as much of the tumor as possible. In these cases, brachytherapy, intraoperative radiotherapy, or postoperative radiation therapy may be beneficial. Recent studies suggest that debulking has no advantage over biopsy in terms of survival. Therefore, it is likely that biopsy followed by medical therapy and excision, when feasible, is the best option.[12]

Previous
Next

Postoperative Details

Patients should be observed postoperatively to ensure adequate wound healing and to examine for signs of local or distant recurrence.

Previous
Next

Follow-up

Postoperatively, the tumor is graded based on extent of resection. This should be determined once the pathology is completed to determine the need for additional medical or surgical therapy. When possible, tumors with positive margins should be re-excised.

Previous
Next

Complications

Complications vary based on tumor site. Because of the frequency of preoperative radiation therapy, the surgeon should be aware of the possibility of impaired wound healing.

Previous
Next

Outcome and Prognosis

The use of multimodal therapy and the long-term investigations by the IRS Group have allowed for steady improvement in prognosis for pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma. The IRS-IV revealed that the failure-free survival rate and overall 3-year survival rate are 77% and 86%, respectively, in patients without metastatic disease. Recent emphasis is on stratification of therapy to provide local control with less impairment in functionality or cosmetics.

Previous
Next

Future and Controversies

Investigations are under way through the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children’s Oncology Group. These studies seek to verify the stratification-based treatment algorithm. Future studies will aim to continue to improve survival while minimizing morbidity and mortality resulting from not only the malignancy but also the treatment.

Previous
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Holly L Neville, MD  Assistant Professor of Clinical Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine

Holly L Neville, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Pediatric Surgical Association, and Association of Women Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Richard Andrassy, MD  Denton A Cooley, MD Chair and Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center; Chief, Section of Pediatric Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center; Chief Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Memorial-Hermann Hospital

Richard Andrassy, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physician Executives, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Clinical Nutrition, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, American Trauma Society, Association for Academic Surgery, International College of Surgeons, Society of Surgical Oncology, and Southwestern Surgical Congress

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Diana Farmer, MD  Professor and Chief of Pediatric Surgery, Vice Chair, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine; Surgeon-in-Chief, UCSF Children's Hospital

Diana Farmer, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, and American Pediatric Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mary L Windle, PharmD  Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Nicholas A Shorter, MD  Professor of Clinical Surgery and Clinical Pediatrics, State University of New York-Downstate University; Division Chief, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, State University of New York-Downstate Medical Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

H Biemann Othersen Jr, MD  Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics, Emeritus Head, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina

H Biemann Othersen Jr, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American Burn Association, American Cancer Society, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, American Surgical Association, American Thoracic Society, British Association of Paediatric Surgeons, Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Society of Critical Care Medicine, South Carolina Medical Association, Southeastern Surgical Congress, Southern Medical Association, Southern Society for Pediatric Research, and Southern Thoracic Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Marleta Reynolds, MD  Professor of Surgery, Northwestern University, The Feinberg School of Medicine; Head, Department of Surgery and Surgeon in Chief, Head, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital of Chicago

Marleta Reynolds, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Pediatric Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Qualman S, Lynch J, Bridge J, Parham D, Teot L, Meyer W, et al. Prevalence and clinical impact of anaplasia in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma : a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group. Cancer. Dec 1 2008;113(11):3242-7. [Medline].

  2. Neville HL, Andrassy RJ, Lobe TE, et al. Preoperative staging, prognostic factors, and outcome for extremity rhabdomyosarcoma: a preliminary report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV (1991-1997). J Pediatr Surg. Feb 2000;35(2):317-21. [Medline].

  3. Raney RB, Stoner JA, Walterhouse DO, et al. Results of treatment of fifty-six patients with localized retroperitoneal and pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-IV, 1991-1997. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jun 2004;42(7):618-25. [Medline].

  4. De Corti F, Dall'Igna P, Bisogno G, Casara D, Rossi CR, Foletto M, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas of extremities. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jan 2009;52(1):51-4. [Medline].

  5. Gow KW, Rapkin LB, Olson TA, Durham MM, Wyly B, Shehata BM. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the pediatric population. J Pediatr Surg. Dec 2008;43(12):2193-8. [Medline].

  6. Murphy JJ, Tawfeeq M, Chang B, Nadel H. Early experience with PET/CT scan in the evaluation of pediatric abdominal neoplasms. J Pediatr Surg. Dec 2008;43(12):2186-92. [Medline].

  7. Ferrari A, Miceli R, Meazza C, Zaffignani E, Gronchi A, Piva L, et al. Soft tissue sarcomas of childhood and adolescence: the prognostic role of tumor size in relation to patient body size. J Clin Oncol. Jan 20 2009;27(3):371-6. [Medline].

  8. Arndt CA, Hawkins DS, Meyer WH, Sencer SF, Neglia JP, Anderson JR. Comparison of results of a pilot study of alternating vincristine/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide and etoposide/ifosfamide with IRS-IV in intermediate risk rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jan 2008;50(1):33-6. [Medline].

  9. Casanova M, Ferrari A, Spreafico F, et al. Vinorelbine in previously treated advanced childhood sarcomas: evidence of activity in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer. Jun 15 2002;94(12):3263-8. [Medline].

  10. Million L, Anderson J, Breneman J, et al. Influence of Noncompliance With Radiation Therapy Protocol Guidelines and Operative Bed Recurrences for Children With Rhabdomyosarcoma and Microscopic Residual Disease: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jun 1 2011;80(2):333-8. [Medline].

  11. Tukenova M, Guibout C, Hawkins M, et al. Radiation therapy and late mortality from second sarcoma, carcinoma, and hematological malignancies after a solid cancer in childhood. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jun 1 2011;80(2):339-46. [Medline].

  12. Cecchetto G, Bisogno G, De Corti F, Dall'Igna P, Inserra A, Ferrari A, et al. Biopsy or debulking surgery as initial surgery for locally advanced rhabdomyosarcomas in children?: the experience of the Italian Cooperative Group studies. Cancer. Dec 1 2007;110(11):2561-7. [Medline].

  13. Andrassy RJ, Corpron CA, Hays D, et al. Extremity sarcomas: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study III. J Pediatr Surg. Jan 1996;31(1):191-6. [Medline].

  14. Andrassy RJ, Hays DM, Raney RB, et al. Conservative surgical management of vaginal and vulvar pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study III. J Pediatr Surg. Jul 1995;30(7):1034-6; discussion 1036-7. [Medline].

  15. Barr FG, Smith LM, Lynch JC, Strzelecki D, Parham DM, Qualman SJ, et al. Examination of gene fusion status in archival samples of alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma entered on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-III trial: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Mol Diagn. May 2006;8(2):202-8. [Medline].

  16. Breneman JC, Lyden E, Pappo AS, et al. Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma--a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study IV. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1 2003;21(1):78-84. [Medline].

  17. Burke M, Anderson JR, Kao SC, Rodeberg D, Qualman SJ, Wolden SL, et al. Assessment of response to induction therapy and its influence on 5-year failure-free survival in group III rhabdomyosarcoma: the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-IV experience--a report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. Nov 1 2007;25(31):4909-13. [Medline].

  18. Cofer BR, Wiener ES. Rhabdomyosarcoma. In: Andrassy, ed. Pediatric Surgical Oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1998:221-35.

  19. Crist WM, Anderson JR, Meza JL, et al. Intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma study-IV: results for patients with nonmetastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. Jun 15 2001;19(12):3091-102. [Medline].

  20. Felix CA, Kappel CC, Mitsudomi T, et al. Frequency and diversity of p53 mutations in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Res. Apr 15 1992;52(8):2243-7. [Medline].

  21. Hays DM. Bladder/prostate rhabdomyosarcoma: results of the multi-institutional trials of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Semin Surg Oncol. Nov-Dec 1993;9(6):520-3. [Medline].

  22. Hays DM, Lawrence W Jr, Wharam M, Newton W Jr, Ruymann FB, Beltangady M, et al. Primary reexcision for patients with 'microscopic residual' tumor following initial excision of sarcomas of trunk and extremity sites. J Pediatr Surg. Jan 1989;24(1):5-10. [Medline].

  23. Leuschner I, Newton WA, Schmidt D, et al. Spindle cell variants of embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma in the paratesticular region. A report of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study. Am J Surg Pathol. Mar 1993;17(3):221-30. [Medline].

  24. Li FP, Fraumeni JF, Mulvihill JJ, et al. A cancer family syndrome in twenty-four kindreds. Cancer Res. Sep 15 1988;48(18):5358-62. [Medline].

  25. Maurer HM, Beltangady M, Gehan EA, et al. The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study-I. A final report. Cancer. Jan 15 1988;61(2):209-20. [Medline].

  26. Meza JL, Anderson J, Pappo AS, Meyer WH. Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma treated on intergroup rhabdomyosarcoma studies III and IV: the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. Aug 20 2006;24(24):3844-51. [Medline].

  27. Ogawa O, Eccles MR, Szeto J, McNoe LA, Yun K, Maw MA, et al. Relaxation of insulin-like growth factor II gene imprinting implicated in Wilms' tumour. Nature. Apr 22 1993;362(6422):749-51. [Medline].

  28. Raney RB, Hays DM, Tefft M, et al. Rhabdomyosarcoma and the undifferentiated sarcomas. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott; 1988:635-53.

  29. Raney RB, Maurer HM, Anderson JR, Andrassy RJ, Donaldson SS, Qualman SJ, et al. The Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group (IRSG): Major Lessons From the IRS-I Through IRS-IV Studies as Background for the Current IRS-V Treatment Protocols. Sarcoma. 2001;5(1):9-15. [Medline].

  30. Scrable HJ, Witte DP, Lampkin BC, Cavenee WK. Chromosomal localization of the human rhabdomyosarcoma locus by mitotic recombination mapping. Nature. Oct 15-21 1987;329(6140):645-7. [Medline].

  31. Sorensen PH, Lynch JC, Qualman SJ, Tirabosco R, Lim JF, Maurer HM, et al. PAX3-FKHR and PAX7-FKHR gene fusions are prognostic indicators in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol. Jun 1 2002;20(11):2672-9. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Proper orientation of the biopsy allows complete resection at second operation.
The histologic findings in rhabdomyosarcoma.
Sentinel node biopsy after lymphatic mapping in a child with rhabdomyosarcoma. Notice that the incision is oriented to allow extension or incorporation of the incision should further dissection be necessary. The sentinel node should be blue and should have high counts of radioactive tracer signal when checked with the gamma probe.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.