eMedicine Specialties > Sports Medicine > Spine
Cervical Spine Sprain/Strain Injuries: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Mar 31, 2008
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
- Multimedia
Differential Diagnoses
| Atlantoaxial Injury and Dysfunction | Cervical Radiculopathy |
| Brachial Plexus Injury | Myofascial Pain in Athletes |
| Cervical Disc Injuries | |
| Cervical Discogenic Pain Syndrome | |
| Cervical Facet Syndrome |
Other Problems to Be Considered
Cervical dislocation
Cervical subluxation
Cervical spine acute bony injuries
Workup
Laboratory Studies
- Laboratory studies are generally not necessary for the diagnosis of cervical spine strain/sprain injuries.
Imaging Studies
- Plain radiographs
- In cervical spine trauma, routine radiography remains the initial imaging study of choice. Cervical spine radiographs should be obtained unless the history is clearly one of overuse. Of note, the microscopic damage that occurs as a result of a suspected whiplash syndrome or impulse loading due to athletic activity may not be seen on routine imaging studies.
- A cervical spine series usually includes anteroposterior (AP), lateral, oblique, and odontoid views.10 All 7 vertebrae must be visualized, and the disc spaces should be approximately equal throughout the cervical spine.
- The lateral view is useful for assessing alignment and soft-tissue swelling. The normal distance between the front of C3-C5 and the tracheal shadow is 5 mm in the adult. An increase in this distance suggests soft-tissue swelling and significant injury. The posterior borders of the vertebral bodies should lie in a relatively straight line that gently curves in a lordotic direction. Lines drawn through the horizontal axis of each spinous process should converge on a point well posterior to the spine when normal cervical lordosis is present. Loss of lordosis implies muscle spasm, whereas loss of convergence implies potential instability. A step-off in the alignment of the vertebral bodies may indicate either a facet subluxation or dislocation or a posterior element fracture.
- The lateral view is also useful in assessing the stability of C1 on C2. A space greater than 2-3 mm between the anterior border of the odontoid process and the adjacent posterior border of the anterior ring of C1 suggests abnormal mobility of C1, which can be due to an odontoid fracture or transverse ligament rupture. Lateral radiographs that demonstrate more than 11° of rotation from either adjacent vertebra or demonstrate more than 3.5 mm of horizontal displacement between any one vertebra in relationship to another represent an absolute contraindication to further participation in contact activities.
- The odontoid or open-mouth view demonstrates the odontoid in the AP direction. The distances between the odontoid and the horizontal portions of the ring of C1 on each side should be equal. If these distances are not equal, a rotary subluxation may be present. The oblique view best shows the facet joints and the neural foramina. If the radiographs reveal any evidence of fracture, dislocation, or subluxation, the patient's neck should be immobilized and the patient should be immediately referred to an orthopedist or neurosurgeon. If the initial static radiographs are normal, flexion-extension lateral views should be obtained once the acute symptoms have subsided. Note that in acute trauma cases, flexion-extension radiographs should be avoided, because during flexion-extension maneuvers, iatrogenic neurologic injuries may result. Flexion-extension views are valuable after acute trauma in revealing ligamentous subacute instability.
- Computed tomography (CT) scanning10,11
- CT scanning is performed in patients who have abnormal plain radiographs or in whom there is a strong clinical suspicion of a fracture with inconclusive radiographs.
- Disruptions of the vertebral body or lamina, fractures of the facet joint, and fragments of intracanal bone are better shown by CT scan studies, particularly with reconstructed images. Multiplanar display, with reformation into sagittal or coronal projections, can greatly enhance demonstrations of fractures and other lesions that are not optimally shown in the transaxial plane or that cover relatively long areas.
- CT scanning remains the imaging study of choice to evaluate traumatic bony lesions of the cervical spine.
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- MRI is usually indicated in athletes with neurologic deficits and when plain radiographic films and CT scans do not provide enough information for definitive management.
- MRI is useful in the diagnosis of cord and nerve root injury in patients who are neurologically compromised.
- Advantages of MRI include the ability to detect soft-tissue and spinal cord abnormalities, such as disc herniation, ligamentous disruption, hematoma, cord hemorrhage or edema, and syringomyelia.
- MRI or bone scintigraphy may be indicated in cases in which patients have continuing limitation of motion, pain, or radicular symptoms.
Related eMedicine topics:
Atlantoaxial Injury and Dysfunction
Fracture, Cervical Spine
Lower Cervical Spine Fractures and Dislocations
Overuse Injury
Related Medscape topics:
Resource Center Spinal Disorders
Resource Center Trauma
More on Cervical Spine Sprain/Strain Injuries |
| Overview: Cervical Spine Sprain/Strain Injuries |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Cervical Spine Sprain/Strain Injuries |
| Treatment & Medication: Cervical Spine Sprain/Strain Injuries |
| Follow-up: Cervical Spine Sprain/Strain Injuries |
| Multimedia: Cervical Spine Sprain/Strain Injuries |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Thomas BE, McCullen GM, Yuan HA. Cervical spine injuries in football players. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. Sep-Oct 1999;7(5):338-47. [Medline].
Watkins RG. Neck injuries in football players. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1986;5(2):215-46. [Medline].
Wroble RR, Albright JP. Neck and low back injuries in wrestling. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1986;5(2):295-325. [Medline].
Zmurko MG, Tannoury TY, Tannoury CA, Anderson DG. Cervical sprains, disc herniations, minor fractures, and other cervical injuries in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. Jul 2003;22(3):513-21. [Medline].
Tall RL, DeVault W. Spinal injury in sport: epidemiologic considerations. Clin Sports Med. Jul 1993;12(3):441-8. [Medline].
Bogduk N. The anatomy and pathophysiology of neck pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. Aug 2003;14(3):455-72, v. [Medline].
Panjabi MM, Vasavada A, White AA III. Cervical spine biomechanics. Semin Spine Surg. Mar 1993;5(1):10-6.
Kongsted A, Bendix T, Qerama E, et al. Acute stress response and recovery after whiplash injuries. A one-year prospective study. Eur J Pain. May 2008;12(4):455-63. [Medline].
Silber JS, Hayes VM, Lipetz J, Vaccaro AR. Whiplash: fact or fiction?. Am J Orthop. Jan 2005;34(1):23-8. [Medline].
Sciubba DM, McLoughlin GS, Gokaslan ZL, et al. Are computed tomography scans adequate in assessing cervical spine pain following blunt trauma?. Emerg Med J. Nov 2007;24(11):803-4. [Medline].
Kaiser JA, Holland BA. Imaging of the cervical spine. Spine. Dec 15 1998;23(24):2701-12. [Medline].
Beazell JR, Magrum EM. Rehabilitation of head and neck injuries in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. Jul 2003;22(3):523-57. [Medline].
Hopkins TJ, White AA 3rd. Rehabilitation of athletes following spine injury. Clin Sports Med. Jul 1993;12(3):603-19. [Medline].
Torg JS. Management guidelines for athletic injuries to the cervical spine. Clin Sports Med. Jan 1987;6(1):53-60. [Medline].
Cibulka MT. Evaluation and treatment of cervical spine injuries. Clin Sports Med. Oct 1989;8(4):691-701. [Medline].
Teitz CC, Cook DM. Rehabilitation of neck and low back injuries. Clin Sports Med. Jul 1985;4(3):455-76. [Medline].
Sawyer M, Zbieranek CK. The treatment of soft tissue after spinal injury. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1986;5(2):387-405. [Medline].
Langer PR, Fadale PD, Palumbo MA. Catastrophic neck injuries in the collision sport athlete. Sports Med Arthrosc. Mar 2008;16(1):7-15. [Medline].
Webb JK, Broughton RB, McSweeney T, Park WM. Hidden flexion injury of the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Aug 1976;58(3):322-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Ellis JL, Gottlieb JE. Return-to-play decisions after cervical spine injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep. Jan 2007;6(1):56-6. [Medline].
Torg JS, Glasgow SG. Criteria for return to contact activities following cervical spine injury. Clin J Sports Med. 1991;1(1):12-26.
Warren WL Jr, Bailes JE. On the field evaluation of athletic neck injury. Clin Sports Med. Jan 1998;17(1):99-110. [Medline].
Vegso JJ, Lehman RC. Field evaluation and management of head and neck injuries. Clin Sports Med. Jan 1987;6(1):1-15. [Medline].
An HS. Cervical spine trauma. Spine. Dec 15 1998;23(24):2713-29. [Medline].
Cole AJ, Farrell JP, Stratton SA. Cervical spine athletic injuries: a pain in the neck. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. Feb 1994;5(1):37-68.
[Best Evidence] Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Fehlings MG, et al. The surgical approach to subaxial cervical spine injuries: an evidence-based algorithm based on the SLIC classification system. Spine. Nov 1 2007;32(23):2620-9. [Medline].
Jackson DW, Lohr FT. Cervical spine injuries. Clin Sports Med. Apr 1986;5(2):373-86. [Medline].
Villavicencio AT, Hernandez TD, Burneikiene S, Thramann J. Neck pain in multisport athletes. 1: J Neurosurg Spine. Oct 2007;7(4):408-13. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
cervical strain, cervical sprain, musculotendinous injury, ligamentous injury, flexion-extension injury, deceleration injury, whiplash, neck pain, neck strain, neck sprain
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Cervical Spine Sprain/Strain Injuries