Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Workup
- Author: Gerard A Malanga, MD; Chief Editor: Craig C Young, MD more...
Imaging Studies
Plain radiographs
Plain radiographs are the most common type of imaging modality that is used in the workup of patients with LBP. However, radiographs have been overused; generally, plain films are not routinely necessary for most episodes of acute LBP, especially within the first 6 weeks after the onset of symptoms. Additionally, the radiographs are often unremarkable in patients who have radiculopathy that is secondary to a herniated nucleus pulposus.
The main purpose of plain radiographs is to detect serious underlying structural pathologic conditions. Many changes seen on the radiographs of symptomatic patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy are also seen in the radiographs of asymptomatic patients.
Selective criteria can be used to improve the usefulness of plain radiographs in the evaluation of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Radiographs are generally not recommended during the first month of the patient's symptoms if there are no red flags (see Clinical, History, above). Oblique views are rarely indicated, as they increase both the cost and radiation exposure to the patient.
MRI (see image below)
Magnetic resonance image demonstrating extension of the nucleus pulposus to the right paracentral region of the spinal cord. The disc is adjacent to the inflamed right L5 nerve root. Courtesy of Barton Branstetter, MD. MRI has demonstrated excellent sensitivity in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation and is considered the imaging study of choice for nerve root impingement. However, this preference is tempered by the prevalence of abnormal findings in asymptomatic subjects.
The use of MRI should be reserved for selected patients, such as the following:
Immediate MRI of the spine may be indicated in patients with progressive neurologic deficits or cauda equina syndrome, in patients with a presentation that is suggestive of malignancy, in patients with a known history or high risk of malignancy, or in cases in which there is a clinical suspicion to evaluate for a possible inflammatory disease or infection.
MRIs are not necessary in all patients who have examination findings that are consistent with a radiculopathy; in fact, these studies should generally be reserved for those cases in which the imaging results are likely to guide treatment.
Although many clinicians prefer to obtain an MRI prior to planning an epidural steroid injection, recent literature suggests this practice may not provide superior outcomes.[7]
When physical examination and electrodiagnostic findings do not indicate the exact levels of pathology in a patient who is in need of a selective nerve root block, MRI may help the physician to determine the exact level of pathology (see Other Tests, Electrodiagnosis, below).
In the absence of red flags, many patients (even those with a classic lumbosacral radiculopathy) can and should be managed without an MRI, especially if these individuals are not being considered for surgery or injections. Some clinicians reserve MRI for those patients in whom the treatment response is not as expected.
The addition of gadolinium for the MRI study is not necessary in most cases unless the patient has had a previous surgery or there is interest in the enhancing qualities of a previously observed lesion.
CT scanning
CT scanning of the lumbar spine provides superior anatomic imaging of the osseous structures of the spine and good resolution for cases of disc herniation. However, the sensitivity of a CT scan without myelography for detecting disc herniation is inferior to that of MRI. As with MRI, there can be a significant number of positive findings in the asymptomatic population when CT scanning is used.
Myelogram
A myelogram involves penetration of the subarachnoid space. This study is generally not indicated in the evaluation of acute LBP.
Generally, the myelogram is reserved as a preoperative test, often performed in conjunction with a CT scan. This procedure provides a detailed anatomic picture, particularly of the spinal osseous elements, and the myelogram can be used to correlate examination findings and assist in preoperative planning.
Myelograms are rarely used in the nonoperative evaluation of patients with acute LBP, except in cases in which the clinical picture supports a progressive neurologic deficit and MRI and electromyography are nondiagnostic.
Discography (see image below)
Discogram showing examples of an intact disc and a disrupted disc at the lumbar level. Discography is rarely necessary in the evaluation of acute LBP, and it is certainly not recommended within the first 3 months of treatment. Discography studies can be helpful in patients whose condition has not had a satisfactory response to a well-coordinated rehabilitation program or who have normal or equivocal MRI findings. In such cases, discography may have some benefit in localizing a symptomatic disc as the etiology of nonradicular back pain. (See also the eMedicine article Discography.)
A positive discogram must include a concordant pain response, which includes reproduction of the patient's symptoms upon injection of a contrast medium into a symptomatic disc, a nonpainful response upon injection of a contrast medium into control discs, and observed annular pathology on a postdiscography CT scan, if used.
Discography is most often used before the contemplation of surgical fusion for unremitting patient pain that is due to a symptomatic internal disc disruption. Some authors have found discography followed by CT scan to be a more precise technique that may delineate discovertebral pathology with sensitivities that are similar to or better than those of MRI and CT scanning/myelography.
Discography must be used with care because a significant percentage of individuals with positive discography findings improve without surgery. In addition, individuals with underlying psychologic issues tend to overreport pain during discographic injection of the contrast medium. Nonetheless, discographic injection still remains the only quasi-objective provocative test for disc-mediated pain. CT discography has also received attention because it may be a good predictor of surgical outcome following lumbar fusion for patients with intractable back pain.
Other Tests
Electrodiagnosis
Electrodiagnostic studies (eg, nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography) should be considered an extension of the history and physical examination in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy and not merely a substitute for detailed neurologic and musculoskeletal examinations. (See also the eMedicine article Physical Assessment for Electrodiagnostic Medicine.)
These studies are helpful when the diagnosis remains unclear (eg, peroneal neuropathy vs radiculopathy) in the evaluation of patients who have limb pain or when attempting to localize the patient's symptoms to a specific nerve root level.[8] Electrodiagnostic studies are also helpful for excluding other causes of sensory and motor disturbances, such as peripheral neuropathy and motor neuron disease. Additionally, these studies can provide useful prognostic information by quantifying the extent and acuity of axonal involvement in radiculopathies. (See also the eMedicine article Peroneal Mononeuropathy.)
Performing late response tests, such as the H-reflex, can provide valuable information regarding the proximal nerve/nerve root involvement. The H-reflex is both a sensitive and specific marker for involvement of the S1 root and will be prolonged from the time of symptom onset.
F waves, which are also used to detect abnormalities in the proximal portion of nerves, are too nonspecific to be clinically useful in the setting of lumbosacral radiculopathy.
Electrodiagnostic testing is usually not necessary in a clear-cut lumbosacral radiculopathy or in patients with isolated mechanical low back symptoms. Furthermore, these studies do not assess the smaller myelinated and unmyelinated nerve fibers, which are typically responsible for pain transmission. (See also the eMedicine article Back Pain, Mechanical.)
If the patient has had previous episodes of radicular symptoms or previous spinal surgery, it may be useful both from a diagnostic perspective and from a medicolegal standpoint to perform initial electrodiagnostic studies as soon as possible after the appearance of new symptoms in order to differentiate later developments from preexisting disease.
Specific electrodiagnostic studies are as follows:
- Nerve conduction studies: Distal peripheral motor and sensory nerve conduction studies are often normal in a single-level radiculopathy.
- Needle electromyography: This technique offers a high diagnostic yield. Timing is important, and the study should be performed less than 4-6 months (but >18-21 d) from symptom onset.
- Somatosensory evoked potential studies (SSEPs): These studies are essentially of no value in the assessment of acute LBP and lumbosacral radiculopathy. SSEPs are not indicated unless the patient's neurologic signs and symptoms are suggestive of pathology that would indicate involvement of the somatosensory pathways.
(See also the eMedicine articles Somatosensory Evoked Potentials: General Principles, Clinical Utility of Evoked Potentials, and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials: Clinical Applications [in the Neurology section].)
Bull RC, ed. Dance injuries. Bull's Handbook of Sports Injuries. Baltimore, Md: McGraw-Hill; 1999:627-8.
Braddom RL, ed. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1996:844-6.
Birnbaum JS. The Musculoskeletal Manual. 2nd ed. Orlando, Fla: Greene & Stratton; 1986:135.
Tarulli AW, Raynor EM. Lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol Clin. May 2007;25(2):387-405. [Medline].
Bono CM. Low-back pain in athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Feb 2004;86-A(2):382-96. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Padua L, Commodari I, Zappia M, Pazzaglia C, Tonali PA. Misdiagnosis of lumbar-sacral radiculopathy: usefulness of combination of EMG and ultrasound. Neurol Sci. Jun 2007;28(3):154-5. [Medline].
Cohen SP, Gupta A, Strassels SA, et al. Effect of MRI on treatment results or decision making in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy referred for epidural steroid injections: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. Jan 23 2012;172(2):134-42. [Medline].
Tsao B. The electrodiagnosis of cervical and lumbosacral radiculopathy. Neurol Clin. May 2007;25(2):473-94. [Medline].
Barr KP, Griggs M, Cadby T. Lumbar stabilization: a review of core concepts and current literature, part 2. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. Jan 2007;86(1):72-80. [Medline].
Willardson JM. Core stability training: applications to sports conditioning programs. J Strength Cond Res. Aug 2007;21(3):979-85. [Medline].
Akuthota V, Nadler SF. Core strengthening. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Mar 2004;85(3 suppl 1):S86-92. [Medline].
Memmo PA, Nadler SF, Malanga GA. Lumbar disc herniation: a review of surgical and non-surgical indications and outcomes. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2000;14(3):79-88.
Friedly J, Chan L, Deyo R. Increases in lumbosacral injections in the Medicare population: 1994 to 2001. Spine. Jul 15 2007;32(16):1754-60. [Medline].
Abram SE. Treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy with epidural steroids. Anesthesiology. Dec 1999;91(6):1937-41. [Medline].
Iversen T, Solberg TK, Romner B, et al. Effect of caudal epidural steroid or saline injection in chronic lumbar radiculopathy: multicentre, blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. Sep 13 2011;343:d5278. [Medline].
Lutz GE, Vad VB, Wisneski RJ. Fluoroscopic transforaminal lumbar epidural steroids: an outcome study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Nov 1998;79(11):1362-6. [Medline].
Cyteval C, Fescquet N, Thomas E, et al. Predictive factors of efficacy of periradicular corticosteroid injections for lumbar radiculopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. May 2006;27(5):978-82. [Medline]. [Full Text].
DePalma MJ, Bhargava A, Slipman CW. A critical appraisal of the evidence for selective nerve root injection in the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jul 2005;86(7):1477-83. [Medline].
Borg-Stein J, Wilkins A. Soft tissue determinants of low back pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. Oct 2006;10(5):339-44. [Medline].
Brown FW. Management of diskogenic pain using epidural and intrathecal steroids. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Nov-Dec 1977;129:72-8. [Medline].
Burnett C, Day M. Recent advancements in the treatment of lumbar radicular pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. Aug 2008;21(4):452-6. [Medline].
Cohen SP, Wenzell D, Hurley RW, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response pilot study evaluating intradiscal etanercept in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain or lumbosacral radiculopathy. Anesthesiology. Jul 2007;107(1):99-105. [Medline].
Dimar JR 2nd, Glassman SD, Carreon LY. Juvenile degenerative disc disease: a report of 76 cases identified by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine J. May-Jun 2007;7(3):332-7. [Medline].
[Best Evidence] Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Backonja M, et al. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain. Dec 5 2007;132(3):237-51. [Medline].
Fisher MA, Bajwa R, Somashekar KN. Routine electrodiagnosis and a multiparameter technique in lumbosacral radiculopathies. Acta Neurol Scand. Aug 2008;118(2):99-105. [Medline].
Gordon SL, Weinstein JN. A review of basic science issues in low back pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. May 1998;9(2):323-42, vii. [Medline].
Hyun JK, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Jeon JY. Asymmetric atrophy of multifidus muscle in patients with unilateral lumbosacral radiculopathy. Spine. Oct 1 2007;32(21):E598-602. [Medline].
Katayama Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon. J Spinal Disord Tech. Jul 2006;19(5):344-7. [Medline].
Kirita T, Takebayashi T, Mizuno S, et al. Electrophysiologic changes in dorsal root ganglion neurons and behavioral changes in a lumbar radiculopathy model. Spine. Jan 15 2007;32(2):E65-72. [Medline].
Malanga GA, Nadler SF. Nonoperative treatment of low back pain. Mayo Clin Proc. Nov 1999;74(11):1135-48. [Medline].
Morsø L, Hartvigsen J, Puggaard L, Manniche C. Nordic walking and chronic low back pain: design of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. Oct 2 2006;7:77. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Smeets RJ, Wade D, Hidding A, et al. The association of physical deconditioning and chronic low back pain: a hypothesis-oriented systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. Jun 15 2006;28(11):673-93. [Medline].
van Rijn JC, Klemetso N, Reitsma JB, et al. Symptomatic and asymptomatic abnormalities in patients with lumbosacral radicular syndrome: Clinical examination compared with MRI. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. Sep 2006;108(6):553-7. [Medline].
Yeung AT, Yeung CA. Minimally invasive techniques for the management of lumbar disc herniation. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 2007;38(3):363-72; abstract vi. [Medline].
Print
