Lumbosacral Spondylolysis Workup

  • Author: Achilles Litao, MD; Chief Editor: Craig C Young, MD   more...
 
Updated: Dec 14, 2011
 

Laboratory Studies

  • No laboratory studies have been shown to aid in the diagnosis of lumbosacral spondylolysis (lumbar spondylolysis).
Next

Imaging Studies

  • Routine thoracolumbar radiography in an athlete suspected of having a lumbosacral spondylolysis (lumbar spondylolysis) should include anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and oblique views. Flexion and extension lateral radiographs can be added if spondylolisthesis is present or stability is in question.
    • AP radiographic findings are usually normal in spondylolysis.[18]
    • The oblique views are particularly screened for the "Scotty dog" lesion in the pars interarticularis (see the image below).[11] The pars defect is represented by the collar on the Scotty dog. Lumbar oblique radiograph showing the "Scotty dog.Lumbar oblique radiograph showing the "Scotty dog." A pars defect is seen at L5.
    • Keep in mind that the oblique view must be of good quality and read by someone experienced in making the diagnosis of lumbosacral spondylolysis (lumbar spondylolysis). Considerable interobserver variation in making this diagnosis has been noted.[17]
    • The 30º cranially angulated AP view and the coned lateral view of the lumbosacral junction are proposed to display the majority of defects. Because the 30º cranially angulated AP view clearly depicts the pars interarticularis of L5 in the frontal plane, it also allows the distinction between unilateral and bilateral defects.[21] Suffice to say, plain radiography is used more to exclude unusual lesions and spondylolisthesis than to make the diagnosis of lumbosacral spondylolysis (lumbar spondylolysis).[15]
  • An athlete who is symptomatic with hyperextension and whose plain radiography results are normal requires additional investigations. A 99-m technetium (99m Tc) ethylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy identifies pars interarticularis stress fractures that were missed on oblique plain radiography. Those patients who have had recent trauma or strenuous activity and who are symptomatic show increased activity on the spondylolytic area. On the other hand, those with chronic low back pain show normal scans.[22]
    • Technetium bone scanning has its limitations.[23] When compared to single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scanning, the SPECT scanning was found to be more sensitive and better at localization of abnormalities in those athletes with radiographically obvious lumbosacral spondylolysis/spondylolisthesis.[24]
    • Bone scanning has a false-positive rate of 15% when using computed tomography (CT) scanning as the standard to establish the diagnosis of lumbosacral spondylolysis (lumbar spondylolysis).[15] Therefore, SPECT scanning is needed to identify the more subtle stress reactions. Moreover, these scans can aid in establishing the acuity of the lesion or in identifying the site of the problem in an athlete with negative plain radiography results but whose clinical course is suggestive of a pars interarticularis fracture.[22] The main value of SPECT scanning lies in the identification of an acute stress reaction of the pars before its manifestation radiographically.[21]
  • For more information about the defect in the bony structure involved, performing CT scanning through the fracture provides excellent detail (see the image below). Sagittally reconstructed computed tomography scan Sagittally reconstructed computed tomography scan of the lumbar spine shows a defect of the pars interarticularis on the left at L5.
  • CT scanning also provides information regarding other features of spondylolysis, such as facet joint changes, spondylolisthesis, and disc herniations, and it also helps prognosticate the potential for a lesion to heal.[25, 26]
  • The technique for CT scanning is crucial, because a lesion is optimally demonstrated when the plane of scanning is perpendicular to the plane of fracture. This is achieved if the CT scan gantry is reversed so that the scanning plane is perpendicular to the fracture.[21] CT scanning is not useful for impending stress fractures.[6]
  • MRI is inferior to CT scanning for direct visualization of defects of the pars interarticularis.[27] However, MRI has utility to rule out disc herniations. (See the images below.) Long TR (T2-weighted) fat suppressed sagittal magnLong TR (T2-weighted) fat suppressed sagittal magnetic resonance image shows increased signal in the pars interarticularis on the left at L5 (same patient in Images 3-4). This is an acute stress reaction. Sagittal short TR (T1-weighted) magnetic resonanceSagittal short TR (T1-weighted) magnetic resonance image shows decreased signal in the pars interarticularis on the left at L5 (same patient in Images 3-4).
  • Sairyo et al evaluated how the stage of a pars defect on CT scan and the presence or absence of high signal change in the adjacent pedicle on T2-weighted MRI were related to bony healing following conservative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis in childhood and adolescence.[28] Twenty-three children (19 boys, 4 girls; mean age 13.5 y) with 41 pars defects were conservatively for at least 3 months, in which they were asked to refrain from sporting activity and to wear a Damen soft thoracolumbosacral type brace.
  • The pars defects were classified as an early, progressive or terminal stage on CT scans. Early-stage lesions were defined as those that had a hairline crack in the pars interarticularis, which became a gap in the progressive stage. Terminal-stage defects were considered equivalent to a pseudarthrosis.[28] On T2-weighted MRIs, the presence or absence of high signal change in the adjacent pedicle were evaluated; then, the defects were divided into high signal change-positive or -negative. Healing of the defect was assessed by CT scanning.[28]
  • The investigators found 13 (87%) of the 15 early defects healed, but of 19 progressive defects, only 6 (32%) healed. None of the seven terminal defects healed. In addition, of the 26 high signal change-positive defects, 20 (77%) healed after conservative treatment, but none of the high signal change-negative defects did.[28] Sairyo et al concluded that early-stage defects on CT scans and high signal changes in the adjacent pedicle on T2-weighted MRIs may be useful predictors of bony healing of a pars defect in children following conservative treatment.
  • In another study, Zehnder et al performed a retrospective radiographic review to assess the relationship between interfacet spacing and pediatric spondylolysis.[29] The investigators compared the anteroposterior lumbar spine radiographs of 41 children with spondylolytic defects with 41 unaffected controls. The vertebral body width and interpedicular distance were recorded, and statistical analysis of the relationships of interfacet distances between the affected and unaffected groups was performed.
  • Zehnder et al noted that the absolute increase in interfacet distance between adjacent levels was significantly smaller at the L4/L5 level in spondylolytic individuals; however, when interpedicular distance was used to standardize for vertebral body size, a significantly smaller increase in the interpedicular distance was noted at the L4/5 level in spondylolytic individuals. The investigators demonstrated similar results when body width was used to standardize for vertebral body size, with a similar, but not significant, trend at the L3/4 level when standardizing with interpedicular distance. Zehnder et al indicated that a likely explanation for the etiology of lumbar pars defects is insufficient caudal increase in lumbar interfacet spacing but noted that further prospective studies are needed to determine if unaffected individuals with a narrowed interfacet spacing are at increased risk of developing spondylolytic defects later in life.[29]
Previous
Proceed to Treatment & Management
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Achilles Litao, MD  Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatrics, MedCentral, Mansfield, Ohio

Achilles Litao, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Sports Medicine, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Achilles Litao, MD  Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatrics, MedCentral, Mansfield, Ohio

Achilles Litao, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Sports Medicine, and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

John Munyak, MD  Associate Program Director, Director of Sports Medicine Education, Department of Emergency Medicine, Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Andrew D Perron, MD  Residency Director, Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center

Andrew D Perron, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Emergency Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD  Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Medscape Salary Employment

Henry T Goitz, MD  Academic Chair and Associate Director, Detroit Medical Center Sports Medicine Institute; Director, Education, Research, and Injury Prevention Center; Co-Director, Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship

Henry T Goitz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Jon B Whitehurst, MD  Clinical Instructor of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine; Partner, Rockford Orthopedic Associates; Orthopedic Chairman, Rockford Memorial Hospital

Jon B Whitehurst, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, and Arthroscopy Association of North America

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Craig C Young, MD  Professor, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Community and Family Medicine, Medical Director of Sports Medicine, Director of Primary Care Sports Medicine Fellowship, Medical College of Wisconsin

Craig C Young, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of Sports Medicine, American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. Arriaza BT. Spondylolysis in prehistoric human remains from Guam and its possible etiology. Am J Phys Anthropol. Nov 1997;104(3):393-7. [Medline].

  2. Morita T, Ikata T, Katoh S, Miyake R. Lumbar spondylolysis in children and adolescents. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Jul 1995;77(4):620-5. [Medline].

  3. Aihara T, Takahashi K, Yamagata M, Moriya H, Tamaki T. Biomechanical functions of the iliolumbar ligament in L5 spondylolysis. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5(3):238-42. [Medline].

  4. Lonstein JE. Spondylolisthesis in children. Cause, natural history, and management. Spine. Dec 15 1999;24(24):2640-8. [Medline].

  5. DeLisa JA, Gans BM, eds. Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:1646.

  6. Smith JA, Hu SS. Management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the pediatric and adolescent population. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 1999;30(3):487-99, ix. [Medline].

  7. Dubousset J. Treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Apr 1997;337:77-85. [Medline].

  8. Albanese M, Pizzutillo PD. Family study of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2(5):496-9. [Medline].

  9. Stinson JT. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in the athlete. Clin Sports Med. Jul 1993;12(3):517-28. [Medline].

  10. Patel DR, Nelson TL. Sports injuries in adolescents. Med Clin North Am. Jul 2000;84(4):983-1007, viii. [Medline].

  11. Weiker GG. Evaluation and treatment of common spine and trunk problems. Clin Sports Med. Jul 1989;8(3):399-417. [Medline].

  12. Ariyoshi M, Nagata K, Sonoda K, et al. Spondylolysis at three sites in the same lumbar vertebra. Int J Sports Med. Jan 1999;20(1):56-7. [Medline].

  13. Commandre FA, Taillan B, Gagnerie F, et al. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in young athletes: 28 cases. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. Mar 1988;28(1):104-7. [Medline].

  14. Soler T, Calderon C. The prevalence of spondylolysis in the Spanish elite athlete. Am J Sports Med. Jan-Feb 2000;28(1):57-62. [Medline].

  15. Congeni J, McCulloch J, Swanson K. Lumbar spondylolysis. A study of natural progression in athletes. Am J Sports Med. Mar-Apr 1997;25(2):248-53. [Medline].

  16. Rossi F, Dragoni S. Lumbar spondylolysis: occurrence in competitive athletes. Updated achievements in a series of 390 cases. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. Dec 1990;30(4):450-2. [Medline].

  17. Ralston S, Weir M. Suspecting lumbar spondylolysis in adolescent low back pain. Clin Pediatr (Phila). May 1998;37(5):287-93. [Medline].

  18. Omey ML, Micheli LJ, Gerbino PG 2nd. Idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolysis in the female athlete. Tips for treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Mar 2000;372:74-84. [Medline].

  19. Sward L. The thoracolumbar spine in young elite athletes. Current concepts on the effects of physical training. Sports Med. May 1992;13(5):357-64. [Medline].

  20. Mannor DA, Lindenfeld TN. Spinal process apophysitis mimics spondylolysis. Case reports. Am J Sports Med. Mar-Apr 2000;28(2):257-60. [Medline].

  21. Harvey CJ, Richenberg JL, Saifuddin A, Wolman RL. The radiological investigation of lumbar spondylolysis. Clin Radiol. Oct 1998;53(10):723-8. [Medline].

  22. Lowe J, Schachner E, Hirschberg E, Shapiro Y, Libson E. Significance of bone scintigraphy in symptomatic spondylolysis. Spine. Sep 1984;9(6):653-5. [Medline].

  23. Bellah RD, Summerville DA, Treves ST, Micheli LJ. Low-back pain in adolescent athletes: detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis with SPECT. Radiology. Aug 1991;180(2):509-12. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  24. Collier BD, Johnson RP, Carrera GF, et al. Painful spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis studied by radiography and single-photon emission computed tomography. Radiology. Jan 1985;154(1):207-11. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  25. Elster AD, Jensen KM. Computed tomography of spondylolisthesis: patterns of associated pathology. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Sep-Oct 1985;9(5):867-74. [Medline].

  26. Kalichman L, Li L, Hunter DJ, Been E. Association between computed tomography-evaluated lumbar lordosis and features of spinal degeneration, evaluated in supine position. Spine J. Apr 2011;11(4):308-15. [Medline].

  27. Ulmer JL, Mathews VP, Elster AD, et al. MR imaging of lumbar spondylolysis: the importance of ancillary observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1997;169(1):233-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  28. Sairyo K, Sakai T, Yasui N. Conservative treatment of lumbar spondylolysis in childhood and adolescence: the radiological signs which predict healing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Feb 2009;91(2):206-9. [Medline].

  29. Zehnder SW, Ward CV, Crow AJ, Alander D, Latimer B. Radiographic assessment of lumbar facet distance spacing and pediatric spondylolysis. Spine. Feb 1 2009;34(3):285-90. [Medline].

  30. Dutton JA, Hughes SP, Peters AM. SPECT in the management of patients with back pain and spondylolysis. Clin Nucl Med. Feb 2000;25(2):93-6. [Medline].

  31. [Best Evidence] Khadilkar A, Odebiyi DO, Brosseau L, Wells GA. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Oct 8 2008;CD003008. [Medline].

  32. [Best Evidence] Yuan J, Purepong N, Kerr DP, et al. Effectiveness of acupuncture for low back pain: a systematic review. Spine. Nov 1 2008;33(23):E887-900. [Medline].

  33. [Best Evidence] Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ, Avins AL, et al. A randomized trial comparing acupuncture, simulated acupuncture, and usual care for chronic low back pain. Arch Intern Med. May 11 2009;169(9):858-66. [Medline].

  34. [Best Evidence] Sertpoyraz F, Eyigor S, Karapolat H, Capaci K, Kirazli Y. Comparison of isokinetic exercise versus standard exercise training in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. Mar 2009;23(3):238-47. [Medline].

  35. O'Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, Allison GT. Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondylolisthesis. Spine. Dec 15 1997;22(24):2959-67. [Medline].

  36. Moeller JL, Rifat SF. Spondylolysis in active adolescents: expediting return to play. Phys Sportsmed. Dec 2001;29(12):27-32.

  37. Buck JE. Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Aug 1970;52(3):432-7. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  38. Morscher E, Gerber B, Fasel J. Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and direct stabilization of spondylolysis by means of a hook screw. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1984;103(3):175-8. [Medline].

  39. Scott JHS. The Edinburgh repair of isthmic (Group II) spondylolysis [abstract]. J Bone Joint Surg Br. June 1987;69:491.

  40. Kakiuchi M. Repair of the defect in spondylolysis. Durable fixation with pedicle screws and laminar hooks. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 1997;79(6):818-25. [Medline].

  41. Wu SS, Lee CH, Chen PQ. Operative repair of symptomatic spondylolysis following a positive response to diagnostic pars injection. J Spinal Disord. Feb 1999;12(1):10-6. [Medline].

  42. Chen JF, Lee ST. A physiological method for the repair of young adult simple isthmic lumbar spondylolysis. Chang Gung Med J. Feb 2000;23(2):92-8. [Medline].

  43. Sales de Gauzy J, Vadier F, Cahuzac JP. Repair of lumbar spondylolysis using Morscher material: 14 children followed for 1-5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. Jun 2000;71(3):292-6. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  44. Fellander-Tsai L, Micheli LJ. Treatment of spondylolysis with external electrical stimulation and bracing in adolescent athletes: a report of two cases. Clin J Sport Med. Jul 1998;8(3):232-4. [Medline].

  45. Micheli LJ, Wood R. Back pain in young athletes. Significant differences from adults in causes and patterns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Jan 1995;149(1):15-8. [Medline].

  46. [Best Evidence] Calmels P, Queneau P, Hamonet C, et al. Effectiveness of a lumbar belt in subacute low back pain: an open, multicentric, and randomized clinical study. Spine. Feb 1 2009;34(3):215-20. [Medline].

  47. Caterini R, Mancini F, Bisicchia S, Maglione P, Farsetti P. The correlation between exaggerated fluid in lumbar facet joints and degenerative spondylolisthesis: prospective study of 52 patients. J Orthop Traumatol. Jun 2011;12(2):87-91. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  48. El-Rich M, Villemure I, Labelle H, Aubin CE. Mechanical loading effects on isthmic spondylolytic lumbar segment: finite element modelling using a personalised geometry. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. Feb 2009;12(1):13-23. [Medline].

  49. [Best Evidence] Helmhout PH, Harts CC, Viechtbauer W, Staal JB, de Bie RA. Isolated lumbar extensor strengthening versus regular physical therapy in an army working population with nonacute low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Sep 2008;89(9):1675-85. [Medline].

  50. Kalichman L, Kim DH, Li L, et al. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: prevalence and association with low back pain in the adult community-based population. Spine. Jan 15 2009;34(2):199-205. [Medline].

  51. Physicians' Desk Reference. 54th ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Co; 2000.

  52. [Best Evidence] Suh KT, Park WW, Kim SJ, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of fusion with one or two cages. J Bone Joint Surg Br. Oct 2008;90(10):1352-6. [Medline].

  53. Wilms G, Maldague B, Parizel P, et al. Hypoplasia of L5 and wedging and pseudospondylolisthesis in patients with spondylolysis: study with MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Apr 2009;30(4):674-80. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Radiograph of L4 defect in the pars interarticularis.
Computed tomography scan demonstrating defects in the left and right pars interarticularis.
Long TR (T2-weighted) fat suppressed sagittal magnetic resonance image shows increased signal in the pars interarticularis on the left at L5 (same patient in Images 3-4). This is an acute stress reaction.
Sagittal short TR (T1-weighted) magnetic resonance image shows decreased signal in the pars interarticularis on the left at L5 (same patient in Images 3-4).
Lateral radiograph of the lumbar spine shows spondylolysis at L5 with spondylolisthesis at L5 through S1. On this single view, it is not possible to determine if these pars defects are unilateral or bilateral. Oblique views may help resolve this issue.
Sagittally reconstructed computed tomography scan of the lumbar spine shows a defect of the pars interarticularis on the left at L5.
Lumbar oblique radiograph showing the "Scotty dog." A pars defect is seen at L5.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.