Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Cholera

  • Author: Sajeev Handa, MBBCh, BAO, LRCSI, LRCPI; Chief Editor: Russell W Steele, MD  more...
 
Updated: Jun 27, 2016
 

Background

Cholera is an intestinal infection caused by Vibrio cholerae (see the images below). The hallmark of the disease is profuse secretory diarrhea. Cholera can be endemic, epidemic, or pandemic. Despite all the major advances in research, the condition still remains a challenge to the modern medical world. Although the disease may be asymptomatic or mild, severe cholera can cause dehydration and death within hours of onset.

Scanning electron microscope image of Vibrio chole Scanning electron microscope image of Vibrio cholerae bacteria, which infect the digestive system.
Electron microscopic image of Vibrio cholera. Electron microscopic image of Vibrio cholera.

See 11 Travel Diseases to Consider Before and After the Trip, a Critical Images slideshow, to help identify and manage infectious travel diseases.

Cholera is transmitted by the fecal-oral route. In the United States and other developed countries, because of advanced water and sanitation systems, cholera is not a major threat. Nevertheless, both clinicians and members of the general public, especially travelers, should be aware of how the disease is transmitted and what can be done to prevent it.[1]

Definitive diagnosis is not a prerequisite for the treatment of patients with cholera. The priority in management of any watery diarrhea is replacing the lost fluid and electrolytes and providing an antimicrobial agent when indicated. (See Workup and Treatment.)

Historical background

Cholera is an ancient disease. Throughout history, populations all over the world have sporadically been affected by devastating outbreaks of cholera. Records from Hippocrates (460-377 BCE) and the Indian peninsula describe an illness that might have been cholera

The 19th century English physician John Snow provided the first demonstration that the transmission of cholera was significantly reduced when uncontaminated water was provided to the population. During a recurrent epidemic of cholera in London in 1854, Snow identified water from the Broad Street pump as the likely source of the disease; removal of the pump handle contained the epidemic.[2]

Although not the first description, the discovery of the cholera organism is credited to German bacteriologist Robert Koch, who independently identified V cholerae in 1883 during an outbreak in Egypt. The genus name refers to the fact that the organism appears to vibrate when moving.

Since 1817, 7 cholera pandemics have occurred. The pandemics originated from cholera’s endemic reservoir in the Indian subcontinent. The first 6 occurred from 1817-1923 and were probably the result of V cholerae O1 of the classic biotype. Of these 6 pandemics, 5 affected Europe and 4 reached the United States, causing more than 150,000 deaths in 1832 and 50,000 deaths in 1866.

The seventh pandemic of cholera, and the first in the 20th century, began in 1961; by 1991, it had affected 5 continents. The pandemic continues today. This seventh pandemic was the first recognized to be caused by the El Tor biotype of V cholerae O1. The pandemic originated from the Celebes Islands, Indonesia, and affected more countries and continents than the previous 6 pandemics.

A new strain of cholera, V cholerae serogroup O139 (Bengal) emerged in the fall of 1992 and caused outbreaks in Bangladesh and India in 1993. Disease from this strain has become endemic in at least 11 countries.

Cholera has been rare in industrialized nations for the past century; however, the disease is still common in other parts of the world, including the Indian subcontinent and sub-Saharan Africa. Epidemics occur after war, civil unrest, or natural disasters when water and food supplies become contaminated with V cholerae in areas with crowded living conditions and poor sanitation.

Next

Pathophysiology

V cholerae is a comma-shaped, gram-negative aerobic or facultatively anaerobic bacillus that varies in size from 1-3 µm in length by 0.5-0.8 µm in diameter (see the image below). Its antigenic structure consists of a flagellar H antigen and a somatic O antigen. The differentiation of the latter allows for separation into pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains. Although more than 200 serogroups of V cholerae have been identified, V cholerae O1 and V cholerae O139 are the principal ones associated with epidemic cholera.

This scanning electron micrograph (SEM) depicts a This scanning electron micrograph (SEM) depicts a number of Vibrio cholerae bacteria of the serogroup 01; magnified 22371x. Image courtesy of CDC/Janice Haney Carr.

Currently, the El Tor biotype of V cholerae O1 is the predominant cholera pathogen. Organisms in both the classical and the El Tor biotypes are subdivided into serotypes according to the structure of the O antigen, as follows:

  • Serotype Inaba - O antigens A and C
  • Serotype Ogawa - O antigens A and B
  • Serotype Hikojima - O antigens A, B, and C

The clinical and epidemiologic features of disease caused by V cholerae O139 are indistinguishable from those of disease caused by O1 strains. Both serogroups cause clinical disease by producing an enterotoxin that promotes the secretion of fluid and electrolytes into the lumen of the small intestine.

To reach the small intestine, however, the organism has to negotiate the normal defense mechanisms of the GI tract. Because the organism is not acid-resistant, it depends on its large inoculum size to withstand gastric acidity.

The infectious dose of V cholerae required to cause clinical disease varies by the mode of administration. If V cholerae is ingested with water, the infectious dose is 103 -106 organisms. When ingested with food, fewer organisms (102 -104) are required to produce disease.

The use of antacids, histamine receptor blockers, and proton pump inhibitors increases the risk of cholera infection and predisposes patients to more severe disease as a result of reduced gastric acidity. The same applies to patients with chronic gastritis secondary to Helicobacter pylori infection or those who have undergone a gastrectomy.

V cholerae O1 and V cholerae O139 cause clinical disease by producing an enterotoxin that promotes the secretion of fluid and electrolytes into the lumen of the small intestine. The enterotoxin is a protein molecule composed of 5 B subunits and 2 A subunits. The B subunits are responsible for binding to a ganglioside (monosialosyl ganglioside, GM1) receptor located on the surface of the cells that line the intestinal mucosa.

The activation of the A1 subunit by adenylate cyclase is responsible for the net increase in cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP). cAMP blocks the absorption of sodium and chloride by the microvilli and promotes the secretion of chloride and water by the crypt cells.[3, 4] The result is watery diarrhea with electrolyte concentrations isotonic to those of plasma.

Fluid loss originates in the duodenum and upper jejunum; the ileum is less affected. The colon is usually in a state of absorption because it is relatively insensitive to the toxin. However, the large volume of fluid produced in the upper intestine overwhelms the absorptive capacity of the lower bowel, resulting in severe diarrhea. Unless the lost fluid and electrolytes are replaced adequately, the infected person may develop shock from profound dehydration and acidosis from loss of bicarbonate.

The enterotoxin acts locally and does not invade the intestinal wall. As a result, few neutrophils are found in the stool.

The O139 Bengal strain of V cholerae has a very similar pathogenic mechanism except that it produces a novel O139 lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and an immunologically related O-antigen capsule. These 2 features enhance its virulence and increase its resistance to human serum in vitro and occasional development of O139 bacteremia.

Previous
Next

Etiology

Cholera can be an endemic, epidemic, or a pandemic disease. Initiation and maintenance of epidemic and pandemic disease by V cholerae result from human infection and poor sanitation with assistance from human migration and seasonal warming of coastal waters.

Owing to the relatively large infectious dose, transmission occurs almost exclusively via contaminated water or food. V cholerae O1 has been shown to survive in crabs boiled for 8 minutes, but not in crabs boiled for 10 minutes. Transmission via direct person-to-person contact is rare.

Certain environmental and host factors appear to play a role in the spread of V cholerae.

Environmental factors

V cholerae is a saltwater organism, and its primary habitat is the marine ecosystem where it lives in association with plankton.

Cholera has 2 main reservoirs, humans and water. V cholerae is rarely isolated from animals, and animals do not play a role in transmission of disease.

Primary infection in humans is incidentally acquired. Risk of primary infection is facilitated by seasonal increases in the number of organisms, possibly associated with changes in water temperature and algal blooms.

Secondary transmission occurs through fecal-oral spread of the organism through person-to-person contact or through contaminated water and food. Such secondary spread commonly occurs in households but can also occur in clinics or hospitals where patients with cholera are treated.

Infection rates predictably are highest in communities in which water is not potable and personal and community hygiene standards are low.

Host factors

Malnutrition increases susceptibility to cholera. Because gastric acid can quickly render an inoculum of V cholerae noninfectious before it reaches the site of colonization in the small bowel, hydrochlorhydria or achlorhydria of any cause (including Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric surgery, vagotomy, use of H2 blockers for ulcer disease) increases susceptibility.

The incidence of cholera appears to be twice as high in people with type O blood. The reason for this increased susceptibility is unknown.

Infection rates of household contacts of cholera patients range from 20-50%. Rates are lower in areas where infection is endemic and individuals, especially adults, may have preexisting vibriocidal antibodies from previous encounters with the organism. For the same reason, adults are symptomatic less frequently than children, and second infections rarely occur or are mild.

An attack of the classic biotype of V cholerae usually results in the generation of antibodies that protect against recurrent infection by either biotype. Those who have had El Tor cholera are not protected against further attacks. Attacks of V cholerae 01 do not lead to immunity against V cholerae 0139.

Asymptomatic carriers may have a role in transfer of disease in areas where the disease is not endemic. Although carriage usually is short-lived, a few individuals may excrete the organisms for a prolonged period.

Previous
Next

Epidemiology

United States statistics

In the United States, cholera has virtually been eliminated because of improved hygiene and sanitation systems. Individuals living in the United States most often acquire cholera through travel to cholera-endemic areas or through consumption of undercooked seafood from the Gulf Coast or foreign waters. Between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2000, 61 cases of cholera were reported in 18 states and 2 US territories. Thirty-seven were travel-associated cases; the other 24 cases were acquired in the United States.[5]

A unique strain of V cholerae O1 (biotype El Tor, serotype Inaba), which is related closely to, but distinguishable from, the strain of the seventh pandemic was recognized in Louisiana and along the Gulf of Mexico in 1973. Since then, this strain has become indigenous to the Gulf coast, although its environmental reservoirs and ecology remain unclear. Of note, none of the toxigenic V cholerae strains associated with the US Gulf Coast (01, 0141, and 075) have caused more than sporadic cases and small outbreaks of diarrhea in the United States.[6]

In October 2005, toxigenic V cholerae infection due to the consumption of contaminated and improperly cooked seafood was reported from Louisiana after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.[7]

The incidence of Vibrio infection in the United States continues to be low, with highest number documented in the age group older than 50 years, which has been around 0.50 cases per 100,000 population from 2003-2008. The frequency of cholera among international travelers returning to the United States has averaged 1 case per 500,000 population, with a range of 0.05-3.7 cases per 100,000 population, depending on the countries visited.

International statistics

The number of patients with cholera worldwide is uncertain because most cases go unreported. Likely contributory factors are as follows:

  • Most cases occur in remote areas of developing countries where definitive diagnosis is not possible
  • Reporting systems often are nonexistent in such areas
  • The stigma of cholera, which has direct adverse effects on commercial trade and tourism, discourages reporting
  • Many countries with endemic cholera do not report at all

In 1990, fewer than 30,000 cases were reported to the WHO. Reported cases increased more than 10-fold with the beginning of the Latin American epidemic in 1991. In 1994, the number of cases (384,403) and countries (94) reporting cholera was the largest ever registered at the WHO. Even Europe experienced a 30-fold increase in cholera from 1993-1994, with reported cases increasing from 73 to 2,339 and deaths increasing from 2 cases to 47.

According to the WHO, the number of cases surged again in 2005. From 2005 to 2008, 178,000-237,000 cases and 4000-6300 deaths were reported annually worldwide.[8] However, the actual global burden is estimated to be 3-5 million cases and 100,000-130,000 deaths per year. The 2008 outbreak in Zimbabwe lasted longer than a year, with more than 98,000 cases and more than 4000 deaths.[9] Outbreaks in Guinea and Yunnan province in China contributed to this increase.[10, 11]

The V cholerae O139 serogroup (also known as Bengal), which emerged from Madras, India in October 1992, has spread throughout Bangladesh and India and into neighboring countries; thus far, 11 countries in Southeast Asia have reported isolation of this serogroup. Some experts regard this as an eighth pandemic.

In mid-October 2010, a cholera epidemic broke out in Haiti, which has been worsened by heavy rains in 2011. As of June 20, 2011, 363,117 cases of cholera and 5,506 deaths have been reported.[12] The epidemic is the first in Haiti in at least a century, and the source may have been a United Nations peacekeeping team from Nepal that came to Haiti after the catastrophic earthquake that hit the Caribbean nation on January 12, 2010.[13, 14]

Analyses performed by US and Haitian laboratories indicate that the strain involved in the outbreak is V cholerae El Tor O1 from the ongoing seventh pandemic predominant in South Asia . This may have consequences beyond Haiti, since this strain is more hardy and virulent, with an increased resistance to antibiotics.[15]

Age-related differences in incidence

In nonendemic areas, the incidence of infection is similar in all age groups, although adults are less likely to become symptomatic than children. The exception is breastfed children, who are protected against severe disease because of less exposure and because of the antibodies to cholera they obtain in breast milk.

Previous
Next

Prognosis

Before the development of effective regimens for replacing fluids and electrolyte losses, the mortality in severe cholera was more than 50%. Mortality is higher in pregnant women and children. Mortality rates are lowest where intravenous therapy is available. Average case fatality rates for Europe and the Americas continue to hover around 1%. At the Treatment Center of the International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, less than 1% of patients with severe dehydration die.

In Africa, a marked decline in case fatality rates has occurred since 1970; however, Africa continues to have the highest reported case fatality rates (approximately 4% in 1999) compared with the rest of the world. Low case fatality rates have been achieved in South America, presumably because of the availability of adequate treatment facilities and trained personnel.

Previous
Next

Patient Education

Education in environmental control is critical for the prevention of cholera. The source of V cholerae in nature is human excrement, and the most common vehicle of infection is water. Environmental control must focus on keeping these elements apart.

In the developed world, much has been done in public health planning and in the engineering of water conservation and sewage disposal. However, in developing countries, contamination of water by human excrement is a daily hazard. Members of these populations experience a constant cycle of infection, excretion, and reinfection. Education about the sterilization of water and hand-washing techniques is critical but difficult.

Contamination via food is also an important consideration. The source of this contamination is impure water used to wash or flush vegetables and fruit. Water contamination occurs via sewage or soil that is used to fertilize crops. In this situation, training food handlers is necessary.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Sajeev Handa, MBBCh, BAO, LRCSI, LRCPI Director, Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital

Sajeev Handa, MBBCh, BAO, LRCSI, LRCPI is a member of the following medical societies: Society of Hospital Medicine

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

John W King, MD Professor of Medicine, Chief, Section of Infectious Diseases, Director, Viral Therapeutics Clinics for Hepatitis, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center; Consultant in Infectious Diseases, Overton Brooks Veterans Affairs Medical Center

John W King, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Physicians, American Federation for Medical Research, Association of Subspecialty Professors, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Sigma Xi

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Vidhu V Thaker, MBBCh, MD Attending Pediatrician, Haverstraw Pediatrics; Clinical Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, New York Medical College

Vidhu V Thaker, MBBCh, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mark R Schleiss, MD Minnesota American Legion and Auxiliary Heart Research Foundation Chair of Pediatrics, Professor of Pediatrics, Division Director, Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School

Mark R Schleiss, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Pediatric Society, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, Society for Pediatric Research

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Russell W Steele, MD Clinical Professor, Tulane University School of Medicine; Staff Physician, Ochsner Clinic Foundation

Russell W Steele, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Immunologists, American Pediatric Society, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Louisiana State Medical Society, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, Society for Pediatric Research, Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Itzhak Brook, MD, MSc Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University School of Medicine

Itzhak Brook, MD, MSc is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, American Medical Association, American Society for Microbiology, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, Infectious Diseases Society of America, International Immunocompromised Host Society, International Society for Infectious Diseases, Medical Society of the District of Columbia, New York Academy of Sciences, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, Society for Pediatric Research, Southern Medical Association, Society for Ear, Nose and Throat Advances in Children, American Federation for Clinical Research, Surgical Infection Society, Armed Forces Infectious Diseases Society

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cholera. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/cholera/index.html. Accessed: July 7, 2011.

  2. CDC. 150th anniversary of John Snow and the pump handle. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5334a1.htm. Accessed: March 29, 2006.

  3. Kenneth Todar. Todar's Online Textbook of Bacteriology. Available at http://textbookofbacteriology.net/cholera.html. Accessed: April 12, 2010.

  4. Sack D, Cadoz M. Cholera vaccines. Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA. Vaccines. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1999. 639-649.

  5. Steinberg EB, Greene KD, Bopp CA, Cameron DN, Wells JG, Mintz ED. Cholera in the United States, 1995-2000: trends at the end of the twentieth century. J Infect Dis. 2001 Sep 15. 184(6):799-802. [Medline].

  6. Tobin-D'Angelo M, Smith AR, Bulens SN, et al. Severe diarrhea caused by cholera toxin-producing vibrio cholerae serogroup O75 infections acquired in the southeastern United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Oct 15. 47(8):1035-40. [Medline].

  7. CDC. Two cases of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae O1 infection after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita--Louisiana, October 2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006 Jan 20. 55(2):31-2. [Medline].

  8. WHO. Cholera vaccines: WHO position paper. World Health Organization. Available at http://www.who.int/wer/2010/wer8513.pdf. Accessed: April 13th, 2010.

  9. WHO. Cholera Country Profiles. World Health Organization. Available at http://www.who.int/cholera/countries/en/index.html. Accessed: April 12th, 2009.

  10. Luquero FJ, Grout L, Ciglenecki I, et al. First outbreak response using an oral cholera vaccine in Africa: vaccine coverage, acceptability and surveillance of adverse events, Guinea, 2012. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Oct 17. 7(10):e2465. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  11. Gu W, Yin J, Yang J, et al. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae from 1986 to 2012 in Yunnan Province, southwest China bordering Myanmar. Infect Genet Evol. 2013 Oct 28. [Medline].

  12. Pan American Health Organization. EOC Situation Report - Cholera Outbreak #20. Pan American Health Organization. Available at http://new.paho.org/blogs/haiti/?p=2034. Accessed: July 17th, 2011.

  13. CDC journal study ‘strongly suggests’ U.N. peacekeepers from Nepal imported cholera to Haiti. Washington Post. June 29, 2011. [Full Text].

  14. Barzilay EJ, Schaad N, Magloire R, et al. Cholera surveillance during the Haiti epidemic--the first 2 years. N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 14. 368(7):599-609. [Medline].

  15. Chin CS, Sorenson J, Harris JB, et al. The origin of the Haitian cholera outbreak strain. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 6. 364(1):33-42. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  16. CDC. 2010 Haiti Cholera Outbreak. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/haiticholera/diagnosistreatment.htm. Accessed: 10/29/2010.

  17. Rehydration Project. Oral Rehydration Solutions: Made at Home. Available at http://rehydrate.org/solutions/homemade-ors.pdf. Accessed: July 7, 2011.

  18. WHO. Cholera vaccines: WHO position paper. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2010 Mar 26. 85(13):117-28. [Medline].

  19. Chen WH, Greenberg RN, Pasetti MF, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine strain CVD 103-HgR prepared from new master and working cell banks. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013 Oct 30. [Medline].

  20. Chen WH, Cohen MB, Kirkpatrick BD, Brady RC, Galloway D, Gurwith M, et al. Single-dose Live Oral Cholera Vaccine CVD 103-HgR Protects Against Human Experimental Infection With Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 1. 62(11):1271-81. [Medline].

  21. Brown T. ACIP Backs Cholera, MenACWY Vaccines. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/865292. June 24, 2016; Accessed: June 27, 2016.

  22. Sinclair D, Abba K, Zaman K, Qadri F, Graves PM. Oral vaccines for preventing cholera. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16. CD008603. [Medline].

  23. Qadri F, Ali M, Chowdhury F, et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of oral cholera vaccine in an urban endemic setting in Bangladesh: a cluster randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2015 Oct 3. 386 (10001):1362-71. [Medline].

  24. Barclay L. Oral Cholera Vaccine Safe, Effective in First Real-life Trial. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/847690. July 09, 2015; Accessed: February 17, 2016.

  25. Matias WR, Falkard B, Charles RC, Mayo-Smith LM, Teng JE, Xu P, et al. Antibody Secreting Cell Responses following Vaccination with Bivalent Oral Cholera Vaccine among Haitian Adults. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jun. 10 (6):e0004753. [Medline].

  26. Azman AS, Luquero FJ, Ciglenecki I, Grais RF, Sack DA, Lessler J. The Impact of a One-Dose versus Two-Dose Oral Cholera Vaccine Regimen in Outbreak Settings: A Modeling Study. PLoS Med. 2015 Aug. 12 (8):e1001867. [Medline].

  27. Pullen LC. Cholera Vaccine: Reduction to Single Dose May Save Lives. Medscape Medical News. Available at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/850078. August 26, 2015; Accessed: February 17, 2016.

 
Previous
Next
 
Electron microscopic image of Vibrio cholera.
Scanning electron microscope image of Vibrio cholerae bacteria, which infect the digestive system.
This scanning electron micrograph (SEM) depicts a number of Vibrio cholerae bacteria of the serogroup 01; magnified 22371x. Image courtesy of CDC/Janice Haney Carr.
This patient with cholera is drinking oral rehydration solution (ORS) in order to counteract the cholera-induced dehydration. Image courtesy of the CDC.
Table 1. Assessment of the Patient With Diarrhea for Dehydration (based on WHO classification)
Sensorium Eyes Thirst Skin Pinch Decision
Abnormally sleepy or lethargic Sunken Drinks poorly or not at all Goes back very slowly (>2 sec) If the patient has 2 or more of these signs, severe dehydration is present
Restless, irritable Sunken Drinks eagerly Goes back slowly (< 2 sec) If the patient has 2 or



more signs, some dehydration is present



Well, alert Normal Drinks normally, not



thirsty



Goes back quickly Patient has no dehydration
Table 2. Fluid Replacement for Dehydration
Severe dehydration Intravenous (IV) drips of Ringer Lactate or, if not available, normal saline and oral rehydration salts as outlined below
  • 100 mL/kg in 3-h period (in 6 h for children < 1 y)
  • Start rapidly (30 mL/kg within 30 min, then slow down)
  • Total amount for first 24 h: 200 L/kg
Some dehydration Oral rehydration salts (amount in first 4 h)
  • Infants < 4 mo (< 5 kg): 200–400 mL
  • Infants 4–11 mo (5–7.9 kg): 400–600 mL
  • Children 1–2 y (8–10.9 kg): 600–800 mL
  • Children 2–4 y (11–15.9 kg): 800–1200 mL
  • Children 5–14 y (16–29.9 kg): 1200–2200 mL
  • Patients >14 y (≥30 kg): 2200–4000 mL
No dehydration Oral rehydration salts
  • Children < 2 y: 50–100 mL, up to 500 mL/day
  • Children 2–9 y: 100–200 mL, up to 1000 mL/day
  • Patients >9 y: As much as wanted, up to 2000 mL/day
Table 3. Approximate Amount of Oral Rehydration Solution to Administer in the First 4 Hours
Age < 4 mo 4-11 mo 12-23 mo 2-4 y 5-14 y ≥15 y
Weight < 5 kg 5-7.9 kg 8-10.9 kg 11-15.9 kg 16-29.9 kg ≥30 kg
ORS solution in mL 200-400 400-600 600-800 800-1200 1200-2200 2200-4000
Table 4. Estimate of Oral Rehydration Solution Packets to Be Administered at Home
Age Amount of Solution After Each Loose Stool ORS Packets Needed
< 24 mo 50-100 mL Enough for 500 mL/d
2-9 y 100-200 mL Enough for 1000 mL/d
≥10 y As much as is wanted Enough for 200 mL/d
Table 5. Oral Replacement Solution for Maintenance of Hydration
Age Amount of Solution After Each Loose Stool
< 24 mo 100 mL
2-9 y 200 mL
≥10 y As much as is wanted
Table 6. Antimicrobial Therapy Used in the Treatment of Cholera*
Antibiotic Single Dose (PO) Multiple Dose (PO)
Doxycycline 7 mg/kg; not to exceed 300 mg/dose 2 mg/kg bid on day 1; then 2 mg/kg qd on days 2 and 3; not to exceed 100 mg/dose
Tetracycline 25 mg/kg; not to exceed 1 g/dose 40 mg/kg/d divided qid for 3 d; not to exceed 2 g/d
Furazolidone 7 mg/kg; not to exceed 300 mg/dose 5 mg/kg/d divided qid for 3 d; not to exceed 400 mg/d
Trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole Not evaluated < 2 months: Contraindicated



≥2 months: 5-10 mg/kg/d (based on trimethoprim component) divided bid for 3 d; not to exceed 320 mg/d trimethoprim and 1.6 g/d of sulfamethoxazole



Ciprofloxacin§ 30 mg/kg; not to exceed 1 g/dose 30 mg/kg/d divided q12h for 3 d; not to exceed 2 g/d
Ampicillin Not evaluated 50 mg/kg/d divided qid for 3 d; not to exceed 2 g/d
Erythromycin Not evaluated 40 mg/kg/d erythromycin base divided tid for 3 d; not to exceed 1 g/d
* Antimicrobial therapy is an adjunct to fluid therapy of cholera and is not an essential component. However, it reduces diarrhea volume and duration by approximately 50%. The choice of antibiotics is determined by the susceptibility patterns of the local strains of V cholerae O1 or O139.



Tetracycline and doxycycline can discolor permanent teeth of children younger than 8 years. However, the risk is small when these drugs are used for short courses of therapy, especially if used in a single dose.



Single-dose therapy of these drugs has not been evaluated systematically in children, and recommendations are extrapolated from experience in adults.



§ Fluoroquinolones (eg, ciprofloxacin) are not approved in the United States for use in persons younger than 18 years. When given in high doses to juvenile animals, they cause arthropathy. Clinical experience indicates that this risk is very small in children when used for short courses of therapy.



Table 7. WHO Guidelines for Cholera Management
Steps in the treatment of a patient with suspected cholera are as follows:
1. Assess for dehydration (see Table 1)
2. Rehydrate the patient and monitor frequently, then reassess hydration status
3. Maintain hydration; replace ongoing fluid losses until diarrhea stops
4. Administer an oral antibiotic to the patient with severe dehydration
5. Feed the patient
More detailed guidelines for the treatment of cholera are as follows:
  • Evaluate the degree of dehydration upon arrival
  • Rehydrate the patient in 2 phases; these include rehydration (for 2-4 h) and maintenance (until diarrhea abates)
  • Register output and intake volumes on predesigned charts and periodically review these data
  • Use the intravenous route only (1) during the rehydration phase for severely dehydrated patients for whom an infusion rate of 50-100 mL/kg/h is advised, (2) for moderately dehydrated patients who do not tolerate the oral route, and (3) during the maintenance phase in patients considered high stool purgers (ie, >10 mL/kg/h)
  • During the maintenance phase, use oral rehydration solution at a rate of 800-1000 mL/h; match ongoing losses with ORS administration
  • Discharge patients to the treatment center if oral tolerance is greater than or equal to 1000 mL/h, urine volume is greater than or equal to 40 mL/h, and stool volume is less than or equal to 400 mL/h.
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.