Croup Treatment & Management

  • Author: Germaine L Defendi, MD, MS, FAAP; Chief Editor: Russell W Steele, MD   more...
 
Updated: Oct 5, 2011
 

Approach Considerations

Urgent care or emergency department treatment of croup depends on the degree of respiratory distress. In mild croup, a child may present with only a croupy cough and may require nothing more than parental reassurance, given alertness, baseline minimal respiratory distress, proper oxygenation, and stable fluid status. The caregivers may only need education regarding the course of the disease and supportive homecare guidelines.

However, any infant/child who presents with significant respiratory distress/complaints with stridor at rest must have a thorough clinical evaluation to ensure the patency of the airway and maintenance of effective oxygenation and ventilation. In young children, it is important to keep the patient as comfortable as possible, allowing for him or her to remain in a parent's arms and avoiding unnecessary painful interventions that may cause agitation and increased oxygen requirements. Persistent crying increases oxygen demands, and respiratory muscle fatigue can worsen the obstruction.

Concurrently, careful monitoring of the heart rate (for tachycardia), respiratory rate (for tachypnea), respiratory mechanics (for sternal wall retractions), and pulse oximetry (for hypoxia) are important. Assessment of the patient’s hydration status, given the risk of increased insensible losses from fever and tachypnea, along with a history of decreased oral intake, is also crucial.

Infants and children with severe respiratory distress or compromise may require 100% oxygenation with ventilation support, initially with a bag-valve-mask device. If the airway and breathing require further maintenance due to worsening hypercarbia and respiratory fatigue, the patient should be intubated with an endotracheal tube. Intubation should be accomplished with an endotracheal tube that is 0.5-1 mm smaller than predicted. Once airway stabilization is achieved, these patients are transferred for their ongoing care to a pediatric intensive care unit.

The current cornerstones of treatment in the urgent care clinics or emergency departments are corticosteroids and nebulized epinephrine; steroids have proven beneficial in severe, moderate, and even mild croup.[11] In the straightforward cases of croup, antibiotics are not prescribed, as the primary cause is viral. Lack of improvement or worsening of symptoms can be due to a secondary bacterial process, which would require the use of antimicrobials for treatment. Typically, these patients initially would have had moderate-to-severe croup scores, requiring inpatient care and observation.

Cool mist administration

Throughout the 19th and most of the 20th century, cool mist administration was the mainstay of treatment. Hospitals had "croup rooms" filled with cool mist. Theoretically, mist moistens airway secretions, decreases their viscosity, and soothes the inflamed mucosa. Animal data show that microaerosol inhalation activates mechanoreceptors that produce a reflex slowing of respiratory flow rate and leads to improved airflow.

However, despite its continued widespread use, little evidence supports the clinical efficacy of cool mist. Randomized studies of children with moderate-to-severe croup revealed no difference in outcome between those who received cool mist and those who did not.[12] Mist tents, used in the hospital setting, can disperse fungus and molds if not properly cleaned and, more importantly, separates the child from the parent, causing anxiety and agitation, worsening the patient’s symptoms.[13, 14, 15] In the home, vaporizers producing hot steam to humidify the air should not be used because of the risk of scalding or burns.

Next

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids are beneficial due to their anti-inflammatory action, whereby laryngeal mucosal edema is decreased. They also decrease the need for salvage nebulized epinephrine. Corticosteroids may be warranted even in those children who present with mild symptoms. (Corticosteroids should not be administered to children recently exposed to or diagnosed with varicella or tuberculosis due to the potential risk of exacerbating the disease process.)[16, 17, 18, 19, 20]

A single dose of dexamethasone has been shown to be effective in reducing the overall severity of croup, if administered within the first 4-24 hours after the onset of illness. The long half-life of dexamethasone (36-54 h) often allows for a single injection or dose. Studies have shown that dexamethasone dosed at 0.15 mg/kg is as effective as 0.3 mg/kg or 0.6 mg/kg (with a maximum daily dose of 10 mg) in relieving the symptoms of mild-to-moderate croup. Despite this knowledge, clinicians still tend to favor the dose of 0.6 mg/kg for initial treatment of croup. Dexamethasone has shown the same efficacy if administered intravenously, intramuscularly, or orally.[21]

Patients given a single oral dose of prednisolone (1 mg/kg) were found to have made more return visits than did those who received a single oral dose of dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg).[22] This is due to the lesser potency to reduce inflammation and shortened half-life of prednisolone (18-36 h) when compared with dexamethasone (36-54 h).

Inhaled budesonide has also proven to be effective but is more expensive; in one study, oral dexamethasone resulted in better improvement than did nebulized budesonide.

Previous
Next

Epinephrine

Nebulized racemic epinephrine is a 1:1 mixture of dextro (D) isomers and levo (L) isomers of epinephrine with the L form (L-epinephrine) as the active component. Its use is typically reserved for patients in the hospital setting with moderate-to-severe respiratory distress. Epinephrine works by adrenergic stimulation, which causes constriction of the precapillary arterioles, thereby decreasing capillary hydrostatic pressure. This leads to fluid resorption from the interstitium and improvement in the laryngeal mucosal edema.[11] Epinephrine’s beta2-adrenergic activity leads to bronchial smooth muscle relaxation and bronchodilation. Its effectiveness is immediate and lasts from 90-120 minutes.

Patients who receive nebulized racemic epinephrine in the emergency department should be observed for at least 3 hours post last treatment because of concerns for a rebound phenomenon of bronchospasm, worsening respiratory distress, and/or persistent tachycardia. Patients can be discharged home only if they demonstrate healthy color, good air entry, baseline consciousness, and no stridor at rest and have received a dose of corticosteroids.

Previous
Next

Heliox

Heliox is a gas containing a mixture of helium and oxygen (with not less than 20% oxygen). Delivery to the patient is via nasal cannula, face mask, or hood. It has low viscosity and low specific gravity, which allows for greater laminar airflow through the respiratory tract. Helium decreases the force necessary and facilitates the movement of oxygen through the airways and decreases the mechanical work of respiratory muscles. This clinical response reduces respiratory distress.[23, 24]

Several trials of heliox have demonstrated no advantage over conventional modalities; however, other trials have shown it to be equally effective in moderate to severe croup when compared with racemic epinephrine.[25, 26, 27] Heliox has also been shown to improve symptoms in very severe croup that failed to improve with racemic epinephrine. Currently, the evidence is not sufficient to establish the effect of heliox in pediatric croup management.[28]

Previous
Proceed to Medication
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Germaine L Defendi, MD, MS, FAAP  Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center

Germaine L Defendi, MD, MS, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Antonio Muñiz, MD  Professor of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Texas Medical School at Houston; Medical Director of the Pediatric Emergency Department, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital

Antonio Muñiz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Heart Association, American Medical Association, Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Rona E Molodow, MD, JD  Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center

Rona E Molodow, MD, JD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics and American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Russell W Steele, MD  Head, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Ochsner Children's Health Center; Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Tulane University School of Medicine

Russell W Steele, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association of Immunologists, American Pediatric Society, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Louisiana State Medical Society, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, Society for Pediatric Research, and Southern Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Joseph Domachowske, MD Professor of Pediatrics, Microbiology and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, State University of New York Upstate Medical University

Joseph Domachowske, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Society for Microbiology, Infectious Diseases Society of America, Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and Phi Beta Kappa

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Benson BE, Baredes S, Schwartz RA. Stridor. Medscape Reference by WebMD [serial online]. January 26, 2010;Accessed October 5, 2011. Available at http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/995267-overview.

  2. Williams JV, Harris PA, Tollefson SJ, Halburnt-Rush LL, Pingsterhaus JM, Edwards KM, et al. Human metapneumovirus and lower respiratory tract disease in otherwise healthy infants and children. N Engl J Med. Jan 29 2004;350(5):443-50. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  3. Segal AO, Crighton EJ, Moineddin R, Mamdani M, Upshur RE. Croup hospitalizations in Ontario: a 14-year time-series analysis. Pediatrics. Jul 2005;116(1):51-5. [Medline].

  4. Bernstein T, Brilli R, Jacobs B. Is bacterial tracheitis changing? A 14-month experience in a pediatric intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis. Sep 1998;27(3):458-62. [Medline].

  5. Donnelly BW, McMillan JA, Weiner LB. Bacterial tracheitis: report of eight new cases and review. Rev Infect Dis. Sep-Oct 1990;12(5):729-35. [Medline].

  6. Edwards KM, Dundon MC, Altemeier WA. Bacterial tracheitis as a complication of viral croup. Pediatr Infect Dis. Sep-Oct 1983;2(5):390-1. [Medline].

  7. Jones R, Santos JI, Overall JC Jr. Bacterial tracheitis. JAMA. Aug 24-31 1979;242(8):721-6. [Medline].

  8. Johnson D. Croup. Clin Evid (Online). Mar 10 2009;2009:[Medline]. [Full Text].

  9. [Guideline] Alberta Medical Association. Guideline for the diagnosis and management of croup. Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines 2005 Update. [Full Text].

  10. Kirks DR. The respiratory system. In: Practical Pediatric Imaging: Diagnostic Radiology of Infants and Children. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:651-53.

  11. Bjornson C, Russell KF, Vandermeer B, Durec T, Klassen TP, Johnson DW. Nebulized epinephrine for croup in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Feb 16 2011;CD006619. [Medline].

  12. [Best Evidence] Scolnik D, Coates AL, Stephens D, Da Silva Z, Lavine E, Schuh S. Controlled delivery of high vs low humidity vs mist therapy for croup in emergency departments: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. Mar 15 2006;295(11):1274-80. [Medline].

  13. Colletti JE. Myth: Cool mist is an effective therapy in the management of croup. CJEM. Sep 2004;6(5):357-8. [Medline].

  14. Humidified air inhalation for treating croup [database online]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; 2006.

  15. Moore M, Little P. Humidified air inhalation for treating croup: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Pract. Sep 2007;24(4):295-301. [Medline].

  16. Bjornson CL, Klassen TP, Williamson J, Brant R, Mitton C, Plint A, et al. A randomized trial of a single dose of oral dexamethasone for mild croup. N Engl J Med. Sep 23 2004;351(13):1306-13. [Medline].

  17. Cetinkaya F, Tüfekçi BS, Kutluk G. A comparison of nebulized budesonide, and intramuscular, and oral dexamethasone for treatment of croup. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Apr 2004;68(4):453-6. [Medline].

  18. Chub-Uppakarn S, Sangsupawanich P. A randomized comparison of dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg versus 0.6 mg/kg for the treatment of moderate to severe croup. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Mar 2007;71(3):473-7. [Medline].

  19. Fifoot AA, Ting JY. Comparison between single-dose oral prednisolone and oral dexamethasone in the treatment of croup: a randomized, double-blinded clinical trial. Emerg Med Australas. Feb 2007;19(1):51-8. [Medline].

  20. Russell K, Wiebe N, Saenz A, Ausejo SM, Johnson D, Hartling L, et al. Glucocorticoids for croup. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;CD001955. [Medline].

  21. Amir L, Hubermann H, Halevi A, Mor M, Mimouni M, Waisman Y. Oral betamethasone versus intramuscular dexamethasone for the treatment of mild to moderate viral croup: a prospective, randomized trial. Pediatr Emerg Care. Aug 2006;22(8):541-4. [Medline].

  22. Sparrow A, Geelhoed G. Prednisolone versus dexamethasone in croup: a randomised equivalence trial. Arch Dis Child. Jul 2006;91(7):580-3. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  23. McGee DL, Wald DA, Hinchliffe S. Helium-oxygen therapy in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. May-Jun 1997;15(3):291-6. [Medline].

  24. Vorwerk C, Coats TJ. Use of helium-oxygen mixtures in the treatment of croup: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. Sep 2008;25(9):547-50. [Medline].

  25. Beckmann KR, Brueggemann WM Jr. Heliox treatment of severe croup. Am J Emerg Med. Oct 2000;18(6):735-6. [Medline].

  26. Terregino CA, Nairn SJ, Chansky ME, Kass JE. The effect of heliox on croup: a pilot study. Acad Emerg Med. Nov 1998;5(11):1130-3. [Medline].

  27. Weber JE, Chudnofsky CR, Younger JG, Larkin GL, Boczar M, Wilkerson MD, et al. A randomized comparison of helium-oxygen mixture (Heliox) and racemic epinephrine for the treatment of moderate to severe croup. Pediatrics. Jun 2001;107(6):E96. [Medline].

  28. [Best Evidence] Vorwerk C, Coats T. Heliox for croup in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Feb 17 2010;CD006822. [Medline].

  29. Dobrovoljac M, Geelhoed GC. 27 years of croup: an update highlighting the effectiveness of 0.15 mg/kg of dexamethasone. Emerg Med Australas. Aug 2009;21(4):309-14. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Child with croup. Note the steeple or pencil sign of the proximal trachea evident on this anteroposterior film. Courtesy of Dr. Kelly Marshall, CHOA at Scottish Rite.
Steeple sign on radiograph.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.