Pediatric Septic Arthritis Workup
- Author: Richard J Scarfone, MD; Chief Editor: Robert W Tolan Jr, MD more...
Approach Considerations
Diagnosis of septic arthritis (SA) is established by a combination of clinical findings and results of synovial fluid analysis. Clinicians should have a low threshold for performing arthrocentesis, especially for children with a painful monoarthritis, significantly limited range of motion, and no plausible noninfectious explanation.
Emergency department physicians are usually adept at performing arthrocentesis of most joints. The knee joint, for example, can usually be entered fairly easily using either a medial or superolateral approach. However, aspiration of fluid from the hip typically requires the involvement of a radiologist and an orthopedic surgeon.
General practices that help to ensure the safety and success of arthrocentesis include liberal use of sedatives and analgesics, joint immobilization, sterile technique, and local anesthesia. Use of a needle large enough (18-20 gauge) to aspirate the viscous synovial fluid is necessary.
Laboratory Studies
When septic arthritis (SA) is suspected, synovial fluid should be obtained for a complete blood count (CBC), glucose, Gram stain, and culture. Synovial culture has poor sensitivity (60-70%), and the data that establish the typical characteristics of synovial fluid in septic arthritis were collected in the era of widespread H influenzae type B infection. How these characteristics will change in the current era remains to be seen. Similarly, although blood cultures should be obtained, they have relatively low yields.
A synovial fluid WBC count of more than 50,000/mL suggests SA, especially if the count exceeds 100,000/mL or if a predominance of polymorphonuclear cells is observed. Still, counts are often lower, and high counts may be associated with other conditions.
The synovial fluid glucose concentration averages 30% of that in the serum, a finding unique to SA. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate is typically elevated, but in one series, fewer than one half of children with septic arthritis had peripheral WBC counts above 15,000 cells/μL.
Although often elevated, a peripheral WBC count within the reference range does not rule out septic arthritis. The C-reactive protein (CRP) is a more sensitive marker for septic arthritis than is the peripheral WBC count. In one study, a CRP of more than 2 mg/dL was found to be a strong independent risk factor for SA of the hip among children presenting with hip pain.[4]
Imaging Studies
Radiography
Although plain radiography may reveal an effusion as widening of the joint space with displacement of fat planes, it is insensitive in the diagnosis of septic arthritis (SA). Radiography may be most helpful in screening for etiologies other than SA as a cause of joint pain. For example, it may reveal bony changes suggestive of osteomyelitis, bony tumors or fractures as the source of swelling, and Legg-Perthes disease or a slipped capital femoral epiphysis, which are diagnostic considerations in a child with an irritable hip.
Ultrasonography
Ultrasonography is a simple and relatively inexpensive technique for detecting a hip effusion. This test has a greater sensitivity than plain radiography and is becoming the modality of choice to reveal hip effusions. Ultrasonography is also used to guide the aspiration needle if an effusion is detected.
In a study of 96 children suspected of having septic arthritis of the hip, 40 had normal ultrasonographic findings and no septic arthritis.
Ultrasonography has several advantages over computed tomography (CT) scanning in this setting, including eliminating radiation exposure and guiding the aspiration of deep joints, such as the hip.
Scintigraphy
This has a limited role in most cases of SA, but scintigraphy may be helpful if multifocal disease is suspected in neonates. It also assists with the detection of an associated osteomyelitis.
Welkon CJ, Long SS, Fisher MC, Alburger PD. Pyogenic arthritis in infants and children: a review of 95 cases. Pediatr Infect Dis. Nov-Dec 1986;5(6):669-76. [Medline].
Thompson A, Mannix R, Bachur R. Acute pediatric monoarticular arthritis: distinguishing lyme arthritis from other etiologies. Pediatrics. Mar 2009;123(3):959-65. [Medline].
Kocher MS, Zurakowski D, Kasser JR. Differentiating between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children: an evidence-based clinical prediction algorithm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 1999;81(12):1662-70. [Medline].
Caird MS, Flynn JM, Leung YL, et al. Factors distinguishing septic arthritis from transient synovitis of the hip in children. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jun 2006;88(6):1251-7. [Medline].
Kaplan SL. Challenges in the evaluation and management of bone and joint infections and the role of new antibiotics for gram positive infections. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;634:111-20. [Medline].
Taekema HC, Landham PR, Maconochie I. Towards evidence based medicine for paediatricians. Distinguishing between transient synovitis and septic arthritis in the limping child: how useful are clinical prediction tools?. Arch Dis Child. Feb 2009;94(2):167-8. [Medline].
[Guideline] Fordham L, Gunderman R, Blatt ER, et al. Limping child--ages 0-5 years. American College of Radiology (ACR). 2007;5. [Full Text].
Pääkkönen M, Kallio MJ, Peltola H, Kallio PE. Pediatric septic hip with or without arthrotomy: retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive nonneonatal culture-positive cases. J Pediatr Orthop B. May 2010;19(3):264-9. [Medline].

