Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Pediatric Omphalocele and Gastroschisis

  • Author: James G Glasser, MD, MA, FACS; Chief Editor: Ted Rosenkrantz, MD  more...
 
Updated: Apr 28, 2015
 

Background

Ventral body wall defects comprise a group of congenital malformations that includes gastroschisis and omphalocele, which are relatively common, and ectopia cordis, bladder exstrophy, and cloacal exstrophy, which are extremely rare. The prevalence of gastroschisis is increasing; thus, it is the congenital anomaly most frequently encountered by pediatric surgeons.[1]

Reported incidence of abdominal wall defects is as follows:

  • Gastroschisis - 1 case in 2000 births
  • Omphalocele - 1 case in 4000 births
  • Bladder exstrophy - 1 case in 40,000 births
  • Ectopia cordis - 1 case in 125,000 births
  • Cloacal exstrophy - 1 case in 200,000 births

Although the treatment of these babies is the task of neonatologists and pediatric surgeons, it behooves pediatricians to become familiar with the clinical spectrum of abdominal wall defects so that they are prepared to care for these children later in life. Sometimes, gastroschisis is as easy to repair as a surgical incision. In such cases, routine postnatal care may suffice; however, if multiple procedures are required or if the abdominal wall defect is one component of a multifaceted anomaly, further care by specialists familiar with the child's specific problems may be required.

A baby born with gastroschisis may have malabsorption, because in utero exposure of the intestine to amniotic fluid may cause mucosal or muscularis dysfunction, or the anatomic defect may constrict the mesentery causing ischemia and diminished intestinal length. In addition, there may be luminal obstruction from adhesions or bands associated with midgut malrotation, which accompanies all the anomalies in which the intestine remains outside the nascent abdominal cavity. Midgut volvulus, the complication most feared in babies with malrotation, is theoretically possible but unlikely, because of postsurgical adhesions. Atypical appendicitis may occur, however, if the abnormally located appendix is not removed. In addition, children with gastroschisis frequently have gastroesophageal reflux, which usually responds to medical therapy; fundoplication is rarely necessary. Hirschsprung disease, also, may contribute to these babies' intestinal dysfunction.

See the Medscape Drugs & Diseases articles Omphalocele and Gastroschisis as well as information from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia on Omphalocele and Gastroschisis.

Next

Pathophysiology

Embryology [2]

Initially, the embryo is a flat disk surrounded by the umbilical ring. Gastrulation proceeds in a cephalocaudal direction and converts the original two-layered disk into three germ layers. The dorsal layer is the ectoderm, which becomes either the central nervous system (CNS) or the skin and sensory organs. The middle layer is the mesoderm, which forms the skeleton, connective tissue, and the cardiovascular and urogenital systems. The ventral layer is the endoderm, which develops into the intestines, liver, gallbladder, and pancreas.

Proliferation of the neuroectoderm and the underlying mesoderm pushes the embryonic disk above the umbilical ring like a sprouting mushroom. The amnion bulges over the embryo and fuses with the yolk sac and body stalk. As the embryo elongates, longitudinal enfolding of its lateral walls creates the appearance of a ridged cylinder. Ventral enfolding separates the thoracic and abdominal cavities from the extra-embryonic space. With caudal enfolding, the embryo begins to resemble a fetus.

The yolk sac is incorporated into the hindgut and the allantois is incorporated into the urogenital sinus creating the cloaca. The cloacal membrane separates the coelom from the amniotic cavity.

The mesoderm invades the cloacal membrane and unites the genital tubercles to form the ventral wall of the urogenital sinus. As the hindgut elongates, condensation of mesoderm anteriorly forms the urorectal septum. The body folds (cephalic, caudal, and lateral) unite where the amnion invests the yolk sac and body stalk.

Fusion is a complex process that also occurs in formation of the neural tube, palate, and lip. In these areas, a surface glycoprotein promotes adhesion; then, planned cellular death (apoptosis) and migration create continuity between the opposing surfaces.

In an analogous fashion, the amnion and the lateral folds of the body wall coalesce about the attenuated yolk sac, constricting the umbilical ring. This process requires a "component separation and reorganization"” for the opposing sides to become a continuous layer. Development of the gut, suspended on its mesentery, occurs coincidentally with these events.

By the sixth week of intrauterine life, rapid growth of the liver and intestines causes herniation of the midgut through the umbilical ring.

By the tenth week, the abdominal cavity has enlarged sufficiently to accommodate the return of the midgut.

Rotation and fixation of the duodenum and the proximal colon occur as the intestine returns to the abdominal cavity.

Omphaloceles and gastroschisis

Omphaloceles

In babies with omphaloceles, this return to the abdominal never takes place; thus, the intestine stays within the confines of the umbilical ring. See the image below)

Baby with an intact omphalocele. Baby with an intact omphalocele.

There is evidence to suggest that omphaloceles have a genetic etiology, as follows:

  • Omphaloceles are associated with increased maternal age.
  • Omphaloceles occur in twins, consecutive children, and different generations of the same family.
  • Omphaloceles are associated with trisomies 13, 18, and 21 (in 25-50 % of cases) and with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome

Gastroschisis

In gastroschisis, there appears to be a weakness in the body wall—perhaps caused by defective ingrowth, cellular death, or impaired cellular fusion, such that the intestines are extruded through the defective area into the amniotic cavity. See the image below.

Baby with gastroschisis. Baby with gastroschisis.

Gastroschisis is associated with young maternal age as well as low gravida, prematurity, and low birth-weight babies, secondary to in utero growth retardation.

Clustering of cases (number and severity) suggests a complex etiology, such as environmental factors acting upon susceptible hosts.

Other abdominal wall defects

There is a vast spectrum of body wall defects, which vary in their anatomic location and size of the defect. Issues to consider include the following:

  • Is a sac is present?
  • Is it ruptured?
  • Are there associated anomalies (which are four times more prevalent in omphalocele than gastroschisis)?

Other associated anomalies include the following:

  • Congenital heart disease
  • Cleft palate
  • Musculoskeletal abnormalities
  • Dental malocclusion
  • Intestinal Atresia
  • Patent omphalomesenteric duct remnant, creating an umbilical cord stoma

Hernias of the umbilical cord

In hernias of the umbilical cord, the umbilical ring is oversized, but the relation of the amnion to the yolk sac and connecting stalk is normal. See the image below.

Baby with an umbilical cord hernia. Baby with an umbilical cord hernia.

Urachal remnants and omphalomesenteric duct malformations

Urachal remnants[3] and omphalomesenteric duct malformations[4] result from deficient apoptotic cell death of the epithelium of the urachus and yolk stalk. See the images below.

Omphalomesenteric duct remnant presenting as an "u Omphalomesenteric duct remnant presenting as an "umbilical granuloma."
Operative finding: patent omphalomesenteric duct, Operative finding: patent omphalomesenteric duct, which is being excised.

Bladder exstrophy

The bladder develops between the fifth and ninth gestational weeks (postfertilization).[5] By 10 weeks, urine is produced and mixes with the amniotic fluid; this is is crucial for normal lung development. In healthy babies, the bladder is visible on ultrasonography toward the end of the first trimester.

In patients with bladder exstrophy, the bladder image is a protruding, semi-solid mass inferior to an umbilical cord that is displaced caudally. The pelvis is shallow and flat; the lack of space displaces the developing bladder, urethra, vagina, and rectum anteriorly. Herniation of these organs interferes with the normal development of the lower abdominal wall. See the images below.

Baby with bladder exstrophy and epispadias; note t Baby with bladder exstrophy and epispadias; note the appearance of the bladder mucosa, indicating chronic inflammation.
Another view demonstrating the epispadias shown in Another view demonstrating the epispadias shown in the previous image.

Prune-belly syndrome

Prune-belly syndrome involves hydroureteronephrosis, megacystis, and undescended testes in addition to multiple other organ system defects. This syndrome is caused by increased "apoptotic" cell death in the body-wall placode or insufficient deposition of mesodermal cells with abnormal retention of the yolk sac.[5]

Note the following:

  • There is attenuation of the abdominal musculature.
  • Muscle fibers are absent and are replaced by thick collagenous aponeuroses.
  • Hypoplasia of the abdominal wall contrasts with hypertrophy of the bladder wall, causing bladder neck obstruction and dilation of the ureters and renal collecting system.
  • Faulty intercellular conduction of electrical impulses causes disordered muscular contraction and ineffective ureteric peristalsis.
  • Approximately 95% of babies with prune belly syndrome are male; the absence of prostatic and seminal fluid precludes normal sperm development and causes infertility.

Cloacal exstrophy

The urorectal septum divides the cloacae into the urogenital sinus and the rectum. Defective enfolding of the embryo's caudal pole and deficient incorporation of the yolk sac and allantois into the urogenital sinus leads to malformation of the external genitalia.

Without ingrowth of the mesoderm, the cloaca persists; differentiation of the genitourinary system and hindgut are arrested; and development of the lower abdominal wall obstructed. The result is cloacal exstrophy.

This anomaly is associated with mutations in the homeobox genes.

See the images below.

Baby with cloacal exstrophy. Baby with cloacal exstrophy.
Note the bifid genitalia in this baby with cloacal Note the bifid genitalia in this baby with cloacal exstrophy.
Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

International

The combined incidence of omphalocele and gastroschisis is 1 case per 3,500 births. Epidemiologic data compiled over the last 40 years show that the incidence of omphalocele has remained constant, whereas that of gastroschisis is increasing.

Over the past 2 decades, the incidence of gastroschisis has increased three- to four-fold, whereas the incidence of omphalocele has remained constant. See the table below.

Table 1. Incidence rates for gastroschisis and/or omphaloceles in various regions and time periods.[1, 6, 7, 8] (Open Table in a new window)

Country Time Period / Incidence Time Period / Incidence
Japan 1975-1980 1996-1997
Gastroschisis 1/77,000 1/20,000
Omphalocele 1/30,000 1/27,000
     
England and Wales 1987 1991
Gastroschisis 1/10,000 2/10,000
Omphalocele 1/10,000 1/12,500
     
Galveston, Texas 1983 2002
Gastroschisis 1/4000 1/900
     
England and Wales 1995 2005
Gastroschisis 1/7500 1/2500

 

Mortality/Morbidity

The mortality of omphaloceles relative to gastroschisis is 8:1. Irreversible pulmonary hypertension/right heart failure is the usual terminal condition.

Factors adversely influencing the management of babies with gastroschisis are as follows:

  • Prematurity and low birth weight
  • Hypothermia (exposure of the intestine to the ambient environment)
  • Dehydration (gastrointestinal losses, in addition to the above factors)
  • Sepsis (open wound)
  • Hypoglycemia (stress with little metabolic reserve)
  • In utero growth restriction (protein loss from the extruded intestines)
  • Oligohydramnios
  • Fetal distress and birth asphyxia
  • Injury to the intestines during delivery (tearing or cutting the bowel or mesentery)

Improvements in respiratory care, pharmacology (antibiotics and total parenteral nutrition), anesthesia, and surgery have increased the survival rates for these babies from 60% during the 1960s to more than 90% in more recent years.[6, 7, 9]

See the images below.

Baby with gastroschisis and associated intestinal Baby with gastroschisis and associated intestinal atresia.
Baby with gastroschisis and colon atresia. Bulbous Baby with gastroschisis and colon atresia. Bulbous proximal end of the atretic colon is excised, and a colostomy is created at the abdominal wall defect. An anastomosis of the proximal, dilated colon to the distal microcolon (in view of its small caliber) would not function properly. The colostomy can be closed 4-6 weeks later.

Long-term morbidity from gastroschisis is related to intestinal dysmotility (pseudo intestinal obstruction), malabsorption (mucosal injury), short gut, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Difficulties in obtaining wound closure usually are reflected in intestinal morbidity. Poor healing of the abdominal wound causes an incisional hernia, which may require surgical repair.[10, 11, 12, 13]

The following scenarios may eventuate in short-gut syndrome, with which the baby has inadequate intestinal length:

  • An antenatal mesenteric vascular accident may cause intestinal atresia.
  • Constriction of the mesentery of the extruded intestine by a small abdominal wall defect may cause gut infarction ("closing gastroschisis").
  • An excessively tight closure of the abdominal wall defect may impede splanchnic blood flow and result in intestinal ischemia or necrosis.

Closed-loop obstructions, in which both efferent and afferent limbs of the intestine are blocked, occur in volvulus (rotation) of the entire midgut around its mesentery (the superior mesenteric artery and vein) or when a single loop of intestine flips on its mesentry or around an external point of fixation, such as an adhesion to the abdominal wall. This causes tense distention and ischemic injury of the intestines (ie, "strangulation obstruction").[14]

The injury produced by antenatal exposure of the intestine to amniotic fluid (mucosal and muscular) leads to diminished absorptive and propulsive capacity of the gut and compounds the crippling effect of diminished length.

The care of babies with short-gut syndrome has improved with innovations in parenteral and enteral nutrition, venous access devices, prevention and early treatment of catheter sepsis, innovative surgical procedures to optimize gut length, and aggressive treatment of bacterial overgrowth in stagnant loops of intestine. Babies with short-gut syndrome from gastroschisis account for a substantial number of children undergoing intestinal transplantation.[15, 16]

See the images below.

Gastroschisis complicated by jejunal atresia and l Gastroschisis complicated by jejunal atresia and loss of the entire distal small bowel = the grey tissue.
Following lysis of adhesions, tubularization of th Following lysis of adhesions, tubularization of the viable, mesenteric portion of the proximal jejunum, the eviscerated viscera are reduced and the gastroschisis abdominal wall defect closed.
Baby with a small omphalocele sac whose contents w Baby with a small omphalocele sac whose contents were liver and gall bladder.
The omphalocele sac contains liver and gall bladde The omphalocele sac contains liver and gall bladder.
Completed repair; simulating an umbilicus. Completed repair; simulating an umbilicus.

Babies with giant omphaloceles usually have small, bell-shaped thoracic cavities and minimal pulmonary reserve. Repair of the omphalocele may precipitate respiratory failure, which may be chronic and require a tracheotomy and long-term ventilator support. The author recently treated (unsuccessfully) a baby with a giant omphalocele and a diaphragmatic hernia. Both conditions are associated with pulmonary hypoplasia, and, occurring together, they were of such severity as to preclude survival, despite extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support.

Even with successful repair of a giant omphalocele, the liver remains located in the midepigastrium, where it lacks the normal protection afforded by the lower rib cage and where it is more vulnerable to injury. See the image below.

Baby with a giant omphalocele, in which the liver Baby with a giant omphalocele, in which the liver assumes an ectopic position in the epigastrium.

A study by Corey et al indicated that compared with infants with gastroschisis, those with omphalocele have a higher incidence of other anomalies, are more likely to have pulmonary hypertension, and have a higher mortality rate. In the study, which involved 4687 infants with gastroschisis and 1448 with omphalocele, the investigators found that 35% of the patients with omphalocele had at least one other anomaly, compared with 8% of those with gastroschisis. The odds ratios for pulmonary hypertension and mortality in infants with omphalocele compared with those with gastroschisis were 7.78 and 6.81, respectively.[17]

Race

Neither gastroschisis nor omphalocele has a geographic or racial predilection. The Texas data indicate that gastroschisis occurs most commonly in Latinos, next in whites, and least frequently in African Americans.

Sex

The male-to-female ratio is 1.5:1.

Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

James G Glasser, MD, MA, FACS Associate Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics, University of South Alabama College of Medicine; Attending Staff, USA Children's and Women's Hospital

James G Glasser, MD, MA, FACS is a member of the following medical societies: Christian Medical and Dental Associations, American Pediatric Surgical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Brian S Carter, MD, FAAP Professor of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine; Attending Physician, Division of Neonatology, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics; Faculty, Children's Mercy Bioethics Center

Brian S Carter, MD, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Pediatric Society, American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Society for Pediatric Research, National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Ted Rosenkrantz, MD Professor, Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics/Gynecology, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine

Ted Rosenkrantz, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Pediatric Society, Eastern Society for Pediatric Research, American Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society, Society for Pediatric Research

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

David N Sheftel, MD, MD Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science

David N Sheftel, MD, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Eggink BH, Richardson CJ, Malloy MH, Angel CA. Outcome of gastroschisis: a 20-year case review of infants with gastroschisis born in Galveston, Texas. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Jun. 41(6):1103-8. [Medline].

  2. Vermeij-Keers C, Hartwig NG, van der Werff JF. Embryonic development of the ventral body wall and its congenital malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996 May. 5(2):82-9. [Medline].

  3. Suita S, Nagasaki A. Urachal remnants. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996 May. 5(2):107-15. [Medline].

  4. Moore TC. Omphalomesenteric duct malformations. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996 May. 5(2):116-23. [Medline].

  5. Duffy PG. Bladder exstrophy. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996 May. 5(2):129-32. [Medline].

  6. Suita S, Okamatsu T, Yamamoto T, et al. Changing Profile of Abdominal Wall Defects in Japan: Results of a National Survey. J Pediatr Surg. 2000. 35:66-72. [Medline].

  7. Tan KH, Kilby MD, Whittle MJ, et al. Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in England and Wales 1987- 93: retrospective analysis of OPCS data. BMJ. 1996 Oct 12. 313(7062):903-6. [Medline].

  8. Srivastava V, Mandhan P, Pringle K, Morreau P, Beasley S, Samarakkody U. Rising incidence of gastroschisis and exomphalos in New Zealand. J Pediatr Surg. March 2009. 44(3):551-555. [Medline].

  9. Puligandla PS, Janvier A, Flageole H, et al. Routine cesarean delivery does not improve the outcome of infants with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 May. 39(5):742-5. [Medline].

  10. Logghe HL, Mason GC, Thornton JG, Stringer MD. A randomized controlled trial of elective preterm delivery of fetuses with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 2005 Nov. 40(11):1726-31. [Medline].

  11. McGuigan RM, Azarow KS. Is splanchnic perfusion pressure more predictive of outcome than intragastric pressure in neonates with gastroschisis?. Am J Surg. 2004 May. 187(5):609-11. [Medline].

  12. Midrio P, Stefanutti G, Mussap M, D'Antona D, Zolpi E, Gamba P. Amnioexchange for fetuses with gastroschisis: is it effective?. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 May. 42(5):777-82. [Medline].

  13. Olguner M, Hakguder G, Ates O, Caglar M, Ozer E, Akgur FM. Urinary trypsin inhibitor present in fetal urine prevents intraamniotic meconium-induced intestinal damage in gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Aug. 41(8):1407-12. [Medline].

  14. Dinatti LA, Meagher DP Jr, Martinez-Frontanilla LA. "Bucket handle" avulsion of intestine in gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 28(6):840. [Medline].

  15. Wada M, Kato T, Hayashi Y, et al. Intestinal transplantation for short bowel syndrome secondary to gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Nov. 41(11):1841-5. [Medline].

  16. Moon S , Jung S , Park K. Ruptured fetal omphalocele complicated by midgut volvulus with strangulation. January 2009. 44:1:303-304. [Medline].

  17. Corey KM, Hornik CP, Laughon MM, et al. Frequency of anomalies and hospital outcomes in infants with gastroschisis and omphalocele. Early Hum Dev. 2014 Aug. 90(8):421-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  18. [Guideline] Finnish Medical Society Duodecim. Ultrasound scanning during pregnancy. EBM Guidelines. 2008 Feb 15.

  19. Pacilli M, Spitz L, Kiely EM, et al. Staged repair of giant omphalocele in the neonatal period. J Pediatr Surg. 2005 May. 40(5):785-8. [Medline].

  20. Langer JC. Gastroschisis and omphalocele. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996 May. 5(2):124-8. [Medline].

  21. Cooney D. Defects of the Abdominal Wall. Pediatr Surg. 1998. 2:1045-1070.

  22. Ledbetter DJ. Gastroschisis and omphalocele. Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Apr. 86(2):249-60, vii. [Medline].

  23. Salihu HM, Boos R, Schmidt W. Omphalocele and gastrochisis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Sep. 22(5):489-92. [Medline].

  24. Wakhlu A, Wakhlu AK. The management of exomphalos. J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Jan. 35(1):73-6. [Medline].

  25. Dykes EH. Prenatal diagnosis and management of abdominal wall defects. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996 May. 5(2):90-4. [Medline].

  26. de Lorimier AA, Adzick NS, Harrison MR. Amnion inversion in the treatment of giant omphalocele. J Pediatr Surg. 1991 Jul. 26(7):804-7. [Medline].

  27. De Ugarte DA, Asch MJ, Hedrick MH, Atkinson JB. The use of tissue expanders in the closure of a giant omphalocele. J Pediatr Surg. 2004 Apr. 39(4):613-5. [Medline].

  28. Kilbride KE, Cooney DR, Custer MD. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for treating patients with giant omphalocele. J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Jan. 41(1):212-5. [Medline].

  29. Bawazir OA, Wong A, Sigalet DL. Absorbable mesh and skin flaps or grafts in the management of ruptured giant omphalocele. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 May. 38(5):725-8. [Medline].

  30. Vossoughi F, Reddy PP, Camps J. Acellular dermal tissue matrix in neonates. J S C Med Assoc. 2008 Apr. 104(4):96-7. [Medline].

  31. Boutros J, Regier M, Skarsgard ED. Is timing everything? The influence of gestational age, birth weight, route, and intent of delivery on outcome in gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. May 2009. 44(5):912-917. [Medline].

  32. Payne N R, Pfleghaar K, Assel B , Johnson A , Rich R H. Predicting the outcome of newborns with gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. May 2009. 44(5):918-923. [Medline].

  33. Fok TF, Ng PC, Wong W, et al. High frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants with increased intra- abdominal pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1997 Mar. 76(2):F123-5. [Medline].

  34. Houben C, Davenport M, Ade-Ajayi N, Flack N, Patel S. Closing gastroschisis: diagnosis, management, and outcomes. J Pediatr Surg. February 2009. 44(2):343-347. [Medline].

  35. Marven S, Owen A. Contemporary postnatal surgical management strategies for congenital abdominal wall defects. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008 Nov. 17(4):222-35. [Medline].

  36. Ryckman J, Aspirot A, Laberge JM, Shaw K. Intestinal venous congestion as a complication of elective silo placement for gastroschisis. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2009 May. 18(2):109-12. [Medline].

  37. Kim HB, Fauza D, Garza J, Oh JT, Nurko S, Jaksic T. Serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP): a novel bowel lengthening procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Mar. 38(3):425-9. [Medline].

  38. Phillips TM. Spectrum of cloacal exstrophy. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2011 May. 20(2):113-8. [Medline].

  39. Bradnock TJ, Marven S, Owen A, et al. Gastroschisis: one year outcomes from national cohort study. BMJ. 2011 Nov 15. 343:d6749. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  40. Emil S, Canvasser N, Chen T, Friedrich E, Su W. Contemporary 2-year outcomes of complex gastroschisis. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Aug. 47(8):1521-8. [Medline].

  41. Keys C, Drewett M, Burge DM. Gastroschisis: the cost of an epidemic. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Apr. 43(4):654-7. [Medline].

  42. McClellan EB, Shew SB, Lee SS, Dunn JC, Deugarte DA. Liver herniation in gastroschisis: incidence and prognosis. J Pediatr Surg. 2011 Nov. 46(11):2115-8. [Medline].

  43. Sadler TW. Langman, ed. Medical Embryology. 11th ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2010.

  44. Sadler TW. The embryologic origin of ventral body wall defects. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010 Aug. 19(3):209-14. [Medline].

  45. Venick RS, Calkins K. The impact of intravenous fish oil emulsions on pediatric intestinal failure-associated liver disease. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011 Jun. 16(3):306-11. [Medline].

 
Previous
Next
 
Baby with an intact omphalocele.
Baby with an umbilical cord hernia.
Baby with gastroschisis.
Baby with a ruptured omphalocele.
Baby with gastroschisis and associated intestinal atresia.
Baby with gastroschisis and colon atresia. Bulbous proximal end of the atretic colon is excised, and a colostomy is created at the abdominal wall defect. An anastomosis of the proximal, dilated colon to the distal microcolon (in view of its small caliber) would not function properly. The colostomy can be closed 4-6 weeks later.
Note the enlarged tongue in this baby with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome.
Baby with pentalogy of Cantrell.
Silo closure of a baby with gastroschisis.
Silon sheets are pulled over the omphalocele sac, elevating the rectus muscles, and, because of their attachment to the costal arch, expanding the thoracic cavity. The Silon sheets are removed and replaced by a permanent Gore-Tex patch that is covered by skin flaps.
Giant omphalocele treated with topical agents for several weeks. The omphalocele sac will absorb, leaving granulation tissue that gradually epithelializes.
The omphalocele sac was adherent to the protuberant liver. It was covered with Gore-Tex so that gradual reduction could be effected.
The Gore-Tex sheet is imbricated, gradually reducing the liver into the abdominal cavity: the rectus muscles are pulled over the liver.
Final skin closure of the giant omphalocele was delayed because the baby developed respiratory distress. Unfortunately, the patch became infected and was removed. Later, bipedicled flank flaps were used to close the giant omphalocele, but reduction was lost.
Split-thickness skin grafts were applied to the flank wounds resulting from mobilization of the bipedicle flaps.
Baby with prune-belly syndrome.
Note the laxity of the abdominal wall in this baby with prune-belly syndrome.
Baby with cloacal exstrophy.
Note the bifid genitalia in this baby with cloacal exstrophy.
In the repair of cloacal exstrophy, the cecal plate in the middle of the bifid bladder is excised and used to create an ostomy, and the bladder halves are approximated.
Closure of the bladder exstrophy.
Baby with bladder exstrophy and epispadias; note the appearance of the bladder mucosa, indicating chronic inflammation.
Another view demonstrating the epispadias shown in the previous image.
Baby with isolated epispadias.
Operative finding: patent omphalomesenteric duct, which is being excised.
Closure of a giant omphalocele with an AlloDerm patch.
Two months after implantation: epithelialization of the AlloDerm patch.
Eight months after implantation: epithelization is nearly complete, but a huge ventral hernia has developed.
Baby with a giant omphalocele, in which the liver assumes an ectopic position in the epigastrium.
Gastroschisis complicated by jejunal atresia and loss of the entire distal small bowel = the grey tissue.
Following lysis of adhesions, tubularization of the viable, mesenteric portion of the proximal jejunum, the eviscerated viscera are reduced and the gastroschisis abdominal wall defect closed.
Recent radiograph showing the intestine following multiple serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP) procedures.
Baby with gastroschisis and colon atresia, with the proximal end open. An ostomy is brought out of the silo.
Inflammatory distortion of the extruded intestine. There appears to be an associated atresia (the dilated intestine), but this resolved in concert with resolution of the inflammation.
A silo is fashioned from Silon sheets, in case reduction of the extruded intestine cannot be achieved without unduly elevating the intra-abdominal pressure.
The sac is removed and the abdominal wall defect is closed around the in utero colostomy.
Baby with a small omphalocele sac whose contents were liver and gall bladder.
The omphalocele sac contains liver and gall bladder.
Completed repair; simulating an umbilicus.
Successful repair; the child, approximately age 30 months in the photo, whose clinical course is described above.
Appearance of the dilated bowel prior to performing the serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP) procedure.
The intestine as it appeared after the serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP) procedure.
The intestine as it appeared after the serial transverse enteroplasty (STEP) procedure.
Omphalomesenteric duct remnant presenting as an "umbilical granuloma."
Table 1. Incidence rates for gastroschisis and/or omphaloceles in various regions and time periods. [1, 6, 7, 8]
Country Time Period / Incidence Time Period / Incidence
Japan 1975-1980 1996-1997
Gastroschisis 1/77,000 1/20,000
Omphalocele 1/30,000 1/27,000
     
England and Wales 1987 1991
Gastroschisis 1/10,000 2/10,000
Omphalocele 1/10,000 1/12,500
     
Galveston, Texas 1983 2002
Gastroschisis 1/4000 1/900
     
England and Wales 1995 2005
Gastroschisis 1/7500 1/2500
Previous
Next
 
 
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.