eMedicine Specialties > Pediatrics: General Medicine > Oncology

Hepatoblastoma: Follow-up

Author: Jennifer R Willert, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor of Pediatrics, University of California at San Diego; Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, San Diego Children's Hospital; Member, Rebecca Moore's Cancer Center, Translational Oncology, University of California San Diego Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Gary Dahl, MD, Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Jan 14, 2008

Follow-up

Further Inpatient Care

  • Follow-up care: Children may be admitted to the hospital to expedite the diagnostic workup or when severe signs or symptoms are present. For medically stable patients, the workup can be performed in the outpatient setting. A central line is typically placed when the patient is scheduled for biopsy or resection. Double-lumen central lines are preferred if vessel access is adequate because this allows concurrent administration of multiple parenteral medications. 
  • Multidisciplinary evaluation: The child is initially evaluated by a pediatric oncologist and surgeons with expertise in childhood malignancies. Evaluation should be performed at a pediatric cancer center. Once the diagnosis is established and the staging workup is completed, the patient and family are instructed on the diagnosis and therapeutic options. Most children and families are offered participation in cooperative group trials. Once the treatment plan is developed, chemotherapy is most frequently administered in the inpatient setting. However, with improvements in supportive care, some chemotherapy may be administered in the outpatient setting. Following completion of the treatment cycle, patients are discharged home with detailed instructions for home care and outpatient follow-up visits. 
  • Patients who undergo liver transplantation require a multidisciplinary team with experienced hepatologist and liver transplant surgeons as well as the team outlined above.

Further Outpatient Care

  • Patients are periodically monitored in the clinic after each course of therapy to assess for complications and response to therapy. 
  • Myelosuppression and pancytopenia are common complications, and a CBC count with a platelet count is obtained once or twice weekly.
  • Some drugs, such as cisplatin and carboplatin, affect renal function and require close monitoring of electrolytes and oral or parenteral electrolyte supplementation.
  • Blood product support is provided when the hemoglobin drops below 8 g/dL, symptoms of anemia are present, the platelet count drops below 10,000 X 109/L, or any signs of bleeding are evident.
  • Fever must be treated as a medical emergency during therapy because the risk of a bacterial or fungal infection is high in patients with myelosuppression.
  • Children with central lines are susceptible to bacteremia and life-threatening sepsis. In addition, all children with central lines must receive appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis against subacute bacterial endocarditis (SBE) for all procedures, including dental procedures.
  • Close contact with the liver transplant team is required for patients who require this treatment. All medical decisions for patients with this complex condition should be communicated to all members of the team including oncologists, primary surgeon, hepatologists, and transplant surgeons.
  • Late effects clinics are available at most major oncology centers, and children with hepatoblastoma should be referred to these clinics if they remain disease free for more than 2 years. Even if the risk of recurrence decreases with time, these children are still at risk for late effects, which include secondary cancers (etoposide and anthracycline), cardiotoxicity (anthracycline), renal toxicity (platinum agents), ototoxicity (platinum agents), and potential speech and developmental delays due to therapy administered.
  • Psychosocial team members, child life experts, medical social workers, nutritionists, and all care providers can help families adjust to life after cancer and can also help encourage a cancer preventive lifestyle for these at-risk patients.

Inpatient & Outpatient Medications

  • Infection prophylaxis: Chemotherapy agents cause myelosuppression and immunosuppression. Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jiroveci, which causes Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, is recommended for all patients. The drug of choice is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (2.5 mg/kg/dose of trimethoprim administered orally twice daily) administered on 3 consecutive days per week. Prophylaxis is initiated before chemotherapy and is continued for at least 3 months after completing therapy.
  • Colony-stimulating factors: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support has become common in pediatric oncology as the intensity of chemotherapy has increased. The doses recommended are 5-10 mcg/kg/d, starting 24-36 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy. G-CSF administration is continued for 10-14 days or until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) is greater than 2,000-10,000/mcL.
  • Erythropoietin: The use of erythropoietin is discouraged because of reports that hepatoblastoma has receptors for this agent and may therefore be stimulated to grow from exogenous sources.

Transfer

  • With supervision by the oncology team, routine care can be performed by the primary care provider for patient convenience. CBC counts and blood chemistries may be obtained and blood products may be administered by primary care providers. 
  • Some patients may even be evaluated and treated for febrile neutropenia by the primary care provider. However, the primary care provider must maintain close contact with the subspecialist physicians and transfer the patient to the pediatric oncology center for any complications that require specialized care.

Deterrence/Prevention

  • The cause of hepatoblastoma is unknown. Because onset of hepatoblastoma is in patients at a young age, investigators have focused on events before conception and during gestation. Factors for which evidence is limited or inconsistent include medications, hormones, birth characteristics, congenital anomalies, previous spontaneous abortion or fetal death, alcohol consumption, tobacco use, and paternal occupational exposures. 
  • Children with hemihypertrophy or BWS and children born to individuals affected by familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) should be screened regularly using blood AFP levels as dictated in current protocols. Children found to harbor a FAP mutation should be monitored periodically for the development of polyps by a gastroenterologist as they reach the teenage years.

Complications

  • At diagnosis: Tumor rupture may occur, resulting in acute abdomen or severe hemorrhage, both of which constitute medical emergencies. Intraoperative and postoperative complications may occur as a result of resection or biopsy procedures.
  • During therapy: Complications can develop with the administration of chemotherapy. Myelosuppression and immunosuppression place the patient at risk for bleeding and infection. After several cycles of therapy, organ toxicity may occur; for example, renal function or hearing may be impaired.
  • Posttransplantation: Complications due to liver transplantation can develop and require close long-term follow-up by the liver transplant team.
  • Long term: Particular attention must be paid to cardiac, renal, and hearing status to assess for the toxic effects of anthracyclines, cisplatin, or carboplatin. Psychosocial effects of frequent painful procedures, hospitalizations, and interference with normal childhood growth and development must be addressed, and children and families must be referred to appropriate specialists when needed. The family's psychosocial needs are affected greatly by having a child with cancer.

Prognosis

Patient Education

  • Medications: To ensure compliance and good medical care, patient and family understanding regarding the importance of treatment and the toxic effects of the medications is critical. In addition, patients and their families should learn to recognize and identify signs and symptoms of complications that require urgent medical care.
  • Long-term follow-up surveillance: After completion of therapy, patients in whom treatment was successful require close surveillance for any signs or symptoms of recurrent disease. Follow-up care includes monitoring AFP levels, physical examination, and diagnostic imaging. Because most recurrences occur during the first 2 years following treatment, most protocols recommend close follow-up monitoring during this interval. Hepatoblastoma does not usually recur more than 3 years after completion of therapy.
  • Long-term issues: Growth and development and long-term toxic effects on organs are long-term issues. Patients who remain free of recurrent disease for 5 years are considered cured; long-term follow-up monitoring to assess the impact of therapy on growth, development, and organ toxicity is essential. Patients are usually monitored by pediatric oncologists, but some sequelae may require the involvement of other subspecialist health care providers.
  • Other issues: Most centers have late effects clinics, and all children treated for cancer should continue to see their oncology providers regularly to monitor for potential long-term complications of therapy. When appropriate, most centers help transition to an adult provider, with guidelines on what to watch for and which tests should be performed to monitor for potential late effects. A cancer-preventive lifestyle is encouraged and includes avoiding passive or primary tobacco exposure, wearing sunscreen, healthy eating habits, maintaining a healthy weight, and an exercise regimen.

Miscellaneous

Medicolegal Pitfalls

  • Prompt referral to a pediatric oncology center for multidisciplinary evaluation and appropriate care is essential because childhood cancer is a rare disease. The vast majority of patients initially present for evaluation to either the primary care provider or a general surgeon. A surgeon without expertise in the management of pediatric tumors may attempt to perform a biopsy or resection of a mass without the necessary resources to obtain and process tumor samples for histologic and molecular genetics studies. Without these studies, assigning risk and administering appropriate therapy become difficult.
  • The field of pediatric oncology has benefited from the high level of patient participation in clinical trials. Pediatric oncologists must be effective in communicating the goals of clinical trial protocols and obtaining informed consent from patients and families. A thorough discussion of the potential benefits and risk of clinical trial participation is warranted. Without compromising the family's enthusiasm and desire to achieve a cure for the patient, the oncologist must make them aware that complications during both the standard of care and clinical trial therapies can result in death.

Special Concerns

  • The cornerstone of pediatrics is the prevention and treatment of disease to foster the normal growth and development of children. Use of chemotherapy in infants, children, and adolescents with cancer presents many challenges to the pediatric oncologist, who must strive to maintain a balance between the appropriate administration of curative therapy and the minimization of the long-term toxic effects of that therapy. 
  • Understanding the effects that chemotherapy may have on the growth and development of children is important. For example, when administered to infants, cisplatin and carboplatin may have ototoxic effects that affect language development, vincristine may have neurotoxic effects that interfere with motor development, and any chemotherapy agent may cause refractory nausea and emesis that lead to food aversion. Recognizing these sequelae is vital to allowing appropriate intervention. 
  • Equally important is the understanding that several physiologic processes during infancy and childhood can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs. Body composition varies during infancy, childhood, and adolescence. Total body water and extracellular fluid volumes are larger in the first year of life, and blood volume and fat composition do not approach adult levels until adolescence. Protein binding is lower during the first year of life, thereby increasing the amount of unbound drug. These variables affect the distributed volume of drugs; therefore, drug doses are calculated differently in infants. 
  • Drug doses in pediatric oncology are calculated most commonly using body surface area (BSA). However, because the BSA is larger in relation to an infant's weight, the use of BSA for dose calculation results in a larger dose per weight in infants than in older children and adults. As a result, many physicians use chemotherapy doses based on weight in kilograms rather than BSA in infants. 
  • The practice of altering dosing in infants may be unwise because any rational approach should be based on the pharmacokinetic behavior of each agent. As more is learned about the pharmacokinetics of drugs and their relationship to efficacy and toxicity, the use of pharmacokinetically guided dosing may become more common. 
  • Data are lacking concerning the disposition of most antineoplastic agents in young children and infants. However, guidelines are available for doxorubicin, etoposide, teniposide, and VCR. The caveat is that only a small number of infants were included in the studies used to formulate most of these recommendations. In addition, not all studies included analysis of plasma-binding proteins, unbound drug systemic clearance, and other relevant factors.
  • Because evidence of increased toxicity with VCR and doxorubicin is lacking, adjustment of dosing by weight rather than BSA is recommended in infants or children younger than 2 years and in those with a BSA less than 0.5 m2. Drugs that are excreted via the kidney can have limited clearance in young infants because the percentage of the cardiac output that reaches the kidneys is only 5% in infants, whereas it is 25% in an older child or adult.
  • Ifosfamide and, less frequently, cyclophosphamide can cause renal tubular injury manifested as Fanconi syndrome, metabolic acidosis, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, proteinuria, or rickets. The chronic nature of these injuries may interfere with normal growth and requires close follow-up monitoring. Cisplatin and, less frequently, carboplatin can cause glomerular injury manifested as acute or chronic decrease in the GFR.
  • The heart is another organ at risk for early and late toxic effects. Anthracyclines have been useful in the treatment of a large number of pediatric cancers; however, the use of anthracyclines, especially in high cumulative doses, can lead to development of cardiomyopathy. Several studies have suggested that age is an important risk factor for this complication because these drugs appear to damage cardiac myocytes and limit the heart's ability to grow.
  • Several agents (ie, carboplatin, cisplatin, CPM, ifosfamide) require prehydration to achieve adequate renal perfusion, urine filtration, and bladder flow and to avoid delayed excretion or bladder toxicity. The use of high-dose therapy in children frequently results in myelosuppression requiring blood product support. 
  • Treatment of infectious diseases is also very important in the pediatric population. Advances in the care and support of the patients with neutropenia who are febrile have improved the survival rate in children. Prophylactic antibiotics commonly are used in patients on immunosuppressive therapy to prevent P carinii pneumonia.
  • Drugs that modify the toxicity of antineoplastic agents (mesna, amifostine, leucovorin) and the availability of hematopoietic growth factors (G-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]) have allowed the use of the maximally tolerated doses of many chemotherapy agents and the development of more dose-intensive protocols.
  • Future directions include the following: 
    • The need for better chemotherapeutic options, with better efficacy and less toxicity, is clear. Bioinformatics and genetic profiling may identify new patterns correlating with prognosis and, thus, potential therapeutic targets. The significance of molecular genetic abnormalities seen in human malignancy is just beginning to be understood, and these molecular abnormalities need to be correlated with a patient's clinical prognosis.
    • Most pediatric chemotherapeutic protocols (eg, COG, SIOP) have incorporated molecular genetic testing of tumor specimens and, in some cases, normal tissues as control. This information is being collected to determine the prognostic significance of oncogene mutations, translocations, gene rearrangements, and tumor suppressor genes, and, in some cases, to determine treatment options. Current research efforts may ultimately identify specific molecular targets that can be used to develop more specific chemotherapeutic agents.
    • Microarray technology currently is being used to determine the molecular profiles of malignancies to better define therapies targeted to specific molecular profiles. Microarray technology was used to analyze patterns of TP53- mediated gene expression, which will undoubtedly contribute to the understanding of how inactivation of this tumor suppressor gene contributes to neoplasia. This information may be used to guide treatment options. Pediatric solid tumors may ultimately be candidates for this type of genetic profiling as well.
    • As physicians gain a better understanding of the molecular abnormalities inherent in cancer cells and critically analyze the prognostic significance and therapeutic implications of the abnormalities, the ability to modify treatment based on this information increases. Sometimes, this means administering more aggressive therapy to patients, thus potentially increasing the chance for long-term survival. At other times, this involves sparing the patient unnecessary toxic effects of therapy. More specifically targeted therapies are likely to have less general systemic toxicity.
    • Identification of the aberrant expression of genes involved in regulation of cellular growth and differentiation and clinical correlation of these abnormalities will likely lead to improvements in therapeutic options for patients with cancer.
 
Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all of our patients and families, as well as all of our mentors along this path towards a better outcome for children with hepatoblastoma!



More on Hepatoblastoma

Overview: Hepatoblastoma
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Hepatoblastoma
Treatment & Medication: Hepatoblastoma
Follow-up: Hepatoblastoma
Multimedia: Hepatoblastoma
References

References

  1. Ang JP, Heath JA, Donath S, Khurana S, Auldist A. Treatment outcomes for hepatoblastoma: an institution's experience over two decades. Pediatr Surg Int. Feb 2007;23(2):103-9. [Medline].

  2. Otte JB, Pritchard J, Aronson DC, et al. Liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma: results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) study SIOPEL-1 and review of the world experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jan 2004;42(1):74-83. [Medline].

  3. Otte JB, de Ville de Goyet J, Reding R. Liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma: indications and contraindications in the modern era. Pediatr Transplant. Oct 2005;9(5):557-65. [Medline].

  4. Czauderna P, Mackinlay G, Perilongo G, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in children: results of the first prospective study of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology group. J Clin Oncol. Jun 15 2002;20(12):2798-804. [Medline].

  5. Hirschman BA, Pollock BH, Tomlinson GE. The spectrum of APC mutations in children with hepatoblastoma from familial adenomatous polyposis kindreds. J Pediatr. Aug 2005;147(2):263-6. [Medline].

  6. Sanders RP, Furman WL. Familial adenomatous polyposis in two brothers with hepatoblastoma: implications for diagnosis and screening. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Nov 2006;47(6):851-4. [Medline].

  7. Anna CH, Sills RC, Foley JF, Stockton PS, Ton TV, Devereux TR. Beta-catenin mutations and protein accumulation in all hepatoblastomas examined from B6C3F1 mice treated with anthraquinone or oxazepam. Cancer Res. Jun 1 2000;60(11):2864-8. [Medline].

  8. Koch A, Waha A, Hartmann W, et al. Elevated expression of Wnt antagonists is a common event in hepatoblastomas. Clin Cancer Res. Jun 15 2005;11(12):4295-304. [Medline].

  9. Tan X, Apte U, Micsenyi A, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor: a novel target of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in liver. Gastroenterology. Jul 2005;129(1):285-302. [Medline].

  10. Wirths O, Waha A, Weggen S, et al. Overexpression of human Dickkopf-1, an antagonist of wingless/WNT signaling, in human hepatoblastomas and Wilms' tumors. Lab Invest. Mar 2003;83(3):429-34. [Medline].

  11. Miao J, Kusafuka T, Udatsu Y, Okada A. Sequence variants of the Axin gene in hepatoblastoma. Hepatol Res. Feb 2003;25(2):174-179. [Medline].

  12. Taniguchi K, Roberts LR, Aderca IN, et al. Mutational spectrum of beta-catenin, AXIN1, and AXIN2 in hepatocellular carcinomas and hepatoblastomas. Oncogene. Jul 18 2002;21(31):4863-71. [Medline].

  13. Kuroda T, Rabkin SD, Martuza RL. Effective treatment of tumors with strong beta-catenin/T-cell factor activity by transcriptionally targeted oncolytic herpes simplex virus vector. Cancer Res. Oct 15 2006;66(20):10127-35. [Medline].

  14. Arsic D, Beasley SW, Sullivan MJ. Switched-on Sonic hedgehog: a gene whose activity extends beyond fetal development - to oncogenesis. J Paediatr Child Health. Jun 2007;43(6):421-3. [Medline].

  15. Ruck P, Xiao JC. Stem-like cells in hepatoblastoma. Med Pediatr Oncol. Nov 2002;39(5):504-7. [Medline].

  16. Tanimura M, Matsui I, Abe J, et al. Increased risk of hepatoblastoma among immature children with a lower birth weight. Cancer Res. Jul 15 1998;58(14):3032-5. [Medline].

  17. Ortega JA, Douglass EC, Feusner JH, et al. Randomized comparison of cisplatin/vincristine/fluorouracil and cisplatin/continuous infusion doxorubicin for treatment of pediatric hepatoblastoma: A report from the Children's Cancer Group and the Pediatric Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. Jul 2000;18(14):2665-75. [Medline].

  18. Aronson DC, Schnater JM, Staalman CR, et al. Predictive value of the pretreatment extent of disease system in hepatoblastoma: results from the International Society of Pediatric Oncology Liver Tumor Study Group SIOPEL-1 study. J Clin Oncol. Feb 20 2005;23(6):1245-52. [Medline].

  19. Feusner J, Plaschkes J. Hepatoblastoma and low birth weight: a trend or chance observation?. Med Pediatr Oncol. Nov 2002;39(5):508-9. [Medline].

  20. Oue T, Kubota A, Okuyama H, et al. Hepatoblastoma in children of extremely low birth weight: a report from a single perinatal center. J Pediatr Surg. Jan 2003;38(1):134-7; discussion 134-7. [Medline].

  21. Ucar C, Caliskan U, Toy H. Hepatoblastoma in a child with neurofibromatosis type I. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Nov 10 2005;[Medline].

  22. Fuchs J, Rydzynski J, Von Schweinitz D, et al. Pretreatment prognostic factors and treatment results in children with hepatoblastoma: a report from the German Cooperative Pediatric Liver Tumor Study HB 94. Cancer. Jul 1 2002;95(1):172-82. [Medline].

  23. Figarola MS, McQuiston SA, Wilson F, Powell R. Recurrent hepatoblastoma with localization by PET-CT. Pediatr Radiol. Dec 2005;35(12):1254-8. [Medline].

  24. Rowland JM. Hepatoblastoma: assessment of criteria for histologic classification. Med Pediatr Oncol. Nov 2002;39(5):478-83. [Medline].

  25. von Schweinitz D, Hecker H, Schmidt-von-Arndt G, Harms D. Prognostic factors and staging systems in childhood hepatoblastoma. Int J Cancer. Dec 19 1997;74(6):593-9. [Medline].

  26. Douglass EC, Reynolds M, Finegold M, Cantor AB, Glicksman A. Cisplatin, vincristine, and fluorouracil therapy for hepatoblastoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1993;11(1):96-9. [Medline].

  27. Casanova M, Massimino M, Ferrari A, et al. Etoposide, cisplatin, epirubicin chemotherapy in the treatment of pediatric liver tumors. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Apr-May 2005;22(3):189-98. [Medline].

  28. McCrudden KW, Hopkins B, Frischer J, et al. Anti-VEGF antibody in experimental hepatoblastoma: suppression of tumor growth and altered angiogenesis. J Pediatr Surg. Mar 2003;38(3):308-14; discussion 308-14. [Medline].

  29. Warmann S, Gohring G, Teichmann B, Geerlings H, Fuchs J. MDR1 modulators improve the chemotherapy response of human hepatoblastoma to doxorubicin in vitro. J Pediatr Surg. Nov 2002;37(11):1579-84. [Medline].

  30. Warmann S, Hunger M, Teichmann B, Flemming P, Gratz KF, Fuchs J. The role of the MDR1 gene in the development of multidrug resistance in human hepatoblastoma: clinical course and in vivo model. Cancer. Oct 15 2002;95(8):1795-801. [Medline].

  31. Rana AN, Qidwai A, Pritchard J, Ashraf MS. Successful treatment of multifocal unresectable hepatoblastoma with chemotherapy only. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Mar 2006;23(2):153-8. [Medline].

  32. Katzenstein HM, London WB, Douglass EC, et al. Treatment of unresectable and metastatic hepatoblastoma: a pediatric oncology group phase II study. J Clin Oncol. Aug 15 2002;20(16):3438-44. [Medline].

  33. Katzenstein HM, Rigsby C, Shaw PH, Mitchell TL, Haut PR, Kletzel M. Novel therapeutic approaches in the treatment of children with hepatoblastoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Dec 2002;24(9):751-5. [Medline].

  34. Fuchs J, Rydzynski J, Hecker H, et al. The influence of preoperative chemotherapy and surgical technique in the treatment of hepatoblastoma--a report from the German Cooperative Liver Tumour Studies HB 89 and HB 94. Eur J Pediatr Surg. Aug 2002;12(4):255-61. [Medline].

  35. Finegold MJ. Chemotherapy for suspected hepatoblastoma without efforts at surgical resection is a bad practice. Med Pediatr Oncol. Nov 2002;39(5):484-6. [Medline].

  36. Beaunoyer M, Vanatta JM, Ogihara M, et al. Outcomes of transplantation in children with primary hepatic malignancy. Pediatr Transplant. Sep 2007;11(6):655-60. [Medline].

  37. Blaker H, Hofmann WJ, Rieker RJ, et al. Beta-catenin accumulation and mutation of the CTNNB1 gene in hepatoblastoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Aug 1999;25(4):399-402. [Medline].

  38. Borger JA, Barbosa JL, Lehan CA. Chemotherapy combined with surgery in successful treatment of hepatoblastoma. J Fla Med Assoc. Dec 1989;76(12):1023-6. [Medline].

  39. Cohen MM Jr. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome: historical, clinicopathological, and etiopathogenetic perspectives. Pediatr Dev Pathol. May-Jun 2005;8(3):287-304. [Medline].

  40. Conran RM, Hitchcock CL, Waclawiw MA, Stocker JT, Ishak KG. Hepatoblastoma: the prognostic significance of histologic type. Pediatr Pathol. Mar-Apr 1992;12(2):167-83. [Medline].

  41. Czauderna P, Otte JB, Aronson DC, et al. Guidelines for surgical treatment of hepatoblastoma in the modern era--recommendations from the Childhood Liver Tumour Strategy Group of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOPEL). Eur J Cancer. May 2005;41(7):1031-6. [Medline].

  42. Czauderna P, Zbrzezniak G, Narozanski W, Korzon M, Wyszomirska M, Stoba C. Preliminary experience with arterial chemoembolization for hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jun 2006;46(7):825-8. [Medline].

  43. D'Antiga L, Vallortigara F, Cillo U, et al. Features predicting unresectability in hepatoblastoma. Cancer. Sep 1 2007;110(5):1050-8. [Medline].

  44. Ehrlich PF, Greenberg ML, Filler RM. Improved long-term survival with preoperative chemotherapy for hepatoblastoma. J Pediatr Surg. Jul 1997;32(7):999-1002; discussion 1002-3. [Medline].

  45. Feusner J, Buckley J, Robison L, et al. Prematurity and hepatoblastoma: more than just an association?. J Pediatr. Oct 1998;133(4):585-6. [Medline].

  46. Filler RM, Ehrlich PF, Greenberg ML, Babyn PS. Preoperative chemotherapy in hepatoblastoma. Surgery. Oct 1991;110(4):591-6; discussion 596-7. [Medline].

  47. Finegold MJ. Chemotherapy for suspected hepatoblastoma without efforts at surgical resection is a bad practice. Med Pediatr Oncol. Nov 2002;39(5):484-6. [Medline].

  48. Herzog CE, Andrassy RJ, Eftekhari F. Childhood cancers: hepatoblastoma. Oncologist. 2000;5(6):445-53. [Medline].

  49. Kasahara M, Ueda M, Haga H, et al. Living-donor liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma. Am J Transplant. Sep 2005;5(9):2229-35. [Medline].

  50. King SJ, Babyn PS, Greenberg ML, Phillips MJ, Filler RM. Value of CT in determining the resectability of hepatoblastoma before and after chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 1993;160(4):793-8. [Medline].

  51. Li FP, Thurber WA, Seddon J, Holmes GE. Hepatoblastoma in families with polyposis coli. JAMA. May 8 1987;257(18):2475-7. [Medline].

  52. Lopez-Terrada D. Integrating the diagnosis of childhood malignancies. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2006;587:121-37. [Medline].

  53. Mejia A, Langnas AN, Shaw BW, Torres C, Sudan DL. Living and deceased donor liver transplantation for unresectable hepatoblastoma at a single center. Clin Transplant. Dec 2005;19(6):721-5. [Medline].

  54. Meyers RL, Katzenstein HM, Malogolowkin MH. Predictive value of staging systems in hepatoblastoma. J Clin Oncol. Feb 20 2007;25(6):737. [Medline].

  55. Mody RJ, Pohlen JA, Malde S, Strouse PJ, Shulkin BL. FDG PET for the study of primary hepatic malignancies in children. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jul 2006;47(1):51-5. [Medline].

  56. Molmenti EP, Wilkinson K, Molmenti H, et al. Treatment of unresectable hepatoblastoma with liver transplantation in the pediatric population. Am J Transplant. Jul 2002;2(6):535-8. [Medline].

  57. Otte JB, de Ville de Goyet J. The contribution of transplantation to the treatment of liver tumors in children. Semin Pediatr Surg. Nov 2005;14(4):233-8. [Medline].

  58. Otte JB, de Ville de Goyet J, Reding R. Liver transplantation for hepatoblastoma: indications and contraindications in the modern era. Pediatr Transplant. Oct 2005;9(5):557-65. [Medline].

  59. Pollock BH, Jenson HB, Leach CT, et al. Risk factors for pediatric human immunodeficiency virus-related malignancy. JAMA. May 14 2003;289(18):2393-9. [Medline].

  60. Pritchard J, Brown J, Shafford E, et al. Cisplatin, doxorubicin, and delayed surgery for childhood hepatoblastoma: a successful approach--results of the first prospective study of the International Society of Pediatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol. Nov 15 2000;18(22):3819-28. [Medline].

  61. Quinn JJ, Altman AJ, Robinson HT, Cooke RW, Hight DW, Foster JH. Adriamycin and cisplatin for hepatoblastoma. Cancer. Oct 15 1985;56(8):1926-9. [Medline].

  62. Raney B. Hepatoblastoma in children: a review. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Sep-Oct 1997;19(5):418-22. [Medline].

  63. Ranganathan S, Tan X, Monga SP. beta-Catenin and met deregulation in childhood Hepatoblastomas. Pediatr Dev Pathol. Jul-Aug 2005;8(4):435-47. [Medline].

  64. Reynolds M, Douglass EC, Finegold M, Cantor A, Glicksman A. Chemotherapy can convert unresectable hepatoblastoma. J Pediatr Surg. Aug 1992;27(8):1080-3; discussion 1083-4. [Medline].

  65. Richter A, Grabhorn E, Schulz A, Schaefer HJ, Burdelski M, Ganschow R. Hepatoblastoma in a child with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. Pediatr Transplant. Dec 2005;9(6):805-8. [Medline].

  66. Ross JA, Gurney JG. Hepatoblastoma incidence in the United States from 1973 to 1992. Med Pediatr Oncol. Mar 1998;30(3):141-2. [Medline].

  67. Sallam A, Paes B, Bourgeois J. Neonatal hepatoblastoma: two cases posing a diagnostic dilemma, with a review of the literature. Am J Perinatol. Nov 2005;22(8):413-9. [Medline].

  68. Srinivasan P, McCall J, Pritchard J, et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation for unresectable hepatoblastoma. Transplantation. Sep 15 2002;74(5):652-5. [Medline].

  69. Tan TY, Amor DJ. Tumour surveillance in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and hemihyperplasia: a critical review of the evidence and suggested guidelines for local practice. J Paediatr Child Health. Sep 2006;42(9):486-90. [Medline].

  70. Tomizawa M, Saisho H. Signaling pathway of insulin-like growth factor-II as a target of molecular therapy for hepatoblastoma. World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28 2006;12(40):6531-5. [Medline].

  71. Tomlinson GE, Douglass EC, Pollock BH, Finegold MJ, Schneider NR. Cytogenetic evaluation of a large series of hepatoblastomas: numerical abnormalities with recurring aberrations involving 1q12-q21. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Oct 2005;44(2):177-84. [Medline].

  72. Tsuchida Y, Ikeda H, Suzuki N, et al. A case of well-differentiated, fetal-type hepatoblastoma with very low serum alpha-fetoprotein. J Pediatr Surg. Dec 1999;34(12):1762-4. [Medline].

  73. Vogl TJ, Scheller A, Jakob U, Zangos S, Ahmed M, Nabil M. Transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatoblastoma in children. Eur Radiol. Jun 2006;16(6):1393-6. [Medline].

  74. Wang JD, Chang TK, Chen HC, et al. Pediatric liver tumors: initial presentation, image finding and outcome. Pediatr Int. Aug 2007;49(4):491-6. [Medline].

  75. Warmann SW, Frank H, Heitmann H, et al. Bcl-2 Gene Silencing in Pediatric Epithelial Liver Tumors. J Surg Res. Jan 2008;144(1):43-48. [Medline].

  76. Warmann SW, Heitmann H, Teichmann B, et al. Effects of P-glycoprotein modulation on the chemotherapy of xenotransplanted human hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Jul-Aug 2005;22(5):373-86. [Medline].

  77. Zimmermann A. The emerging family of hepatoblastoma tumours: from ontogenesis to oncogenesis. Eur J Cancer. Jul 2005;41(11):1503-14. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

hepatoblastoma, embryonal hepatic tumor, hepatic neoplasms in children, liver tumor, liver cancer, pediatric cancer, pediatric neoplasm, childhood hepatic tumor, Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, BWS, pulmonary metastases, hemihypertrophy, trisomy 20, epithelial hepatoblastoma, familial adenomatous polyposis, FAP, colonic polyps, adenocarcinoma, Wnt pathway, low birth weight infants, very low birth weight infants, anorexia, osteopenia, acute abdomen, chronic hepatitis B infection, isosexual precocity, talipes equinovarus, persistent ductus arteriosus, tetralogy of Fallot, extrahepatic biliary atresia, dysplastic kidney, horseshoe kidney, cleft palate, Goldenhar syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Meckel diverticulum, Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome, fetal alcohol syndrome, neurofibromatosis type 1, NF1, Li-Fraumeni syndrome

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Jennifer R Willert, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor of Pediatrics, University of California at San Diego; Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplant, San Diego Children's Hospital; Member, Rebecca Moore's Cancer Center, Translational Oncology, University of California San Diego Medical Center
Jennifer R Willert, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Children's Oncology Group
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Gary Dahl, MD, Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine
Gary Dahl, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Stephan A Grupp, MD, PhD, Director, Stem Cell Biology Program, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania
Stephan A Grupp, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine.com, Inc
Disclosure: Pfizer Inc Stock Investment from broker recommendation; Avanir Pharma Stock Investment from broker recommendation

Managing Editor

Steven K Bergstrom, MD, Assistant to the Chairman, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center of Oakland
Steven K Bergstrom, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Children's Oncology Group, and International Society for Experimental Hematology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Helen SL Chan, MBBS, FRCP(C), FAAP, Senior Scientist, Research Institute; Professor, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Canada
Helen SL Chan, MBBS, FRCP(C), FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Cancer Research, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Max J Coppes, MD, PhD, MBA, Executive Director, Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC; Professor of Medicine, Oncology, and Pediatrics, Georgetown University
Max J Coppes, MD, PhD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.