eMedicine Specialties > Pediatrics: General Medicine > Oncology

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Treatment & Medication

Author: J Martin Johnston, MD, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Mercer University School of Medicine; Director of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Backus Children's Hospital; Consulting Oncologist/Hematologist, St Damien's Pediatric Hospital
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Dec 5, 2008

Treatment

Medical Care

Proper care of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) requires a referral to a comprehensive tertiary care center. The current intense treatment regimens, particularly those for advanced stages of disease, necessitate inpatient administration of chemotherapy, as well as aggressive support by a team experienced in the care of children with immunosuppression.

Before and during the initial induction phase of chemotherapy, patients may develop tumor lysis syndrome. This term describes metabolic derangements caused by a highly proliferative and/or bulky malignancy. Renal involvement by lymphoma is an additional risk factor.

Hyperuricemia or tubular obstruction may lead to acute renal failure, requiring dialysis. In general, this is not a contraindication to continuing chemotherapy. However, some protocols now include a preliminary phase of relatively gentle cytoreductive chemotherapy designed to avoid these metabolic complications.

With all patients, administer intravenous fluids at twice the maintenance rates, usually without potassium. Add sodium bicarbonate to the intravenous fluid to achieve moderate alkalinization of the urine (pH of approximately 7). This measure enhances the excretion of tumor metabolites. For example, the solubility of uric acid is 10-12 times higher at a pH of about 7 than it is at pH 5, whereas the solubility of xanthine is doubled. Avoid a urine pH higher than this to prevent crystallization of hypoxanthine or calcium phosphate. Administer allopurinol to prevent or correct hyperuricemia. In high-risk situations (extreme elevations of lactate dehydrogenase [LDH] and/or uric acid or evidence of impaired renal function at presentation), consider administration of recombinant urate oxidase (rasburicase [Elitek]).31

Follow up the patient's laboratory values to monitor tumor lysis syndrome throughout initial therapy. Testing may be needed as often as 2-4 times per day. This follow-up is especially important during the first 48-72 hours of therapy in a patient with bulky disease.

If present, fever simply may reflect the underlying malignancy. However, consider beginning empiric broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage until sepsis or focal infection (eg, due to bowel perforation) is excluded.

Current treatment regimens are primarily based on the immunophenotype of the particular lymphoma (B cell vs T cell). In broad terms, T-cell therapies are longer and less intensive (particularly with respect to the use of alkylating agents) than B-cell therapies. Treatments for B-cell lymphomas involve relatively high doses of alkylators and antimetabolites.

Current survival rates for patients with advanced disease are 65-75% for T-cell (lymphoblastic) lymphomas and 80-90% for those with B-cell lymphomas.

Lymphoblastic Lymphoma

The most successful treatment protocols for advanced-stage lymphoblastic lymphoma feature chemotherapy combinations designed to treat ALL.

LSA2 L2 protocol

The LSA2 L2 protocol evolved from ALL protocols used at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in the early 1960s. The LSA2 L2 protocol features 3 phases of therapy—namely, induction, consolidation, and repeated cycles of maintenance—given over a total of 2-3 years.32 Methotrexate is administered intrathecally for CNS prophylaxis throughout treatment. When this protocol was first described, it included irradiation of sites of bulky disease; however, radiation is no longer routinely applied.

Children's Cancer Group protocol 552

Between 1986 and 1989, 143 subjects with lymphoblastic lymphoma (10% with localized disease) received treatment with a modified LSA2 L2 regimen in a Children's Cancer Group trial (see Table 1). Their 5-year event-free survival was 74%.33

Table 1. Modified LSA2 L2 Therapy in Children's Cancer Group Protocol 552

Open table in new window

Table
PhaseDrugRoute
InductionCyclophosphamide, vincristine, daunorubicinIV
Ara-C, methotrexateIT
PrednisonePO
ConsolidationAra-CIV or SC
6-thioguaninePO
MethotrexateIT
L-asparaginaseIM
BCNUIV
PhaseCycleDrugRoute
Maintenance* 16-thioguaninePO
CyclophosphamideIV
2HydroxyureaPO
DaunorubicinIV
3MethotrexatePO
BCNUIV
4Ara-CIV or SC
VincristineIV
PhaseDrugRoute
InductionCyclophosphamide, vincristine, daunorubicinIV
Ara-C, methotrexateIT
PrednisonePO
ConsolidationAra-CIV or SC
6-thioguaninePO
MethotrexateIT
L-asparaginaseIM
BCNUIV
PhaseCycleDrugRoute
Maintenance* 16-thioguaninePO
CyclophosphamideIV
2HydroxyureaPO
DaunorubicinIV
3MethotrexatePO
BCNUIV
4Ara-CIV or SC
VincristineIV

Source.—Children's Cancer Group.
Ara-C = cytarabine; BCNU = 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea, or carmustine; IM = intramuscular; IT = intrathecal; IV = intravenous; PO = oral; SC = subcutaneous.
* A minimum of 5 repeated courses (total duration of therapy >18 mo) are noted. Each course of intrathecal methotrexate (day 0 of each course) consists of 4 cycles of rotating drug pairs that are administered every 2 weeks after blood counts have recovered.

German Berlin, Frankfurt, Muenster treatment protocol

The German Berlin, Frankfurt, Muenster (BFM) protocols demonstrated excellent results in patients with ALL or lymphoblastic lymphoma. As reported in 1995, 71 subjects with stage III or IV non–B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (see the Children's Oncology Group protocols below) received treatment, as shown in Table 2.34

Compared with the LSA2 L2 protocol, the BFM regimen adds a re-induction phase and features a less complicated and less intense maintenance phase. In its original report, the BFM protocol included prophylactic cranial irradiation during re-induction. Patients receiving this treatment had a 6-year event-free survival of 79%.

Table 2. Therapy for Stage III and IV non–B-Cell Disease* According to BFM Protocol 86

Open table in new window

Table
PhasesDrugRoute
InductionPrednisone, 6-mercaptopurinePO
Vincristine, daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide, Ara-CIV
L-asparaginaseIM
MethotrexateIT
Consolidation6-mercaptopurinePO
Methotrexate with leucovorin rescueIV
MethotrexateIT
Re-inductionDexamethasone, 6-thioguaninePO
Vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, Ara-CIV
L-asparaginaseIM
MethotrexateIT
Maintenance 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexatePO
PhasesDrugRoute
InductionPrednisone, 6-mercaptopurinePO
Vincristine, daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide, Ara-CIV
L-asparaginaseIM
MethotrexateIT
Consolidation6-mercaptopurinePO
Methotrexate with leucovorin rescueIV
MethotrexateIT
Re-inductionDexamethasone, 6-thioguaninePO
Vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, Ara-CIV
L-asparaginaseIM
MethotrexateIT
Maintenance 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexatePO

Source.—Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Group.
Ara-C = cytarabine; IT = intrathecal; IV = intravenous; PO = oral; SC = subcutaneous.
* Diagnoses included lymphoblastic lymphoma of the T-cell or precursor B-cell type, immunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, and other peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Of note, patients with Ki-1+ anaplastic LCLs were not included.
Continued until 24 months after diagnosis.

Children's Oncology Group protocols

The most recent Children's Oncology Group phase 3 protocol (A5971) for children with advanced-stage T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma featured a 4-way randomization between BFM therapy, a Children's Cancer Group modified version of BFM therapy (which did not include high-dose methotrexate/leucovorin during consolidation), and intensified versions of these 2 protocols (with early introduction of daunomycin and cyclophosphamide). Results from this comparison are still pending.

The Children's Oncology Group is developing specific protocols to treat T-cell diseases—both T-lymphoblastic lymphoma and T-cell ALL. In particular, researchers will examine the role of nelarabine (previously known as compound 506U78), a prodrug of the deoxyguanosine analog 9-beta-D-arabinofuranosylguanine (Ara-G) that has shown efficacy in T-cell malignancies.

Additional treatment details

For advanced-stage lymphoblastic lymphoma, as for ALL, relatively long intervals of treatment have been most successful. The maintenance phase typically lasts 18-30 months. Protocols shorter than this have also been investigated. For example, Children's Cancer Group protocol 5941 examined an aggressive, 11-month multiagent regimen. Results of this trial were recently published: the 5-year event-free survival was 78% ± 4.5% and overall survival was 85% ± 3.9%. These results suggest that the experimental approach is safe and just as effective as more prolonged regimens.35

Localized lymphoblastic lymphoma is unusual. In the previously mentioned BFM study, 6 of 77 subjects with non–B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma had stage I or II disease.

When results from several series were combined, patients appeared to have an excellent prognosis. Long-term survival was approximately 80%.

Despite these findings, a consensus about optimal therapy is lacking. Treatment options include the LSA2 L2 protocol and the BFM protocol 86 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (with the re-induction phase eliminated). Patients with localized lymphoblastic lymphoma are included in Children's Oncology Group protocol A5971; they receive a Children's Cancer Group modified version of the BFM protocol (as described above) that includes re-induction but with fewer doses of intrathecal chemotherapy during the maintenance phase.

Regimens simpler than these have demonstrated comparable results. For example, protocol 77-04 from the NCI included alternating cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) and high-dose methotrexate (with leucovorin as rescue therapy). Aggressive intrathecal prophylaxis with cytarabine and methotrexate was included. However, local radiation therapy was not offered routinely. The total duration of therapy is 15 cycles (approximately 60 wk).

Small Noncleaved Cell Lymphoma

Since the mid-1980s, survival rates for patients with Burkitt or Burkittlike lymphomas have increased dramatically. In general terms, several lessons have been learned, as summarized below:

  • Long-term maintenance chemotherapy appears to have no role. Therefore, chemotherapy can be short. A typical duration is 2-6 cycles, each lasting 3-4 weeks. However, the intensity of treatment is high for most patients, and inpatient treatment is required.
  • When observed, relapses occur early, either during therapy or within 6-12 months of its completion. Salvage rates for patients with relapse have been disappointing.
  • Even patients with widely disseminated disease (eg, bone marrow involvement) have a long-term survival rate of 90%.
  • Involvement of the CNS at diagnosis continues to be an adverse prognostic indicator.

Treatment protocol from a Cooperative Group trial

Three cooperative groups conducted a recent international trial for patients with SNCCL: the French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP) in France, Belgium, and the Netherlands; the Children's Cancer Group in the United States, Canada, and Australia; and the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKCCSG) in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Chemotherapy was based on the SFOP LMB-89 study, in which event-free survival rates ranged from 100% in group A to 87.5% in group C (see Table 3). Patients with B-cell ALL were included in this protocol. Subjects were staged (as described above), then assigned to clinical risk groups, as presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Clinical Risk Groups in the International Trial for Patients With SNCCL (Children's Cancer Group study 5961)

Open table in new window

Table
Clinical GroupSubjects,
Estimated %
Definition
A10All resected stage I or abdominal stage II tumors
B65Unresected stage I or II tumor, stage III, tumor, or stage IV with no CNS involvement and <25% marrow blasts
C25CNS involvement or >25% marrow blasts
Clinical GroupSubjects,
Estimated %
Definition
A10All resected stage I or abdominal stage II tumors
B65Unresected stage I or II tumor, stage III, tumor, or stage IV with no CNS involvement and <25% marrow blasts
C25CNS involvement or >25% marrow blasts

Table 4. Standard Therapy for Subjects in the International Trial for Patients With SNCCL, Group A*

Open table in new window

Table
DrugRoute
PrednisonePO
Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Filgrastim (G-CSF), to enhance neutrophil recoverySC or IV
DrugRoute
PrednisonePO
Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Filgrastim (G-CSF), to enhance neutrophil recoverySC or IV

G-CSF = granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IV = intravenous; PO = oral; SC = subcutaneous.
* See Table 3 for the definition of group A. All subjects received 2 cycles.

The results of the international trial were recently published; with median follow-up of more than 4 years, the 4-year event-free survival for group A subjects was 98.3%, and overall survival was 99.2%.36

In this trial, patients with advanced disease (groups B and C) received an initial moderately intensive reduction phase of chemotherapy. This was intended to reduce the tumor burden with a minimal risk of inducing or exacerbating tumor lysis syndrome. The experimental treatment arms for these patients involved incremental reductions in the intensity and/or duration of chemotherapy. For patients in group B with an "early response" to therapy (at least 20% tumor decrease after 7 d of treatment), outcomes with standard therapy were not superior to outcomes on any of the experimental (reduced therapy) arms. Thus, pediatric patients with intermediate-risk B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma who have an early response and achieve a complete remission after the first consolidation course are effectively treated using a 4-course regimen with a total dose of only 3.3 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and 120 mg/m2 doxorubicin.37

Table 5. Standard Therapy for Subjects in International Trial for Patients With SNCCL, Group B*

Open table in new window

Table
PhaseDrugRoute
ReductionPrednisonePO
 Vincristine, cyclophosphamideIV
 Methotrexate/hydrocortisoneIT
PhaseCyclesDrugRoute
Induction2, starting 7 d after reductionPrednisonePO
Vincristine, methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/hydrocortisoneIT
Filgrastim (G-CSF)SC or IV
Consolidation2Methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, Ara-C 
Methotrexate/hydrocortisone, Ara-C/hydrocortisone 
Filgrastim (G-CSF) 
Maintenance1PrednisonePO
Vincristine, methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/hydrocortisoneIT
PhaseDrugRoute
ReductionPrednisonePO
 Vincristine, cyclophosphamideIV
 Methotrexate/hydrocortisoneIT
PhaseCyclesDrugRoute
Induction2, starting 7 d after reductionPrednisonePO
Vincristine, methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/hydrocortisoneIT
Filgrastim (G-CSF)SC or IV
Consolidation2Methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, Ara-C 
Methotrexate/hydrocortisone, Ara-C/hydrocortisone 
Filgrastim (G-CSF) 
Maintenance1PrednisonePO
Vincristine, methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/hydrocortisoneIT

Ara-C = cytarabine; G-CSF = granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IT = intrathecal; IV = intravenous; PO = oral, SC = subcutaneous.
* See Table 3 for the definition of group B.

Based on published results from this trial, equivalent outcomes are expected with a reduced (50%) dose of cyclophosphamide in induction phase 2, elimination of maintenance phase 1, or both.

Group C patients in remission after 3 cycles were randomized to standard versus reduced-intensity therapy (omitting the last 3 cycles of maintenance). The 4-year event-free survival after randomization was 90% ± 3.1% versus 80% ± 4.2%, whereas survival was 93% ± 2.7% versus 83% ± 4%. Patients with either combined marrow and CNS disease at diagnosis or a poor response to reduction therapy had significantly inferior event-free survival and survival (P <0.001).38 Therefore, decreasing therapy in this subgroup of patients appears unwise; standard-intensity therapy is recommended for children with high-risk B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Table 6. Standard Therapy for Subjects in International Trial for Patients With SNCCL, Group C*

Open table in new window

Table
PhaseDrugRoute
ReductionPrednisonePO
Vincristine, cyclophosphamideIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Induction, cycle 1 starting 7 d after reductionPrednisonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Filgrastim (G-CSF)SC or IV
Induction, cycle 2PrednisonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Filgrastim (G-CSF)SC or IV
Consolidation, 2 cycles High-dose Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IV
Filgrastim (G-CSF), days 7-21SC or IV
High-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescueIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Maintenance 1PrednisonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Maintenance 2Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IT
Maintenance 3PrednisonePO
Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Maintenance 4Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IV
PhaseDrugRoute
ReductionPrednisonePO
Vincristine, cyclophosphamideIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Induction, cycle 1 starting 7 d after reductionPrednisonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Filgrastim (G-CSF)SC or IV
Induction, cycle 2PrednisonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Filgrastim (G-CSF)SC or IV
Consolidation, 2 cycles High-dose Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IV
Filgrastim (G-CSF), days 7-21SC or IV
High-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescueIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Maintenance 1PrednisonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/hydrocortisoneIT
Maintenance 2Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IT
Maintenance 3PrednisonePO
Vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Maintenance 4Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IV

Ara-C = cytarabine; G-CSF = granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IT = intrathecal; IV = intravenous; PO = oral, SC = subcutaneous.
* See Table 3 for the definition of group C.
For patients with CNS involvement, during consolidation cycle 1 only.

An alternative treatment approach has been developed over a series of randomized trials by the German Berlin, Frankfurt, Muenster group.39 In particular, the role of intermediate-dose or high-dose methotrexate has been investigated among the different clinical risk groups.

Future protocols for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma will include monoclonal antibodies (eg, anti-CD20 rituximab) for children with high-risk disease (ie, patients with CNS disease at diagnosis or those with advanced-stage disease and elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase).

Large Cell Lymphoma

B cell–derived LCLs

Patients with B cell-derived LCLs are treated effectively by using the regimens for SNCCL (discussed above).40,41,42 In fact, the recent international protocol allowed clinicians to enroll of subjects with LCL, as well as those with SNCCL. Outcomes are similar between the groups.

An alternative therapy is the APO regimen consisting of doxorubicin (Adriamycin), prednisone, vincristine [Oncovin].43 Methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine were later added. A randomized study of children with LCLs (including B-cell LCLs) showed no advantage when cyclophosphamide was added to this regimen.44 Therefore, this therapy has the advantage of avoiding exposure to an alkylating agent. However, the cumulative dose of doxorubicin is 450 mg/m2.

Anaplastic (T cell–derived) LCLs

The therapy for anaplastic (T-cell) LCLs is somewhat controversial. Good results (event-free survival rates of 65-80%) have been reported with a number of protocols. Some were based on ALL therapy, whereas others were similar or identical to those used to treat B-cell lymphomas.

The BFM group reported what may be the best results with treatment for Ki-1+ anaplastic LCLs.45 The group administered a regimen for B-cell lymphomas that did not include local radiation therapy. Among 62 patients (none with bone marrow disease and 1 with CNS involvement), 4 did not achieve remission, 1 died from infection, and 7 had a relapse. At the time of the report, 50 patients remained in a continuous first episode of complete remission, and 56 were alive. The calculated event-free survival rate at 9 years was 83%.

Table 7. Prephase Therapy for Ki-1+ Anaplastic LCLs in All Patients According to the BFM-90 Protocol

Open table in new window

Table
DrugRoute
PrednisonePO
CyclophosphamideIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
DrugRoute
PrednisonePO
CyclophosphamideIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT

Ara-C = cytarabine; IT = intrathecal; IV = intravenous; PO = oral.

Subsequent therapy is based on the stage, which is determined by using a modified St Jude system. Treatments are listed below, and cycles A, B, AA, BB, and CC are defined in Table 8.

  • Patients with stage I or resected stage II disease receive cycles A-B-A.
  • Patients with unresected stage II or stage III disease receive cycles A-B-A-B-A-B.
  • Patients with stage IV disease or multifocal bone disease receive cycles AA-BB-CC-AA-BB-CC.

Table 8. Subsequent Therapy for Ki-1+ Anaplastic LCLs According to the BFM-90 Protocol

Open table in new window

Table
CycleDrugRoute
AMethotrexate with leucovorin rescue, ifosfamide, etoposide (VP-16), Ara-CIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
BDexamethasonePO
Methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, Ara-C, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
AADexamethasonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, ifosfamide, Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
BBDexamethasonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
CCDexamethasonePO
Vindesine, high-dose Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
CycleDrugRoute
AMethotrexate with leucovorin rescue, ifosfamide, etoposide (VP-16), Ara-CIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
BDexamethasonePO
Methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, Ara-C, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
AADexamethasonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, ifosfamide, Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
BBDexamethasonePO
Vincristine, high-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicinIV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT
CCDexamethasonePO
Vindesine, high-dose Ara-C, etoposide (VP-16)IV
Methotrexate/Ara-C/prednisoloneIT

Ara-C = cytarabine; IT = intrathecal; IV = intravenous; PO = oral.

A recent report of 89 children described the results of virtually identical therapy in which dexamethasone was used instead of prednisone in the prephase. The overall event-free survival rate at 5 years was 76%.

A recent report of 89 children described the results of virtually identical therapy in which dexamethasone was used instead of prednisone in the prephase. The overall event-free survival rate at 5 years was 76%.46

As noted previously, good results have also been observed with the relatively uncomplicated APO regimen.

A recent randomized study of children with LCL (including both B-cell LCL and anaplastic LCL) showed no apparent advantage when intermediate-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine were added to an APO backbone.47

A report from the SFOP described surprising efficacy of monotherapy with vinblastine for relapsing anaplastic LCL, even in patients who previously underwent myeloablative therapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation.48 The role of vinblastine in front-line therapy for anaplastic LCL is being examined in a Children's Oncology Group protocol. Investigators are comparing the standard APO regimen with an experimental therapy that includes vinblastine.

Treatment of Relapsed Disease

As front-line therapies for pediatric non-Hodgkin lymphoma continue to evolve and improve, treatment of relapses is becoming increasingly problematic.

Reinduction regimens use novel chemotherapy combinations, such as ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE). Depending on the presence of certain cell-surface markers, monoclonal antibodies (eg, anti-CD20 rituximab) may be added to the regimen.49,50

In most cases, myeloablative chemotherapy with either autologous stem-cell rescue or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation may offer the best option for curative consolidative therapy.

Surgical Care

Even for patients with bulky non-Hodgkin lymphoma, debulking surgery is not crucial to effective therapy. For example, chemotherapy is effective in relieving partial airway or bowel obstruction (see Media file 3, Media file 4). In rare instances, resection may be required for this purpose.

The chief role for surgery is obtaining tissue for diagnosis. Thus, excision of an easily accessible lymph node (when present) is preferable to a thoracotomy or laparotomy, unless symptoms dictate otherwise. Even moderately aggressive surgery generally is not necessary or helpful.

One exception, and a potential therapeutic dilemma, involves abdominal B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The patient can be assigned to clinical group A (see Table 5 above), if the following conditions are met:

  • An intestinal primary lesion can be resected along with all involved adjacent lymph nodes
  • The marginal lymph nodes are free of disease
  • The patient has no evidence of further dissemination (eg, to CNS or marrow)

In this situation, the prescribed chemotherapy regimen is far less toxic than it otherwise is.

Therefore, a surgeon treating a reasonably small abdominal non-Hodgkin lymphoma is advised to perform lymph node dissection and to try to excise all visible areas of tumor. However, this surgery is performed only if it can be accomplished without causing clinically significant morbidity. Heroic attempts at resection are best avoided because unresected disease can still be cured in most patients. Furthermore, prolonged postoperative recovery may delay the start of chemotherapy and potentially compromise its effectiveness.

Second-look surgery may be helpful for assessing the viability of residual masses. Second-look procedures require highly individualized approaches. As an alternative, uptake of67 Ga suggests viability of residual masses in patients whose tumors are gallium avid.

Consultations

  • Intensive care specialist
    • Patients with childhood non-Hodgkin lymphoma frequently present in a tenuous condition because of airway compromise, metabolic derangements, and/or infection. In the initial stages of therapy, the patient's condition may be unstable or deteriorating. Therefore, the support of a pediatric intensive care unit is highly desirable.
    • If available, a pediatric intensivist should be made aware of the patient in the event that respiratory management or pressor support becomes necessary.
  • Radiation oncologist
    • Consider consultation with a radiation oncologist. In general, radiation therapy has a limited role in the treatment of childhood non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and it is applied almost exclusively in situations deemed to be real or potential emergencies.
    • Mediastinal irradiation may be helpful in patients with impending airway obstruction, especially if the use of general anesthesia is being contemplated for biopsy or central line placement.
    • For patients with lymphoblastic lymphoma, low-dose radiation therapy is often is used to treat neurologic involvement (eg, cranial nerve palsies, intracerebral extension of tumor, paraplegia).
    • Irradiation has minimal efficacy in patients with SNCCL, presumably because of the rapid growth of these cells. Although a dose of radiation may result in significant cell kill, rapid regrowth of surviving cells between doses largely negates the benefit. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy (ie, >1 dose per day) offers a theoretic advantage, as does low-dose continuous irradiation; however, the unfeasibility of the latter all but precludes its use.51
    • Finally, consider radiotherapy in any patient with documented residual disease after chemotherapy and in patients with bulky disease at the time of relapse.
  • Nephrologist: Notify a nephrologist if the patient has substantial tumor lysis syndrome and if dialysis is under consideration.

Medication

As discussed Medical Care, the agents described below are used in combination regimens, and doses are tailored to the histologic subtype of lymphoma and stage of disease present.

Corticosteroids

Corticosteroids elicit anti-inflammatory properties and cause profound and varied metabolic effects. They modify the body's immune response to diverse stimuli.


Methylprednisolone (Medrol)

Mechanism of cytotoxicity unknown but apparently mediated by glucocorticoid receptors.

Adult

Pediatric

5-25 mg/m2/d PO/IV
4-10 mg IT

Phenobarbital, phenytoin, ephedrine, and rifampin may enhance clearance of corticosteroids; coadministration with potassium-depleting diuretics increases risk of hypokalemia; may alter response to warfarin (Coumadin) anticoagulants (usually inhibitory, but unsubstantiated reports describe potentiation)

Documented hypersensitivity; avascular necrosis of bone; systemic fungal infection (relative contraindication)

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Immunosuppression; weight gain; hypertension; osteopenia; myositis; striae; cataracts; poor linear growth; gastritis can be reduced with coadministration of antacids or inhibitors of gastric acid secretion


Dexamethasone (Decadron)

Mechanism of cytotoxicity unknown, but apparently mediated by glucocorticoid receptors; apparently enhanced CNS penetration (relative to prednisone).

Adult

Pediatric

8-10 mg/m2/d PO/IV

Phenobarbital, phenytoin, ephedrine, and rifampin may enhance clearance of corticosteroids; coadministration with potassium-depleting diuretics increases risk of hypokalemia; may alter response to warfarin (Coumadin) anticoagulants (usually inhibitory, but unsubstantiated reports describe potentiation)

Avascular necrosis of bone; systemic fungal infection (relative contraindication)

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Immunosuppression; weight gain; hypertension; osteopenia; myositis; striae; cataracts; avascular necrosis of bone; poor linear growth; gastritis can be reduced by coadministration of antacids or inhibitors of gastric acid secretion

Antineoplastic Agents

Cancer chemotherapy is based on an understanding of tumoral cell growth and on how drugs affect this growth. After cells divide, they enter a period of growth (ie, phase G1), followed by DNA synthesis (ie, phase S). The next phase is the premitotic phase (ie, G2), then finally mitotic cell division (ie, phase M).

Cell division rates vary for different tumors. Most common cancers grow slowly compared with normal tissues, and the growth rate may further decrease in large tumors. This difference allows normal cells to recover from chemotherapy more quickly than malignant cells, and is the rationale for current cyclic dosage schedules.

Antineoplastic agents interfere with cell reproduction. Some agents are cell cycle specific, whereas others (eg, alkylating agents, anthracyclines, cisplatin) are not phase specific.

Cellular apoptosis (ie, programmed cell death) is another potential mechanism of many antineoplastic agents.


Daunorubicin (Cerubidine)

Anthracycline. Multiple mechanisms of action involve DNA intercalation, topoisomerase-mediated DNA strand breakage, and oxidative damage due to free radical production.

Increased risk of cardiotoxicity when combined with cardiac irradiation

Documented hypersensitivity; myocardial damage; cumulative anthracycline dose >450 mg/m2 (relative contraindication)

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; diarrhea; alopecia; cardiotoxicity; tissue damage with extravasation


Doxorubicin (Adriamycin)

Anthracycline. Multiple mechanisms of action involve DNA intercalation, topoisomerase-mediated DNA strand breakage, and oxidative damage due to free radical production.

Increased risk of cardiotoxicity when combined with cardiac irradiation; may potentiate toxicity of other chemotherapeutic agents, including cyclophosphamide and mercaptopurine

Documented hypersensitivity; myocardial damage; cumulative anthracycline dose >450 mg/m2 (relative contraindication)

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; diarrhea; alopecia; cardiotoxicity; tissue damage with extravasation


Cytarabine (Cytosine arabinoside, Ara-C, Cytosar-U)

Antimetabolite. Cytotoxic analog of deoxycytidine. Interferes with DNA replication and repair by incorporating into DNA and inhibiting DNA polymerase.

Adult

Pediatric

75-100 mg/m2 IV
16-30 mg IT

Steady-state digoxin levels may decrease if coadministered with beta-acetyldigoxin (not digitoxin)

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; diarrhea; mucositis; alopecia; ocular toxicity; neurotoxicity


6-mercaptopurine (6-MP, Purinethol)

Purine analog. Metabolites incorporated into DNA, inhibiting synthesis.

Coadministration of allopurinol substantially enhances absorption of 6-MP PO; after pretreatment with allopurinol, reduce dose by 75%; food decreases bioavailability

Documented hypersensitivity; severe liver disease and bone marrow depression

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; mucositis; hepatotoxicity; adjust dose in thiopurine methyltransferase deficiency


6-thioguanine (Purinethol)

Purine analog. Metabolites are incorporated into DNA, inhibiting synthesis

Increases busulfan toxicity; empty stomach enhances absorption

Documented hypersensitivity; hepatic venoocclusive disease

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; mucositis; hepatotoxicity (eg, venoocclusive disease, unsteady gait, photosensitivity); adjust dose in thiopurine methyltransferase deficiency


Methotrexate (MTX, Folex PFS)

Cytotoxic folate antagonist. Inhibits dihydrofolate reductase.

Adult

Pediatric

10 mg/m2 to 8 g/m2 PO/IV/IM
8-15 mg IT

NSAIDs may increase or prolong levels; may decrease clearance of theophylline; penicillins may decrease renal excretion; broad-spectrum PO antibiotics may decrease bioavailability; additional folate antagonists (eg, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) may cause additive myelosuppression

Documented hypersensitivity; caution with chronic liver disease; severe pre-existing bone marrow depression

Pregnancy

X - Contraindicated; benefit does not outweigh risk

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; mucositis; leucovorin rescue required with high doses


Vincristine (Oncovin)

Inhibits microtubule formation in mitotic spindle, causing metaphase arrest.

Adult

Pediatric

1.5-2 mg/m2 IV; not to exceed 2 mg/dose

Acute pulmonary reaction may occur with concurrent mitomycin-C

Documented hypersensitivity; severe constipation and/or peripheral neuropathy (relative contraindications)

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Peripheral neuropathy; constipation; alopecia; tissue damage with extravasation


Etoposide (VP-16, Toposar)

Inhibits topoisomerase, causing DNA strand breaks.

May prolong effects of warfarin and increase clearance of methotrexate; has additive effects with cyclosporine on cytotoxicity of tumor cells

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; alopecia; mucositis; hypersensitivity reaction


Cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan)

Alkylates and cross-links DNA.

Coadministration of phenobarbital and phenytoin may enhance metabolic activation; inhibits cholinesterase, potentiating effect of succinylcholine

Documented hypersensitivity; severe hemorrhagic cystitis

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; alopecia; hemorrhagic cystitis; impaired fertility


Ifosfamide (Ifex)

Alkylates and cross-links DNA.

Coadministration of phenobarbital and phenytoin may enhance metabolic conversion to active metabolites; phenobarbital, phenytoin, chloral hydrate, and other drugs that interfere with cytochrome P450 activity may alter effects

Documented hypersensitivity; severe hemorrhagic cystitis

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; nausea; alopecia; hemorrhagic cystitis; impaired fertility


Carmustine (BCNU, BiCNU)

Alkylates DNA and RNA; may also act by carbamoylation of enzymes.

Coadministration with cimetidine may increase toxicity; coadministration with etoposide may cause severe hepatic dysfunction (hyperbilirubinemia ascites, thrombocytopenia)

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Delayed myelosuppression; nausea; nephrotoxicity; pulmonary toxicity; impaired fertility


L-asparaginase (Elspar)

Enzyme produced by Escherichia coli, which catalyzes conversion of L-asparagine to aspartic acid; former is nonessential amino acid for most normal tissues. Many lymphoid malignancies have low levels of asparagine synthase and, therefore, depend on circulating pool of L-asparagine.

Adult

Pediatric

6,000-10,000 IU/m2 IM

May inhibit effect of methotrexate on neoplastic cells; vincristine or prednisone may increase toxicity

Documented hypersensitivity; history of pancreatitis

Pregnancy

C - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Pancreatitis; hyperglycemia; coagulopathy; hypersensitivity reaction; occasional myelosuppression


Nelarabine (Arranon)

Prodrug of deoxyguanosine analog 9-beta-D-arabinofuranosylguanine (Ara-G). Converted to active 5'-triphosphate (ara-GTP), a T-cell–selective nucleoside analog. Leukemic blast cells accumulate ara-GTP, allowing for incorporation into DNA; result is inhibition of DNA synthesis and cell death.
Approved by US Food and Drug Administration as orphan drug to treat T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma not responding to or relapsing with at least 2 chemotherapy regimens.

Adult

1500 mg/m2 IV infusion over 2 h on days 1, 3, and 5; repeat q21d

Pediatric

650 mg/m2/d IV infusion over 1 h for 5 consecutive days; repeat q21d

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus.

Precautions

Common adverse effects include hematologic toxicity (eg, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia), hypokalemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyperbilirubinemia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea; severe neurologic events reported and include extreme somnolence, convulsions, demyelination, ascending peripheral neuropathies similar to Guillain-Barré syndrome, and peripheral neuropathy ranging from numbness and paresthesia to motor weakness and paralysis; do not dilute before administration; must take preventive measures for hyperuricemia of tumor lysis syndrome (eg, hydration, urine alkalinization, allopurinol prophylaxis)


Hydroxyurea (Hydrea)

Apparently inhibits DNA synthesis.

Coadministration with fluorouracil can increase neurotoxicity

Documented hypersensitivity; severe anemia and bone marrow depression

Pregnancy

D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus

Precautions

Myelosuppression; megaloblastic anemia; nausea; mucositis; impaired fertility

More on Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Overview: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Treatment & Medication: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Follow-up: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Multimedia: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
References

References

  1. Shad A, Magrath I. Malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in children. In: Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 1997:545-87.

  2. Cancer in children (ages 0-14 and ages 0-19). In: Ries LA, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973-94. NIH publication 97-2789. Bethesda, Md: Cancer Statistics Branch, Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute; 1997:[Full Text].

  3. Liu S, Semenciw R, Mao Y. Increasing incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Canada, 1970-1996: age-period-cohort analysis. Hematol Oncol. 2003;21(2):57-66. [Medline].

  4. Kadin ME, Sako D, Berliner N, Franklin W, Woda B, Borowitz M. Childhood Ki-1 lymphoma presenting with skin lesions and peripheral lymphadenopathy. Blood. Nov 1986;68(5):1042-9. [Medline][Full Text].

  5. Kumar S, Pittaluga S, Raffeld M, Guerrera M, Seibel NL, Jaffe ES. Primary cutaneous CD30-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma in childhood: report of 4 cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Dev Pathol. Jan-Feb 2005;8(1):52-60. [Medline].

  6. Al-Tonbary Y, Abdel-Razek N, Zaghloul H, Metwaly S, El-Deek B, El-Shawaf R. HLA class II polymorphism in Egyptian children with lymphomas. Hematology. Apr 2004;9(2):139-45. [Medline].

  7. Vadivelu MK, Damodaran S, Solomon J, Rajaseharan A. Distribution of ABO blood groups in acute leukaemias and lymphomas. Ann Hematol. Sep 2004;83(9):584-7. [Medline].

  8. Quintana PJ, Delfino RJ, Korrick S, Ziogas A, Kutz FW, Jones EL. Adipose tissue levels of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Environ Health Perspect. Jun 2004;112(8):854-61. [Medline][Full Text].

  9. Zahm SH, Ward MH. Pesticides and childhood cancer. Environ Health Perspect. Jun 1998;106 Suppl 3:893-908. [Medline][Full Text].

  10. Pearce MS, Cotterill SJ, Parker L. Fathers' occupational contacts and risk of childhood leukemia and non-hodgkin lymphoma. Epidemiology. May 2004;15(3):352-6. [Medline].

  11. Hughes AM, Armstrong BK, Vajdic CM, Turner J, Grulich AE, Fritschi L. Sun exposure may protect against non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a case-control study. Int J Cancer. Dec 10 2004;112(5):865-71. [Medline].

  12. Prosper F, Robledo C, Cuesta B, Rifon J, Borbolla JR, Pardo J. Incidence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease. Leuk Lymphoma. Feb 1994;12(5-6):457-62. [Medline].

  13. Dietrich PY, Henry-Amar M, Cosset JM, Bodis S, Bosq J, Hayat M. Second primary cancers in patients continuously disease-free from Hodgkin's disease: a protective role for the spleen?. Blood. Aug 15 1994;84(4):1209-15. [Medline][Full Text].

  14. Eguiguren JM, Ribeiro RC, Pui CH, Hancock ML, Pratt CB, Head DR. Secondary non-Hodgkin's lymphoma after treatment for childhood cancer. Leukemia. Oct 1991;5(10):908-11. [Medline].

  15. Imai S, Sugiura M, Mizuno F, Ohigashi H, Koshimizu K, Chiba S. African Burkitt's lymphoma: a plant, Euphorbia tirucalli, reduces Epstein-Barr virus-specific cellular immunity. Anticancer Res. May-Jun 1994;14(3A):933-6. [Medline].

  16. van den Bosch CA. Is endemic Burkitt's lymphoma an alliance between three infections and a tumour promoter?. Lancet Oncol. Dec 2004;5(12):738-46. [Medline].

  17. Goldsby RE, Carroll WL. The molecular biology of pediatric lymphomas. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Jul-Aug 1998;20(4):282-96. [Medline].

  18. Lones MA, Sanger WG, Le Beau MM, Heerema NA, Sposto R, Perkins SL. Chromosome abnormalities may correlate with prognosis in Burkitt/Burkitt-like lymphomas of children and adolescents: a report from Children's Cancer Group Study CCG-E08. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Mar 2004;26(3):169-78. [Medline].

  19. Garcia JL, Hernandez JM, Gutierrez NC, Flores T, Gonzalez D, Calasanz MJ. Abnormalities on 1q and 7q are associated with poor outcome in sporadic Burkitt's lymphoma. A cytogenetic and comparative genomic hybridization study. Leukemia. Oct 2003;17(10):2016-24. [Medline].

  20. Cayuela JM, Gardie B, Sigaux F. Disruption of the multiple tumor suppressor gene MTS1/p16(INK4a)/CDKN2 by illegitimate V(D)J recombinase activity in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Blood. Nov 1 1997;90(9):3720-6. [Medline][Full Text].

  21. Poirel HA, Cairo MS, Heerema NA, et al. Specific cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with a significantly inferior outcome in children and adolescents with mature B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of the FAB/LMB 96 international study. Leukemia. 2008;[Medline].

  22. Liang X, Meech SJ, Odom LF, Bitter MA, Ryder JW, Hunger SP. Assessment of t(2;5)(p23;q35) translocation and variants in pediatric ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol. Apr 2004;121(4):496-506. [Medline].

  23. Sandlund JT, Pui CH, Roberts WM, Santana VM, Morris SW, Berard CW. Clinicopathologic features and treatment outcome of children with large-cell lymphoma and the t(2;5)(p23;q35). Blood. Oct 15 1994;84(8):2467-71. [Medline][Full Text].

  24. Depas G, De Barsy C, Jerusalem G, Hoyoux C, Dresse MF, Fassotte MF. 18F-FDG PET in children with lymphomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. Jan 2005;32(1):31-8. [Medline].

  25. Schoder H, Noy A, Gonen M, Weng L, Green D, Erdi YE. Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2005;23(21):4643-51. [Medline].

  26. Mussolin L, Basso K, Pillon M, D'Amore ES, Lombardi A, Luzzatto L. Prospective analysis of minimal bone marrow infiltration in pediatric Burkitt's lymphomas by long-distance polymerase chain reaction for t(8;14)(q24;q32). Leukemia. Mar 2003;17(3):585-9. [Medline].

  27. Sabesan V, Cairo MS, Lones MA, Perkins SL, Morris E, Sposto R. Assessment of minimal residual disease in childhood non-hodgkin lymphoma by polymerase chain reaction using patient-specific primers. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Feb 2003;25(2):109-13. [Medline].

  28. Hutchison RE, Finch C, Kepner J, Fuller C, Bowman P, Link M. Burkitt lymphoma is immunophenotypically different from Burkitt-like lymphoma in young persons. Ann Oncol. 2000;11 Suppl 1:35-8. [Medline].

  29. Bovio IM, Allan RW. The expression of myeloid antigens CD13 and/or CD33 is a marker of ALK+ anaplastic large cell lymphomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;130(4):628-34. [Medline].

  30. Murphy SB. Classification, staging and end results of treatment of childhood non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: dissimilarities from lymphomas in adults. Semin Oncol. Sep 1980;7(3):332-9. [Medline].

  31. Hochberg J, Cairo MS. Rasburicase: future directions in tumor lysis management. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008;8(10):1595-604. [Medline].

  32. Mora J, Filippa DA, Qin J, Wollner N. Lymphoblastic lymphoma of childhood and the LSA2-L2 protocol: the 30-year experience at Memorial-Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cancer. Sep 15 2003;98(6):1283-91. [Medline].

  33. Tubergen DG, Krailo MD, Meadows AT, Rosenstock J, Kadin M, Morse M. Comparison of treatment regimens for pediatric lymphoblastic non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a Childrens Cancer Group study. J Clin Oncol. Jun 1995;13(6):1368-76. [Medline].

  34. Reiter A, Schrappe M, Parwaresch R, Henze G, Muller-Weihrich S, Sauter S. Non-Hodgkin's lymphomas of childhood and adolescence: results of a treatment stratified for biologic subtypes and stage--a report of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster Group. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1995;13(2):359-72. [Medline].

  35. Abromowitch M, Sposto R, Perkins S, et al. Shortened intensified multi-agent chemotherapy and non-cross resistant maintenance therapy for advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma in children and adolescents: report from the Children's Oncology Group. Br J Haematol. 2008;143(2):261-7. [Medline].

  36. Gerrard M, Cairo MS, Weston C, Auperin A, Pinkerton R, Lambilliote A, et al. Excellent survival following two courses of COPAD chemotherapy in children and adolescents with resected localized B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of the FAB/LMB 96 international study. Br J Haematol. 2008;141(6):840-7. [Medline].

  37. Patte C, Auperin A, Gerrard M, et al. Results of the randomized international FAB/LMB96 trial for intermediate risk B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents: it is possible to reduce treatment for the early responding patients. Blood. 2007;109(7):2773-80. [Medline].

  38. Cairo MS, Gerrard M, Sposto R, et al. Results of a randomized international study of high-risk central nervous system B non-Hodgkin lymphoma and B acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents. Blood. 2007;109(7):2736-43. [Medline].

  39. Woessmann W, Seidemann K, Mann G, Zimmermann M, Burkhardt B, Oschlies I. The impact of the methotrexate administration schedule and dose in the treatment of children and adolescents with B-cell neoplasms: a report of the BFM Group Study NHL-BFM95. Blood. Feb 1 2005;105(3):948-58. [Medline].

  40. Lones MA, Perkins SL, Sposto R, Kadin ME, Kjeldsberg CR, Wilson JF. Large-cell lymphoma arising in the mediastinum in children and adolescents is associated with an excellent outcome: a Children's Cancer Group report. J Clin Oncol. Nov 15 2000;18(22):3845-53. [Medline].

  41. Raetz E, Perkins S, Davenport V, Cairo MS. B large-cell lymphoma in children and adolescents. Cancer Treat Rev. Apr 2003;29(2):91-8. [Medline].

  42. Seidemann K, Tiemann M, Lauterbach I, Mann G, Simonitsch I, Stankewitz K. Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma with sclerosis in pediatric and adolescent patients: treatment and results from three therapeutic studies of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Group. J Clin Oncol. May 1 2003;21(9):1782-9. [Medline].

  43. Weinstein HJ, Lack EE, Cassady JR. APO therapy for malignant lymphoma of large cell "histiocytic" type of childhood: analysis of treatment results for 29 patients. Blood. Aug 1984;64(2):422-6. [Medline].

  44. Laver JH, Mahmoud H, Pick TE, Hutchinson RE, Weinstein HJ, Schwenn M. Results of a randomized phase III trial in children and adolescents with advanced stage diffuse large cell non Hodgkin's lymphoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. Leuk Lymphoma. Jul 2001;42(3):399-405. [Medline].

  45. Reiter A, Schrappe M, Tiemann M, Parwaresch R, Zimmermann M, Yakisan E. Successful treatment strategy for Ki-1 anaplastic large-cell lymphoma of childhood: a prospective analysis of 62 patients enrolled in three consecutive Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster group studies. J Clin Oncol. May 1994;12(5):899-908. [Medline].

  46. Seidemann K, Tiemann M, Schrappe M, Yakisan E, Simonitsch I, Janka-Schaub G. Short-pulse B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma-type chemotherapy is efficacious treatment for pediatric anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a report of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Group Trial NHL-BFM 90. Blood. Jun 15 2001;97(12):3699-706. [Medline][Full Text].

  47. Laver JH, Kraveka JM, Hutchison RE, Chang M, Kepner J, Schwenn M. Advanced-stage large-cell lymphoma in children and adolescents: results of a randomized trial incorporating intermediate-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine in the maintenance phase of the APO regimen: a Pediatric Oncology Group phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. Jan 20 2005;23(3):541-7. [Medline].

  48. Brugières L, Quartier P, Le Deley MC, Pacquement H, Perel Y, Bergeron C. Relapses of childhood anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: treatment results in a series of 41 children--a report from the French Society of Pediatric Oncology. Ann Oncol. Jan 2000;11(1):53-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  49. Jetsrisuparb A, Wiangnon S, Komvilaisak P, Kularbkaew C, Yutanawiboonchai W, Mairieng E. Rituximab combined with CHOP for successful treatment of aggressive recurrent, pediatric B-cell large cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Apr 2005;27(4):223-6. [Medline].

  50. Kewalramani T, Zelenetz AD, Nimer SD, Portlock C, Straus D, Noy A. Rituximab and ICE as second-line therapy before autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed or primary refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. May 15 2004;103(10):3684-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  51. Pilecki B, Kopiec P, Zajusz A, Podworski H, Szelc S, Skladowski K. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy for Burkitt-type lymphoma. Radiobiological aspects. Neoplasma. 1991;38(6):609-15. [Medline].

  52. Muller HL, Klinkhammer-Schalke M, Kuhl J. Final height and weight of long-term survivors of childhood malignancies. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 1998;106(2):135-9. [Medline].

  53. Lahteenmaki PM, Sankila R, Pukkala E, Kyyronen P, Harila-Saari A. Scholastic achievement of children with lymphoma or Wilms tumor at the end of comprehensive education--a nationwide, register-based study. Int J Cancer. 2008;123 (10):2401-5. [Medline].

  54. Haddy TB, Adde MA, McCalla J, Domanski MJ, Datiles M 3rd, Meehan SC. Late effects in long-term survivors of high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J Clin Oncol. Jun 1998;16(6):2070-9. [Medline].

  55. Hawkins MM, Wilson LM, Stovall MA, Marsden HB, Potok MH, Kingston JE. Epipodophyllotoxins, alkylating agents, and radiation and risk of secondary leukaemia after childhood cancer. BMJ. Apr 11 1992;304(6832):951-8. [Medline][Full Text].

  56. Nysom K, Holm K, Lipsitz SR, Mone SM, Colan SD, Orav EJ. Relationship between cumulative anthracycline dose and late cardiotoxicity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1998;16(2):545-50. [Medline].

  57. Gilsanz V, Carlson ME, Roe TF, Ortega JA. Osteoporosis after cranial irradiation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr. Aug 1990;117(2 Pt 1):238-44. [Medline].

  58. Pulte D, Gondos A, Brenner H. Trends in 5- and 10-year survival after diagnosis with childhood hematologic malignancies in the United States, 1990-2004. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(18):1301-9. [Medline].

  59. Suzuki R, Kagami Y, Takeuchi K, et al. Prognostic significance of CD56 expression for ALK-positive and ALK-negative anaplastic large-cell lymphoma of T/null cell phenotype. Blood. 2000;96(9):2993-3000. [Medline].

  60. Kube D, Hua TD, von Bonin F, et al. Effect of interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms on clinical outcome of patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an exploratory study. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14 (12):3777-84. [Medline].

  61. Lee JJ, Kim DH, Lee NY, et al. Interleukin-10 gene polymorphism influences the prognosis of T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Br J Haematol. 2007;137 (4):329-36. [Medline].

  62. Attarbaschi A, Dworzak M, Steiner M, Urban C, Fink FM, Reiter A. Outcome of children with primary resistant or relapsed non-Hodgkin lymphoma and mature B-cell leukemia after intensive first-line treatment: a population-based analysis of the Austrian Cooperative Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jan 2005;44(1):70-6. [Medline].

  63. Smith SM, van Besien K, Carreras J, et al. Second autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed lymphoma after a prior autologous transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(8):904-12. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

non-Hodgkin lymphoma, NHL, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, lymphoblastic lymphoma, LL, T-lymphoblastic lymphoma, T-LL, BL, Burkitt lymphoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, non-Burkitt lymphoma, non-Burkitt's lymphoma, non Burkitt lymphoma, Burkitt-like lymphoma, BLL, malignant small noncleaved lymphoma, small noncleaved cell lymphoma, SNCCL, SNCC lymphoma, undifferentiated lymphoma, large cell lymphomas, large-cell lymphomas, LCLs, B-cell LCLs, B-cell lymphoma, B-cell large cell lymphomas, BLCLs

ALCLs, anaplastic LCLs, anaplastic large cell lymphomas, Ki-1+ lymphoma, Ki 1+ lymphoma, malignant anaplastic lymphoma, histiocytic lymphoma, immunoblastic lymphoma, myeloid lymphoma, lymphosarcoma, reticulum cell sarcoma, acute lymphoblastic lymphoma, ALL, common ALL antigen, CALLA, diffuse large cell lymphoma

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

J Martin Johnston, MD, Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Mercer University School of Medicine; Director of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Backus Children's Hospital; Consulting Oncologist/Hematologist, St Damien's Pediatric Hospital
J Martin Johnston, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Kathleen M Sakamoto, MD, PhD, Professor and Chief, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Vice-Chair of Research, Mattel Children's Hospital at UCLA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA and California Nanosystems Institute and Molecular Biology, UCLA
Kathleen M Sakamoto, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, New York Academy of Sciences, Society for Pediatric Research, and Western Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Pfizer Inc Stock Investment from broker recommendation; Avanir Pharma Stock Investment from broker recommendation

Managing Editor

Timothy P Cripe, MD, PhD, Professor of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati; Director, Translational Research Trials Office, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Timothy P Cripe, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Pediatric Society, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Samuel Gross, MD, Professor Emeritus, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, UNC, Adjunct Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University
Samuel Gross, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Max J Coppes, MD, PhD, MBA, Executive Director, Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Medical Center; Professor of Medicine, Oncology, and Pediatrics, Georgetown University
Max J Coppes, MD, PhD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.