Pediatric Rhabdomyosarcoma Treatment & Management

  • Author: Timothy P Cripe, MD, PhD; Chief Editor: Max J Coppes, MD, PhD, MBA   more...
 
Updated: Jun 1, 2011
 

Medical Care

Treatment in patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) involves a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Because the treatment plan is complicated and prolonged and because many medical issues are unique to pediatric oncology, all patients should be referred (at least initially) to a center with personnel who are skilled in caring for children with cancer.

At present, patients are categorized according to their risk, which takes into account the location of the tumor and the histologic and surgical results. Low-risk patients are those who have the best prognosis, whereas intermediate-risk or high-risk patients have an increased risk of having relapses and incurable disease. To separate the features into meaningful categories, patients are assigned to both a surgicopathologic clinical group (Roman numeral) and a stage (Arabic numeral). All patients with metastatic disease (group IV, stage 4) are considered high risk, except children and adolescents younger than 14 years with embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS). In some studies, these patients appear to do better than others, for unknown reasons. Although all patients require chemotherapy, regimens vary depending on the stage and group.

  • Surgicopathologic (clinical) group (Groups I-III are for localized disease).
    • Group I - Tumor completely removed
    • Group II - Microscopic residual tumor, involved regional nodes, or both
    • Group III - Gross residual tumor
    • Group IV - Distant metastatic disease
  • Tumor, nodes, and metastases (TNM) staging system
    • Tumor - Confined to the site of origin (T1) or extends beyond the site of origin (T2)
    • Node - No regional node involvement (N0), regional node involvement (N1), or nodes unknown (NX)
    • Metastasis - No metastasis (M0), or metastases present at diagnosis (M1)
  • RMS staging system
    • Stage 1 - Orbit, head, and/or neck (not parameningeal) involvement, and involvement of the GU tract (not bladder or prostate)
    • Stage 2 - Other locations, N0 or NX
    • Stage 3 - Other locations, N1 if the tumor is less than 5 cm or N0 or NX if the tumor more than 5 cm
    • Stage 4 - Any site with distant metastases
  • Low-risk patients are those with the following embryonal histology:
    • Stages 1-3 in groups I-II (or III for only orbital involvement)
    • Stage 1 in group III
  • Intermediate-risk patients are those with the following embryonal histology:
    • Stages 2-3 in clinical group III (nonorbital involvement)
    • Stage 4 in clinical group IV if patient is 1 - 14 years
Next

Surgical Care

Surgical management of rhabdomyosarcoma varies depending on the location of the tumor. If feasible, remove tumors promptly and without unacceptable disfigurement or loss of function. Even if metastatic disease is present, surgical excision of the primary site should be performed, if possible. The surgical result helps determine the clinical grouping to be used for treatment stratification.

Surgical guidelines for the various sites can be found in the protocols of the Children's Oncology Group Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee (formerly, Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group [IRSG]) and are beyond the scope of this article. However, common principles are noteworthy and described below.

  • Primary tumor
    • Because relapses often occur at the site of the original primary tumor, adequate local control is essential.
    • Data from Europe suggest that chemotherapy alone can be effective for achieving adequate local control in some patients who have a complete response of the primary tumor. However, surgery and/or irradiation are needed for local control of residual disease.
    • If possible, complete excision of the lesion should be performed with a wide (2-cm) margin of healthy tissue. Wide margins of normal tissue often are impossible to achieve at certain sites, such as the head and neck. If margins are narrow, obtain several biopsy specimens from the surrounding tissue to assess for residual local disease.
    • For tumors that cannot be excised at diagnosis, a second-look procedure may be appropriate after a period of chemotherapy (usually 12 wk).
  • Lymph nodes
    • Regional lymph nodes that appear to be clinically or radiographically involved should be sampled to determine the clinical group and the need for later radiation therapy.
    • Radical node dissection is not appropriate.
    • Axillary and femoral node sampling should be performed for lesions in the extremities, even if clinical findings are negative because of the high prevalence of metastatic disease arising from extremity lesions.
    • The use of sentinel node biopsy instead of lymph node sampling is being explored.[14]
Previous
Next

Consultations

The care of patients with rhabdomyosarcoma is complicated and extensive and touches all aspects of their lives. Initial evaluation and treatment should be undertaken at a center with a comprehensive program for children with cancer.

  • Radiotherapist
    • Most patients with rhabdomyosarcoma require radiotherapy to achieve adequate local control, though radiotherapy is not usually performed until after initial surgical resection and the start of chemotherapy. Exceptions are patients with parameningeal primary tumors, for which initial radiotherapy has been shown to be beneficial.
    • A radiotherapist familiar with the requirements for clinical trials should be consulted at diagnosis for most patients in North America to determine if they have any special needs for treatment planning.
    • In initial studies, new techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and proton-beam radiotherapy appear to achieve adequate tumor control with reduced exposure to normal tissues.[15, 16]
    • There is a high risk of local recurrence in patients with group II disease (microscopic residual disease) if prescribed radiotherapy is omitted or reduced, as demonstrated by Million et al.[17] They noted that more than half the patients who relapsed at the original tumor site received nonstandard radiation therapy, and, of these, three quarters died of their disease.
  • Psychosocial team: The psychosocial team is critical for helping patients and families cope with the stresses associated with the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The social worker usually plays an intimate role in helping families navigate complicated insurance and financial issues.
  • Dentist: A thorough dental evaluation is required to identify potential problems that may arise during chemotherapy.
  • Pediatric therapists: Activities and therapy can be critical in helping the patient through the phases of medical therapy.
Previous
Next

Diet

No specific dietary recommendations are needed. However, patients may require nasogastric feedings or parenteral nutrition during some phases of chemotherapy. This is especially true for patients with primary tumors in head and neck, who may have severe mucositis after radiation therapy.

Previous
Next

Activity

No specific activity limitations are required. The patient's activity is restricted only as the location of the tumor and the adverse effects of treatment dictate.

Previous
Proceed to Medication
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Timothy P Cripe, MD, PhD  Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Clinical Director, Musculoskeletal Tumor Program, Co-Medical Director, Office for Clinical and Translational Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Director of Pilot and Collaborative Clinical and Translational Studies Core, Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

Timothy P Cripe, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Pediatric Society, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Society for Pediatric Research

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Samuel Gross, MD  Professor Emeritus, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida; Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina; Adjunct Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University

Samuel Gross, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and Society for Pediatric Research

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mary L Windle, PharmD  Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Steven K Bergstrom, MD  Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center of Oakland

Steven K Bergstrom, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Children's Oncology Group, and International Society for Experimental Hematology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Paul D Petry, DO, FACOP, FAAP  Consulting Staff, Freeman Pediatric Care, Freeman Health System

Paul D Petry, DO, FACOP, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Osteopathy, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians, and American Osteopathic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Max J Coppes, MD, PhD, MBA  Senior Vice President, Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Children's National Medical Center; Professor of Medicine, Oncology, and Pediatrics, Georgetown University School of Medicine; Clinical Professor of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences

Max J Coppes, MD, PhD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Society for Pediatric Research

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Arndt CA, Crist WM. Common musculoskeletal tumors of childhood and adolescence. N Engl J Med. Jul 29 1999;341(5):342-52. [Medline].

  2. Stout AP. Rhabdomyosarcoma of the skeletal muscles. Ann Surg. 1946;123:447-72.

  3. Pappo AS, Shapiro DN, Crist WM, Maurer HM. Biology and therapy of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. J Clin Oncol. Aug 1995;13(8):2123-39. [Medline].

  4. Barr FG. Molecular genetics and pathogenesis of rhabdomyosarcoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. Nov-Dec 1997;19(6):483-91. [Medline].

  5. Sumegi J, Streblow R, Frayer RW, et al. Recurrent t(2;2) and t(2;8) translocations in rhabdomyosarcoma without the canonical PAX-FOXO1 fuse PAX3 to members of the nuclear receptor transcriptional coactivator family. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. Mar 2010;49(3):224-36. [Medline].

  6. Merlino G, Helman LJ. Rhabdomyosarcoma--working out the pathways. Oncogene. Sep 20 1999;18(38):5340-8. [Medline].

  7. Punyko JA, Mertens AC, Baker KS, et al. Long-term survival probabilities for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma. A population-based evaluation. Cancer. Apr 1 2005;103(7):1475-83. [Medline].

  8. Oberlin O, Rey A, Lyden E, et al. Prognostic factors in metastatic rhabdomyosarcomas: results of a pooled analysis from United States and European cooperative groups. J Clin Oncol. May 10 2008;26(14):2384-9. [Medline].

  9. Bisogno G, Ferrari A, Prete A, et al. Sequential high-dose chemotherapy for children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Eur J Cancer. Nov 2009;45(17):3035-41. [Medline].

  10. Mazzoleni S, Bisogno G, Garaventa A, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors after recurrence in children and adolescents with nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer. Jul 1 2005;104(1):183-90. [Medline].

  11. Gripp KW. Tumor predisposition in Costello syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. Aug 15 2005;137C(1):72-7. [Medline].

  12. Grufferman S, Ruymann F, Ognjanovic S, Erhardt EB, Maurer HM. Prenatal X-ray exposure and rhabdomyosarcoma in children: a report from the children's oncology group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. Apr 2009;18(4):1271-6. [Medline].

  13. Qualman SJ, Coffin CM, Newton WA, et al. Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study: update for pathologists. Pediatr Dev Pathol. Nov-Dec 1998;1(6):550-61. [Medline].

  14. De Corti F, Dall'Igna P, Bisogno G, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas of extremities. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jan 2009;52(1):51-4. [Medline].

  15. Wolden SL, Wexler LH, Kraus DH, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck rhabdomyosarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Apr 1 2005;61(5):1432-8. [Medline].

  16. Yock T, Schneider R, Friedmann A, et al. Proton radiotherapy for orbital rhabdomyosarcoma: clinical outcome and a dosimetric comparison with photons. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Nov 15 2005;63(4):1161-8. [Medline].

  17. Million L, Anderson J, Breneman J, et al. Influence of Noncompliance With Radiation Therapy Protocol Guidelines and Operative Bed Recurrences for Children With Rhabdomyosarcoma and Microscopic Residual Disease: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jun 1 2011;80(2):333-8. [Medline].

  18. Currier MA, Adams LC, Mahller YY, et al. Widespread intratumoral virus distribution with fractionated injection enables local control of large human rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts by oncolytic herpes simplex viruses. Cancer Gene Ther. Apr 2005;12(4):407-16. [Medline].

  19. Modak S, Guo HF, Humm JL, et al. Radioimmunotargeting of human rhabdomyosarcoma using monoclonal antibody 8H9. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. Oct 2005;20(5):534-46. [Medline].

  20. Bersani F, Taulli R, Accornero P, et al. Bortezomib-mediated proteasome inhibition as a potential strategy for the treatment of rhabdomyosarcoma. Eur J Cancer. Apr 2008;44(6):876-84. [Medline].

  21. Cao L, Yu Y, Darko I, et al. Addiction to elevated insulin-like growth factor i receptor and initial modulation of the AKT pathway define the responsiveness of rhabdomyosarcoma to the targeting antibody. Cancer Res. Oct 1 2008;68(19):8039-48. [Medline].

  22. Klingebiel T, Boos J, Beske F, et al. Treatment of children with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma with oral maintenance compared to high dose chemotherapy: report of the HD CWS-96 trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Apr 2008;50(4):739-45. [Medline].

  23. Pappo AS, Lyden E, Breitfeld P, et al. Two consecutive phase II window trials of irinotecan alone or in combination with vincristine for the treatment of metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1 2007;25(4):362-9. [Medline].

  24. Punyko JA, Mertens AC, Gurney JG, et al. Long-term medical effects of childhood and adolescent rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jun 15 2005;44(7):643-53. [Medline].

  25. Pappo AS, Shapiro DN, Crist WM. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Biology and treatment. Pediatr Clin North Am. Aug 1997;44(4):953-72. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Axial CT scan of rhabdomyosarcoma in the left middle ear. Image provided by Suresh Muhkerji, MD, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Hospitals.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.