Close
New

Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions – Choose your Edition here.

 

Pediatric Seminoma Workup

  • Author: Arnold C Paulino, MD; Chief Editor: Robert J Arceci, MD, PhD  more...
 
Updated: Apr 16, 2012
 

Laboratory Studies

Measurements of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are important in the management of patients with testicular tumors such as seminomas. In fact, these tests are incorporated in the current staging system for testicular tumors (see Staging).[8]

Both AFP and beta-hCG are suggestive of malignancy when elevated before orchiectomy. The rate of decline after orchiectomy indicates the likelihood of residual tumor. Tumor marker levels are used to assess response to treatment and to predict the likelihood of complete remission. In regular follow-up, tumor marker levels indicate recurrence, often in the absence of symptoms, physical findings, or abnormal findings on imaging studies.

  • Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin
    • Beta-hCG is a glycoprotein typically produced by the placenta.
    • Elevations in beta-hCG levels are found in the serum of approximately 15% of patients with seminoma.
    • The half-life of beta-hCG is approximately 22 hours.
  • Alpha-fetoprotein
    • AFP is a glycoprotein typically associated with the human fetus and is the fetal equivalent of albumin. AFP is found in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors, as well as in hepatocellular carcinomas, cirrhosis, hepatitis, and pregnancy.
    • The half-life of AFP is approximately 5 days.
    • Elevated AFP levels are rare in pure seminomas and indicate that nonseminomatous elements are also present (ie, mixed tumor).[9]
  • Lactate dehydrogenase: The LDH level is an independent prognostic factor in patients with germ cell tumors (including seminoma). It is thought to reflect tumor burden.
Next

Imaging Studies

See the list below:

  • Plain chest radiography, CT scanning of the abdomen and pelvis, and bipedal lymphangiography (LAG) are the most important radiologic investigations in determining the extent of disease in patients with seminoma.[10]
    • Chest radiography is adequate screening to rule out pulmonary parenchymal metastases.
    • CT scanning of the abdomen is the best technique for identifying the presence and extent of retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy and is necessary in all patients; it has largely replaced bipedal LAG in the radiographic staging of patients with seminoma. Retroperitoneal lymph nodes measuring 1-2 cm are confirmed to be pathologically involved with metastatic tumor in approximately 70% of cases.
    • Although radiologists skilled in the technique are increasingly difficult to find, bipedal LAG is uniquely able to define abnormal lymph nodes by both size and internal architecture, unlike CT scanning. In addition, LAG is useful to the radiation oncologist, who is able to minimize irradiation of normal tissues when such a study is available to facilitate portal design. Currently, this test is not widely used because of the difficulty in finding radiologists who are experts in this technique.
    • Further radiologic investigation is obtained only if the patient has symptoms suggesting further metastatic disease (eg, bone imaging in the setting of skeletal pain, brain CT scanning when neurologic signs are elicited).
  • The typical testicular tumor is intratesticular and may produce one or more discrete hypoechoic masses or diffuse abnormalities with microcalcifications that can be detected using scrotal ultrasonography. Calcifications are more frequent in seminoma than in nonseminomatous tumors.
Previous
Next

Histologic Findings

Grossly, seminomas are pale gray–to-yellow nodules that are uniform or slightly lobulated. Pure seminomas are subdivided into 3 subtypes based on histopathologic characteristics.

  • Classic seminomas (85%) demonstrate a monotonous sheet of large cells with abundant cytoplasm and round hyperchromatic nuclei with prominent nucleoli. A lymphocytic infiltrate or granulomatous reaction with giant cells or both is frequently present. Trophoblastic giant cells capable of producing hCG are present in 15-20% of tumors. Mitoses are infrequent.
  • Anaplastic seminoma (10%) is an older term used to describe seminomas with 3 or more mitotic figures per high-power field. This finding has no clinical or prognostic significance because the response of anaplastic seminomas to standard therapy is equivalent to that of classic seminomas.
  • Spermatocytic seminoma (5%) is a rare histologic variant that is not associated with carcinoma in situ. These well-differentiated tumors usually contain cells resembling secondary spermatids or spermatocytes. Spermatocytic seminomas rarely metastasize, and they occur almost exclusively in elderly men.[2] The only recommended treatment is orchiectomy.
Previous
Next

Staging

Testicular seminoma is staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 2010 staging guidelines.[11] This is a TNM staging system comprising separate categorizations for the primary tumor, regional lymph nodes, distant metastases, and serum tumor markers; these 4 categories are used to determine the stage of the patient's disease. Modern treatment decisions are based, in part, on the subdivisions of this staging system. Formal staging is a complex process involving particular required and allowable tests and procedures; the following is a quick overview. (For full staging information, see the AJCC Staging Manual.)

  • Primary tumor staging
    • Tis - Intratubular germ cell neoplasia (carcinoma in situ)
    • T1 - Tumor limited to testis/epididymis without vascular or lymphatic invasion; tumor may invade into the tunica albuginea but not the tunica vaginalis
    • T2 - Tumor limited to testis/epididymis with vascular or lymphatic invasion or tumor extending through tunica albuginea with involvement of the tunica vaginalis
    • T3 - Tumor invading spermatic cord with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion
    • T4 - Tumor invading scrotum with or without vascular/lymphatic invasion
  • Regional lymph node staging
    • N0 - No regional lymph node metastases
    • N1 - Metastasis with lymph node(s) 2 cm or less in greatest dimension or multiple lymph nodes, none more than 2 cm in greatest dimension
    • N2 - Metastasis with lymph node(s) larger than 2 cm but not larger than 5 cm in greatest dimension, or multiple lymph nodes, any 1 mass larger than 2 cm, but not more than 5 cm, in greatest dimension
    • N3 - Metastasis with lymph node(s) larger than 5 cm in greatest dimension
  • Distant metastatic staging
    • M0 - No distant metastases
    • M1a - Nonregional nodal or pulmonary metastasis
    • M1b - Distant metastases other than M1a
  • Serum tumor marker staging
    • S0 - Marker studies within normal limits
    • S1 - LDH level less than 1.5 times the reference range, beta-hCG level less than 5000 mIU/mL, and AFP level less than 1000 ng/mL
    • S2 - LDH level 1.5-10 times the reference range, beta-hCG level 5,000-50,000 mIU/mL, or AFP level 1,000-10,000 ng/mL
    • S3 - LDH level more than 10 times the reference range, beta-hCG level more than 50,000 mIU/mL, or AFP level more than 10,000 ng/mL
  • Stage grouping
    • Stage IA - T1 N0 M0 S0
    • Stage IB - T2,3,4 N0 M0 S0
    • Stage IS - Any T N0 M0 S1,2,3
    • Stage IIA - Any T N1 M0 S0,1
    • Stage IIB - Any T N2 M0 S0,1
    • Stage IIC - Any T N3 M0 S0,1
    • Stage IIIA - Any T Any N M1a S0,1
    • Stage IIIB - Any T Any N M0,1a S2
    • Stage IIIC - Any T Any N M1a,1b S3
Previous
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Arnold C Paulino, MD Professor of Radiation Oncology, Methodist Hospital and Weill-Cornell Medical College; Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine

Arnold C Paulino, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Radiological Society of North America, Children's Oncology Group, American Society of Clinical Oncology, International Society of Paediatric Oncology, American Medical Association, American Radium Society, American Society for Radiation Oncology

Disclosure: Received royalty from Elsevier, Inc for author of book.

Coauthor(s)

Jodi Muscal, MD Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital

Jodi Muscal, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Mary L Windle, PharmD Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Steven K Bergstrom, MD Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center of Oakland

Steven K Bergstrom, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, Children's Oncology Group, American Society of Clinical Oncology, International Society for Experimental Hematology, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Robert J Arceci, MD, PhD Director, Children’s Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Co-Director of the Ron Matricaria Institute of Molecular Medicine, Phoenix Children’s Hospital; Editor-in-Chief, Pediatric Blood and Cancer; Professor, Department of Child Health, University of Arizona College of Medicine

Robert J Arceci, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Association for Cancer Research, American Pediatric Society, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Additional Contributors

Kathleen M Sakamoto, MD, PhD Shelagh Galligan Professor, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine

Kathleen M Sakamoto, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: International Society for Experimental Hematology, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Society for Pediatric Research

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

References
  1. Fernandes ET, Etcubanas E, Rao BN, Kumar AP, Thompson EI, Jenkins JJ. Two decades of experience with testicular tumors in children at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. J Pediatr Surg. 1989 Jul. 24(7):677-81; discussion 682. [Medline].

  2. Thomas GM, Williams SD. Testis. Perez CA, ed. Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997. 1695-715.

  3. Hussey DH. The testicle. Cox JD, ed. Moss' Radiation Oncology - Rationale, Technique, Results. 7th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book; 1994. 559-86.

  4. Walsh TJ, Davies BJ, Croughan MS, Carroll PR, Turek PJ. Racial differences among boys with testicular germ cell tumors in the United States. J Urol. 2008 May. 179(5):1961-5. [Medline].

  5. Warde PR, Sturgeon JFG, Gospodarowicz MK. Testicular cancer. Gunderson LL, Tepper JE, eds. Clinical Radiation Oncology. 2000. 844-62.

  6. Bosl GJ, Sheinfeld J, Bajorin DF. Cancer of the testis. Devita VT, ed. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997. 1397-425.

  7. Johnson KJ, Poynter JN, Ross JA, et al. Pediatric germ cell tumors and maternal vitamin supplementation: a Childrens Oncology Group Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. October 2009. 18(10):2661-4. [Medline]. [Full Text].

  8. Weissbach L, Bussar-Maatz R, Mann K. The value of tumor markers in testicular seminomas. Results of a prospective multicenter study. Eur Urol. 1997. 32(1):16-22. [Medline].

  9. Nazeer T, Ro JY, Amato RJ, et al. Histologically pure seminoma with elevated alpha-fetoprotein: a clinicopathologic study of ten cases. Oncol Rep. 1998 Nov-Dec. 5(6):1425-9. [Medline].

  10. Foster RS, Nichols CR. Testicular cancer: what's new in staging, prognosis, and therapy. Oncology (Williston Park). 1999 Dec. 13(12):1689-94; discussion 1697-700, 1703. [Medline].

  11. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2010. 471-80.

  12. Capelouto CC, Clark PE, Ransil BJ, Loughlin KR. A review of scrotal violation in testicular cancer: is adjuvant local therapy necessary?. J Urol. 1995 Mar. 153(3 Pt 2):981-5. [Medline].

  13. Gordon W Jr, Siegmund K, Stanisic TH, et al. A study of reproductive function in patients with seminoma treated with radiotherapy and orchidectomy: (SWOG-8711). Southwest Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Apr 1. 38(1):83-94. [Medline].

  14. DeSantis M, Albrecht W, Holtl W, Pont J. Impact of cytotoxic treatment on long-term fertility in patients with germ-cell cancer. Int J Cancer. 1999 Dec 10. 83(6):864-5. [Medline].

  15. Hallak J, Kolettis PN, Sekhon VS, Thomas AJ Jr, Agarwal A. Sperm cryopreservation in patients with testicular cancer. Urology. 1999 Nov. 54(5):894-9. [Medline].

  16. Kliesch S, Bergmann M, Hertle L, et al. Semen parameters and testicular pathology in men with testicular cancer and contralateral carcinoma in situ or bilateral testicular malignancies. Hum Reprod. 1997 Dec. 12(12):2830-5. [Medline].

  17. Zapzalka DM, Redmon JB, Pryor JL. A survey of oncologists regarding sperm cryopreservation and assisted reproductive techniques for male cancer patients. Cancer. 1999 Nov 1. 86(9):1812-7. [Medline].

  18. Warde P, Gospodarowicz MK, Panzarella T, et al. Stage I testicular seminoma: results of adjuvant irradiation and surveillance. J Clin Oncol. 1995 Sep. 13(9):2255-62. [Medline].

  19. Zagars GK, Babaian RJ. Stage I testicular seminoma: rationale for postorchiectomy radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987 Feb. 13(2):155-62. [Medline].

  20. Zagars GK, Babaian RJ. The role of radiation in stage II testicular seminoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987 Feb. 13(2):163-70. [Medline].

  21. Schmidberger H, Bamberg M, Meisner C, et al. Radiotherapy in stage IIA and IIB testicular seminoma with reduced portals: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Sep 1. 39(2):321-6. [Medline].

  22. Kiricuta IC, Sauer J, Bohndorf W. Omission of the pelvic irradiation in stage I testicular seminoma: a study of postorchiectomy paraaortic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996 May 1. 35(2):293-8. [Medline].

  23. Fossa SD, Horwich A, Russell JM, et al. Optimal planning target volume for stage I testicular seminoma: A Medical Research Council randomized trial. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumor Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr. 17(4):1146. [Medline].

  24. Niazi TM, Souhami L, Sultanem K, et al. Long-term results of para-aortic irradiation for patients with stage I seminoma of the testis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Mar 1. 61(3):741-4. [Medline].

  25. Sultanem K, Souhami L, Benk V, et al. Para-aortic irradiation only appears to be adequate treatment for patients with Stage I seminoma of the testis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jan 15. 40(2):455-9. [Medline].

  26. Martin JM, Panzarella T, Zwahlen DR, Chung P, Warde P. Evidence-based guidelines for following stage 1 seminoma. Cancer. 2007 Jun 1. 109(11):2248-56. [Medline].

  27. Fiveash J, Sandler HM. Controversies in the management of stage I seminoma. Oncology (Huntingt). 1998 Aug. 12(8):1203-12; discussion 1212-21. [Medline].

  28. Buchholz TA, Walden TL, Prestidge BR. Cost-effectiveness of posttreatment surveillance after radiation therapy for early stage seminoma. Cancer. 1998 Mar 15. 82(6):1126-33. [Medline].

  29. Reiter WJ, Brodowicz T, Alavi S, et al. Twelve-year experience with two courses of adjuvant single-agent carboplatin therapy for clinical stage I seminoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jan 1. 19(1):101-4. [Medline].

  30. Oliver RT, Mason MD, Mead GM, et al. Radiotherapy versus single-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage I seminoma: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2005 Jul 23-29. 366(9482):293-300. [Medline].

  31. Oliver RT, Mead GM, Rustin GJ, et al. Randomized trial of carboplatin versus radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: mature results on relapse and contralateral testis cancer rates in MRC TE19/EORTC 30982 study (ISRCTN27163214). J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10. 29(8):957-62. [Medline].

  32. Mead GM, Fossa SD, Oliver RT, et al. Randomized trials in 2466 patients with stage I seminoma: patterns of relapse and follow-up. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Feb 2. 103(3):241-9. [Medline].

  33. Warde P, Gospodarowicz M, Panzarella T. Management of stage II seminoma. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan. 16(1):290-4. [Medline].

  34. Steele GS, Richie JP, Stewart AK, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base report on patterns of care for testicular carcinoma, 1985-1996. Cancer. 1999 Nov 15. 86(10):2171-83. [Medline].

  35. Garcia-del-Muro X, Maroto P, Guma J, et al. Chemotherapy as an alternative to radiotherapy in the treatment od stage IIA and IIB testicular seminoma: a Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol. Nov 20 2008. 26(33):5416-21. [Medline].

  36. Jacobsen KD, Olsen DR, Fossa K, Fossa SD. External beam abdominal radiotherapy in patients with seminoma stage I: field type, testicular dose, and spermatogenesis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Apr 1. 38(1):95-102. [Medline].

  37. Bauman GS, Venkatesan VM, Ago CT, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy for Stage I/II seminoma: results for 212 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Sep 1. 42(2):313-7. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Radiotherapy fields for stage I seminoma.
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.