Background
Wilms tumor, or nephroblastoma, is the most common childhood abdominal malignancy. Over the past 4 decades, the multidisciplinary approach to this tumor has become an example for successful cancer treatment (see the images below). (See Treatment and Medications.)
CT scan in a patient with a right-sided Wilms tumor with favorable histology.
Gross nephrectomy specimen shows a Wilms tumor pushing the normal renal parenchyma to the side. At present, survival rates of children with Wilms tumor are approximately 80-90%. This is in contrast to the rate 50 years ago, when only 10% of children survived. The addition of radiation therapy to surgery alone improved survival rates to approximately 40%. With the use of chemotherapy, survival rates climbed to their current values. (See Prognosis.)
The National Wilms Tumor Study Group (NWTSG) and the International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) have identified several chemotherapeutic agents through clinical trials. When used together, these agents lead to a cure in most children with this renal tumor. In addition, the guidelines for surgical treatment and the role of radiation therapy are better defined now than ever before. (See Treatment and Medications.)
With the great improvement in survival rates, therapeutic trials came to focus on limiting treatment-related toxicity.[1] Understanding of the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the development of Wilms tumor has also greatly increased, making Wilms tumorigenesis a model for the understanding of the development of other tumors. (See Etiology.)
Children’s Oncology Group staging of Wilms tumors
Stage I tumors have the following characteristics:
- The tumor is limited to kidney and is completely resected
- The renal capsule is intact
- The tumor was not ruptured or biopsied prior to removal
- The vessels of the renal sinus are not involved
- No evidence of tumor is present at or beyond the margins of resection
Stage II tumors have the following characteristics:
- The tumor is completely resected
- No evidence of tumor at or beyond the margins of resection is noted
- The tumor extends beyond the kidney (penetration of renal capsule, involvement of renal sinus)
Stage III tumors have the following characteristics:
- A residual, nonhematogenous tumor is present following surgery and is confined to the abdomen
- Positive lymph nodes in the abdomen or pelvis are noted
- Penetration through the peritoneal surface is observed
- Peritoneal implants are present
- Gross or microscopic tumor remains postoperatively, including positive margins of resection
- Tumor spillage is noted, including biopsy
- The tumor is treated with preoperative chemotherapy
- The tumor is removed in more than 1 piece
- Stage IV tumors are characterized by the following:
- Hematogenous metastases (eg, lung, liver, bone, brain) or lymph node metastases beyond the abdomen or pelvis are noted
Stage V tumors are characterized by the following:
Bilateral renal involvement by the tumor is present at diagnosis
Patient education
The parents and patient must know that long-term follow-up care is essential because of the late effects of treatment.
Etiology
Wilms tumor is thought to be caused by alterations of genes responsible for normal genitourinary development. Examples of common congenital anomalies associated with Wilms tumor are cryptorchidism, a double collecting system, horseshoe kidney, and hypospadias. Environmental exposures, although considered, seem relatively unlikely to play a role.
WT1 gene
In the early 1970s, Knudson and Strong proposed a genetic model for the development of Wilms tumor.[2] WT1, the first Wilms tumor suppressor gene at chromosomal band 11p13, was identified as a direct result of the study of children with Wilms tumor who also had aniridia, genitourinary anomalies, and mental retardation (WAGR syndrome).[3]
Karyotypic analysis revealed constitutional deletions within the short arm of 1 copy of chromosome 11. The 11p13 locus was subsequently demonstrated to encompass numerous contiguous genes, including the aniridia gene PAX6 and the Wilms tumor suppressor gene WT1, which was cloned in 1990. WT1 encodes a transcription factor critical to normal renal and gonadal development.
Characterization of this novel tumor suppressor gene has provided insight into the mechanisms underlying normal kidney development and Wilms tumorigenesis. The WT1 gene is the specific target of mutations and deletions in a subset of patients with sporadic Wilms tumors, as well as in the germline of some children (eg, those with Denys-Drash syndrome) with a genetic predisposition to develop this cancer.[4]
Additional genetic loci
A second gene that predisposes individuals to develop the Wilms tumor has been identified (but has not yet been cloned) telomeric of WT1, at 11p15. This locus was proposed on the basis of studies in patients with both Wilms tumor and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), another congenital Wilms-tumor predisposition syndrome linked to chromosomal band 11p15.[3]
BWS is an overgrowth syndrome characterized by visceromegaly, macroglossia, and hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. In addition, patients with BWS are predisposed to have several embryonal neoplasms, including Wilms tumor. Thus far, a few candidate loci for Wilms tumor and BWS have been proposed. These loci include the insulinlike growth factor II gene (IGFII), H19 (for an untranslated ribonucleic acid [RNA]), and that encoding for p57kip2.
Results of linkage analyses in large pedigrees with familial transmission of susceptibility to the Wilms tumor suggest the existence of additional genetic loci.
Finally, loci at 16q, 1p, 7p, and 17p have also been implicated in the biology of Wilms tumor, although these loci do not seem to predispose individuals to develop a Wilms tumor. Instead, they seem to be associated with the phenotype or the outcome.[1, 5]
Epidemiology
Occurrence in the United States
Wilms tumor affects approximately 10 children and adolescents per 1 million before age 15 years. Therefore, it accounts for 6-7% of all childhood cancers in North America. As a result, about 450-500 new cases are diagnosed each year on this continent. In 5-10% of patients, both kidneys are affected at the same time (synchronous bilateral Wilms tumor) or one after the other (metachronous bilateral Wilms tumor).
International occurrence
Wilms tumor appears to be relatively more common in Africa and least common in East Asia.[6] The incidence in Europe is similar to that reported in North America.
Race-, sex-, and age-related demographics
Wilms tumor is relatively more common in blacks than in whites and is rare in East Asians. Estimates suggest 6-9 cases per million person years in whites, 3-4 cases per million person years in East Asians and more than 10 cases per million person years among black populations.[6]
Among patients with unilateral Wilms tumor enrolled in all NWTSG protocols, the male-to-female ratio was 0.92:1. For patients with bilateral disease, the male-to-female ratio was 0.60:1.
The median age at diagnosis of Wilms tumor is approximately 3.5 years. The median age is highest for patients with unilateral unicentric disease (36.1 mo) and lowest for those with synchronous bilateral Wilms tumors (25.5 mo).[6]
Prognosis
Approximately 80-90% of children with a diagnosis of Wilms tumor survive with current multimodality therapy.[7] Patients who have tumors with favorable histology have an overall survival rate of at least 80% at 4 years after the initial diagnosis, even in patients with stage IV disease.
The 4-year relapse-free and overall survival rates in patients with favorable-histology Wilms tumor are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Survival Rates in Patients with Favorable-Histology Wilms Tumor (Open Table in a new window)
| Stage | Relapse-Free Survival, % | Overall Survival, % |
| I | 92 | 98 |
| II | 85 | 96 |
| III | 90 | 95 |
| IV | 80 | 90 |
Patients with synchronous bilateral tumors have a 70-80% survival rate,[8, 9] whereas those with metachronous tumors have a 45-50% survival rate.[10]
Patients with anaplastic Wilms tumor have a worse prognosis compared with favorable histology Wilms tumor; the 4-year overall survival rates are 83%, 83%, 65% and 33% for stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively.[11]
Children with a loss of heterozygosity at 1p and 16q have a worse prognosis than do children without this heterozygosity loss.[5]
The prognosis for patients who have a relapse is not as good as it is for those with a newly diagnosed Wilms tumor, with 40-80% of relapse patients expected to survive after salvage therapy. Patients who relapse after having received vincristine and actinomycin D have a better survival with relapse treatment compared with those who initially received vincristine, actinomycin D, and doxorubicin.[12, 13]
Nephrectomy leaves the child with 1 functional kidney. In almost all patients, the remaining kidney can compensate and maintain adequate renal function. Additional treatment modalities after nephrectomy may damage several organs, such as the heart, lungs, liver, bones, and gonads.[14, 15] In addition, chemotherapy and radiation therapy can induce second malignant neoplasms.[16]
Renal complications
Children with Wilms tumor have a minimal risk for impaired renal function, primarily related to nephrectomy. In selected patients, (ie, those who receive radiation therapy), function of the remaining kidney can be further endangered. The development of compensatory postnephrectomy hypertrophy of the remaining kidney is well documented in patients with Wilms tumor.
NWTSG data suggest that most patients with unilateral Wilms tumor do not develop serious, long-term renal complications. By comparison, renal function can be impaired in those with bilateral disease. The most common cause of renal failure in patients with bilateral Wilms tumor is bilateral nephrectomy. Treatment-related injury (eg, radiation-induced damage, surgical complications) of the remaining kidney is the second leading cause of renal insufficiency.
In a study of 7950 patients in the National Wilms Tumor Studies (from 1969-2002), 100 patients, or approximately 1%, developed end-stage renal disease. The primary risk factors included stromal predominant histology, intralobar rests, age at diagnosis of younger than 24 months, metachronous bilateral Wilms tumor, and WT1 mutation etiology.[17] The particularly high frequency of renal failure associated with metachronous bilateral Wilms tumor was due to surgery for progressive Wilms tumor.
Hepatic complications
Several cytotoxic agents may damage the liver of patients treated for Wilms tumor, including dactinomycin and irradiation. Most early reports suggest that hepatic irradiation is the major etiologic factor in hepatic injury. However, reports have documented hepatic toxicity with the combination of vincristine and dactinomycin in nonirradiated children with Wilms tumor, suggesting that chemotherapeutic agents themselves can also damage the liver.
In the fourth NWTSG report, the incidence of hepatotoxicity was 2.8-14.3% in patients who did not receive irradiation. The fact that patients who received less dactinomycin than others (ie, those with relatively low-stage disease) had a low incidence of 2.8% suggests a dose-related toxicity for dactinomycin.
With the use of currently accepted radiotherapy techniques, radiation-induced hepatitis is rare in survivors of Wilms tumor.
Some patients with Wilms tumor have developed hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). VOD is primarily a clinical diagnosis characterized by hepatomegaly or pain in the right upper quadrant, jaundice, ascites, and unexplained weight gain. The syndrome occurs in patients with Wilms tumor undergoing nephrectomy first and in those receiving combination chemotherapy before surgery, the standard approach that SIOP recommends. Although treatment for VOD is primarily supportive, the administration of chemotherapeutic agents can be resumed after the signs of VOD have disappeared.
Other complications of chemotherapy and radiation therapy
Congestive heart failure is a well-known complication of the administration of anthracyclines. Therefore, patients with Wilms tumor who receive anthracyclines, most commonly doxorubicin, should be monitored for cardiac dysfunction.
Because radiation therapy can affect pulmonary function, monitoring of pulmonary function is required in patients with metastatic Wilms tumors to the lung who are treated with bilateral pulmonary irradiation. The total lung capacity and vital capacity of patients receiving bilateral irradiation can be expected to decrease by 50-70% of the predicted values.
Women who received whole-abdomen irradiation in childhood can develop ovarian failure. Data clearly suggest that a high risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes should be considered in the counseling and prenatal care of women who received abdominal radiation therapy to treat a Wilms tumor. Male patients are at risk for testicular failure after whole-abdomen radiation therapy or certain types of chemotherapy, most notably that involving alkylating agents.
The effect of radiation therapy to the skeletal system is often predictable. Although radiation therapy may affect the growth of any given bone, the spine is most notably affected at doses of 20 Gy. A study from the University of Iowa showed a dose-response relationship in the induction of scoliosis and in the dose delivered. Most patients who received doses of more than 24 Gy with megavoltage beams developed asymptomatic scoliosis. Patients receiving current doses of 10-12 Gy may have a much reduced likelihood of developing scoliosis.[18]
Patients who survive Wilms tumor are at risk because inherited disposition and treatment (eg, chemotherapy, irradiation) can induce second malignant neoplasms. Most secondary malignant neoplasms reported (eg, bone tumors, breast and thyroid cancers) have occurred in irradiated areas. Nevertheless, certain chemotherapeutic agents, including doxorubicin, dactinomycin, and vincristine, may contribute to an increased risk for secondary malignancies.
Fifteen years after initial diagnosis, the cumulative incidence of a secondary malignant neoplasm in patients registered with the NWTSG was 1.6% and increasing. According to NWTSG investigators, abdominal irradiation increases the risk of a secondary malignant neoplasm and doxorubicin potentiates the radiation effect. Treatment for relapse further increased the risk for a secondary malignant neoplasm by a factor of 4-5.
Coppes MJ, Pritchard-Jones K. Principles of Wilms' tumor biology. Urol Clin North Am. Aug 2000;27(3):423-33, viii. [Medline].
Knudson AG, Strong LC. Mutation and cancer: a model for Wilms' tumor of the kidney. J Natl Cancer Inst. Feb 1972;48(2):313-24. [Medline].
Coppes MJ, Haber DA, Grundy PE. Genetic events in the development of Wilms' tumor. N Engl J Med. Sep 1 1994;331(9):586-90. [Medline].
Coppes MJ, Huff V, Pelletier J. Denys-Drash syndrome: relating a clinical disorder to genetic alterations in the tumor suppressor gene WT1. J Pediatr. Nov 1993;123(5):673-8. [Medline].
Grundy PE, Breslow NE, Li S, et al. Loss of heterozygosity for chromosomes 1p and 16q is an adverse prognostic factor in favorable-histology Wilms tumor: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. J Clin Oncol. Oct 10 2005;23(29):7312-21. [Medline].
Breslow N, Olshan A, Beckwith JB, Green DM. Epidemiology of Wilms tumor. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1993;21(3):172-81. [Medline].
Green DM. The treatment of stages I-IV favorable histology Wilms' tumor. J Clin Oncol. Apr 15 2004;22(8):1366-72. [Medline].
Montgomery BT, Kelalis PP, Blute ML, et al. Extended followup of bilateral Wilms tumor: results of the National Wilms Tumor Study. J Urol. Aug 1991;146(2 ( Pt 2)):514-8. [Medline].
Paulino AC, Wilimas J, Marina N, et al. Local control in synchronous bilateral Wilms tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Oct 1 1996;36(3):541-8. [Medline].
Paulino AC, Thakkar B, Henderson WG. Metachronous bilateral Wilms' tumor: the importance of time interval to the development of a second tumor. Cancer. Jan 15 1998;82(2):415-20. [Medline].
Dome JS, Cotton CA, Perlman EJ, et al. Treatment of anaplastic histology Wilms' tumor: results from the fifth National Wilms' Tumor Study. J Clin Oncol. May 20 2006;24(15):2352-8. [Medline].
Green DM, Cotton CA, Malogolowkin M, et al. Treatment of Wilms tumor relapsing after initial treatment with vincristine and actinomycin D: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. May/ 2007;48:493-9. [Medline].
Malogolowkin M, Cotton CA, Green DM, et al. Treatment of Wilms tumor relapsing after initial treatment with vincristine, actinomycin D, and doxorubicin. A report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Feb 2008;50(2):236-41. [Medline].
Green DM, Donckerwolcke R, Evans AE, D'Angio GJ. Late effects of treatment for Wilms tumor. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. Dec 1995;9(6):1317-27. [Medline].
Egeler RM, Wolff JE, Anderson RA, Coppes MJ. Long-term complications and post-treatment follow-up of patients with Wilms' tumor. Semin Urol Oncol. Feb 1999;17(1):55-61. [Medline].
Evans AE, Norkool P, Evans I, et al. Late effects of treatment for Wilms' tumor. A report from the National Wilms' Tumor Study Group. Cancer. Jan 15 1991;67(2):331-6. [Medline].
Lange J, Peterson SM, Takashima JR, et al. Risk Factors for End Stage Renal Disease in Non-WT1-Syndromic Wilms Tumor. J Urol. Aug 2011;186(2):378-86. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Paulino AC, Wen BC, Brown CK, et al. Late effects in children treated with radiation therapy for Wilms' tumor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Mar 15 2000;46(5):1239-46. [Medline].
van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Grundy P, Graf N, et al. Characteristics and survival of 750 children diagnosed with a renal tumor in the first seven months of life: A collaborative study by the SIOP/GPOH/SFOP, NWTSG, and UKCCSG Wilms tumor study groups. Pediatr Blood Cancer. Jun 2008;50(6):1130-4. [Medline].
Refaie HD, Sarhan M, Hafez A. Role of CT in assessment of unresectable Wilms' tumor response after preoperative chemotherapy in pediatrics. ScientificWorldJournal. Jul 13 2008;8:661-9. [Medline].
Mitchell C, Pritchard-Jones K, Shannon R, et al. Immediate nephrectomy versus preoperative chemotherapy in the management of non-metastatic Wilms' tumour: results of a randomised trial (UKW3) by the UK Children's Cancer Study Group. Eur J Cancer. Oct 2006;42(15):2554-62. [Medline].
Reinhard H, Semler O, Burger D, et al. Results of the SIOP 93-01/GPOH trial and study for the treatment of patients with unilateral nonmetastatic Wilms Tumor. Klin Padiatr. May-Jun 2004;216(3):132-40. [Medline].
Coppes MJ, Arnold M, Beckwith JB, et al. Factors affecting the risk of contralateral Wilms tumor development: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Cancer. Apr 1 1999;85(7):1616-25. [Medline].
D'Angio GJ, Breslow N, Beckwith JB, et al. Treatment of Wilms' tumor. Results of the Third National Wilms' Tumor Study. Cancer. Jul 15 1989;64(2):349-60. [Medline].
Kalapurakal JA, Li SM, Breslow NE, et al. Influence of radiation therapy delay on abdominal tumor recurrence in patients with favorable histology Wilms' tumor treated on NWTS-3 and NWTS-4: a report from the National Wilms' tumor Study Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:495-9. [Medline].
Green DM, Breslow NE, Beckwith JB, et al. Treatment with nephrectomy only for small, stage I/favorable histology Wilms tumor: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. J Clin Oncol. Sep 1/ 2001;19:3719-24. [Medline].
Meisel JA, Guthrie KA, Breslow NE, Donaldson SS, Green DM. Significance and management of computed tomography detected pulmonary nodules: a report from the National Wilms Tumor Study Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Jun 1 1999;44(3):579-85. [Medline].
Hamilton TE, Ritchey ML, Haase GM, Argani P, Peterson SM, Anderson JR, et al. The management of synchronous bilateral wilms tumor: a report from the national wilms tumor study group. Ann Surg. May 2011;253(5):1004-10. [Medline].
D'Angio GJ, Rosenberg H, Sharples K, et al. Position paper: imaging methods for primary renal tumors of childhood: costs versus benefits [published erratum appears in Med Pediatr Oncol 1993;21(9):695]. Med Pediatr Oncol. 1993;21(3):205-12. [Medline].
| Stage | Relapse-Free Survival, % | Overall Survival, % |
| I | 92 | 98 |
| II | 85 | 96 |
| III | 90 | 95 |
| IV | 80 | 90 |
| Stage and Histology | Surgery | Chemotherapy | Radiation Therapy* |
| Stage I or II favorable histology without loss of heterozygosity (LOH) 1p and 16q† | Nephrectomy | Vincristine, dactinomycin | No |
| Stage I or II favorable histology with LOH 1p and 16q | Nephrectomy | Vincristine, dactinomycin, doxorubicin | No |
| Stage III and IV favorable histology without LOH 1p and 16q | Nephrectomy | Vincristine, dactinomycin, doxorubicin | Yes |
| Stage III and IV favorable histology with LOH 1p and 16q | Nephrectomy | Vincristine, dactinomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide | Yes |
| * The current dose for radiation therapy for favorable histology Wilms tumor is approximately 1080 cGy for the abdomen and 1200 cGy for the lung.[24] Postoperative radiotherapy is started within 14 days of nephrectomy.[25] Patients with stage IV favorable histology Wilms tumor and lung metastases whose pulmonary lesions do not disappear after 6 weeks of chemotherapy receive whole-lung radiation therapy. † Some evidence suggests that certain children with stage I disease and favorable histology do well with nephrectomy alone.[26] Children younger than 24 months with small (< 550 g) Wilms tumors with favorable histology are noted in the current COG protocol. | |||
| Stage and Type of Wilms Tumor | Imaging Studies | Off-Treatment Schedule |
| Stages I, II, and III with favorable histology; stages I, II, and III with anaplastic histology | Chest radiography | 6 wk and 3 mo after surgery, then every 3 mo (5 times), then every 6 mo (3 times), then yearly (2 times) |
| All stages in patients aged < 48 mo at diagnosis with nephrogenic rests | Abdominal ultrasonography | Every 3 mo for 6 y |
| All stages in patients aged >48 mo at diagnosis with nephrogenic rests | Abdominal ultrasonography | Every 3 mo for 4 y |
| Stages I and II with favorable histology | Abdominal ultrasonography | Yearly (6 times) |
| Stage III with favorable histology | Abdominal ultrasonography | 6 wk and 3 mo after surgery, then every 3 mo (5 times), then every 6 mo (3 times), then yearly (2 times) |
| All stages with unfavorable histology | Abdominal ultrasonography | Every 3 mo (4 times), then every 6 mo (4 times) |
| * Subsequent imaging studies should be performed as clinically indicated. | ||

