eMedicine Specialties > Pediatrics: General Medicine > Oncology

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Differential Diagnoses & Workup

Author: Noriko Satake, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis Medical Center
Coauthor(s): Janet M Yoon, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis Medical Center
Contributor Information and Disclosures

Updated: Aug 12, 2009

Differential Diagnoses

Acute Myelocytic Leukemia
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Anemia, Acute
Osteomyelitis
Anemia, Fanconi
Parvovirus B19 Infection
Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rhabdomyosarcoma
Leukocytosis
Mononucleosis and Epstein-Barr Virus Infection
Neuroblastoma

Other Problems to Be Considered

Aplastic anemia
Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)

Workup

Laboratory Studies

The following studies are indicated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL):

  • Basic laboratory tests
    • Upon initial evaluation, obtain a CBC count. A hematologist or hematopathologist must evaluate the peripheral smear for the presence and morphology of lymphoblasts. An elevated leukocyte count of more than 10 X 109/L (>10 X 103/µL) occurs in one half of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia may be observed secondary to inhibition of normal hematopoiesis by leukemic infiltration. Rare cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia may initially manifest with pancytopenia.
    • Various metabolic abnormalities may include increased serum levels of uric acid, potassium, phosphorus, and calcium, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The degree of abnormality reflects the leukemic cell burden and destruction (lysis). Although not universally performed, coagulation studies can be helpful, including tests of the prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), fibrinogen level, and D-dimer level to assess for disseminated intravascular coagulation; these studies are particularly important in a child who is acutely toxic.
  • Immunophenotyping
    • Complete morphologic, immunologic, and genetic examination of the leukemia cells necessary to establish the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
    • An important advancement in the classification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia was the observation that malignant lymphoblasts share many of the features of normal lymphoid progenitors. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells rearrange their immunoglobulin and T-cell receptor (TCR) genes and express antigen receptor molecules in ways that correspond to such processes in normal developing B and T lymphocytes. However, leukemic lymphoblasts can also have aberrant gene expression with resultant phenotypes that differ from those of normal lymphocyte progenitors. Nevertheless, acute lymphoblastic leukemia can be broadly classified as B-lineage or T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
    • The diagnosis of B-cell leukemia, which accounts for only about 3% of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases, depends on the detection of surface immunoglobulin on leukemic blasts. Lymphoblasts with this phenotype have a distinctive morphology, with deeply basophilic cytoplasm containing prominent vacuoles. This morphologic pattern is designated L3 in the French-American-British (FAB) system (see Histologic Findings). Prominent clinical features include extramedullary lymphomatous masses in the abdomen or head and neck and frequently involve the CNS.
    • Approximately 80% of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia involves lymphoblasts with phenotypes that correspond to those of B-cell progenitors. These cases can be identified by their cell-surface expression of 2 or more B-lineage–associated antigens (ie, CD19, CD20, CD24, CD22, CD21, or CD79). Only CD79 is specific for B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In addition, about one fourth of B-cell precursor cases express cytoplasmic immunoglobulin µ heavy-chain proteins and are designated pre–B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cases related to B-cell precursors can be subclassified as early pre–B-cell, pre–B-cell, or transitional pre–B-cell cases. Although mature B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia should be differentiated from B-precursor cases, distinguishing the subtypes of B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia is probably not clinically relevant.
    • T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia is identified by the expression of T-cell–associated surface antigens, of which cytoplasmic CD3 is specific. T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases can be classified by early, mid, or late thymocytes. Clinical features most closely associated with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia are high blood leukocyte counts and CNS involvement. About one half of patients have a mediastinal mass at the time of diagnosis. The prognosis of patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia has historically been worse than that of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, the outlook for patients with T-cell leukemia is improved to nearly that of precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia when intensive chemotherapy is used.
  • Cytogenetic and molecular diagnosis
    • In more than 90% of acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases, specific genetic alterations can be found in the leukemic blasts. These alterations include changes in chromosome number (ploidy) and structure; about half of all childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia involves recurrent translocations.  Standard cytogenetic analysis is an essential tool in the workup of all patients with leukemia because the karyotype of the leukemic cells has important diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications. In addition, molecular techniques, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and Southern blot analysis help improve diagnostic accuracy. Molecular analysis can be used to identify translocations not detected on routine karyotype analysis and to distinguish lesions that appear cytogenetically identical but are molecularly different.
    • Common chromosomal abnormalities in acute lymphoblastic leukemia include t(9;22)(q34;q11) or BCR-ABL, t(1;19)(q23;p13) or E2A-PBX1, t(12;21)(p13;q22) or TEL-AML1, MLL rearrangements, hyperdiploidy (>50 chromosomes/cell), and hypodiploidy (<44 chromosomes/cell). In general, BCR-ABL, t(4;11) with MLL-AF4, and hypodiploidy confer a poor outcome, whereas hyperdiploidy, TEL-AML1, and trisomy 4, trisomy 10, and trisomy 17 are associated with favorable outcomes.
  • Minimal residual disease: Although still experimental, molecular analysis promises to play a role in the diagnosis and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia and in monitoring patients' responses to therapy. Studies of minimal residual disease (MRD) may be based on the detection of chimeric transcripts generated by fusion genes, the detection of clonal TCR or immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) gene rearrangements, or the identification of a phenotype specific to the leukemic blasts. All studies using MRD techniques have shown significant correlations between end-of-induction leukemia burden and outcome.
  • Risk assessment: Current risk assessment includes clinical features (age and WBC at diagnosis), biological characteristics of the leukemic blasts, response to the induction chemotherapy, and MRD burden. Current studies are ongoing to assess an optimal treatment for each leukemia group with different risks. Future goals include better understanding the molecular pathways leading to specific phenotypes, minimizing the risk of relapse by identifying subsets of patients requiring more intensive therapy, and minimizing the risk of toxicity for those patients highly likely to be cured with currently available therapies. 

Imaging Studies

  • Chest radiography: Evaluate for a mediastinal mass. In general, no other imaging studies are required. However, if the physical examination reveals enlarged testes, perform ultrasonography to evaluate for testicular infiltration.
  • Testicular ultrasonography: Perform testicular ultrasonography if the testes are enlarged upon physical examination.
  • Renal ultrasonography: Some clinicians prefer to evaluate for leukemic kidney involvement to assess the risk of tumor lysis syndrome.
  • Echocardiography and ECG: Obtain an echocardiogram and an ECG before anthracyclines are administered.

Procedures

  • Bone marrow aspirate and biopsy: The results confirm the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In addition, special stains (immunohistochemistry), immunophenotyping, cytogenetic analysis, and molecular analysis help in classifying each case.
  • Lumbar puncture with cytospin morphologic analysis: These tests are performed before systemic chemotherapy is administered to assess for CNS involvement and to administer intrathecal chemotherapy.

Histologic Findings

According to the French-American-British (FAB) classification system, acute lymphoblastic leukemia is classified into 3 groups based on morphology.

  • L1: Cells are usually small, with scant cytoplasm and inconspicuous nucleoli. L1 accounts for 85% of all cases of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
  • L2: Cells are larger than in L1. The cells demonstrate considerable heterogeneity in size, with prominent nucleoli, and abundant cytoplasm. L2 accounts for 14% of all childhood ALL.
  • L3: Cells are large and notable for their deep cytoplasmic basophilia. They frequently have prominent cytoplasmic vacuolation and are morphologically identical to Burkitt lymphoma cells. L3 accounts for 1% of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cases.

Although the FAB system was used in the past, it is no longer useful (except for L3) because current standard diagnosis is based on immunophenotype and molecular techniques.

More on Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Overview: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Treatment & Medication: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Follow-up: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Multimedia: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
References

References

  1. le Viseur C, Hotfilder M, Bomken S, et al. In childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, blasts at different stages of immunophenotypic maturation have stem cell properties. Cancer Cell. Jul 8 2008;14(1):47-58. [Medline].

  2. Lee S, Kim YJ, Min CK, et al. The effect of first-line imatinib interim therapy on the outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. May 1 2005;105(9):3449-57. [Medline].

  3. [Best Evidence] Pui CH, Campana D, Pei D, et al. Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation. N Engl J Med. Jun 25 2009;360(26):2730-41. [Medline].

  4. de Labarthe A, Rousselot P, Huguet-Rigal F, et al. Imatinib combined with induction or consolidation chemotherapy in patients with de novo Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the GRAAPH-2003 study. Blood. Feb 15 2007;109(4):1408-13. [Medline].

  5. Fuster JL, Bermudez M, Galera A, Llinares ME, Calle D, Ortuno FJ. Imatinib mesylate in combination with chemotherapy in four children with de novo and advanced stage Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. Dec 2007;92(12):1723-4. [Medline].

  6. Thomas DA, Faderl S, Cortes J, et al. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphocytic leukemia with hyper-CVAD and imatinib mesylate. Blood. Jun 15 2004;103(12):4396-407. [Medline].

  7. Landier W, Bhatia S, Eshelman DA, et al. Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines from the Children's Oncology Group Late Effects Committee and Nursing Discipline. J Clin Oncol. Dec 15 2004;22(24):4979-90. [Medline].

  8. Cave H, van der Werff ten Bosch J, Suciu S, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer--Childhood Leukemia Cooperative Group. N Engl J Med. Aug 27 1998;339(9):591-8. [Medline].

  9. Cheok MH, Evans WE. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a model for the pharmacogenomics of cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. Feb 2006;6(2):117-29. [Medline].

  10. Coustan-Smith E, Behm FG, Sanchez J, et al. Immunological detection of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. Feb 21 1998;351(9102):550-4. [Medline].

  11. Dordelmann M, Reiter A, Borkhardt A, et al. Prednisone response is the strongest predictor of treatment outcome in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. Aug 15 1999;94(4):1209-17. [Medline].

  12. Gaynon PS. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and relapse. Br J Haematol. Dec 2005;131(5):579-87. [Medline].

  13. Goldman SC, Holcenberg JS, Finklestein JZ, et al. A randomized comparison between rasburicase and allopurinol in children with lymphoma or leukemia at high risk for tumor lysis. Blood. May 15 2001;97(10):2998-3003. [Medline].

  14. Greaves MF. Aetiology of acute leukaemia. Lancet. Feb 1 1997;349(9048):344-9. [Medline].

  15. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2000;50(1):7-33. [Medline].

  16. Gurney JG, Severson RK, Davis S, Robison LL. Incidence of cancer in children in the United States. Sex-, race-, and 1-year age-specific rates by histologic type. Cancer. Apr 15 1995;75(8):2186-95. [Medline].

  17. Hong D, Gupta R, Ancliff P, et al. Initiating and cancer-propagating cells in TEL-AML1-associated childhood leukemia. Science. Jan 18 2008;319(5861):336-9. [Medline].

  18. Jones LK, Saha V. Philadelphia positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia of childhood. Br J Haematol. Aug 2005;130(4):489-500. [Medline].

  19. Kersey JH. Fifty years of studies of the biology and therapy of childhood leukemia. Blood. Sep 1 1998;92(5):1838. [Medline].

  20. Linet MS, Hatch EE, Kleinerman RA, et al. Residential exposure to magnetic fields and acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. N Engl J Med. Jul 3 1997;337(1):1-7. [Medline].

  21. Margolin JF, Steuber CP, Poplack DG. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In: Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 15th ed. 2006:538-90.

  22. McNeil DE, Cote TR, Clegg L, Mauer A. SEER update of incidence and trends in pediatric malignancies: acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Med Pediatr Oncol. Dec 2002;39(6):554-7; discussion 552-3. [Medline].

  23. Neglia JP, Robison LL. Epidemiology of the childhood acute leukemias. Pediatr Clin North Am. Aug 1988;35(4):675-92. [Medline].

  24. Pui CH. Childhood Leukemias. Cambridge University Press; 1996.

  25. Pui CH, Campana D, Evans WE. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia--current status and future perspectives. Lancet Oncol. Oct 2001;2(10):597-607. [Medline].

  26. Pui CH, Evans WE. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. Jan 12 2006;354(2):166-78. [Medline].

  27. Pui CH, Robison LL, Look AT. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet. Mar 22 2008;371(9617):1030-43. [Medline].

  28. Rubnitz JE, Pui CH. Molecular diagnostics in the treatment of leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol. Jul 1999;6(4):229-35. [Medline].

  29. Smith M, Arthur D, Camitta B, Carroll AJ, Crist W, Gaynon P. Uniform approach to risk classification and treatment assignment for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1996;14(1):18-24. [Medline].

Further Reading

Keywords

acute lymphocytic leukemia, acute lymphatic leukemia, acute lymphoid leukemia, ALL, pediatric cancer, childhood cancer, childhood malignancy, inherited genetic syndromes, lymphoblastic leukemia, leukemia, leukemic blasts, T cell, T-cell ALL, B cell, B-lineage ALL, BCR-ABL, MLL, high-risk ALL, exposure to ionizing radiation, exposure to electromagnetic fields, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, HSCT, bone marrow failure, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, petechiae, bleeding, lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, bone pain, Down syndrome, Fanconi anemia, Bloom syndrome, influenza, varicella, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, congenitalhypogammaglobulinemia, ataxia-telangiectasia

Contributor Information and Disclosures

Author

Noriko Satake, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Coauthor(s)

Janet M Yoon, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology, University of California Davis Medical Center
Janet M Yoon, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology and Children's Oncology Group
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Medical Editor

Stephan A Grupp, MD, PhD, Director, Stem Cell Biology Program, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Associate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania
Stephan A Grupp, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Pharmacy Editor

Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine
Disclosure: Pfizer Inc Stock Investment from financial planner; Avanir Pharma Stock Investment from financial planner ; WebMD Salary and stock Employment and investment from financial planner

Managing Editor

Timothy P Cripe, MD, PhD, Professor of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati; Director, Translational Research Trials Office, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Timothy P Cripe, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Pediatric Society, American Society of Hematology, American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

CME Editor

Samuel Gross, MD, Professor Emeritus, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida; Clinical Professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina; Adjunct Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University
Samuel Gross, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and Society for Pediatric Research
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Robert J Arceci, MD, PhD, King Fahd Professor of Pediatric Oncology, Professor of Pediatrics, Oncology and the Cellular and Molecular Medicine Graduate Program, Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Robert J Arceci, MD, PhD is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for Cancer Research, American Association for the Advancement of Science, American Pediatric Society, American Society of Hematology, and American Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

 
 
HONcode

We subscribe to the
HONcode principles of the
Health On the Net Foundation

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright© 1994- by Medscape.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.