Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treatment & Management
- Author: Justine K Walker, MD; Chief Editor: Robert J Arceci, MD, PhD more...
Medical Care
General treatment considerations for nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma (NRSTS) vary depending on the anatomic site of the tumor, its histologic features, and the extent of local and metastatic disease. The standard of care for high-grade NRSTs is to achieve local control by complete surgical resection, preferably limb-preserving, with radiation therapy. However, most of the data have been extrapolated from trials involving adults. In general, multimodality therapy offers the greatest opportunity for survival.
The role of radiation therapy in children with NRSTSs has yet to be defined and is the future of current Children's Oncology Group (COG) studies. For low-grade NRSTSs the use of radiation therapy after complete surgical excision is controversial. Thus, in these tumors, radiation therapy is generally used adjuvantly only when surgical margins are involved and re-resection is not possible. Radiation is also indicated for use in large, high-grade tumors.
Radiation therapy must be approached differently in children than in adults, who typically require a large treatment volume. This places the adjacent tissues of children at risk for decreased bone growth, loss of joint function, and soft tissue and muscle fibrosis. Devastating lifelong complications, including secondary malignancies, are also a concern. The efficacy of focal limited margin external radiation therapy in patients with high-grade NRSTSs has been tested; preliminary results show a high rate of local control.[13] Radiation therapy may also have a role in the control and palliative treatment of certain metastatic diseases.
Metastatic disease, disease of high metastatic potential, or large and unresectable primary tumors may require chemotherapy as part of the treatment plan. Chemotherapeutic agents that demonstrate the most activity against NRSTS include ifosfamide, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin. Other chemotherapeutic agents that have shown activity either alone or in combination are vincristine, etoposide, cisplatin, and dactinomycin. Ongoing clinical trials are under way to prospectively evaluate the exact role of chemotherapy in managing NRSTSs.
The current COG trial for patients with NRSTSs, COG-ARST0332,[14] was designed to elucidate a risk-based strategy for treating these patients, with the goals of limiting toxicity in low-risk patients and maximizing efficacy in intermediate and high-risk patients. Stratification into these groups is based on tumor grade and extent. Patients at low-risk are treated with surgery with or without adjuvant radiation therapy, depending on the histologic grade of the tumor and the surgical margin status. Intermediate and high-risk patients in whom the primary tumor has not been excised receive neoadjuvant combined chemoradiotherapy prior to definitive resection. If the primary tumor was able to be excised, they are treated with adjuvant chemotherapy with irradiation. The chemotherapeutic regimen for all patients is doxorubicin with ifosfamide. See the pdf below.
COG-ARST0332 experimental design schema.
For patients with refractory or recurrent NRSTSs, a few newer agents have shown promising activity and are now being evaluated for certain subtypes in clinical trials. Sunitinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase-inhibitor that also has anti-angiogenic properties. It targets the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor as well as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors and has been shown to have effectiveness against alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS).[15] Pazopanib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor that also targets VEGF and PDGF receptors. It has been found preliminarily to have activity in patients with leiomyosarcomas and synovial sarcomas.[16]
Surgical Care
Wide local excision is the primary therapy for NRSTS. Every attempt is made to obtain negative tumor margins, which can be accomplished in 50-80% of patients. If the initial surgery does not achieve pathologically negative margins, a re-excision should be performed in order to obtain clear margins. The mainstay of local control for sarcomas of the head and neck is aggressive surgical resection. These tumors may be difficult to remove with wide surgical margins. However, modern reconstruction techniques with vascularized flaps, free composite grafts, and rotation flaps assist in complete resection. Lesions in the extremities are usually totally resectable.
Limb-salvage procedures or amputation are the surgical options in patients with limb tumors. Limb or ray amputation may be needed to manage tumors of the hands or feet. In rapidly growing, young children, limb salvage is not always the best option in terms of function because frequent limb-lengthening procedures may be needed. New orthopedic limb-lengthening procedures and prostheses may make limb salvage more feasible than it once was in select patients. For some children with relapsed extremity tumors who were treated with previous radiation therapy, amputation may be the only option.
Dissection of the lymph nodes is not always warranted because of the infrequency of lymph node involvement in association with NRSTSs. The rate of involvement is 6-9% in pediatric cases, usually high-grade NRSTSs. Lymph node resection is warranted if the lymph nodes are enlarged on examination or scanning or if the tumor arises in an area near lymph nodes.
Surgical staging is important in making treatment decisions. Appropriate staging also allows for prognostication. The tumor, node, and metastases (TNM) staging system is useful and takes into account the size of the tumor (>5 cm or < 5 cm), the involvement of lymph nodes, and the presence or absence of metastatic disease. Another staging system, one used by the IRS researchers, is based on the extent of disease after initial surgical resection. See Staging above for definitions of the TNM stages and IRS groups.
In children with metastatic disease involving isolated pulmonary mets, an exploratory thoracotomy should be performed in an attempt to resect all gross disease.[17] In addition, re-resection of relapsed primary tumors is considered standard treatment.
Consultations
Patients with sarcomas, particularly children, should be treated at comprehensive cancer centers with devoted multidisciplinary sarcoma programs that involve a pediatric sarcoma oncologist, oncologic surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and soft tissue pathologists.
For limb salvage procedures or amputation, consultation with a physical therapist and occupational therapist is essential to maximize functional outcome and recovery. The use of these services in certain other patients may be necessary, depending on the site and surgical procedure.
Loh ML, Ahn P, Perez-Atayde AR, et al. Treatment of infantile fibrosarcoma with chemotherapy and surgery: results from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Children's Hospital, Boston. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;24 (9):722-6. [Medline].
McArthur GA, Demetri GD, van Oosterom A, Heinrich MC, Debiec-Rychter M, Corless CL. Molecular and clinical analysis of locally advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with imatinib: Imatinib Target Exploration Consortium Study B2225. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1 2005;23(4):866-73. [Medline].
Brecht IB, Ferrari A, Int-Veen C, et al. Grossly-resected synovial sarcoma treated by the German and Italian Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Cooperative Groups: discussion on the role of adjuvant therapies. Pediatric Blood and Cancer. 2006;47:11-17. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Okcu MF, Munsell M, Treuner J, et al. Synovial sarcoma of childhood and adolescence: a multicenter, multivariate analysis of outcome. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1602-11. [Medline].
Faulkner LB, Hajdu SI, Kher U, et al. Pediatric desmoid tumor: retrospective analysis of 63 cases. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:2813-8. [Medline].
Skapek SX, Ferguson WS, Granowetter L, et al. Vinblastine and methotrexate for desmoid fibromatosis in children: results of a Pediatric Oncology Group Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25 (5):501-6. [Medline].
Daller JA, Bueno J, Gutierrez J, et al. Hepatic hemangioendothelioma: clinical experience and management strategy. J Pediatr Surg. 1999;34:98-105. [Medline].
Randall RL, Albritton KH, Ferney BJ, Layfield L. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of soft tissue: an abandoned diagnosis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). Dec 2004;33(12):602-8. [Medline].
Erlandson RA, Antonescu CR. The rise and fall of malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Ultrastruct Pathol. Sep-Dec 2004;28(5-6):283-9. [Medline].
Federman N, Feig SA. PET/CT in evaluating pediatric malignancies: a clinician's perspective. J Nucl Med. Dec 2007;48(12):1920-2. [Medline].
McCarville MB, Christie R, Daw NC, et al. PET/CT in the evaluation of childhood sarcomas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Apr 2005;184(4):1293-304. [Medline].
American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th. New York, NY: Springer; 2002.
Krasin MJ, Davidoff AM, Spunt SL, et al. Preliminary results from a prospective study using limited margin radiotherapy in pediatric and young adult patients with high-grade nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. Mar 2010;76 (3):874-8. [Medline].
Phase III Study of Risk-Based Therapy Comprising Observation Only, Adjuvant Radiotherapy, or Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy, Surgery, and Adjuvant Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy in Young Patients With Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Available at http://www.hemonc.theclinics.com/article/S0889-8588(05)00034-1/abstract.
Stacchiotti S, Tamborini E, Marrari A, et al. Response to sunitinib malate in advanced alveolar soft part sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15 (3):1096-104. [Medline].
Sleijfer S, Ray-Coquard I, Papai Z, et al. Pazopanib, a multikinase angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer- soft tissue and bone sarcoma group (EORTC study 62043). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27 (19):3126-32. [Medline].
Putnam JB Jr, Roth JA. Surgical treatment for pulmonary metastases from sarcoma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1995;9 (4):869-87. [Medline].
Albritton KH. Sarcomas in adolescents and young adults. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2005;19:527-546. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Antonescu CR. The role of genetic testing in soft tissue sarcoma. Histopathology. Jan 2006;48(1):13-21. [Medline].
Blakely ML, Spurbeck WW, Pappo AS, et al. The impact of margin of resection on outcome in pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma. J Pediatr Surg. May 1999;34(5):672-5. [Medline].
Dillon PW. Nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas in children. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. 1997;6(1):24-28. [Medline].
Kayton ML, Meyers P, Wexler LH, et al. Clinical presentation, treatment, and outcome of alveolar soft part sarcoma in children, adolescents, and young adults. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:187-193. [Medline].
Lanzkowsky P. Rhabdomyosarcoma and other soft tissue sarcomas. In: Manual of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. 2005. 4th ed. San Diego, Calif: Academic; 561-584.
Loeb DM, Thornton K, Shokek O. Pediatric soft tissue sarcomas. Surg Clin North Am. Jun 2008;88(3):615-27, vii. [Medline].
Marcus KC, Grier HE, Shamberger RC, et al. Childhood soft tissue sarcoma: a 20-year experience. J Pediatr. Oct 1997;131(4):603-7. [Medline].
Marcus RB Jr. Current controversies in pediatric radiation oncology. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 1996;27(3):551-7. [Medline].
Meyer WH, Spunt SL. Soft tissue sarcomas of childhood. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30:269-80. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Okeu M, Hicks J, Merchant TE, Andrassy RJ, Pappo AS, Horowitz ME. Non-rhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcomas. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. 5th. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2006:1034-1073.
Pappo AS. Rhabdomyosarcoma and other soft tissue sarcomas in children. Curr Opin Oncol. Jul 1996;8(4):311-6. [Medline].
Paulides M, Kremers A, Stohr W, Bielack S, Jurgens H, Treuner J. Prospective longitudinal evaluation of doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy in sarcoma patients: a report of the late effects surveillance system (LESS). Pediatr Blood Cancer. Apr 2006;46(4):489-95. [Medline].
Paulino AC. Treatment options for children with nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2004;4:247-56. [Medline].
Sirvent N, Maire G, Pedeutour F. Genetics of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans family of tumors: from ring chromosomes to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. May 2003;37(1):1-19. [Medline].
Spunt S, Wolden S, Schofield D, Skapek S. Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas. In: Pappo, Alberto. Pediatric Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas. New York: Springer; 2006:133-162.
Spunt SL, Poquette CA, Hurt YS, et al. Prognostic factors for children and adolescents with surgically resected nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of 121 patients treated at St Jude Children's Research Hospital. J Clin Oncol. Dec 1999;17(12):3697-705. [Medline].
Spunt SL, Skapek SX, Coffin CM. Pediatric nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas. Oncologist. Jun 2008;13(6):668-78. [Medline].
Womer RB, Sinniah D. Soft tissue sarcomas. In: Practical Pediatric Oncology. 1992:318-23.
| Primary Tumor | Regional Lymph Nodes | Distant Metastasis | Histologic Grade | |
| Stage I | Any tumor size, superficial or deep | N0 | M0 | G1 or G2 |
| Stage II | T1a (tumor < 5 cm, superficial) | N0 | M0 | G3 |
| T1b (tumor < 5 cm, deep) | N0 | M0 | G3 | |
| T2a (tumor >5 cm, superficial) | N0 | M0 | G3 | |
| Stage III | T2b (tumor >5 cm, deep) | N0 | M0 | G3 |
| Stage IV | Any tumor size, superficial or deep | N1 | M0 or M1 | G1, G2, or G3 |
| Any tumor size, superficial or deep | N0 or N1 | M1 | G1, G2, or G3 |

