eMedicine Specialties > Pediatrics: Surgery > Otolaryngology
External Auditory Canal Atresia: Follow-up
Updated: Jul 18, 2008
Follow-up
Further Inpatient Care
- Most children require overnight admission to monitor oral intake. Pain control is often accomplished early in healing with oral narcotics; later, nonnarcotics are used.
Further Outpatient Care
- Care immediately following discharge involves oral pain control with a narcotic if needed, an oral antibiotic for 10 days, ear drops after the oral antibiotic is completed to keep the ear canal sterile, and water precautions (ie, no water onto the wound for 3 days, no water into the ear canal until the first postoperative visit).
- Follow-up care is at least yearly to assess social, developmental, and clinical issues. Audiologic follow-up testing may be more frequent, and informational meetings with providers to keep families abreast of new developments are essential.
Complications
Complications after surgery include those related to the surgical site, middle-ear function, inner-ear function, and facial-nerve function. Careful attention to perioperative care and informed discussion with the family of possible complications limit the occurrence and psychologic impact of postoperative problems.
- Wound
- Infection of the surgical site is limited by sterile technique and perioperative use of intravenous antibiotics and oral antibiotics. Infection of the skin graft donor site is prevented by careful perioperative hygiene.
- Stenosis of the newly created external auditory canal (EAC) occurs in 8-12% of cases. Narrowing at the meatus or more medially may be caused by infection or by cicatricial wound healing. The House Ear Institute evaluated its outcomes after instituting changes in their surgical approach in these patients and found that the use of the argon laser, thinner split-thickness skin grafts, silastic sheets in the external auditory canal, and Merocel wicks have all combined to decrease rate of external auditory canal stenosis to 3.8%.12
- Hearing loss
- Hearing should improve by 3 months after surgery. Persistent conductive hearing loss can occur because of failed ossicular reconstruction or scar formation (synechiae) in the middle ear. Hearing loss that develops after initial improvement may be due to OM, displacement of reconstructed ossicles or prostheses, synechiae formation, or lateralization of the reconstructed tympanic membrane, which occurs in 12-28% of cases. As expected, the acoustic characteristics of the newly reconstructed external auditory canal differ from those of contralateral healthy ear canals. A study showed that a significant shift existed in reconstructed canals in the resonant frequency toward the higher frequencies and a nonsignificant bandwidth change.13
- New sensorineural hearing loss is a rare occurrence and may happen with any middle ear surgery.
- Vertigo
- Dizziness for several hours after surgery is not unusual and reflects inner-ear trauma from manipulation of the stapes footplate during middle ear surgery. This vertigo should be transient.
- Oral or intravenous vestibular suppressants may be used if needed.
- Facial nerve injury
- Facial nerve function should be assessed preoperatively, with objective measures taken if necessary.
- Injury during surgery, when visible nerve injury is identified or indicated by nerve monitoring, is treated with high-dose intravenous corticosteroids, along with nerve reanastomosis and/or decompression.
- Upon emergence from general anesthesia, postoperative facial nerve palsy may be identified by absence of nasal flaring on the operative side, or it may be detected upon crying or grimacing after awakening. High-dose corticosteroids and observation are followed by a decision to re-explore the surgical site and decompress the nerve if injury is felt to be due to edema and is not responding to nonsurgical measures. This is addressed in more detail in the eMedicine article Dynamic Reanimation for Facial Paralysis.
Prognosis
- Hearing is measured in dB; normal hearing is considered to be between 0 and 15-20 dB for children. Higher measurements indicate sounds must be louder for a person to perceive them. A jet plane, for example, has a sound pressure level (SPL) of approximately 110 dB. Children with ear infections usually have a 40-dB hearing level.
- In a series of 16 patients published in 1988, Lambert obtained a speech reception threshold (SRT) or hearing threshold of 30 dB or greater in 67% of the operated ears.7 In De la Cruz's larger study of 302 ears, 73% of patients had a residual hearing deficit of 30 dB or less at 6-month follow-up.14 Jahrsdoerfer reported that 73% of 90 patients who had scores higher than 6 according to his grading system (see Surgical Care) and underwent operation achieved an SRT less than or equal to 25 dB.8
- The House Ear Institute published its results in 2004.12 It compared modifications in its technique with its previous surgical technique. The new modifications included the use of the Argon laser, thinner split-thickness skin grafts, Silastic sheets, and Merocel wicks in the external auditory canal. With these modifications, hearing results were closure of the air-bone gap to 30 dB or less in 63% of patients, with a long-term postoperative air-bone gap of 30 dB or less in 50% of patients. Ossicular chain refixation occurred in only 4% of these patients.
- According to Wetmore et al, Krowiak and Grundfast believe that the standard of care when surgically correcting an atretic EAC includes creation of a patent external auditory canal, resolution to a hearing level of 25 dB or less, and closure of the air-bone gap.15
- For unilateral conductive hearing loss due to unilateral EACA, Glasscock et al explain to patients that if surgery is successful, they should be able to listen to stereo music, tell the directionality of sound, and hear better in a noisy environment.9 In a quiet place or in one-to-one conversation, patients are told not to expect improved hearing after surgery.
- An excellent study that included a cost analysis of the surgery versus hearing aids found that "even with significant investments in EAC reconstruction, most patients still required some form of amplification."16 Cost analysis suggests that osteointegrated bone-conduction devices may have an economic advantage over surgical intervention.
Miscellaneous
Medicolegal Pitfalls
- Appropriate informed consent must be obtained before photographic documentation. In most cases, photographic consent is required if the person is identifiable from a particular image. Failure to obtain consent may have legal implications and result in significant social and psychologic injury, particularly in children.
More on External Auditory Canal Atresia |
| Overview: External Auditory Canal Atresia |
| Differential Diagnoses & Workup: External Auditory Canal Atresia |
| Treatment & Medication: External Auditory Canal Atresia |
Follow-up: External Auditory Canal Atresia |
| Multimedia: External Auditory Canal Atresia |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Jahrsdoerfer, RA. Congenital Atresia of the Ear. Laryngoscope. 1978;88(9 pt. 3 Suppl 13):1-48. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Caughey RJ, Jahrsdoerfer RA, Kesser BW. Congenital cholesteatoma in a case of congenital aural atresia. Otol Neurotol. Oct 2006;27(7):934-6. [Medline].
Sheykholeslami K, Sheykholesami K, Megerian CA, Kaga K. Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in infancy and early childhood. Laryngoscope. Aug 2005;115(8):1440-4. [Medline].
Ishimoto S, Ito K, Karino S, Takegoshi H, Kaga K, Yamasoba T. Hearing levels in patients with microtia: correlation with temporal bone malformation. Laryngoscope. Mar 2007;117(3):461-5. [Medline].
Sheykholeslami K, Mohammad HK, Sebastien S, Kaga K. Binaural interaction of bone-conducted auditory brainstem responses in children with congenital atresia of the external auditory canal. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67(10):1083-90. [Medline].
Siegert R, Mattheis S, Kasic J. Fully implantable hearing aids in patients with congenital auricular atresia. Laryngoscope. Feb 2007;117(2):336-40. [Medline].
Lambert PR. Major congenital ear malformations: surgical management and results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Nov-Dec 1988;97(6 Pt 1):641-9. [Medline].
Jahrsdoerfer RA, Yeakley JW, Aguilar EA, et al. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol. Jan 1992;13(1):6-12. [Medline].
Glasscock ME 3rd, Schwaber MK, Nissen AJ, Jackson CG. Management of congenital ear malformations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Sep-Oct 1983;92(5 Pt 1):504-9. [Medline].
Battelino S, Hocevar-Boltezar I, Zargi M. Intraoperative use of mitomycin C in fibrous atresia of the external auditory canal. Ear Nose Throat J. Dec 2005;84(12):776-9. [Medline].
Yamane H, Sunami K, Takayama M, et al. Application of modified transmastoid approach methods to congenital atresia of the external ear canal with middle ear infection. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. Oct 2004;38-44. [Medline].
Teufert KB, De la Cruz A. Advances in congenital aural atresia surgery: effects on outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;131(3):263-70. [Medline].
Satar B, Yetiser S, Ozkaptan Y. Acoustic characteristics of reconstructed ear canal after atresia surgery. Br J Audiol. 2000;34(6):379-81. [Medline].
De la Cruz A, Linthicum FH Jr, Luxford WM. Congenital atresia of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope. Apr 1985;95(4):421-7. [Medline].
Wetmore RF, Muntz HR, McGill TJ. Congenital malformations of the ear. In: Pediatric Otolaryngology Principles and Practice Pathways. 2000:235-52.
Evans AK, Kazahaya K. Canal atresia: "surgery or implantable hearing devices? The expert's question is revisited". Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Mar 2007;71(3):367-74. [Medline].
Blevins NH, Byahatti SV, Karmody CS. External auditory canal duplication anomalies associated with congenital aural atresia. J Laryngol Otol. Jan 2003;117(1):32-8. [Medline].
Caversaccio M, Romualdez J, Baechler R, et al. Valuable use of computer-aided surgery in congenital bony aural atresia. J Laryngol Otol. Apr 2003;117(4):241-8. [Medline].
Hol MK, Cremers CW, Coppens-Schellekens W, Snik AF. The BAHA Softband. A new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Jul 2005;69(7):973-80. [Medline].
Jacobsen N, Mills R. Management of stenosis and acquired atresia of the external auditory meatus. J Laryngol Otol. Apr 2006;120(4):266-71. [Medline].
Parrish KL, Amedee RG. Atresia of the external auditory canal. J La State Med Soc. Sep 1990;142(9):9-12. [Medline].
Swartz JD, Faerber EN. Congenital malformations of the external and middle ear: high-resolution CT findings of surgical import. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Mar 1985;144(3):501-6. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
external auditory canal atresia, congenital aural atresia, congenital atresia of the external auditory canal, EAC, EACA, EAC atresia, conductive hearing loss, ossicular malformations, craniofacial syndromes, atretic external canal, microtia, otitis media, OM, mastoiditis, facial nerve palsy, cholesteatoma
Follow-up: External Auditory Canal Atresia