eMedicine Specialties > Pediatrics: Surgery > Otolaryngology
Cholesteatoma: Differential Diagnoses & Workup
Updated: Mar 7, 2008
- Overview
- Differential Diagnoses & Workup
- Treatment & Medication
- Follow-up
- Multimedia
Differential Diagnoses
Other Problems to Be Considered
Tympanosclerosis
Middle ear osteoma
Chronic suppurative otitis media
Workup
Laboratory Studies
- No laboratory diagnostic tests are generally necessary.
Imaging Studies
- Some surgeons believe that any patient with a cholesteatoma scheduled for surgical intervention should have a preoperative CT scan. These surgeons believe that useful information is obtained in every circumstance and, consequently, that the expense and radiation exposure is always justified. The imaging modality of choice is a CT scan without intravenous contrast. CT scans can reveal the following subtle bony defects:
- Scutal erosion
- Labyrinthine fistula
- Defects in the tegmen
- Details of ossicular involvement
- Details of ossicular erosion or discontinuity
- Anomalies, erosion, or invasion of the facial nerve canal
- CT scanning cannot always distinguish between granulation tissue and cholesteatoma.
- Even technically excellent, fine-cut CT scans cannot always determine the full extent of disease.
- The surgeon, therefore, cannot always predict which operative course is required.
- Both the operating surgeon and the patient must understand these limitations of the preoperative assessment and must prepare for intraoperative surprises.
- Other surgeons reserve preoperative imaging for only special cases and are comfortable performing surgery without preoperative imaging. These surgeons are likely to request a preoperative CT scan in the following circumstances:
- Doubtful diagnosis
- The diagnosis may be in doubt among individuals with only small attic retractions upon physical examination.
- CT scanning may distinguish between shallow retractions without soft tissue extension into the epitympanic space and an extensive soft tissue mass with bony erosion.
- CT scanning can be helpful in individuals who already have had tympanomastoid surgery. In this group of patients, a white mass behind the TM can represent tympanosclerosis, cartilage deliberately placed at a previous operation, or recurrent cholesteatoma. CT scanning frequently helps determine which.
- Patient who adamantly wishes to avoid surgery
- Poor surgical candidates or patients who, for other reasons, wish to avoid an operation, can be better advised regarding the risks of nonsurgical management on the basis of CT scanning.
- Information from a CT scan may help a surgeon advise the patient and parents and/or caregivers that the presence of extensive disease, labyrinthine fistula, encroachment on the fallopian canal, and involvement of the oval window niche increase the risk of expectant management.
- If ossicular involvement is apparent on preoperative CT scans, then parents can be counseled that ossicular removal may be necessary and that a significant postoperative conductive hearing loss should be expected.
- Indeterminate underlying anatomy and unclear extent of disease as the result of previous surgery
- Reasonable expectation of congenital anomalies (eg, atresia, craniofacial anomalies)
- Suspected complications
- Doubtful diagnosis
- MRI is useful when the following very specific problems involving surrounding soft tissues are expected:
- Dural involvement invasion and/or inflammation
- Subdural or epidural abscess
- The presence of herniated brain into the mastoid cavity
- Inflammation of the membranous labyrinth or facial nerve
- Intracranial invasion
- Sigmoid sinus thrombosis
- Meningitis
Other Tests
- Audiometry
- In most circumstances, perform audiometry prior to surgery and include air and bone conduction and speech discrimination testing.
- Infrequently, a serious complication of cholesteatoma requires urgent surgery; in these patients, audiometric testing can be omitted.
Histologic Findings
The histology of surgically removed cholesteatoma specimens demonstrates typical squamous epithelium. The histology is indistinguishable from sebaceous cysts or keratomas removed from any other portion of the body.
More on Cholesteatoma |
| Overview: Cholesteatoma |
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Cholesteatoma |
| Treatment & Medication: Cholesteatoma |
| Follow-up: Cholesteatoma |
| Multimedia: Cholesteatoma |
| References |
| « Previous Page | Next Page » |
References
Roland PS, Meyerhoff WL. Open-cavity tympanomastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Jun 1999;32(3):525-46. [Medline].
Graham MD, Delap TG, Goldsmith MM. Closed tympanomastoidectomy. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Jun 1999;32(3):547-54. [Medline].
Manolidis S, Kutz JW Jr. Diagnosis and management of lateral sinus thrombosis. Otol Neurotol. Sep 2005;26(5):1045-51. [Medline].
Kazahaya K, Potsic WP. Congenital cholesteatoma. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Oct 2004;12(5):398-403. [Medline].
Potsic WP, Korman SB, Samadi DS, Wetmore RF. Congenital cholesteatoma: 20 years' experience at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Apr 2002;126(4):409-14. [Medline].
Dawes PJ, Leaper M. Paediatric small cavity mastoid surgery: second look tympanotomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Feb 2004;68(2):143-8. [Medline].
De la Cruz A, Fayad JN. Detection and management of childhood cholesteatoma. Pediatr Ann. Jun 1999;28(6):370-3. [Medline].
Dornhoffer JL, Colvin GB, North P. Evidence of residual disease in ossicles of patients undergoing cholesteatoma removal. Acta Otolaryngol. Jan 1999;119(1):89-92. [Medline].
Busaba NY. Clinical presentation and management of labyrinthine fistula caused by chronic otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. May 1999;108(5):435-9. [Medline].
Anderson J, Caye-Thomasen P, Tos M. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in tympanoplasty after surgery for sinus or tensa retraction cholesteatoma in children. Otol Neurotol. Nov 2004;25(6):856-63. [Medline].
Bennett M, Warren F, Jackson GC, Kaylie D. Congenital cholesteatoma: theories, facts, and 53 patients. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Dec 2006;39(6):1081-94. [Medline].
Chadha NK, Jardine A, Owens D, et al. A multivariate analysis of the factors predicting hearing outcome after surgery for cholesteatoma in children. J Laryngol Otol. Nov 2006;120(11):908-13. [Medline].
Golz A, Goldenberg D, Netzer A, et al. Cholesteatomas associated with ventilation tube insertion. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jul 1999;125(7):754-7. [Medline].
Kemppainen HO, Puhakka HJ, Laippala PJ, et al. Epidemiology and aetiology of middle ear cholesteatoma. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(5):568-72. [Medline].
Migirov L, Duvdevani S, Kronenberg J. Otogenic intracranial complications: a review of 28 cases. Acta Otolaryngol. Aug 2005;125(8):819-22. [Medline].
Ottaviani F, Neglia CB, Berti E. Cytokines and adhesion molecules in middle ear cholesteatoma. A role in epithelial growth?. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119(4):462-7. [Medline].
Semaan MT, Megerian CA. The pathophysiology of cholesteatoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. Dec 2006;39(6):1143-59. [Medline].
Thompson JW. Cholesteatomas. Pediatr Rev. Apr 1999;20(4):134-6. [Medline].
Tierney PA, Pracy P, Blaney SP, Bowdler DA. An assessment of the value of the preoperative computed tomography scans prior to otoendoscopic 'second look' in intact canal wall mastoid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. Aug 1999;24(4):274-6. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
cholesteatoma, keratoma, middle ear cholesteatoma, primary cholesteatoma, primary acquired cholesteatoma, secondary cholesteatoma, secondary acquired cholesteatoma, otorrhea, tympanic membrane perforation, TM perforation, temporal bone, squamous epithelium, congenital cholesteatoma, scutal erosion, labyrinthine fistula
Differential Diagnoses & Workup: Cholesteatoma