Pierre Robin Sequence
- Author: Marie M Tolarova, MD, PhD, DSc; Chief Editor: Ravindhra G Elluru, MD, PhD more...
Pierre Robin sequence (PRS; also referred to as Pierre Robin malformation, Pierre Robin malformation sequence, Robin sequence, Pierre Robin syndrome, and Pierre Robin anomalad) consists of three essential components:
Micrognathia or retrognathia
Cleft palate (usually U-shaped but sometimes V-shaped)
Glossoptosis, often accompanied by airway obstruction
PRS is a series of anomalies all initiated by one developmental problem. Other definitions have been suggested, based on a combination of mandibular deficiency, presence of U-shaped or V-shaped cleft palate, and airway obstruction.
PRS is not only causally heterogenous but also pathogenetically and phenotypically variable. Each of the three symptoms can occur along a wide spectrum of severity. On the absis of the combination of symptoms, newborn babies and infants suffer from airway obstruction and feeding problems. An approach dividing this condition into three grades of severity has been recommended.
PRS occurs as an isolated defect, as part of a recognized syndrome, or as part of a complex of multiple congenital anomalies. Diagnosis of a possible syndrome is very often critically important for correct management of a newborn affected with PRS.[3, 4]
The condition is named after the French dental surgeon Pierre Robin (1867-1950). His first paper described only micrognathia, glossoptosis, and respiratory distress ; a decade later, he included cleft palate in the list of symptoms. His main interest was glossoptosis; over a 30-year period, he published more than 20 articles and monographs on the embryology, anatomy, complications, and management of this disorder.
PRS is etiologically heterogenous. Its etiologic heterogeneity suggests pathogenetic heterogeneity and phenotypic variability, which include various causes of malformations and deformations and connective tissue dysplasia (see Etiology). A major distinction should be made between isolated occurrences of PRS and cases in which PRS is part of a recognized syndrome, part of a complex of multiple anomalies, or part of an unrecognized syndrome.
Isolated PRS is often a deformation resulting from intrauterine forces acting on the mandible, which restrict its growth and impact the tongue between the palatal shelves. Some deformational cases of PRS have been associated with oligohydramnios. Because micrognathia results from intrauterine molding, mandibular catchup growth is expected after birth once intrauterine forces are removed. The most severe cases of micrognathia are unlikely to be isolated PRS caused by deformation. Therefore, catchup growth is unlikely.
In patients with PRS, 13-27.7% of other family members are affected with cleft lip with or without cleft palate.[8, 9] Jakobsen et al compared data in several databases and proposed genes that might participate in the etiology of PRS, including GAD67 on 2q31, PVRL1 on 11q23-q24, and SOX9 on 17q24.3-q25.1. Melkoniemi et al detected disease-associated mutations in COL11A1 and COL11A2 genes in some patients with nonsyndromic PRS.
Jacobsen et al screened 10 unrelated patients affected with PRS for SOX9 and KCNJ2 mutations and suggested that nonsyndromic PRS may be caused by both SOX9 and KCNJ2 dysregulation. Several lines of evidence for the existence of a 17q24 locus underlying PRS, including linkage analysis results, a clustering of translocation breakpoints 1.06-1.23 Mb upstream of SOX9, and microdeletions both approximately 1.5 Mb centromeric and approximately 1.5 Mb telomeric of SOX9, have been reported by Benko et al.
The proportion of cases that are isolated PRS varies in different studies. Hanson and Smith found that 25% of PRS cases had specific syndromes, another 35% had multiple anomalies without a specific recognized syndrome, and only 40% had isolated PRS. Another study found that 74% of cases were isolated PRS.
Among syndromic varieties of PRS, the most common is Stickler syndrome, which accounts for 20-25% of all cases. The second most common PRS syndrome is velocardiofacial syndrome, which accounts for about 15% of all PRS cases. Treacher Collins syndrome (mandibulofacial dysostosis), Nager syndrome, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita (SEC), and other recognized syndromes account for the rest of the syndromic PRS cases.
Cohen listed 46 conditions associated with PRS (see the image below). Although this list is representative, it is not complete. PRS may be present with other conditions and various other anomalies, especially those involving the eye, ear, heart, and limb.
When Robin sequence is diagnosed, a full genetic evaluation (including fluorescent in situ hybridization [FISH] for 22q deletion and testing for mutation in the Treacle [TCOF1] gene) is appropriate, together with diagnostic tests for other suspected syndromes (eg, bone radiographs and ophthalmologic examination).
Among 47 patients with PRS who were monitored by Sheffield et al, 12 patients were diagnosed as syndromic. Out of 52 cases reported by Sher, 15 patients had Stickler syndrome and only 5 had nonsyndromic PRS.
Distinguishing between micrognathia (ie, a small mandible) and retrognathia (ie, an essentially normal-sized mandible in an abnormal position) is important. In micrognathia, the mandible is small; in retrognathia, the mandible is essentially normal in size but is retrognathic in position because the cranial base angle is larger than normal. Most PRS conditions are either micrognathic or retrognathic.
In velocardiofacial syndrome, the mandible is retrognathic. Because the cranial base is altered, the mandible grows downward instead of forward. This gives the appearance of a small mandible, but the bone mass is normal. Retrognathia rarely produces severe airway distress.
In the vast majority of other syndromes, the mandible is micrognathic. The bone mass is decreased, and the mandible is disproportionately small. Severe airway obstruction is more common with these syndromes.
One of the most severe problems with airway obstruction may occur in patients affected with SEC. Cleft palate or PRS is often present in this autosomal dominant condition that has a mutation in the COL2A1 gene, located on chromosome 12 (12q13.11-q13.2), the same as that found in Stickler syndrome type I (hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy).
The respiratory compromise in SEC is caused by multiple mechanisms, including a small abnormal chest, a tracheobronchomalacia, and a central apnea caused by compression of cervical spinal cord or medulla oblongata from cervical instability. Furthermore, the upper respiratory obstruction of PRS may worsen the respiratory condition of the patient with SEC (see the image below).
The mandible in PRS is often compared with the mandible in Treacher Collins syndrome (see the image below). When comparing two newborn babies with these two conditions, one can see that the mandible is short in both.
Because the severity of the defects varies widely in both conditions, the defects in PRS may initially seem much greater than those in Treacher Collins syndrome; however, a significant difference between these conditions becomes very apparent as the infant develops. In deformational PRS, so-called catchup growth occurs, though it may be incomplete. In Treacher Collins syndrome, mandibular growth remains severely affected.
Suggested causes of PRS and Robin complexes include malformation, deformation, and connective tissue dysplasia. Because of differences in pathogenetic causes and phenotypes, various forms of PRS or Robin complexes can occur (see the image below).
For example, a pure exogenous factor such as oligohydramnios causing mandibular constraint leads to a failure of the tongue to descend and starts a sequence that ends as PRS. However, intrinsic intrauterine mandibular hypoplasia that may be part of a complex of anomalies (syndrome) caused by a chromosomal aberration can cause the same problem (ie, failure of tongue descent) and end in exactly the same way as the previous example; yet the former is a deformation sequence and the latter is a malformation sequence.
The reported birth prevalence of PRS ranges from 1 in 2000 to 1 in 30,000. Bush and Williams suggested 1 in 8500. The case definition of PRS still varies, and differences in definition lead to differences in the reported birth prevalence. In studies with the highest birth prevalence of PRS, syndromic cases are most likely included.
A study of a population-based sample of 4433 patients with orofacial cleft (ascertained from 2,509,881 California births) reported the birth prevalence of nonsyndromic PRS to be 1 in 18,730 (0.05 cases per 1000 births).
Most nonsyndromic PRS cases are sporadic. In the older literature, several authors reported a familial occurrence[29, 30, 31] ; some of these cases were probably syndromic. The authors' recommend that Stickler syndrome be considered first when a familial occurrence of PRS is found. Stickler syndrome is the most common syndrome among PRS cases, and PRS is the most constant feature of Stickler syndrome. When correctly diagnosed, myopia is detected early; this can prevent retinal detachment and possibly blindness.
All neonates with significant PRS are at risk for sudden death. The sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) data show that the risk of SIDS is increased when infants sleep in the prone position. Neonates with PRS already have a compromised airway, and they also typically require prone positioning. Accordingly, monitoring of these neonates should be strongly considered.
Infants with PRS deserve to be treated with a multidisciplinary approach that involves a knowledgeable and experienced team capable of providing a comprehensive assessment, a realistic plan of treatment, and appropriate follow-up. Engaging the family in the early stages of the evaluation, the ongoing medical investigations, the issues regarding the child's care, and future planning generally leads to satisfaction, even in the most difficult of medical scenarios.
Children with PRS have difficulties with feeding. A cleft palate prevents production of the negative pressure necessary for sucking during breastfeeding. In addition, because of an abnormal jaw position, a baby with a small mandible usually has difficulties contracting its orbicularis oris muscle and squeezing the mother's nipple. In cleft palate, a wide communication between the oral and nasal cavities creates a risk of aspiration, nasal regurgitation, choking, and other feeding problems.
Consultation with a feeding specialist is advised. In many cases, when carefully instructed, a mother is able to manage bottle feeding while her baby is in a semisitting position. Special cleft palate nipples and squeezing bottles are helpful (see Cleft Lip and Palate). In patients with severe problems, gavage feeding may be necessary in the beginning of the baby's life.
Verifying that the mother of the baby with PRS is familiar with emergency techniques for the prevention of suffocation by food, such as the Heimlich maneuver, is important.
Pruzansky S. Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike. Birth Defects. 1969. 5(2):120-9.
Cole A, Lynch P, Slator R. A new grading of Pierre Robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008 Nov. 45(6):603-6. [Medline].
Olasoji HO, Ambe PJ, Adesina OA. Pierre Robin syndrome: an update. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2007 Jun. 14(2):140-5. [Medline].
Shprintzen RJ. The implications of the diagnosis of Robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992. 29:205-209. [Medline].
Robin P. La chute de la base de la langue consideree comme une nouvelle cause de gene dans la respiration naso-pharyngienne. Bull Acad Med Paris. 1923. 89:37-41.
Robin P. Glossoptosis due to atresia and hypotrophy of the mandible. Am J Dis Child. 1934. 48:541-547.
Beighton P, Beighton G. The Man Behind Syndrome. Springer-Verlag, Berlin: 1986.
Marques IL, Barbieri MA, Bettiol H. Etiopathogenesis of isolated Robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1998 Nov. 35(6):517-25. [Medline].
Holder-Espinasse M, Abadie V, Cormier-Daire V, et al. Pierre Robin sequence: a series of 117 consecutive cases. J Pediatr. 2001 Oct. 139(4):588-90. [Medline].
Jakobsen LP, Knudsen MA, Lespinasse J, et al. The genetic basis of the Pierre Robin Sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Mar. 43(2):155-9. [Medline].
Melkoniemi M, Koillinen H, Mannikko M, et al. Collagen XI sequence variations in nonsyndromic cleft palate, Robin sequence and micrognathia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003 Mar. 11(3):265-70. [Medline].
Jakobsen LP, Ullmann R, Christensen SB, et al. Pierre Robin sequence may be caused by dysregulation of SOX9 and KCNJ2. J Med Genet. 2007 Jun. 44(6):381-6. [Medline].
Benko S, Fantes JA, Amiel J, Kleinjan DJ, Thomas S, Ramsay J, et al. Highly conserved non-coding elements on either side of SOX9 associated with Pierre Robin sequence. Nat Genet. 2009 Mar. 41(3):359-64. [Medline].
Hanson JW, Smith DW. U-shaped palatal defect in the Robin anomalad: developmental and clinical relevance. J Pediatr. 1975 Jul. 87(1):30-33. [Medline].
Williams AJ, Williams MA, Walker CA, Bush PG. The Robin anomalad (Pierre Robin syndrome) - a follow-up study. Arch Dis Child. 1981. 45:663-668. [Medline].
Shprintzen RJ, Goldberg RB, Young D, Wolford L. The velo-cardio-facial syndrome: A clinical and genetic analysis. Pediatrics. 1981. 67:167-172. [Medline].
Cohen MM Jr. The Child with Multiple Birth Defects,. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University; 1997.
Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM Jr, Hennekam RCM. Syndromes of the Head and Neck,. 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University; 2001.
Sheffield LJ, Reiss JA, Strohm K, Gilding M. A genetic follow-up study of 64 patients with the Pierre Robin complex. Amer J Med Genet. 1987. 28:25-36. [Medline].
Sher AE. Mechanisms of airway obstruction in Robin sequence: Implications for treatment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992. 29:224-231. [Medline].
Cohen MM Jr. Dysmorphology, syndromology, and genetics in plastic surgery. McCarthy JG, ed. Plastic Surgery. WB Saunders: Philadelphia, PA; 1990. 69-112.
Harding CO, Green CG, Perloff WH, Pauli RM. Respiratory complications in children with spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1990. 9:49-54. [Medline].
Kreiborg S, Cohen MM Jr. Syndrome delineation and growth in orofacial clefting and craniosynostosis. Turvey TA, Vig KWL, Fonseca RJ, eds. Facial Clefts and Craniosynostosis. Principles and Management. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1996. 57-75.
Cohen MM Jr. Editorial comment. Robin sequences and complexes. Causal heterogeneity and pathogenetic/phenotypic variability. Amer J Med Genet. 1999. 84:311-315. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Poswillo D. The aetiology and surgery of cleft palate with micrognathia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1968. 43(2):61-88. [Medline].
Bush PG, Williams AJ. Incidence of the Robin anomalad (Pierre Robin syndrome). Br J Plast Surg. 1983. 36:434-437. [Medline].
Shprintzen RJ. Pierre Robin, micrognathia, and airway obstruction: The dependency of treatment on accurate diagnosis. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1988. 26:64-71. [Medline].
Tolarova MM, Cervenka J. Classification and birth prevalence of orofacial clefts. Amer J Med Genet. 1998. 75:126-137. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Smith JW, Stowe WR. The Pierre Robin syndrome (glossoptosis, micrognathia, cleft palate). A review of 39 cases with emphasis on associated ocular lesions. Pediatrics. 1961. 27:128-33.
Bixler D, Christian JC. Pierre Robin syndrome occurring in two unrelated sibships. Birth Defects Orig Art Ser. 1971. VII(7):67-71.
Shah CV, Pruzansky S, Harris WS. Cardiac malformations with facial clefts; with observations on the Pierre Robin syndrome. Am J Dis Child. 1970 Mar. 119(3):238-44. [Medline].
Radhakrishnan J, Sharma A. Feeding plate for a neonate with Pierre Robin sequence. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jul-Sep. 29(3):239-43. [Medline].
Jones KL. Smith's Recognizable Patterns of Human Malformation. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 2005.
Cohen MM Jr. Etiology and pathogenesis of orofacial clefting. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. 2000. 12(3):379-97.
Lee JH, Kim YH. Temporary tongue-lip traction during the initial period of mandibular distraction in Pierre Robin sequence. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2009 Jan. 46(1):19-23. [Medline].
Hong P. A clinical narrative review of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in neonates with Pierre Robin sequence. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Aug. 75(8):985-91. [Medline].
Sidman JD, Sampson D, Templeton B. Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible for airway obstruction in children. Laryngoscope. 2001. 111:1137-1146. [Medline].
Dauria D, Marsh JL. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis for Pierre Robin sequence: what percentage of neonates need it?. J Craniofac Surg. 2008 Sep. 19(5):1237-43. [Medline].
St-Hilaire H, Buchbinder D. Maxillofacial pathology and management of Pierre Robin sequence. Otolaryngol Clin of North Am. 2000 Dec. 33(6):1241-1256. [Medline].
Han KD, Seruya M, Oh AK, Zalzal GH, Preciado DA. "Natural" decannulation in patients with Robin sequence and severe airway obstruction. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 Jan. 121(1):44-50. [Medline].
Glynn F, Fitzgerald D, Earley MJ, Rowley H. Pierre Robin sequence: an institutional experience in the multidisciplinary management of airway, feeding and serous otitis media challenges. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Sep. 75(9):1152-5. [Medline].
Smith MC, Senders CW. Prognosis of airway obstruction and feeding difficulty in the Robin sequence. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Feb. 70(2):319-24. [Medline].
Lehman JA, Fishman JRA, Neiman GS. Treatment of cleft palate associated with Robin sequence: Appraisal of risk factors. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995. 32:25-29. [Medline].
McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, et al. Lengthening of the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992. 89:1-8. [Medline].
Cohen SR, Simms C, Burstein FD. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of upper airway obstruction in children with craniofacial anomalies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998. 101:312-318. [Medline].
Lam DJ, Tabangin ME, Shikary TA, Uribe-Rivera A, Meinzen-Derr JK, de Alarcon A, et al. Outcomes of mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of severe micrognathia. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr. 140(4):338-45. [Medline].
Flores RL, Tholpady SS, Sati S, Fairbanks G, Socas J, Choi M, et al. The surgical correction of Pierre Robin sequence: mandibular distraction osteogenesis versus tongue-lip adhesion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun. 133(6):1433-9. [Medline].
Witt PD, Myckatyn T, Marsh JL, et al. Need for velopharyngeal management following palatoplasty: An outcome analysis of syndromic and nonsyndromic patients with Robin sequence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997. 99:1522-1529. [Medline].