Pediatric Microtia Surgery 

  • Author: Arturo Bonilla, MD; Chief Editor: Glenn C Isaacson, MD, FACS, FAAP   more...
 
Updated: May 17, 2011
 

Background

Microtia is the most common major congenital anomaly of the external ear but is rare enough that parents usually have never encountered it. Because of the prominent location of the ears, any deformity is visible.

Health care providers may also be unfamiliar with this condition. Because of technical advances in the reconstruction of the microtic ear, results have dramatically improved in the hands of experienced ear reconstructive surgeons.

Because of the fine details of microtia reconstruction, the surgeon must have a complete understanding of the 3-dimensional form of the auricle and sound surgical principles of soft tissue management and transfer. The future of microtia surgery holds much promise.

Next

History of the Procedure

This condition is rarely noticed prenatally and is very traumatic for parents. Another major stressor is the feeling of guilt that parents may experience. Reassure parents that they were likely not the cause of their child's condition.

The affected ear usually has severe conductive hearing loss (approximately 40-60 dB) secondary to lack of an external auditory canal and ossicular fixation. These children are likely to have normal speech.

Previous
Next

Problem

Microtia is classified as follows based on a gradient from less severe (grade I) to total absence of the external ear (anotia):

Grade I

The pinna is malformed and smaller than normal. Most of the characteristics of the pinna, such as the helix, triangular fossa, and scaphae, are present with relatively good definition (see the image below).

Microtia, grade I. The pinna is malformed and smalMicrotia, grade I. The pinna is malformed and smaller than normal. Most of the characteristics of the pinna, such as the helix, triangular fossa, and scaphae, are present with relatively good definition.

Grade II

The pinna is smaller and less developed than in grade I. The helix may not be fully developed. The triangular fossa, scaphae, and antihelix have much less definition (see the image below).

Microtia, grade II. The pinna is smaller and less Microtia, grade II. The pinna is smaller and less developed than in grade I. The helix may not be fully developed. The triangular fossa, scaphae, and antihelix have much less definition.

Grade III

The pinna is essentially absent, except for a vertical sausage-shaped skin remnant. The superior aspect of this sausage-shaped skin remnant consists of underlying unorganized cartilage, and the inferior aspect of this remnant consists of a relatively well-formed lobule (see the image below).

Microtia, grade III. The pinna is essentially abseMicrotia, grade III. The pinna is essentially absent except for a vertical sausage-shaped skin remnant. The superior aspect of this sausage-shaped skin remnant consists of underlying unorganized cartilage, and the inferior aspect of this remnant consists of a relatively well-formed lobule.

Anotia

Total absence of the pinna is observed (see the image below).

Microtia, anotia. Total absence of the pinna. Microtia, anotia. Total absence of the pinna.
Previous
Next

Epidemiology

Frequency

Microtia has been reported to occur in 1 per 6,000-12,000 births. Although the reason is unknown, microtia is seen more commonly in males than in females. In addition, the right side is affected more commonly than the left. Some studies have reported that the prevalence of auricular anomalies at birth increases with maternal age.

Previous
Next

Etiology

The actual cause is relatively unknown. McKenzie and Craig state that microtia may occur as a result of in utero tissue ischemia secondary to obliteration of the stapedial artery or actual hemorrhage into the local tissues.[1]

Genetic studies have revealed several possible etiologic factors, such as chromosomal aberrations, multifactorial inheritance, and autosomal and recessive traits. The most common syndromes associated with microtia are Goldenhar syndrome and Treacher Collins syndrome.

In addition, several medications, such as thalidomide and isotretinoin (Accutane), have been implicated as causing severe congenital malformations such as microtia.

Previous
Next

Pathophysiology

During the seventh week of gestation, the first and second arches give rise to 6 hillocks called the hillocks of His. The first 3 hillocks are derived from the first arch, and the final 3 hillocks are derived from the second arch. These hillocks then fuse, forming the future ear. The structures of the adult ear corresponding to the hillocks are the tragus (first hillock), helical crus (second hillock), the helix (third hillock), the antihelix (fourth and fifth hillocks), and the antitragus (sixth hillock).

Previous
Next

Presentation

Consultation regarding a patient born with microtia ideally should occur soon after birth. In addition to evaluation of the major organ systems, the initial hearing status of the child is of utmost importance.

Although severe conductive hearing loss results secondary to a malformed ear and absence or stenosis of the external auditory canal, inner ear function is almost always good, resulting in some ability to hear on the affected side.

The contralateral ear almost always is normal, resulting in relatively normal speech development. During the initial consultation, the ear reconstructive surgeon should reassure the parents and outline the future management of their child's condition.

If microtia is the only developmental anomaly, the initial workup consists of the evaluation of the child's hearing status. As previously stated, the inner ear function is usually normal in patients with microtia. Also, the middle ear status of the nonaffected ear is usually normal, resulting in overall normal hearing in the nonaffected ear. The contralateral ear is normal in most patients.

Previous
Next

Indications

Unilateral microtia

Auricular reconstruction for unilateral microtia usually begins in children aged 6-8 years because the pinna reaches about 85-90% of its adult size at this age. By this time, the child is usually large enough that rib size is sufficient to harvest an adequate rib graft. If the child is still small, postpone surgery until an adequate rib for the framework can be harvested.

For example, if a very small 6-year-old child presents with microtia, postponing auricular reconstruction until age 7-8 years, when rib growth is sufficient, is reasonable. On the other hand, if a very large 5-year-old child presents with microtia, the surgeon may begin reconstruction sooner because of adequate rib size.

The ideal time to begin the reconstruction is the summer before the first grade. By the time the child starts the first grade, at least 2 of the surgeries can be performed, allowing the child to have the resemblance of an ear. Children tend to be teased during these early school years when the ear is not yet reconstructed.

Bilateral microtia

Surgical reconstruction in children with bilateral microtia is started at age 6-7 years, depending on their size. Before the pinna reconstructions, a CT scan of the temporal bones is obtained to evaluate for ear canal and middle ear reconstructive surgery. Two relatively smaller ears are not as noticeable as one asymmetric ear.

Starting the external ear reconstructions before the middle ear surgery is very important. If an attempt is made to open the canal before the external ear reconstruction, the elasticity of the "virgin" skin and the circulation are compromised.

Because these children are dependent on bone-conduction hearing aids, the goal of starting earlier is to finish at least one ear. The canal may be drilled soon after the ear is reconstructed. Obtaining adequate hearing without hearing aids is the eventual goal. If the child is not a candidate for atresia surgery, the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) is also an option.

Previous
Next

Relevant Anatomy

The reconstructive surgeon must intimately know the anatomy of the external, middle, and inner ear. Important landmarks include the helix, helical crus, antihelix, crura of the antihelix, tragus, antitragus, scapha, triangular fossa, concha cymba, concha cavum, and lobule.

The primary blood supply to the external ear is via the superficial temporal artery and branches of the posterior auricular artery. The sensory innervation of the external ear is via the anterior and posterior branches of the greater auricular nerve.

The location and reference point of the ear must be well understood. The angle of the long axis of the ear approximates the angle of the nasal dorsum. The superior point of the ear is usually at the eyebrow level. In a child aged 5-7 years, the helical crus is usually approximately 6.5-7 cm from the lateral canthus. The most inferior aspect of the lobule on the microtic ear is usually 0.5 cm higher than the normal side.

Previous
Next

Contraindications

Contraindications to rib surgery for microtia reconstruction include high-risk surgical status and chest wall deformities. In addition, patients with pulmonary hypoplasia are at risk of a pneumothorax occurring during the rib harvest.

Previous
Proceed to Workup
 
 
Contributor Information and Disclosures
Author

Arturo Bonilla, MD  Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Founder and Director, Microtia - Congenital Ear Deformity Institute; Consulting Staff, Pediatric Subspecialists of South Texas

Arturo Bonilla, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and American Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Specialty Editor Board

Orval Brown, MD  Director of Otolaryngology Clinic, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Orval Brown, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Bronchoesophagological Association, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Society for Ear, Nose and Throat Advances in Children, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Mary L Windle, PharmD  Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy; Editor-in-Chief, Medscape Drug Reference

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Alan D Murray, MD  Pediatric Otolaryngologist, ENT for Children; Full-Time Staff, Medical City Dallas Children's Hospital; Consulting Staff, Department of Otolaryngology, Medical Center of Lewisville, Children's Medical Center at Dallas, Cook Children's Medical Center; Full-Time Staff, Texas Pediatric Surgery Center, The Pediatric Surgery Center

Alan D Murray, MD is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Society for Ear, Nose and Throat Advances in Children, and Texas Medical Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Paul D Petry, DO, FACOP, FAAP  Consulting Staff, Freeman Pediatric Care, Freeman Health System

Paul D Petry, DO, FACOP, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Osteopathy, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Osteopathic Pediatricians, and American Osteopathic Association

Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.

Chief Editor

Glenn C Isaacson, MD, FACS, FAAP  Professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Pediatrics, Temple University School of Medicine

Glenn C Isaacson, MD, FACS, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Bronchoesophagological Association, American College of Surgeons, American Laryngological Rhinological and Otological Society, American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, and Society of University Otolaryngologists-Head and Neck Surgeons

Disclosure: Covidien Honoraria Consulting

References
  1. Craig MJ. Mandibulo-facial dysostosis. Arch Dis Child. 1955;30:391-397.

  2. Aguilar EF. Auricular reconstruction of congenital microtia (grade III). Laryngoscope. Dec 1996;106(12 Pt 2 Suppl 82):1-26. [Medline].

  3. Avelar JM, Psillakis JM. Microtia: total reconstruction of the auricle in one single operation. Br J Plast Surg. Apr 1981;34(2):224-7. [Medline].

  4. Brent B. Technical advances in ear reconstruction with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: personal experience with 1200 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1999;104(2):319-34; discussion 335-8. [Medline].

  5. Cao Y, Vacanti JP, Paige KT, et al. Transplantation of chondrocytes utilizing a polymer-cell construct to produce tissue-engineered cartilage in the shape of a human ear. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1997;100(2):297-302; discussion 303-4. [Medline].

  6. Cilingir M, Malkoc C, Duman A, et al. Microtia and pectoralis muscle agenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 2004;113(7):2222-4. [Medline].

  7. Harris J, Kallen B, Robert E. The epidemiology of anotia and microtia. J Med Genet. Oct 1996;33(10):809-13. [Medline].

  8. Lynberg MC, Khoury MJ, Lammer EJ, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of multiple malformations in isotretinoin embryopathy surveillance. Teratology. Nov 1990;42(5):513-9. [Medline].

  9. More V, Ahuja SR, Kulkarni HV, Kulkarni MV. Bilateral anotia with congenital hypothyroidism. Indian J Pediatr. Apr 2004;71(4):369-70. [Medline].

  10. Nagata S. Total auricular reconstruction with a three-dimensional costal cartilage framework. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. Aug 1995;40(4):371-99; discussion 400-3. [Medline].

  11. Shih JC, Shyu MK, Lee CN, et al. Antenatal depiction of the fetal ear with three-dimensional ultrasonography. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1998;91(4):500-5. [Medline].

  12. Smithells RW, Newman CG. Recognition of thalidomide defects. J Med Genet. Oct 1992;29(10):716-23. [Medline].

  13. Song Y, Song Y. An improved one-stage total ear reconstruction procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1983;71(5):615-23. [Medline].

  14. Tanzer RC. Correction of microtia with autotenous costal cartilage. In: Tanzer RC, Edgerton MT, eds. Symposium on Reconstruction of the Auricle. St. Louis:. Mosby;1974:46-57.

  15. Yanai A, Fukuda O, Yamada A. Problems encountered in contouring a reconstructed ear of autogenous cartilage. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1985;75(2):185-91. [Medline].

Previous
Next
 
Microtia, grade I. The pinna is malformed and smaller than normal. Most of the characteristics of the pinna, such as the helix, triangular fossa, and scaphae, are present with relatively good definition.
Microtia, grade II. The pinna is smaller and less developed than in grade I. The helix may not be fully developed. The triangular fossa, scaphae, and antihelix have much less definition.
Microtia, grade III. The pinna is essentially absent except for a vertical sausage-shaped skin remnant. The superior aspect of this sausage-shaped skin remnant consists of underlying unorganized cartilage, and the inferior aspect of this remnant consists of a relatively well-formed lobule.
Microtia, anotia. Total absence of the pinna.
Normal ear characteristics.
Microtia. Location of rib cartilage harvesting.
The sixth and seventh rib synchondroses form the base framework of the new ear. The eighth rib is used to form the rim or helix.
The 3 pieces of rib are carved, sculpted, and sutured together.
The new framework is inserted into a skin pocket under the microtic ear.
Photograph of the new framework inserted into a skin pocket under the microtic ear.
The second stage consists of forming the earlobe, otherwise known as transposition of the lobule. An incision is made both in front and behind the skin vestige as shown. The skin vestige is then rotated into place via a Z-plasty and spliced to the cartilaginous framework that was sculpted during the first stage.
Sutures are placed, and antibiotic ointment is applied.
The graft is taken from the upper buttock area on the same side as the microtic ear. The graft harvest site is hidden under the bathing suit or underwear region.
An incision is made behind the newly constructed ear, and the undersurface is undermined. The banked cartilage harvested from the first stage is then placed under the framework to provide support and elevation.
This raw tissue is lined with a skin graft.
The reconstructed ear is marked for the future placement of the tragus. An incision is made as shown. At this point, a J-shaped incision is made in the conchal area of the microtic ear.
Once the concha on the microtic ear is excavated, the second skin graft is placed to line the raw conchal tissue. The ear now has the appearance of having an external auditory canal.
Preoperative image of a grade III microtia.
Postoperative image of a corrected grade III microtia (same patient as image above).
 
 
 
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2012 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

DISCLAIMER: The content of this Website is not influenced by sponsors. The site is designed primarily for use by qualified physicians and other medical professionals. The information contained herein should NOT be used as a substitute for the advice of an appropriately qualified and licensed physician or other health care provider. The information provided here is for educational and informational purposes only. In no way should it be considered as offering medical advice. Please check with a physician if you suspect you are ill.