Dientamoeba Fragilis Infection Workup
- Author: David R Mack, MD, FRCPC; Chief Editor: Russell W Steele, MD more...
Laboratory Studies
Blood tests
Blood test results are usually normal in patients with Dientamoeba fragilis infection. However, a CBC count with differential may reveal eosinophilia in as many as 50% of children infected with the parasite.
Stool evaluation
The usual method for confirming the diagnosis is examination of a permanently stained smear of fresh feces, preserved immediately, for the morphologic characteristics of D fragilis trophozoites. Newer, but experimental, techniques include immunofluorescence and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques.[4] Culture is not routinely available.
Preferred stool preparation involves a fresh sample that is immediately preserved with polyvinyl alcohol fixative, sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin fixative, or Schaudinn fixative. Immediate preservation is necessary because, in unpreserved feces, the morphologic characteristics of the trophozoites do not persist, and they round up and become granular within 15 minutes at room temperature.
A single sample is diagnostic only 50-60% of the time. Three separate samples increase the yield to 70-85%, and 6 separate samples increase the yield to 90-95%.
Ensure that stool samples are collected on alternate days because D fragilis can be excreted in a cyclic pattern similar to G lamblia. The final portion of the stool evacuation may contain the most concentrated numbers of trophozoites. Collect stool specimens before radiologic procedures that use barium because barium interferes with trophozoite detection and may do so for several weeks.
Other medications that can interfere with parasite detection include antibiotics, antiprotozoan medication, antimalarials, mineral oil, bismuth-containing preparations, and nonabsorbable diarrheal medications. Process stool specimens in the laboratory with the formalin-ether sedimentation concentration technique and stain with either iron hematoxylin, trichrome, or celestin B.
Diagnostic characteristics
Diagnostic characteristics are a pleomorphic trophozoite ranging in diameter from 5-15 mm (range, 4-30 mm) that contains 1-4 nuclei. The most common form is binucleated. However, approximately 20-30% are uninucleated. Multinucleated forms also can be present. The nuclei are distinctive, with several (4-8) chromatin granules clumped in the center of each nucleus. The cytoplasm frequently contains numerous food vacuoles.
Imaging Studies
Radiologic test findings are usually normal.
Stark D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis J. A review of the clinical presentation of dientamoebiasis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. Apr 2010;82(4):614-9. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Cuffari C, Oligny L, Seidman EG. Dientamoeba fragilis masquerading as allergic colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. Jan 1998;26(1):16-20. [Medline].
Johnson EH, Windsor JJ, Clark CG. Emerging from obscurity: biological, clinical, and diagnostic aspects of Dientamoeba fragilis. Clin Microbiol Rev. Jul 2004;17(3):553-70, table of contents. [Medline].
Verweij JJ, Mulder B, Poell B, van Middelkoop D, Brienen EA, van Lieshout L. Real-time PCR for the detection of Dientamoeba fragilis in fecal samples. Mol Cell Probes. Oct-Dec 2007;21(5-6):400-4. [Medline].
Butler WP. Dientamoeba fragilis. An unusual intestinal pathogen. Dig Dis Sci. Sep 1996;41(9):1811-3. [Medline].
Frenkel LM. Dientamoeba fragilis infection. In: Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. Vol 2. 4th ed. Elsevier Health Sciences; 1998:2403-6.
Grendon JH, DiGiacomo RF, Frost FJ. Descriptive features of Dientamoeba fragilis infections. J Trop Med Hyg. Oct 1995;98(5):309-15. [Medline].
Keystone JS, Yang J, Grisdale D, et al. Intestinal parasites in metropolitan Toronto day-care centres. Can Med Assoc J. Oct 1 1984;131(7):733-5. [Medline].
Kurt O, Girginkardesler N, Balcioglu IC, Ozbilgin A, Ok UZ. A comparison of metronidazole and single-dose ornidazole for the treatment of dientamoebiasis. Clin Microbiol Infect. Jun 2008;14(6):601-4. [Medline].
Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics. Drugs for parasitic infections. Med Lett Drugs Ther. Mar 6 1992;34(865):17-26. [Medline].
Norberg A, Nord CE, Evengard B. Dientamoeba fragilis--a protozoal infection which may cause severe bowel distress. Clin Microbiol Infect. Jan 2003;9(1):65-8. [Medline].
Preiss U, Ockert G, Broemme S, Otto A. On the clinical importance of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in childhood. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol. 1991;35(1):27-34. [Medline].
Shein R, Gelb A. Colitis due to Dientamoeba fragilis. Am J Gastroenterol. Oct 1983;78(10):634-6. [Medline].
Spencer MJ, Garcia LS, Chapin MR. Dientamoeba fragilis. An intestinal pathogen in children?. Am J Dis Child. Apr 1979;133(4):390-3. [Medline].
Spencer MJ, Millet VE, Garcia LS, et al. Parasitic infections in a pediatric population. Pediatr Infect Dis. Mar-Apr 1983;2(2):110-3. [Medline].
Stark DJ, Beebe N, Marriott D, et al. Dientamoebiasis: clinical importance and recent advances. Trends Parasitol. Feb 2006;22(2):92-6. [Medline].
Turner JA. Giardiasis and infections with Dientamoeba fragilis. Pediatr Clin North Am. Aug 1985;32(4):865-80. [Medline].
Vandenberg O, Peek R, Souayah H, Dediste A, Buset M, Scheen R. Clinical and microbiological features of dientamoebiasis in patients suspected of suffering from a parasitic gastrointestinal illness: a comparison of Dientamoeba fragilis and Giardia lamblia infections. Int J Infect Dis. May 2006;10(3):255-61. [Medline].
Vandenberg O, Souayah H, Mouchet F, Dediste A, van Gool T. Treatment of Dientamoeba fragilis infection with paromomycin. Pediatr Infect Dis J. Jan 2007;26(1):88-90. [Medline].

