Mallet Finger

Updated: Mar 09, 2022
Author: Roy A Meals, MD; Chief Editor: Harris Gellman, MD 


Practice Essentials

The term mallet finger has long been used to describe the deformity produced by disruption of the terminal extensor mechanism at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint.[1, 2, 3, 4]  It is the most common closed tendon injury seen in athletes, though it is also common in nonathletes after "innocent" trauma. Mallet finger has also been referred to as drop, hammer, or baseball finger (though baseball accounts for only a small percentage of such injuries). (See Etiology and Epidemiology.)

The terminal portion of the extensor mechanism that crosses the DIP joint in the midline dorsally is responsible for active extension of the distal joint. A flexion force on the tip of the extended finger jolts the DIP joint into flexion. This may result in a stretching or tearing of the tendon substance or an avulsion of the tendon's insertion on the dorsal lip of the distal phalanx base. In either instance, active extension power of the DIP joint is lost, and the joint rests in an abnormally flexed position. (See Etiology and Presentation.)

Although athletes and coaches often believe mallet injuries to be minor, with many cases going untreated, all individuals with finger injuries, including suspected mallet finger, should have a systematic evaluation performed. Good results can usually be obtained with early treatment of such injuries, whereas a delay in or lack of treatment may produce permanent disability. (See Prognosis, Workup, and Treatment.)

Controversy exists as to whether the management of bony mallet injuries should be closed or open, especially when the dorsal avulsion fragment is large and the substance of the distal phalanx is subluxed anteriorly. The literature, however, supports the concept of nonoperative treatment even in these cases. (See Treatment.)

For patient education information, see the First Aid and Injuries Center, as well as Mallet Finger and Broken Finger.


The terminal extensor tendon is a thin, flat structure measuring approximately 1 mm thick and 4-5 mm wide. This tendon occupies the sparse space between the bone and dorsal skin and inserts onto the dorsal lip of the distal phalanx, well proximal to the germinal nail matrix. At the DIP joint, the tendon's excursion is only several millimeters from full joint extension to 80° of flexion.

As its name implies, the terminal extensor tendon is the terminal extension of the dorsal mechanism, which is a complex crossing of fibers at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. Powered by the lumbrical and interosseous muscles, the dorsal mechanism flexes the MCP joint and extends the PIP and DIP joints.


Any forced flexion of the finger while it is held in an extended position risks the integrity of the extensor mechanism at the DIP joint. The classic mechanism of injury is a finger held rigidly in extension or nearly full extension when the finger is struck on the tip by a softball, volleyball, or basketball. Other common mechanisms of injury include forcefully tucking in a bedspread or slipcover or pushing off a sock with extended fingers. A direct blow over the dorsum of the DIP joint may also produce mallet finger.

Mallet deformity can also be associated with a fracture of the dorsal articular surface of the distal phalanx. Radiographically, these bony avulsions can be characterized into three common patterns, as follows:

  • A tiny fleck of bone that involves less than 25% of the articular surface
  • A large bony fragment that involves 30% or more of the articular surface
  • An avulsion of any size that is associated with palmar subluxation of the distal phalanx

Generally, fleck fractures and nondisplaced avulsions that involve up to 40% of the joint surface are believed to be stable injuries.[5] Individuals with stable injuries are candidates for conservative treatment. (See the image below.)

Stable mallet fracture that involves 40% of the jo Stable mallet fracture that involves 40% of the joint surface.

From experimental studies, the rate of loading determines whether a tendon (or ligament) ruptures in midsubstance or is avulsed from its bony attachment. Rapid loading rates are more likely to cause a tear in the tendon itself, while lower loading rates are more likely to cause a bony avulsion. This is because the bone is relatively more viscoelastic than the tendon.

Swan-neck deformity

With a disruption of the dorsal mechanism at the DIP joint, the entire power of extension is directed to the PIP joint. Over time, and especially if the volar plate is lax, this concentrated extension force results in PIP joint hyperextension and a swan-neck deformity (ie, the DIP joint rests in an abnormally flexed position and the PIP joint rests in a hyperextended position). This deformity frequently causes a functional deficit.[6] Therefore, even if a mallet finger is not particularly symptomatic from a functional or cosmetic perspective, treatment of the mallet injury may preclude development of swan-neck deformity.


Several different athletic injuries can occur at the interphalangeal joints. The most common injury is a sprain of the PIP joint, the so-called jammed finger. Mallet fingers are less common than PIP joint sprains, but they are more common than PIP fractures or fracture dislocations and are also the most common closed tendon injury seen in athletes. (Similar injuries to the extensor mechanism at the interphalangeal joint of the thumb occur, albeit infrequently.) As previously stated, mallet finger is also a common trauma injury in nonathletes.


An untreated mallet finger is rarely of functional consequence unless a secondary swan-neck deformity occurs. Even in those cases, patients rarely request surgical reconstruction, choosing instead to live with the injury. With this in mind, treatment of a mallet finger should not be worse than the disease. Although an untreated mallet finger may be of some cosmetic consequence, treatment that leaves a finger with improved appearance but diminished function is not ideal.

A functionally and cosmetically normal finger can be obtained with conservative treatment, as long as the patient understands the concept of nonstop extension splinting and is compliant with the care. It may take several months following completion of splinting for local swelling and erythema to subside, but thereafter, the finger’s appearance and mobility will be excellent.

Frequently, a faint residual extension lag is present, in the range of 5-10°, but is observable only on close scrutiny. Beware of the patient with naturally hyperextensible interphalangeal joints. Caution these patients at the outset that the best they can hope for is restoration of extension to neutral rather than the degree of active hyperextension observed in their adjacent digits. This loss of complete extension will present no functional difficulties and will be of trivial cosmetic consequence.




In mallet finger, the patient’s history involves a forced distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint flexion injury, after which he or she notices an inability to actively extend the distal joint (though full passive extension remains intact). The dorsum of the joint may be slightly tender and swollen, but often the injury is painless or nearly painless. Patients may think that the joint is only sprained and continue playing sports, with 1 or more days passing before they notice a loss of active extension.

Typically, the athlete with a mallet fracture has a history of a direct blow to the finger, followed by pain and swelling at the DIP joint and an inability to actively fully extend the joint.

Physical Examination

The physical examination findings of mallet finger include localized swelling and tenderness to palpation at the affected DIP joint, as well as an inability to actively extend the injured joint. (See the images below.)

Despite active extension effort, the distal interp Despite active extension effort, the distal interphalangeal joint of the index finger rests in flexion, characteristic of a mallet finger.
Typical mallet finger deformity. Typical mallet finger deformity.

In some individuals, the swan-neck deformity, with hyperextension of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, may be found, owing to imbalance of the extensor mechanism. However, this is more often a late finding in untreated injuries.

Mallet finger injuries have often been described in terms of Doyle's classification, which comprises the following four main types[1] :

  • Type I - Closed injury with or without small avulsion fracture
  • Type II - Open injury; laceration
  • Type III - Open injury; abrasions with loss of skin or tendon
  • Type IV - (A) Physeal injury to distal phalanx (children); (B) fracture fragment involving 20-50% of the articular surface; (C) fracture fragment involving more than 50% of the articular surface





Posteroanterior (PA) and lateral radiographs centered at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint of the affected finger are required. These radiographs are used to differentiate between a bony mallet injury (see the first image below) and a tendinous one. They also reveal any associated metaphyseal, shaft, or tuft fractures of the distal phalanx. Perhaps most important, lateral radiographs reveal the presence of volar subluxation of the distal phalanx (see the second image below). In addition, these radiographic views reveal rare condylar fractures of the middle phalanx.

This radiograph depicts a large, dorsal-lip avulsi This radiograph depicts a large, dorsal-lip avulsion fracture from the distal phalanx, a bony mallet injury.
Mallet fracture with volar subluxation of the dist Mallet fracture with volar subluxation of the distal phalanx.

Radiographs of the whole hand do not suffice in the evaluation of mallet finger, because parallax of the x-ray beams creates an uninterpretable oblique view of the DIP joint. No imaging studies other than radiography are indicated in mallet finger.



Approach Considerations

Patients may not present to the orthopedist with mallet finger for weeks or even months, perhaps having received no treatment or ineffective treatment. Bony injuries heal within weeks; thus, an old bony injury without functional deficit is best left untreated.

A tendinous injury generally can be improved by extension splinting up to 6 months from the time of injury. The period of splinting for such an old injury is extended because the area becomes less inflamed as time passes. Therefore, fibroplasia and wound contraction occur more slowly and less completely.

Attempted open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a mallet injury, either tendinous or bony, often results in a stiff, infected, or painful finger. In most instances, therefore, the surgeon should resist the urge to treat mallet finger surgically.[7] However, some indications for surgical reduction, such as volar subluxation of the distal phalanx, do exist.


Mallet injuries, whether bony or tendinous, should be addressed with closed treatment. This injured area is constrained tightly by adjacent unpadded skin dorsally, a tightly constrained hinge joint volarly, and the germinal matrix of the nail distally. Splinting of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint in full extension allows healing of the injured structure and restoration of excellent function and appearance. (See the images below.)[8]

Stack splints are widely used for the treatment of Stack splints are widely used for the treatment of mallet finger.
Molded plastic stack splint for the treatment of m Molded plastic stack splint for the treatment of mallet finger.
A skin-tight plaster cast can effectively hold the A skin-tight plaster cast can effectively hold the distal interphalangeal joint extended and the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) flexed when a mallet deformity is accompanied by a hyperextensible PIP. Not immobilizing the PIP in partial flexion risks the development of a swan-neck deformity.

Patient education and compliance are keys to good results. Once extension splinting has been initiated, it should be maintained without even a momentary lapse for the prescribed treatment period. Tendinous injuries require 6-8 weeks of splinting,[9] and bony injuries require 4-5 weeks.[10]

The time that is spent educating the patient regarding the necessity for nonstop protection in extension, as well as in techniques for maintaining joint extension (even when cleaning the finger and changing the splint), will be rewarded with favorable results.

The DIP joint should be immobilized in full extension so that the finger is straight. Sustained hyperextension of the joint, however, may cause ischemia in the skin over the dorsum of the joint and contribute to the development of pressure sores, which are occasionally observed as a result of tight splinting. (See the image below.)

Pressure-sore formation can result from a splint t Pressure-sore formation can result from a splint that is applied too tightly, especially if the joint is maintained in a hyperextended position rather than a position of neutral extension.

Various means are available for holding the DIP joint in extension. Splinting can be isolated to the distal joint if the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint is not lax and does not hyperextend. Splinting the PIP joint in partial flexion for the first half of treatment is appropriate if the untreated finger assumes a swan-neck posture.

Small strips of aluminum with foam-rubber backing are commonly used in splinting. The foam backing should be of the closed-pore variety so that the foam does not absorb moisture. The open-pore form retains water in its interstices and harbors various microorganisms that hamper proper hygiene. Closed-pore foam aluminum strips are available from various orthopedic supply houses.

The aluminum strip can be applied either dorsally or volarly. Applied dorsally, the aluminum strip requires two strips of tape—one around the midportion of the middle phalanx and one around the midportion of the distal phalanx—for the splint to achieve three-point fixation and maintain the distal joint in an extended position. Dorsal splinting allows the digital pulp to be partially exposed for keyboarding and other daily activities. In addition, dorsal splints are more effective at maintaining the joint in full extension. (See the image below.)

Dorsal aluminum foam splint for the treatment of a Dorsal aluminum foam splint for the treatment of a mallet finger.

Volar splinting, however, requires only one band of tape around the finger, at the level of the distal joint, to achieve three-point fixation; thus, the volar splint is slightly easier to apply and maintain. The aluminum strip, however, precludes any tactile feedback from the digital pulp for light activities.

Other rigid materials can be used for makeshift splints. A large paper clip can be padded with adhesive tape and then used as a splint. Also, some patients have improvised temporary splints with plastic disposable spoons or sections of wooden ice-cream sticks.

Premolded plastic splints are available commercially. However, they often do not fit the finger closely enough to maintain the joint in full extension. These splints have the added disadvantages of entirely covering and blinding the pulp from tactile sensation and preventing evaporation of moisture from the enclosed skin.

Having witnessed the shortcomings of the various splints, as noted above, the author devised a simple, custom-molded plastic splint, as shown in the images below. This splint leaves the pulp relatively exposed for functional activities, adheres closely to the contour of the digit without the need for tape, and is of sufficiently low profile to allow for evaporation of moisture from between the splint and the skin. Blanks can be made from various thermoplastic materials that are routinely used by hand therapists or can be purchased commercially.[11]

This photo demonstrates a thermoplastic blank for This photo demonstrates a thermoplastic blank for a custom-molded mallet finger splint and an oblique view of the molded splint in place.
Dorsal view of the custom-molded thermoplastic spl Dorsal view of the custom-molded thermoplastic splint in place.
Volar view of the thermoplastic splint in place. Volar view of the thermoplastic splint in place.

The technique for applying this splint is demonstrated in the video below. (Contact George Tiemann & Co [25 Plant Ave, Hauppauge, NY, 11788; phone: 800-843-6266] to request more information or to purchase the Meals Custom Malleable Mallet Mender splint.)

Application of the thermoplastic splint.

Regardless of the splinting method used, patients should have a follow-up appointment 1 week following the initiation of splinting to ensure that the joint is being properly maintained in extension and will continue to be. An adjustment in splint size may be necessary if any surrounding edema has subsided.

Most athletes with mallet finger are able to participate in their sport during treatment. Additional padding and support of the affected finger may be appropriate for play in contact sports. Throwing athletes who injure their dominant hand may initially miss practice and playing time.

At the end of treatment, the DIP joint should be stiff in full extension. Full-time splinting in extension for an additional 2-4 weeks is advised if an extensor lag is noted. If no extension lag is present and strength against resistance can be demonstrated, the patient should begin a slow weaning of the splint over the next 1-2 weeks. At that point, the splint should be used for 2-4 more weeks at night and with activities that put the joint at risk. The patient may then resume full activity. Specific finger exercises to regain flexion are very rarely required.

Surgical Reduction

Concerns and indications

When a large bony fragment is observed, the surgeon instinctively wants to anatomically reconstruct the articular surface. It must be kept in mind, however, that this is a nonweightbearing joint, and articular incongruity, which would not be tolerated in the ankle or knee, is well tolerated in the DIP joint. This joint has been demonstrated to remodel beautifully over time, even in the presence of volar subluxation of the distal phalanx.

Moreover, late osteoarthritis at the DIP joint of an untreated mallet finger or a mallet finger that is treated without anatomic reduction of the fracture is rare, if not nonexistent. Thus, the risk of poor outcome from ill-advised open treatment far outweighs any risk of early dysfunction or late arthritis from splint treatment.

The appropriate indications for surgical fixation of mallet fractures, which techniques to use, and the accuracy of outcome measures are frequently debated.[12, 2, 13] Most authors agree that mallet fractures that are associated with volar subluxation of the distal phalanx should be referred to an orthopedic surgeon for fixation.

Referral should also be considered for cases in which there are large or displaced avulsion fragments that involve more than 30-40% of the joint surface.[12] Surgical fixation of a mallet fracture of the thumb is sometimes recommended because of the greater extrinsic displacing forces across the interphalangeal joint.


Many surgeons prefer operative treatment of mallet injuries that are accompanied by volar subluxation of the distal phalanx. The belief is that the restoration of joint alignment and the balance between flexor and extensor forces is needed to obtain an adequate functional result in these patients. In general, the joint is reduced, and a transarticular Kirschner wire (K-wire) is placed. If the fracture fragment cannot be held in reasonably close approximation to its insertion site, it may be stabilized with another K-wire or with the pull-out suture technique.[14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 12, 20, 10]

Occasionally, certain patients (eg, surgeons or dentists) may be unable to wear splints for the required 6-8 weeks for vocational reasons. With a digital block, a 0.035-in. K-wire can be inserted across the joint to serve as a temporary internal splint. Although the wire may help to maintain the reduction of a bony fragment, its primary purpose is to maintain extension of the joint. It can be difficult to get a K-wire to engage in the distal phalangeal tuft for a retrograde pinning.

Another option is to insert an oblique, antegrade K-wire by starting at the midportion of the middle phalanx and placing the K-wire obliquely into the main body of the distal phalanx. By starting on the ulnar side of the digit, the wire can be clipped off just below the surface of the skin. The K-wire stabilization should be protected with an external splint when patients are not engaged in critical portions of their occupation. The K-wire can be retrieved and extracted with local anesthesia at the end of treatment.

On the basis of results in 9 patients with mallet fracture in whom extension block pinning had failed, Lee et al concluded that tension wire fixation can be an effective second-line treatment in such cases.[21]

A study by Wang et al indicated that when splinting fails to achieve adequate resolution of tendinous mallet finger, a tendon-bone graft can be an effective alternative treatment. In 28 patients for whom splinting had failed, grafts were taken from the extensor carpi radialis brevis and the third metacarpal base.[22]


The most bothersome complication from closed management of a mallet finger is a dorsal pressure sore over the DIP joint. This results from excessive pressure of the splint or tape at that site and is probably potentiated by a hyperextension posture of the joint (see the image below). Treatment of mallet finger does not represent an instance in which one can assume that if extension is good, hyperextension is better. Notice, in fact, that dorsally over the DIP joint, the skin blanches when the joint is held in a hyperextended position. Prefabricated orthoses appear to have a higher rate of skin complications than custom-made orthoses do.[23]

Pressure-sore formation can result from a splint t Pressure-sore formation can result from a splint that is applied too tightly, especially if the joint is maintained in a hyperextended position rather than a position of neutral extension.

Complications from open surgical management abound. Often, the small bony fragment is more comminuted than it appears on a radiograph, or it becomes comminuted during the effort at anatomic reduction and internal fixation. Mobilization of the fragment in an effort to obtain an anatomic reduction can further devitalize the fragment, leading to a risk of avascular necrosis. Infection, stiffness in extension, nail-bed damage, and chronic tenderness are other well-known problems of open treatment.


Questions & Answers