Pediatric Femur Fractures

Updated: Sep 29, 2023
Author: Karthik S Murugappan, MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB, MRCS; Chief Editor: Jeffrey D Thomson, MD 


Practice Essentials

Pediatric femoral fractures are injuries that may involve the proximal femur, the femoral shaft, or the distal femur. In the treatment of these injuries, it is important to keep in mind that pediatric femur fractures differ from adult femur fractures in several key respects (see below), and these differences affect management.

Treatment of pediatric hip fractures has the following goals:

  • Anatomic reduction
  • Maintenance of reduction until complete healing
  • Minimization of complications associated with the injury and its treatment

The most important factors determining the outcome of treatment in these injuries are as follows:

  • Age of the child
  • Type of fracture
  • Degree of displacement of the fracture fragments
  • Length of time since injury

Differences between pediatric and adult femoral fractures

Significant differences between femoral fractures occurring in children and those occurring in adults include the following:

  • Pediatric femoral fractures heal rapidly because of a biologically active periosteum and abundant vascularity; the formation and subsequent remodeling of the callus are rapid in children who have sustained femoral fractures
  • Proximal femoral fractures in children are the result of high-energy trauma, in contrast to comparable fractures in the elderly, which may result from a trivial trauma such as a fall
  • Transepiphyseal separation is an injury seen only in the skeletally immature
  • The transcervical and cervicotrochanteric fractures seen in children are associated with a higher incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN) and  coxa vara
  • Cervicotrochanteric and intertrochanteric fractures can lead to premature closure of the trochanteric apophysis and coxa valga
  • Children have much greater potential for healing and remodeling after proximal femoral fractures
  • Deformities after these injuries in children often progress with age (particularly when the growth plate is injured)
  • Remodeling of the residual deformities after malunion of femoral shaft fractures leads to resolution of the deformities; a malunion is most likely to remodel if the deformity is close to a joint, is in the plane of normal motion at the neighboring joint, and is in a younger child; however, remodeling does not normally correct the rotational malunion
  • Femoral overgrowth after fracture leading to limb-length discrepancy and femoral growth disturbances after fracture are problems seen exclusively in children
  • Anatomic reduction is not required for regaining preinjury function; it is more important to restore the alignment of fragments with respect to one another
  • The presence of the ossification centers modifies the choice of  internal fixation for these fractures in children; to prevent iatrogenic growth disturbances, the treatment chosen must avoid injury to the trochanteric apophysis and the distal femoral physis
  • Isolated femoral fractures usually do not necessitate a blood transfusion, because the blood loss is not significant; these patients can be treated with routine monitoring [1]
  • Children with multiple trauma associated with femoral fractures are at lower risk for pulmonary complications; furthermore, the timing of fracture stabilization, unlike the timing in adults, does not affect the risk of  pneumonia or  respiratory distress syndrome [2]


For most proximal femoral fractures in children, treatment consists of closed reduction followed by a spica cast or open or closed reduction followed by internal fixation and a spica cast. Femoral shaft fractures can be treated nonoperatively or surgically with excellent results, provided that patients are appropriately selected; treatment depends on the age of the child, the severity of the injury, and whether the injury is isolated or part of multiple trauma. For undisplaced distal fractures, nothing more than cast immobilization for a period of 6 weeks may be needed; treatment of displaced distal fractures depends on the fracture type.


The embryonic development of the femur begins during week 4 of gestation, with the appearance of the limb bud. Rapid mesenchymal growth follows, and endochondral ossification occurs during week 8. The femoral shaft is the primary ossification center. Secondary ossification, at the upper end, begins at the gestational age of 6 months. Ossification of the femoral head occurs at the age of 4-5 months. The distal femoral ossification center appears during month 7 of gestation.

At about 4 years of age, the single secondary ossification center at the upper end divides into two separate structures: the greater trochanter and the capital femoral epiphysis. The lesser trochanteric apophysis ossifies at the age of 10 years.

Proximal femur

The proximal femur has two growth centers: the proximal femoral epiphysis and the trochanteric apophysis. The proximal femoral epiphysis contributes 30% of the length of the femur and 13% of the length of the lower limb. Damage to the proximal femoral epiphysis leads to shortening of the extremity.

The trochanteric apophysis is a traction apophysis, and it contributes to the growth of the femoral neck. Injury to the trochanteric apophysis or paralysis of the muscles attached to it leads to shortening of the greater trochanter and coxa valga. Overgrowth of the greater trochanteric apophysis leads to apparent coxa vara and reduced articulotrochanteric distance.

Proximal femoral bone is very strong and is not easily fractured, except when the bone is affected by a pathologic condition. The proximal femoral epiphysis, however, is an area of structural weakness that can fail readily when subjected to shear forces.

The vascular anatomy of the proximal femur in children differs from that in adults. The artery of the ligamentum teres does not contribute any blood supply until the age of 8 years. The metaphyseal vessels do not contribute to the vascularity of the femoral head after the age of 3 years, and they contribute to the intraosseous blood supply to the femoral head only after the physeal closure, between the ages of 14 and 17 years, when the vascular anastomoses between the metaphyseal and epiphyseal blood vessels develop.

The lateral epiphyseal branches of the medial femoral circumflex system supply most of the femoral head throughout childhood (see the image below). The vascularity of the femoral head, therefore, is precarious in children, especially those between 3 and 8 years of age, and this arrangement renders children highly susceptible to AVN after proximal femoral injuries.[3]

Arterial supply to head of femur in child. Arterial supply to head of femur in child.

Femoral shaft

The longitudinal growth and peripheral growth of the femoral shaft occur through endochondral ossification, which leads to the formation of woven bone. With maturation and development, the bone becomes more like adult bone, with remodeling of the trabecular bone into lamellar bone along the lines of stress.

The pediatric femoral shaft has an abundant blood supply that derives from both endosteal and periosteal blood vessels. The endosteal blood supply is from two nutrient vessels, which enter the medullary canal posteromedially at the junction of the proximal and middle thirds and the junction of the distal and middle thirds of the shaft. The periosteal blood supply comes from the large muscular cuff of the thigh. The periosteal vessels supply the outer one third of the cortex.

These two systems are interconnected and together provide the abundant blood supply that facilitates both the growth of bone and the healing of fractures in children.

Distal femur

The epiphyseal ossification center of the distal femur is usually present at birth in a full-term infant. This area is the largest and most active physeal system in the body, contributing almost 70% of the length of the femur and 40% of the length of the entire leg. It fuses with the metaphysis during the teen years (girls, age 14-16 y; boys, age 16-18 y).

At birth, the physis is essentially a transverse plane. As the infant commences walking, shearing forces across the knee cause the development of macroscopic undulations in the distal femoral physis; the physis also exhibits microscopic undulations and mammillary processes. This is a very important point: Because of the undulating nature of the distal femoral epiphysis, any type of fracture may lead to growth problems.

The circulatory supply to the epiphysis is multifocal. The main input and output are through the posterior femoral notch. There are watershed areas in the condyles, especially medially, that have limited circulation.[4]

The physis is completely extra-articular. The strong posterior capsule and the major ligaments are attached to the epiphysis. Normally, in an adult knee, ligaments fail when a bending stress is applied across the knee. In an immature skeleton, the bone fails through the growth plate because the ligaments are stronger than the cartilage of the distal femoral physis.


Nearly two thirds of femoral fractures in children and adolescents result from falls and motor vehicle accidents. Nearly 30% of fractures in children younger than 4 years are reported to be due to child abuse. Birth trauma can cause fracture of the femur in the newborn.

With increasing age from childhood to adolescence, the mechanism of injury goes from being a low-energy injury in young children to a high-energy injury in adolescents; as a result, there are increases in the complexity of injuries, the need for surgical intervention, the length of hospital stay, overall hospital costs, and mortality.[5]

Pathologic fractures of the femur in children account for just over 4% of cases and can occur after minor trauma. Underlying pathologic conditions include osteogenesis imperfecta,[6]  aneurysmal bone cyst, unicameral bone cyst, nonossifying fibroma, and generalized osteopenia due to neuromuscular disorders. Cerebral palsy and osteogenesis imperfecta are the most common associated pathologies. Typically, these patients experience femoral fractures between the ages of 6 and 12 years because they begin walking late.[5]

Proximal femoral injuries are produced by high-velocity trauma, such as occurs with falls from a height, motor vehicle accidents, and child abuse. In cases of distal femoral fracture, the cause in younger children is invariably severe trauma, whereas the usual cause in adolescents is a sports injury.

Classification of femoral fractures

Various classification systems have been developed for proximal femoral fractures, femoral shaft fractures, and distal femoral epiphyseal fractures.

Proximal femoral fracture (Delbet classification)

Proximal femoral fractures are most often categorized according to the Delbet classification (see the image below).[7]

Depiction of various Delbet types of proximal femo Depiction of various Delbet types of proximal femoral injury.

Delbet type I injury is transepiphyseal separation—that is, acute traumatic separation of the proximal femoral epiphysis, similar to Salter-Harris type I epiphyseal injury. It is an uncommon injury, accounting for fewer than 10% of all pediatric proximal femoral fractures. This injury can occur in newborns after breech delivery and is often missed in these cases.

Type I injury has also been reported in children aged 5-10 years. In these patients, it occurs after high-energy trauma and has a high incidence of associated injuries, especially femoral head dislocations. This fracture type has the worst prognosis, and the reported rates of AVN range from 20% to 100%.

Delbet type II injury is a transcervical fracture and is the most common type, accounting for about 40-50% of proximal femoral fractures. These injuries are often displaced at the time of presentation. AVN rates as high as 50% have been reported with these injuries.

Delbet type III injury is a cervicotrochanteric fracture that occurs through the basicervical region; it accounts for 30-35% of proximal femoral fractures. AVN has been reported in 15-20% of cases.

Delbet type IV injury is a pertrochanteric or intertrochanteric fracture. This type accounts for 10-20% of proximal femoral fractures and is associated with the best prognosis; AVN is reported in fewer than 10% of cases. The involvement of the greater trochanter may lead to premature closure of the apophysis and coxa valga.

Femoral shaft fracture (Gustilo classification)

Femoral shaft fractures can be either open (with breach of the overlying soft-tissue envelope) or closed. The open fractures are further categorized according to the Gustilo classification.[8]  In this system, the fracture is classified on the basis of the following:

  • Location (eg, proximal, middle, or lower third)
  • Configuration (eg, spiral, oblique, or transverse)
  • Degree of displacement or comminution

Distal femoral epiphyseal fracture (Salter-Harris classification)

Distal femoral epiphyseal fractures are categorized according to the Salter-Harris classification of epiphyseal injuries, with a modification by Ogden (see the image below).

Depiction of various Salter-Harris types of distal Depiction of various Salter-Harris types of distal femoral epiphyseal injury.

Salter-Harris type I fracture involves the physis without an associated fracture through the adjacent epiphysis or metaphysis. It is an infrequent birth injury that occurs during delivery of a breech child, even in cases of cesarean section.[9]  The distal femur is also a common site of fracture in cases of child abuse. Metaphyseal beak fracture, a type I injury, is characteristic of child abuse but is not pathognomonic.

Salter-Harris type II fracture is characterized by physeal fracture, with extension of the fracture line into a corner of the adjacent metaphysis. This is the most common fracture and occurs in adolescents. The metaphyseal fragment remaining attached to the epiphysis is called the Thurstan Holland fragment. The periosteum is intact on the compression/concave side, and the torn periosteal sleeve on the tension side sometimes becomes interposed between the fracture ends.

Salter-Harris type III fracture involves the medial or lateral condyle. The fracture line usually exits through the intercondylar notch.

Salter-Harris type IV fracture is uncommon. A sagittal fracture line extends from the metaphyseal cortex down to the physis and enters the articular surface of the epiphysis.

Salter-Harris type V fracture is due to compression of the epiphyseal plate, which may be associated with an ipsilateral femoral fracture. Diagnosis is often retrospective when growth arrest is seen.

Salter-Harris type VI fracture is caused by glancing blows that lead to destruction of a small peripheral segment and formation of a physeal bridge.

Salter-Harris type VII fracture involves fracture of the femoral condyles. Bone bruising occurs within the substance of the epiphyseal trabecular plane.[4]

Salter-Harris type VIII fracture mainly consists of a metaphyseal fracture with extension into the metaphyseal-physeal junction.


Femoral head and neck fractures in children are rare injuries, accounting for fewer than 1% of all pediatric fractures and fewer than 1% of all hip fractures. Femoral shaft fractures account for 1-2% of all pediatric fractures.

Fractures of the femur have a bimodal age distribution. There is a high incidence in the first 2-3 years of life, when child abuse most commonly occurs and the femur is composed of weak woven bone. After the age of 5 years, the increase in lamellar bone, the greater cortical thickness, and the larger femoral diameter result in a stronger femur, and the incidence of femoral fractures falls. A second peak in incidence occurs in adolescence, when motor vehicle accidents account for the majority of fractures.

Femoral fracture is about 2.5 times more common in boys than in girls. Distal femoral physeal fractures account for 6-9% of all physeal injuries in children[10] and 15% of all lower-extremity physeal injuries.[11]




In most cases of proximal femoral fractures, there is a history of high-energy trauma, such as that caused by a fall from a height or a motor vehicle accident. These injuries are often associated with serious injuries to other organ systems and unconsciousness; convulsions; bleeding from the ear, nose, or throat; or breathlessness. A conscious patient complains of pain in the groin or buttock and an inability to walk after the injury.

Patients with a femoral shaft fracture usually have a history of a fall or a motor vehicle accident, with pain in the thigh and an inability to walk. The history, however, may be inadequate in patients with mental retardation, nonambulatory patients, patients with polytrauma, and patients with head injury. In pathologic fractures, there may be a history of pain in the thigh and a recent increase in the pain.

In the presence of traumatic brain injury, child abuse may be suggested in children younger than 4 years who have a history of injury discordant with fracture and multiple fractures in different stages of healing (see the image below).[12]

Spiral fracture of femoral shaft, with hypertrophi Spiral fracture of femoral shaft, with hypertrophic callus due to previous multiple fractures (a) in 2-year-old abused child treated with spica cast (b), showing union (c).

Physical Examination

The examination must be extensive, with care taken to rule out associated injuries to the head, chest, abdomen, and other skeletal sites. In proximal femoral injuries, the injured limb is short and lies slightly adducted and externally rotated. Tenderness can be elicited over the Scarpa triangle and, more commonly, posteriorly over the femoral neck region. Detailed examination of the peripheral pulses and the motor and sensory systems must be performed to rule out neurovascular injuries.

Femoral shaft fractures are hard to miss on examination; deformity, swelling, shortening, tenderness, abnormal mobility, and crepitus suggest the diagnosis. Nevertheless, a complete physical examination must still be performed to rule out associated injuries, especially in the setting of hypotension, which is rarely due to isolated femoral shaft fractures.

Rang described the Waddel triad of femoral shaft fracture, head injury, and intra-abdominal or thoracic injury caused by automobile-pedestrian collisions.[13]  Common musculoskeletal injuries associated with femoral shaft fracture that are often missed include femoral neck fracture, hip dislocation, and ligamentous injuries of the knee.

Distal femoral fractures usually involve a relatively violent injury with resulting severe pain and inability to bear weight on the injured leg. Malalignment, swelling, and ecchymosis are frequently present. Salter-Harris type III and type IV fractures present as hemarthrosis of the knee.

The displacement of the epiphysis occurs most often in the coronal plane, and the protruding metaphyseal end can be palpated. With anterior displacement, the patella becomes prominent, and the metaphyseal end is felt as fullness in the popliteal fossa. A posterior displacement causes fullness in the lower thigh, caused by the protruding metaphyseal end. The patella and condyles are always in line with the tibia, ruling out knee dislocation.

A thorough neurovascular examination is warranted in all cases of distal femoral fracture.



Plain Radiography

Whenever a proximal femoral injury is suspected, an anteroposterior (AP) radiograph of the pelvis with both hips and a cross-table lateral radiograph should be obtained. The radiographs must be carefully examined with a view to determining the presence of fracture, the Delbet type, and the degree of displacement.

Careful examination of the contralateral side on radiographs (or magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] scans) helps detect undisplaced fractures. In patients younger than 18 months with suspected proximal femoral epiphyseal separation, arthrography has been suggested as a diagnostic aid.

For the diagnosis of femoral shaft fractures, plain radiographs are generally adequate (see the image below). The radiographs must be carefully examined for the presence and location of the fracture, its configuration, the degree of displacement, and the degree of comminution. Radiographic examination must include the entire femur, along with the hip and knee, to rule out associated injuries. Appropriate additional studies should be undertaken in patients with multiple trauma, head injuries, and other visceral injuries.

X-ray of adolescent who sustained sporting injury X-ray of adolescent who sustained sporting injury and fractured his right femur. Image courtesy of Dr. Bhavuk Garg, Senior Resident of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.

For the diagnosis of distal femoral physeal injuries, plain AP and lateral radiographs are usually adequate. The radiographs show displacement, widening, or adjacent bony disruption in cases of physeal injury.

Other Imaging Modalities

Type I and type III undisplaced fractures are often overlooked on plain radiography. Stress views were previously recommended for diagnosis, but MRI has become the preferred imaging modality. Computed tomography (CT) is used to determine the degree of displacement and is useful for preoperative planning. In infants, MRI, ultrasonography (US), or arthrography of the knee may be required to make the diagnosis of separation of a relatively unossified femoral epiphysis.



Proximal Femoral Fractures

For most proximal femoral fractures in children, treatment consists of closed reduction followed by a spica cast or open or closed reduction followed by internal fixation and a spica cast (see Table 1 below).

Table 1. Recommended Treatments for Pediatric Proximal Femoral Fractures (Open Table in a new window)

Delbet Fracture Type

Recommended Treatment


I (transepiphyseal)

Gentle closed reduction and fixation with 2 or 3 smooth pins, followed by spica cast in abduction and internal rotation for 6-12 wk

Repeated attempts at reduction should be avoided

Irreducible fractures and fracture dislocations may require open reduction

These fractures have highest rate of complications and worst prognosis

Loss of reduction with varus deformity is frequent

Premature physis closure and limb length discrepancy may occur

AVN of femoral head is reported in 20-100% of cases

II (transcervical)

Gentle closed reduction and fixation with 2 or 3 threaded pins (young children) and 2 or 3 parallel screws (older children), followed by spica cast for 6 wk

Implants must stop short of physis

Hip decompression by needle aspiration may be added

Loss of reduction and varus malunion are common if fracture is stabilized by external immobilization alone

Decompression is reported to reduce risk of AVN in these cases; AVN is reported in as many as 50% of cases

Nonunion is reported in 15% of cases

III (cervicotrochanteric)

Closed reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires or cannulated screws in all displaced fractures and undisplaced fractures in children >6 y

Undisplaced fractures in children < 6 y can be treated with closed reduction and spica cast

Conservative treatment in older children is associated with high rates of varus nonunion in some series

Overall, these fractures have better outcome than type II fractures

Reported incidence of AVN is 15-20%

IV (pertrochanteric or intertrochanteric)

Closed reduction and internal fixation with Kirschner wires or cannulated screws in all displaced fractures and undisplaced fractures in children >6 y

Undisplaced fractures in children < 6 y can be treated with closed reduction and spica cast

Conservative treatment in older children is associated with high rates of varus nonunion in some series

These fractures have best prognosis

These are extracapsular fractures and therefore less likely to cause direct vascular insult; reported incidence of AVN is 5%

AVN = avascular necrosis.

Closed reduction and spica cast immobilization are used to treat small children (who have good remodeling potential) and children with minimally displaced type III and IV fractures.

All type I and II fractures and displaced type III and IV fractures are best treated by means of closed or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with smooth pins or Kirschner wires (K-wires) (in children < 4 y), threaded Knowles pins (in children 4-7 y), or cannulated screws (in older children). Internal fixation in these cases prevents loss of reduction and malunion, delayed union, and nonunion. Transphyseal fixation using a combination of cannulated cancellous screws and K-wires has been described for femoral neck fracture in adolescents.[14]

Although early fixation (≤ 24 hr) is commonly recommended for reducing the risk of complications with traumatic femoral neck fractures in children, so-called near-early fixation (24-72 hr) may be a worthwhile option when early fixation is not feasible (eg, in developing countries, where referrals may be delayed or awareness low).[15]

Prolonged spica cast immobilization is required in most cases until solid union of the fracture occurs. Capsulotomy is advocated to evacuate the fracture hematoma and thereby prevent its deleterious effect on femoral head blood flow,[16, 17]  though it is not completely clear whether the hematoma plays a major role in the occurrence of posttraumatic avascular necrosis (AVN) in children.

Femoral Shaft Fractures

Femoral shaft fractures can be treated nonoperatively or surgically with excellent results, provided that patients are appropriately selected.[18] The choice of treatment modality depends on the age of the child, the severity of the injury, and whether the femur fracture is an isolated injury or part of multiple trauma (see Table 2 below).

Table 2. Age-Appropriate Treatments for Pediatric Femoral Shaft Fractures (Open Table in a new window)


Fracture Treatment






Suspect abuse or osteogenesis imperfecta

Remarkable remodeling potential


Pavlik harness, gallows traction, spica cast

1-6 y

Stable fracture

Immediate spica cast

Telescope test to determine stability

Skeletal traction in older, heavier patients

Unstable fracture/unacceptable reduction

Traction followed by spica cast

Multiple trauma

Flexible intramedullary nails/external fixator

6-11 y

Low-energy stable fractures

Early spica

Remodeling potential lesser than for younger children

Operative stabilization indicated if early mobilization required

Flexible intramedullary nailing preferred

High-energy unstable fracture

Traction followed by spica/plating/external fixator/flexible nailing

≥ 11 y


Internal or external fixation; external fixator for comminuted, unstable, and compound fractures

Operative stabilization preferred

Limited remodeling potential

Accurate restoration of length and alignment mandatory

Rigid nailing through piriformis fossa should be avoided to reduce risk of avascular necrosis

General considerations

The following generalizations can be made about the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children.

Because infants have the greatest remodeling potential, a greater degree of deformity can be accepted: up to 30° of angulation in both the coronal and the sagittal planes and 2-3 cm of shortening. In older children, acceptable degrees of deformity are less: not more than 15° in the coronal plane and 20° in the sagittal plane. Shortening of more than 1 cm is not acceptable in adolescents nearing skeletal maturity.

Limb-length discrepancy is the most common complication of pediatric femoral shaft fractures, occurring as a result of either malunion (and shortening) or overgrowth of the injured limb. Overgrowth of the femur occurs because of the stimulation of growth commonly seen in children 3-10 years of age. It is most prominent in fractures with greater overriding. The increased growth rate is usually seen in the first 18 months after the fracture and may continue for 5 years after the injury. The average growth stimulation is 1 cm (range, 0.5-2.5).

Unstable fractures and fractures caused by high-energy trauma with severe displacement, comminution, or shortening of more than 3 cm are more suitable for operative intervention. A telescope test is described, wherein the patients are examined with fluoroscopy while gentle axial compression is applied. If shortening of more than 3 cm is demonstrated, conservative treatment is expected to result in a higher incidence of malunion and unacceptable results.[19, 20]

In patients with associated head injury, femoral shaft fractures are difficult to treat conservatively, because muscle spasm and seizures tend to displace fracture fragments. As a rule, it is better to treat these patients with surgical stabilization.

Patients with multiple trauma should be treated by means of operative skeletal stabilization to facilitate nursing and mobilization.

Stabilization of femoral fractures with rigid interlocking nails is reserved for adolescents and is associated with a higher risk of AVN of the femoral head.

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has published a clinical practice guideline on the treatment of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures (see Guidelines).[21]

Nonoperative treatment

Nonoperative treatment of femoral shaft fractures consists of a Pavlik harness, gallows traction, and a spica cast, with or without preceding skin or skeletal traction.

Pavlik harness

The Pavlik harness is the treatment of choice for newborns with unstable proximal or midshaft fracture sustained as a result of birth trauma. These patients have a thick periosteum, and the fracture hematoma consolidates rapidly. The Pavlik harness is applied with the hip in moderate flexion and abduction. A wrap around the thigh can aid reduction. The harness is well tolerated, is easy to adjust, holds the femur in reduced position, and prevents skin complications. An understanding and compliant attendant is mandatory for Pavlik harness treatment.[22]

Gallows traction

Gallows traction (overhead Bryant skin traction) is useful for children younger than 2 years who weigh 10-12 kg. The traction should be enough to just lift the buttocks of the child off the bed. Careful examination of the neurovascular status of the extremity is mandatory in the early period after application of Bryant traction. Older children have a risk of vascular insufficiency, compartment syndrome, peroneal nerve palsy, and skin breakdown when treated with this method.

Spica cast

Immediate spica casting is ideally suited for treatment of isolated low-energy fractures with less than 2 cm shortening in a child younger than 10 years.[23, 24]  Contraindications for immediate spica cast treatment include the following:

  • Shortening of more than 2 cm
  • Poor skin condition
  • Massive swelling of the thigh
  • Presence of other injuries

Also, in an obese patient with a short thigh, it may be difficult to control the femur with a cast despite the patient’s young age.

Ideally, a spica cast should be applied with the patient under general anesthesia. A 90-90 plaster cast or a sitting spica cast, which allows the child to be placed in a sitting position in the chair, may be applied.

The plaster is applied with 90° of flexion, 30° of abduction, and 15° of external rotation at the hip and with 90° flexion at the knee. The plaster is molded anteriorly and laterally to prevent anterior and varus bowing. Acceptable reduction comprises less than 15° of angulation and less than 2 cm of shortening. If reduction is not acceptable, the spica cast should be reapplied after remanipulation; wedging a 90-90 cast may cause peroneal nerve palsy.

The spica cast is kept in place for 4-8 weeks, depending on the age of the patient. Excessive shortening is the most common early complication of spica casting. Limb-length discrepancy greater than 2 cm has been reported in 43% of cases and unacceptable angular deformity in 10-30%.[25]

The incidence of malunion is even higher in children older than 6 years. Therefore, those patients who are selected for this form of treatment must be followed up radiographically. Patients who have high-energy trauma and instability on the telescope test (as described above) should not be treated by immediate spica cast treatment.

Skin and skeletal traction

Skin traction can be used to align the fracture fragments and maintain reduction. It can be used as a prelude to spica cast treatment in cases where massive swelling or poor skin condition does not allow immediate spica application. It can also be used when an unstable high-energy fracture must be treated nonoperatively and early spica casting is likely to lead to malunion. In these cases, traction is employed until the fracture site has become nontender and callus is palpable locally, at which time a spica cast may be applied.

Skin traction can be used as definitive treatment for femoral shaft fractures in children between the ages of 2 and 4 years who weigh no more than 20 kg. Russell or split Russell skin traction is applied. The position of the fragments is checked radiographically, and treatment is continued until complete healing is achieved. To prevent skin complications such as blistering and sloughing, skin traction should not be used when more than 2.25 kg of traction is required.

Skeletal traction can be used as a definitive treatment or can be switched for a spica cast when sufficient stability is detected at the fracture site clinically and callus is demonstrable on radiographs. Indications for skeletal traction include the following:

  • Unstable fracture with more than 2-3 cm of shortening in an older child
  • Inability to achieve or maintain reduction in a spica cast
  • Comminuted proximal femoral fracture where there are limited choices for internal fixation
  • Patient with multiple injuries who is unfit for surgical intervention

The skeletal traction is applied through a Steinmann pin placed through the distal femur 2 cm proximal to the distal femoral physis. An upper tibial pin is not preferred, because it can lead to proximal tibial epiphyseal injury with resultant recurvatum deformity and can aggravate an unrecognized coexistent injury to the knee ligaments.

For proximal femur fractures and in young children, 90-90 traction is applied. In children older than 12 years in whom prolonged positioning of the knee in 90° of flexion can cause stiffness of the knee, balanced traction with the hip flexed 20-60° and a knee support to allow up to 45° of knee flexion are used. Radiographs are obtained weekly to check the alignment of the fracture fragments. Traction may be continued until healing occurs, or it may be removed and a spica cast applied after 2-3 weeks when the callus is apparent.

Operative treatment

Operative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children is frequently undertaken for patients who have sustained unstable high-energy fractures with disruption of the periosteal sleeve, breach of the skin, or severe soft-tissue trauma, as well as for patients in whom reduction cannot be achieved or maintained by means of a closed approach.

Operative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in adolescents is undertaken when nonoperative treatment would mean prolonged hospitalization or immobilization in traction or a spica cast or when the patient has multiple injuries, such as floating knee and pathologic fractures. Psychosocial factors may influence operative treatment of adolescents in whom prolonged immobilization may adversely affect self-image and interrupt social and educational development.

The surgical modalities used for fixation of these fractures include the following:

  • External fixation
  • Plating
  • Intramedullary nailing

External fixation

External fixation is indicated in patients who have fractures with severe soft-tissue injury (eg, open fractures, fractures with burns, and fractures with severe comminution) and in patients with head injury or multiple trauma for rapid skeletal stabilization as a damage control measure.

This procedure is minimally invasive and can be performed in critically ill patients, even with only local anesthesia. Two pins are inserted above the fracture and two below it, far enough away to avoid the fracture hematoma. The pins are then attached to a unilateral frame. The advantages of external fixation include maintenance of reduction with minimal overgrowth or malunion. The fixator provides excellent stability at the fracture site and allows mobilization, acting as a kind of portable traction.

Removal of the hardware is not an issue. However, the complications of external fixation include pin tract infection, fracture through the pinholes, delayed union, pin site scarring that causes cosmetic concerns, and refracture. Delayed union and refracture due to stress shielding are more likely when the fracture site is not dynamized[26] ; dynamization should be done at 4-6 weeks after the fracture.

The fixator is removed when at least three out of the four cortices on anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs show bony continuity across the fracture site. Joint stiffness, frequently seen with this form of treatment in adults, is uncommon in children.


For many years, plating was not a popular method for the treatment of femoral fractures in children, because of the long incision and soft-tissue stripping required for the insertion, the need for protected weightbearing, the risk of plate breakage, the need for hardware removal, and the risk of fracture after plate removal. Although high rates of complications were reported after plate osteosynthesis of femoral shaft fractures in children, subsequent series showed excellent results with minimal complications.

Plating is currently an acceptable method of treating children younger than 11 or 12 years who have a femoral fracture that requires surgical intervention. Plating has the advantage of allowing anatomic reduction and early mobilization. It allows quick fixation of a fracture in a multiply injured patient. It is particularly useful for the fixation of fractures that are difficult to fix with intramedullary nailing or external fixation (eg, subtrochanteric/supracondylar fractures). Plating and bone grafting can adequately treat pathologic fractures accompanied by bone loss.

Advances in plating—such as indirect reduction, biologic fixation, and the availability of locked plates[27] —have offset several of the disadvantages previously associated with this method.

Kanlic et al reported good or better results in 51 patients (average age, 10 y) who were treated with submuscular bridge plating,[28]  a technique that is easy to perform, is applicable in a wide variety of fractures, simplifies postoperative care, and preserves the biology of the fracture site (see the image below). The authors observed no symptomatic malalignment or limb-length discrepancies, and they found that the complications—plate failure and refracture—could generally be avoided by using better technique.

(a) Comminuted fracture shaft of femur in adolesce (a) Comminuted fracture shaft of femur in adolescent. (b) Insertion of submuscular bridge plate through small distal incision. (c) Screw insertion through tiny stab incisions under imaging guidance. (d) Postoperative check film. (e) Tiny scars 3 months after surgery.

Other authors have also recommended percutaneous plating for the management of all complex and unstable pediatric femoral diaphyseal fractures.[29]

A systematic review and meta-analysis by Strait et al compared submuscular plating with elastic intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures in children.[30]  Patients who underwent plating had significantly more blood loss, a significantly lower risk of postoperative adverse surgical events, and a significantly longer hospital stay. The two procedures did not differ significantly with respect to mean operating time, limb-length discrepancy, or mean time to union.

Intramedullary nailing

Intramedullary nailing with rigid interlocked nails or multiple flexible nails has been used to treat femoral shaft fractures in children, with good results.

Rigid nails, with or without reaming, are used in older patients (usually >12 y). These nails are introduced in an antegrade manner through the tip of the greater trochanter and are locked in cases of rotationally unstable or comminuted fractures prone to shortening.

The complications associated with these nails include AVN, arrest of trochanteric apophysis leading to coxa valga, and heterotopic ossification. To reduce the risk of AVN, introduction of the nail through the piriformis fossa should be avoided. A survey of 286 pediatric orthopedists reported 14 specific instances of AVN after rigid intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures.[31]

Flexible intramedullary nailing is suitable for transverse and short oblique fractures of the femoral shaft in children. Comminuted fractures prone to shortening and rotationally unstable fractures may be difficult to fix when these devices are used alone. The procedure uses the three-point fixation principle and can be accomplished with Ender nails, Rush pins, or titanium elastic nails (see the image below). The first report of the use of titanium elastic nails came from a hospital in Nancy, France; since then, these nails have often been referred to as Nancy nails.

Immediate postoperative x-ray of titanium elastic Immediate postoperative x-ray of titanium elastic nailing performed on male child. Image courtesy of Dr. Bhavuk Garg, Senior Resident of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi.

The flexible nails can be introduced in either a retrograde or an antegrade manner. Antegrade introduction can be performed through the greater trochanter or through a cortical window distal to it; two nails, one C-shaped and the other S-shaped, are used for fixation of midshaft or distal-third fractures. Retrograde nailing is done through the supracondylar region; two C-shaped rods, one from the medial side and the other from the lateral side, are introduced into the medullary canal for midshaft or proximal-third fractures.

The nail diameter should be 40% of the canal diameter. The two nails should be of the largest size possible. A symmetric construct is made with the maximum curve at the fracture site and with the nails crossing above and below. The advantages of flexible nailing include relatively rapid fracture stabilization, early patient mobilization, a small incision, minimal blood loss, and avoidance of the proximal blood supply.

In several series, flexible nailing has yielded excellent results.[32, 33, 34, 35]  The technique is especially useful in young children and typically does not lead to AVN or trochanteric arrest. However, nail migration and irritation of the skin by the ends of the nail are frequently seen and sometimes troublesome. Loss of reduction and malunion may be noted with unstable comminuted fractures. The need for hardware removal and the risk of refracture are the other problems associated with this technique.

In a study of 350 fractures treated with titanium elastic nails, 8% were associated with a coronal plane malunion between 5° and 10°, 5% with a leg length discrepancy of more than 2 cm, and 12% with irritation at the insertion site.[36]  There was one case of osteomyelitis 3 months after nail removal, and there were two refractures 3 months after nail removal as a result of severe trauma. No cases of AVN or nonunion were reported.

There has been some controversy as to whether titanium or stainless-steel elastic nails are superior for treating femoral shaft fractures in children. A systematic review by Mohamed et al did not find conclusive evidence for the superiority of either type but noted a trend favoring stainless-steel nails, particularly in view of their lower cost.[37]

The IOLE (Intramedullary titanium nail Osteosynthesis Linked External fixator) technique, developed by Bisaccia and Meccariello, involves the hybridization of titanium intramedullary nails with a modular external fixator. In a study of 58 pediatric patients with femoral shaft fractures, Bisaccia et al compared the IOLE technique (n = 14) with placement of endomedullary titanium nails (n = 22) and use of external axial or modular external fixators (n = 16).[38]  At final follow-up, no significant differences among the three groups were noted with respect to significant rotation defects, angulation, growth, or nonunion; however, the IOLE group had an advantage with regard to early weightbearing.

Distal Femoral Epiphyseal Fractures

Undisplaced fractures

For undisplaced fractures, nothing more than cast immobilization for a period of 6 weeks may be needed. If displacement is uncertain, it can be ruled out by means of computed tomography (CT). A high cast is preferred to prevent large movements of the arm at the fracture. Hip spica casting is advisable in short and obese children. If a fracture appears highly likely but cannot be seen, the child is placed in a cylinder cast or knee immobilizer, and repeat radiographs are taken after 10-14 days to look for callus formation.

Fractures that are reduced and immobilized without fixation have a high likelihood of displacement; accordingly, the surgeon should have a low threshold for surgical intervention in such cases.

Displaced fractures

Treatment of these injuries depends on the fracture type (see the image below).

Schematic diagram showing various methods of opera Schematic diagram showing various methods of operative fixation of distal femoral epiphyseal injuries.

Type I

Type I displaced fractures are treated with closed reduction under anesthesia and percutaneous pin fixation. Smooth pins 2.9-3.2 mm in size are inserted in a crossed fashion in such a way that the pins are maximally separated at the fracture site and cross just proximal to the physis. The pins are bent to prevent migration. Infection is a concern at the pin site, and septic arthritis may develop. The pins can be removed early (3-6 wk).

Type II

For type II displaced fractures, if the metaphyseal fragment is large enough, cannulated screw fixation proximal and parallel to the physis is performed. Two different-sized screws may be used if necessary. If the fragment is small, crossed pinning can be done (see the image below). The presence of the periosteal sleeve in between the fracture ends itself is not an indication for open reduction. It has been observed that with fracture healing, the periosteum is degraded.

Type II distal femoral epiphyseal injury fixed wit Type II distal femoral epiphyseal injury fixed with 2 smooth crossed pins.

Type III and type IV

For all displaced type III and type IV fractures, open anatomic reduction and internal fixation are preferred because of the high probability of growth arrest, bony bar formation, and angulation in these fractures. Preoperative CT is helpful in planning.

Cannulated screw fixation is done after anatomic reduction in type III fractures. Large osteochondral fragments can be fixed with Herbert screws. Titanium screws are preferable because they would not interfere with the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained to evaluate the growth plate if physeal bar formation is suspected.

Type IV fractures are fixed with cannulated screws proximal and distal to the physis and, if necessary, smooth pins crossing the physis.

Postoperative Care

Postoperative immobilization in the form of a spica cast is necessary for most pediatric patients with surgically stabilized hip fractures. Supplemental immobilization is necessary for patients with unstable femoral shaft fractures that were treated with titanium elastic nails.

After distal femoral fracture fixation, all patients are given a long leg fiberglass cast with the knee in 5-10° of flexion. Ambulation with crutches may be initiated in a few days. At 1 week and, if necessary, at 2 and 3 weeks, repeat radiographs are taken to check for displacement. With Salter type I and II injuries, partial weightbearing can be started by 2-3 weeks. If infection is a concern, pins may be removed by 3-4 weeks through a window in the cast. Casts may be discontinued after clinical and radiologic evidence of union has been obtained.


Proximal femoral fracture

Complications associated with proximal femoral fractures in children are frequent and serious. Moon and Mehlman reported an overall complication rate of 46%, with some patients experiencing more than one complication.[7]  The incidence of complications has decreased with the use of aggressive treatment protocols comprising early reduction, stable internal fixation, decompression of the joint hematoma, and prolonged external immobilization until sound union.

Older children with type I and II injuries are at the highest risk for complications. Adolescents and older children possess a precarious blood supply and limited ability to revascularize and remodel the femoral head.

Serious complications associated with these fractures include AVN, premature closure of the epiphysis, nonunion, and coxa vara.

Avascular necrosis

AVN is the most common and most disabling complication associated with proximal femoral fractures (see the image below). It occurs after pediatric hip fracture as a consequence of the following:

  • Insult to the vascular supply at the time of the initial injury
  • Vascular insult caused by reduction maneuvers or the insertion of fixation devices
  • Increased intracapsular pressure (tamponade effect) due to fracture hematoma; this explains the occurrence of AVN in undisplaced fractures
(a) Delbet type I proximal femoral epiphyseal inju (a) Delbet type I proximal femoral epiphyseal injury. (b) Reduction and fixation with smooth pins. (c) Avascular necrosis 1 year after surgery. (d) Bone scan showing decreased vascularity of femoral head on affected side. (e) Radiograph after pin removal showing avascular necrosis (L) of hip.

Risk factors cited for the development of AVN include type I or II fracture, greater degree of fracture displacement,[39]  older age, and poorer quality of reduction.[40] Aggressive surgical treatment with decompressive hip arthrotomy is increasingly believed to reduce the incidence of AVN in patients with these fractures.

A retrospective review by Spence et al found fracture displacement, fracture location, and time to treatment—but not patient age, type of fixation, mechanism of injury, capsular decompression, postoperative alignment, or performance of reduction—to be predictive of osteonecrosis after femoral neck fracture in children and adolescents.[41]

AVN occurs within a few months of injury in children, and all cases develop within 1 year.[16]  As a rule, patients initially present with pain in the groin and later exhibit limitation of range of motion and proximal femoral deformities. Radiographs reveal areas of lucency and sclerosis in the femoral head, followed by fragmentation and collapse of the femoral head.

MRI is the most sensitive investigation for the early diagnosis of AVN. However, in cases where stainless-steel implants have been used and MRI cannot be performed, a technetium (Tc)-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan can be useful for diagnosing AVN.

In 1962, Ratliff described the following three patterns of AVN after proximal femoral fractures in children[42]  (see the image below):

  • Type I – Diffuse necrosis of the entire femoral head and neck proximal to the fracture, occurring in about 50% of cases; this denotes total necrosis, is the most serious type, and has the worst prognosis
  • Type II – Necrosis of the neck with sparing of the epiphysis, occurring in 25% of cases; this is essentially metaphyseal necrosis with little functional significance and is associated with the best outcome
  • Type III – Necrosis confined to the epiphysis, occurring in 25% of cases; this represents partial epiphyseal necrosis and has a better prognosis than type I
Patterns of avascular necrosis in hip fractures in Patterns of avascular necrosis in hip fractures in children.

No effective treatment of posttraumatic AVN is recognized. At the onset of pain, partial weightbearing or refraining from weightbearing is recommended until the pain resolves. Acetabular and femoral osteotomies to contain the femoral head or to place the viable head in the area of weightbearing have been recommended but have failed to improve outcomes. More than three fourths of these patients require additional surgery to improve function.

It should be noted, however, that AVN is less disabling in younger children (ie, < 6 y) because of the biologic plasticity of the bone and the greater potential for regeneration.

Premature physeal closure

Premature physeal closure mostly occurs in conjunction with AVN of the femoral head. Internal fixation that crosses the physis predisposes to this complication. In addition, severe displacement at the time of injury or forceful attempts at closed reduction may injure the physis and cause fusion. Premature closure of the physis has little impact on function when it is not associated with AVN, because the shortening in such cases rarely exceeds 1.5 cm. However, when it occurs in association with AVN in a young child, significant limb-length discrepancy develops.

Physeal arrest can be diagnosed on radiographs by comparing the injured side with the normal side. Scanograms and growth charts can help predict the final limb-length discrepancy and determine the optimal timing for contralateral distal femoral epiphysiodesis.


Nonunion has been reported in 6-12% cases, particularly after nonoperative treatment. Inadequate reduction and distraction at the fracture site at the time of internal fixation are other contributory factors. Nonunion leads to coxa vara and a poor functional outcome. If nonunion is associated with coxa vara, it can usually be effectively treated by means of a subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy and internal fixation across the nonunion.

If the normal neck shaft angle is maintained, autogenous bone grafting with rigid internal fixation to gain compression across the fracture site can help achieve union.

In a small study (N = 12), Elgeidi et al found the use of fibular strut grafts to be effective for fixation of nonunited femoral neck fractures in children with or without subtrochanteric valgus osteotomy.[43]

Risk factors for nonunion include severe initial displacement, poor reduction quality, and the presence of comminuted medial or posterior cortex on AP or lateral radiographs.[44]

Coxa vara

Coxa vara is defined as a neck shaft angle of less than 130°. Like nonunion, it is related to the method of treatment and is more commonly seen with nonoperative therapy. Malreduction, loss of reduction, nonunion, and premature physeal closure are predisposing causes.

Coxa vara is best prevented by maintenance of high standards for initial reduction of type III and IV fractures, rigid internal fixation, and postoperative spica cast immobilization. Coxa vara of functional consequence (ie, coxa vara associated with nonunion) is best treated by a subtrochanteric or intertrochanteric valgus osteotomy and internal fixation.

Femoral shaft fracture

The most common complication associated with femoral shaft fractures in children is malunion, with or without limb-length discrepancy. This may resolve with time as remodeling occurs. Because overgrowth is often seen after femoral fractures, an adequate period of observation is mandatory before a decision is made to perform epiphysiodesis of the contralateral normal extremity. Osteotomy can be performed to correct persistent angular deformity in older children. Care should be taken to watch for possible postoperative femoral malrotation.[45]

Neurovascular injuries may accompany femoral shaft fractures in children. Vascular injuries are most commonly associated with distal femoral fractures. They are treated with vascular repair following arteriography. Stabilization of the femoral fracture with internal or external fixation should be undertaken at the time of vascular repair.

Compartment syndrome affecting the thigh muscles may occur after the femoral shaft fracture, after intramedullary nailing, or as a result of gallows traction or skin traction. Permanent disability can be prevented by maintaining a high index of suspicion and providing early decompression.

In general, delayed union and nonunion are rare in children; they are seen mainly in children who are older, those with high-energy injuries, those with infections, and those in whom external fixators were used.

Infection is seen with the use of external fixators and, rarely, as a consequence of hematogenous seeding of the fracture hematoma. Surgical debridement is the mainstay of treatment. When infection is absent, bone grafting with a locked nail or compression plate is the treatment of choice. Control of infection with repeated debridements followed by external fixation and bone grafting can help achieve union.

Distal femoral epiphyseal fracture

Complications of distal femoral fractures include injuries to nearby structures (eg, ligaments, blood vessels, and the peroneal nerve) and various growth disturbances.

Injuries to ligaments, blood vessels, or nerves

Associated meniscal and cruciate ligament tears may occur that can cause residual instability after fracture healing. One study reported symptomatic ligamentous laxity in 8% of patients with distal femoral epiphyseal injuries.[46]  Most such injuries occur in patients nearing maturity. Ligament reconstruction is done along with meniscal repair, depending on the patient’s age. If there is no reparable meniscal lesion, the child is put on a rehabilitation program.

Vascular injuries occur in 2% of distal femoral fractures.[47]  Arterial spasm or mechanical obstruction caused by the metaphyseal fragment may resolve with reduction, and if vascularity does not return after reduction, arteriography and a vascular consultation are warranted. In the case of open fractures, vessel repair is done after bone fixation.

Most peroneal nerve injuries are neurapraxias that resolve with time, sometimes lasting up to 6 months.

Growth disturbances

Because the physis is undulating (see Anatomy), the germinal layer may be traversed in any type of fracture. Consequently, growth disturbances are commonplace. Most patients with more than 1 year of growth remaining demonstrate some type of growth disturbance, either a focal arrest or a slowdown of longitudinal growth.

Physeal injury can be seen on plain films as the convergence or absence of Park-Harris growth arrest lines as early as 6 months after the fracture. MRI is used to demonstrate the bony bar earlier, and CT is used to map the physis if a bar resection is planned.

Physeal offset and bony bar formation are the mechanisms of growth arrest in type III and type IV fractures. The physis distal to the metaphyseal fragment continues to grow in type II injury and leads to angular deformity.

If the localized area of premature arrest constitutes less than 50% of the total area of the physis and if at least 2 years of growth remains, excision of the bony bridge is recommended.[48, 49]  A corrective osteotomy should be performed at the same time if there is significant angulation. The results of bar resection have not been encouraging; accordingly, in older children, an epiphysiodesis should be considered. An alternative method of correcting angular deformity is the use of the Ilizarov fixator.

Leg-length discrepancy occurs as a result of premature physeal closure.[50] If patients have more than 2 years of growth remaining, leg-length discrepancy is expected to proceed at a rate of 1 cm/y. Although it is frequently reported, most cases are not clinically significant. The treatment of leg-length discrepancy in these fracture patients proceeds along the usual lines.

Long-Term Monitoring

The need for prolonged follow-up is thoroughly explained to the patient’s parents at the initiation of treatment. Children with femoral head and neck fractures are to be followed for the occurrence of AVN. Children with distal femoral fractures are usually followed for as long as 24 months to evaluate for evidence of growth disturbances in the form of angulation and limb-length discrepancy.



AAOS Guidelines on Treatment of Pediatric Diaphyseal Femur Fractures

In 2020, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) issued updated guidelines for pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures.[21] Recommendations included the following:

  • Strong evidence supports the position that children younger than 36 months with a diaphyseal femur fracture should be evaluated for child abuse.
  • Limited evidence supports treatment with a Pavlik harness or a spica cast for infants aged 6 months or younger who have a diaphyseal femur fracture; outcomes are similar.
  • Moderate evidence supports early spica casting or traction with delayed spica casting for children aged 6 months to 5 years who have a diaphyseal femur fracture with < 2 cm of shortening.
  • Limited evidence supports the option to use flexible intramedullary nailing for treatment of children aged 5-11 years with diagnosed diaphyseal femur fractures.
  • Limited evidence supports rigid trochanteric entry nailing, submuscular plating, and flexible intramedullary nailing as treatment options for children diagnosed with diaphyseal femur fractures from the age of 11 years to skeletal maturity; piriformis and near-piriformis entry rigid nailing are not options.
  • Limited evidence supports regional pain management for patient comfort perioperatively.
  • Limited evidence supports waterproof liners for spica casts as an option for children diagnosed with pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures.