Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Treatment & Management

Updated: Oct 15, 2019
  • Author: Vera A De Palo, MD, MBA, FCCP; Chief Editor: Vinod K Panchbhavi, MD, FACS  more...
  • Print
Treatment

Approach Considerations

Anticoagulant and thrombolytic therapy options are available for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Anticoagulant therapy prevents further clot deposition and allows the patient’s natural fibrinolytic mechanisms to lyse the existing clot. [26]  Guidelines have been developed for optimal management of anticoagulation therapy in patients with VTE. [27] (See Guidelines.)

Anticoagulant inpatient medications should include heparin or a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), followed by the initiation of an oral coumarin derivative. The predominant coumarin derivative in clinical use in North America is warfarin sodium.

The anticoagulant properties of unfractionated heparin (UFH), LMWH, and warfarin sodium stem from their effects on the factors and cofactors of the coagulation cascade.

Patients with acute, massive pulmonary embolism (PE) causing hemodynamic instability may be treated initially with a thrombolytic agent (eg,  tissue plasminogen activator [t-PA]). t-PA has increasingly been used as the first-choice thrombolytic agent.

Surgical interventions for VTE include thrombectomy and venous interruption.

Special considerations

Pregnancy

In pregnancy, establishing a clear guideline for the treatment of thromboembolic disease is difficult from an evidence-based perspective. Heparin is the anticoagulant of choice, given its relative safety for the fetus.

Heparin therapy should be discontinued immediately before delivery, and then both heparin and warfarin therapy can be started post partum.

Pregnant women with a history of previous thromboembolic disease probably should receive some prophylaxis, as the estimated range of recurrence is 0-15%.

Cancer

International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of VTE in patients with cancer were issued in early 2013. [28] Guidelines have also been published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). [29]  (See Guidelines.)

Next:

Anticoagulant Therapy

The results of a Cochrane review indicated that the use of heparin in patients with cancer but with no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for it was related to a significant reduction in death at 24 months but not at 12 months. [30] A statistically and clinically important reduction in VTE was also noted. It had no effect on bleeding or quality of life. Future studies are needed to investigate the survival benefit of different types of anticoagulants in patients with different types and stages of cancer.

No significant reduction in mortality at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, or 5 years was found in another, similar Cochrane review comparing the use of oral anticoagulants with either placebo or no intervention in patients with cancer who had no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation. In addition, the oral anticoagulant warfarin was found to increase major and minor bleeding. [31]

In a study of patients with a first VTE who did not have cancer and who received different durations of anticoagulant treatment, the results indicated a similar risk of recurrent VTE whether anticoagulation therapy was stopped after 3 months or a longer period of treatment was provided. The study evaluated data from seven randomized trials that included 2925 men or women. Proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PE showed a higher risk of recurrence whenever treatment was stopped. [32]

Results from phase II/III studies, according to a report by Merli et al, suggested that newer oral anticoagulants may provide an efficacious alternative for prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery and have had a good overall safety profile, with no evidence of increased hepatotoxicity. Comparison with large observational registries, however, revealed differences between real-life patient populations; differences in endpoint definitions also prevented indirect comparison of agents. [33]

The study’s authors stated that specific compliance and postmarketing safety issues (especially liver enzyme monitoring requirements) need to be clarified before these agents can be widely accepted in routine clinical practice.

Heparin

Heparin is the first line of therapy. It is administered by bolus dosing, followed by a continuous infusion. Adequacy of therapy is determined by an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of 1.5-2 times baseline. Progression or recurrence of thromboembolism is 15 times more likely when a therapeutic aPTT is not achieved within the first 48 hours.

A weight-based nomogram has been employed to determine adequate dosing, using heparin at 80 mg/kg for the bolus and 18 mg/kg/hr for the infusion. A short course of heparin is followed by a longer course of oral anticoagulant (warfarin sodium). It should be started only after effective anticoagulation has been achieved; there can be an increase in coagulability and thrombogenesis during the first few days of oral anticoagulant administration.

The goal is to achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0. The optimum duration of treatment depends on several factors (eg, first episode or recurrent event, other underlying risk factors). [34]  A minimum of 3 months of oral therapy has been suggested following a first episode of DVT or PE.

Low-molecular-weight heparin

Several studies have shown that LMWH, which is a fractionated heparin, is as effective as UFH in treating DVT. Minimal requirements for outpatient therapy with LMWH regimens include the following:

  • Stable PE or DVT
  • Low risk for bleeding
  • Absence of severe renal insufficiency
  • Availability of systems for administration and monitoring of LMWH and warfarin, as well as surveillance and treatment of recurrent thromboembolic disease

A Cochrane review found that LMWH, in a comparison with oral anticoagulants (eg, a vitamin K antagonist [VKA] or ximelagatran), reduced VTE events but not death in patients with cancer. [35]

Factor Xa and direct thrombin inhibitors

Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban are alternatives to warfarin for prophylaxis or treatment of DVT and PE. Apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and betrixaban all inhibit factor Xa, whereas dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor.

Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for a variety of treatment and prophylaxis VTE indications, including the following:

  • Risk reduction for stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
  • Treatment of DVT
  • Treatment of PE
  • Reduction in risk of recurrent DVT and/or PE
  • Prophylaxis of DVT following hip or knee replacement surgery
  • Prophylaxis of VTE in acutely ill medical patients at risk for thromboembolic complications owing to restricted mobility (and who are not at high risk of bleeding)
  • Risk reduction of major cardiovascular events with coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD)

In November 2012, rivaroxaban was approved by the FDA for the treatment of DVT or PE and for reduction of the risk of recurrent DVT and PE following initial treatment. [36, 37, 38, 39]

In October 2017, the FDA approved rivaroxaban in a dosage of 10 mg once daily for reducing the ongoing risk of recurrent VTE after at least 6 months of initial anticoagulation therapy. [40]  In the new prescribing information, the drug may be initiated at 15 mg twice daily for the first 21 days after VTE, then reduced to 20 mg once daily from day 22 through at least day 180. After at least 180 days, the once-daily 10-mg regimen may now be prescribed for patients at continued risk for VTE.

In October 2019, rivaroxaban was approved for prophylaxis of VTE in acutely ill medical patients who are at risk for thromboembolic complications owing to restricted mobility (and who are not at high risk of bleeding). Rivaroxaban in this setting demonstrated noninferiority to enoxaparin with short-term use (10 ± 4 days) and superiority with long-term use (35 ± 4 days) compared with short-term use of enoxaparin followed by placebo. [41]

Another study failed to show a significant benefit of rivaroxaban over placebo in reducing the composite end point of symptomatic VTE or death in medically ill patients at increased risk for VTE after discharge; however, there were few events and the primary safety outcome, major bleeding, was not significantly increased with treatment. [42]

Apixaban

In August 2014, apixaban was approved by the FDA for treatment of DVT and PE. The approval for treatment of PE and prevention of recurrence was based on the outcome of the AMPLIFY (Apixaban for the Initial Management of Pulmonary Embolism and Deep-Vein Thrombosis as First-Line Therapy) and AMPLIFY-EXT studies, in which apixaban therapy was compared with enoxaparin and warfarin treatment.

The AMPLIFY study showed that, in comparison with the standard anticoagulant regimen, apixaban therapy resulted in a 16% reduction in the risk of a composite endpoint that included recurrent symptomatic VTE or VTE-associated death. [43]

Dabigatran

Dabigatran inhibits free and clot-bound thrombin and thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. It was approved in 2010 to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. In April 2014, it was approved for the treatment of DVT and PE in patients who have been treated with a parenteral anticoagulant for 5-10 days. Additionally, it was approved to reduce the risk of DVT and PE recurrence in patients who have been previously treated. Approval was based on results from 4 global phase III trials.

The RE-COVER and RE-COVER II trials included patients with DVT and PE who were treated with parenteral anticoagulant therapy for 5-10 days. Results showed dabigatran was noninferior to warfarin in reducing DVT and PE after a median of 174 days of treatment with a lower risk of bleeding compared with warfarin. [44, 45]

The RE-SONATE trial and RE-MEDY trials included 2856 patients with acute DVT and PE who had completed at least 3 months of anticoagulant therapy. Results showed that dabigatran was noninferior to warfarin in the extended treatment of VTE and carried a lower risk of major or clinically relevant bleeding than warfarin did. [46]

Edoxaban

Edoxaban was approved by the FDA in January 2015 for treatment of DVT and PE in patients who have been initially treated with a parenteral anticoagulant for 5-10 days. Approval was based on the Hokusai-VTE study that included 4921 patients with DVT and 3,319 patients with PE.

Among patients with PE, 938 had right ventricular dysfunction, as assessed by measurement of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. [47] The rate of recurrent VTE in this subgroup was 3.3% in the edoxaban group and 6.2% in the warfarin group. Edoxaban was noninferior to high-quality standard warfarin therapy and caused significantly less bleeding in a broad spectrum of patients with VTE, including those with severe PE.

In a study of edoxaban for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, 1050 patients were randomized to receive LMWH for at least 5 days followed by oral edoxaban (60 mg daily) or subcutaneous (SC) dalteparin (200 IU/kg body weight daily). Treatment was for 6 to 12 months. Edoxaban was noninferior to SC dalteparin for the composite outcome of recurrent VTE or major bleeding. The rate of recurrent VTE was lower, but the rate of major bleeding was higher with edoxaban. [48]

Betrixaban

Betrixaban, an FXa inhibitor, was approved by the FDA in June 2017. It is indicated for prophylaxis of VTE in adults hospitalized for acute medical illness who are at risk for thromboembolic complications owing to moderate or severe restricted mobility and other risk factors that may cause VTE.

Approval of betrixaban was based on data from the phase 3 APEX studies. [49, 50] These randomized, double-blind, multinational clinical trials compared extended-duration betrixaban (35-42 days) with short-duration enoxaparin (6-14 days) for VTE in 7513 acutely medically ill hospitalized patients with VTE risk factors.

Patients in the betrixaban group took an initial dose of 160 mg orally on day 1, followed by 80 mg once daily for 35-42 days, and received a placebo injection once daily for 6-14 days. Patients in the enoxaparin group received 40 mg SC once daily for 6-4 days and took an oral placebo once daily for 35-42 days.

Efficacy was measured in 7441 patients by using a composite outcome score composed of the occurrence of asymptomatic or symptomatic proximal DVT, nonfatal PE, stroke, or VTE-related death. Betrixaban showed significant decreases in VTE events as compared with enoxaparin.

Previous
Next:

Thrombolytic Therapy

Thrombolytic therapy dissolves recent clots promptly by activating a plasma proenzyme, plasminogen, to its active form, plasmin. Plasmin degrades fibrin to soluble peptides. Thrombolytic therapy speeds pulmonary tissue reperfusion and rapidly reverses right heart failure. It also improves pulmonary capillary blood flow and more rapidly improves hemodynamic parameters.

The recombinant t-PAs (rt-PAs) tenecteplase, alteplase, and reteplase are thrombolytic agents that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved for thrombolytic use in PE. In head-to-head studies by Goldhaber et al between rt-PA and heparin, there was a higher incidence of recurrent PE and death in the group receiving heparin. Patients in both groups had bleeding complications requiring transfusion therapy. [51]

Indications

Thrombolytic treatment may be administered in acute PE associated with hemodynamic instability in patients who do not seem prone to bleeding, on the basis of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) evidence-based guidelines regarding antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis. [34]

Contraindications

Absolute contraindications for thrombolysis include the following:

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the past 6 months
  • Active or recent internal bleeding
  • History of hemorrhagic stroke
  • Intracranial or intraspinal disease
  • Recent cranial surgery or head trauma
  • Pregnancy

Relative contraindications include the following:

  • Major surgery or trauma within the past 2 weeks
  • Biopsy within 10 days
  • Other invasive procedures
  • Procedures in a location inaccessible to external compression
  • Uncontrolled coagulation defects such as thrombocytopenia
  • Nonhemorrhagic stroke
Previous
Next:

Thrombectomy, Embolectomy, IVC Filter, and Ligation

Thrombectomy for venous embolism is performed less frequently, in view of the relatively high incidence of rethrombosis, unless heparin infusion is added to the therapeutic regimen.

Pulmonary embolectomy remains a therapeutic option, but mortality is extremely high. It is reserved for cases of massive PE in which an absolute contraindication for thrombolysis is present or when all other treatment modalities have failed. It is only effective when the clot is in the large central vessels.

Catheter pulmonary embolectomy is performed by inserting a cup-tipped, steerable catheter into the central venous system, with access gained through the jugular vein or through the right common femoral vein. When the cup reaches the thrombus, suction is applied and the thrombus is extracted.

The inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is designed to trap potentially lethal emboli while maintaining vena caval patency. It has been used in cases where anticoagulation is contraindicated, where there has been a complication of anticoagulation, where anticoagulation has failed, or in the case of pulmonary embolectomy. [52]

Although IVC filters are frequently placed in adults who have experienced acute PE or VTE to prevent a subsequent event, evidence for the safety and efficacy of the practice is limited. In a study published in late 2018, Bikdeli et al found that for older adults with PE, the use of IVC filters appears to offer no mortality benefit and may in fact confer a mortality risk. [53, 54]

Ligation of venous tributaries is an option that is rarely practiced today. Its use has been limited by a high mortality and the need for continuous anticoagulation. It essentially has been replaced by the percutaneous insertion of the IVC filter.

Previous
Next:

Inpatient Care

In general, inpatient care requires the administration and continuation of intravenous (IV) or SC anticoagulants, with an oral anticoagulant (the coumarin derivative warfarin sodium) started within 72 hours of the SC anticoagulant or, if IV heparin is being given, once the aPTT is therapeutic (1.5-2 times baseline).

The reason that the oral administration of warfarin sodium is started after anticoagulation with SC or IV anticoagulants has been achieved is because warfarin can have an initial procoagulant effect, particularly in patients with protein C or protein S deficiencies, potentially causing fat necrosis.

For patients whose treatment has included thrombolysis for acute, massive PE causing hemodynamic instability, heparin infusion should be started once the thrombin time (TT) or aPTT is less than twice the baseline value. Treatment with an oral coumarin derivative should begin after 24-48 hours of consistent anticoagulation.

Appropriate anticoagulation with the oral medication has been accomplished when the INR is between 2.0 and 3.0.

Once the INR is consistently within the desired range, treatment can continue in the outpatient setting as long as no other concomitant conditions are present that require continued inpatient treatment.

Previous
Next:

Outpatient Care

Prolongation of the prothrombin time (PT) should be monitored in the outpatient setting by the routine measurement of the INR, with adjustments made to maintain its level between 2.0 and 3.0. In the outpatient setting, the oral anticoagulant, warfarin sodium, is continued; oral anticoagulation treatment should be continued for at least 3 months.

In patients with recurrent venous thrombosis or with a continuing risk factor, such as a hematologic factor or a malignancy, prolonged or even indefinite anticoagulation treatment should be considered.

The results of one study suggested that outpatient care may be a safe and effective alternative to inpatient care in selected hemodynamically stable patients with PE. [55] The study evaluated data from 344 patients with a low risk of death at 19 emergency departments internationally. Patients in the inpatient group experienced no recurrent VTE events within 90 days and no major bleeding within 14 days or at 90 days.

Whereas a few members of the outpatient group developed recurrent VTE within 90 days (1/171) and major bleeding within 14 days or at 90 days (2/171 and 3/171, respectively), patients in the outpatient group experienced less mean length of stay than did those in the inpatient group (0-5 days and 3-9 days, respectively). One inpatient and one outpatient died within 90 days. [55]

Previous
Next:

Complications

Postthrombotic syndrome

The most common long-term complication of treated DVT is postthrombotic syndrome (postphlebitic syndrome), which is a chronic complication of VTE characterized by pain and swelling. [56]  Chronic deep venous insufficiency, recurrent cellulitis, venous stasis, and ulceration of the skin can develop in as many as 50% of patients treated with full anticoagulation.

The results from an open-label, randomized, controlled trial suggested that additional treatment with catheter-directed thrombolysis using alteplase (an rt-PA) reduces the development of postthrombotic syndrome, prompting the authors to suggest that it be considered for patients at low risk of bleeding who have high proximal DVT. [57]

Bleeding

The most feared complication of the treatment of PE is severe and fatal bleeding. Major risk factors for bleeding include intensity and duration of therapy, increased age, and significant hepatic or renal dysfunction. Comparison studies of the incidence of severe and fatal bleeding complications between heparin and rt-PA have demonstrated no significant differences. When significant bleeding does occur, it may be necessary to treat with agent-specific strategies. [58]

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis [59] may develop in 3-4% of patients receiving heparin. It is an immune-mediated process that typically presents within 5-10 days of therapy. It can result in bleeding or thrombosis and should be suspected when the platelet count falls precipitously to less than 50% below its baseline or to less than 100,000/µL. In such cases, heparin therapy should be stopped immediately.

LMWH cross-reacts with the antibody in vitro in 90% of cases. Therefore, it should not be substituted in the acute setting. Danaparoid, a heparinoid, has less than 10% cross-reactivity with the antibody.

Fondaparinux has been used in suspected HIT.  A study by Kang et al found that fondaparinux was shown had an effectiveness and safety profile similar to those of argatroban and danaparoid. [60]

Recombinant hirudin is also been approved for HIT and thrombosis. Plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin G (IgG) infusion may be effective in cases with thrombosis.

Heparin-induced osteopenia

Heparin-induced osteopenia has been reported following UFH treatment of more than 1 month's duration.

Skin necrosis

Coumarin derivatives can cause skin necrosis as a consequence of widespread subcutaneous microthrombosis. This can occur in individuals who are protein C–deficient, either genetically or owing to large loading doses of a coumarin derivative. Areas usually affected include the breasts, abdominal wall, and lower extremities. [61]

Recurrence

Recurrence of thromboembolism had been documented following discontinuance of therapy. After a 3- to 6-month course of anticoagulant therapy, the risk of recurrent thromboembolism is lower in patients who have reversible risk factors. The recurrence rate is higher in patients with previous proximal vein thrombosis than in those with calf vein thrombosis.

After a 3-month course of anticoagulant therapy, the risk of secondary thrombosis is 2-4% in the first year. The recurrence risk is dependent on the precipitating risk factor: Risk is low if VTE is provoked by surgery, intermediate if it is related to a nonsurgical risk factor, and high if it is unprovoked and occurs in the setting of the patient with a disease-related risk factor. [62]

Two studies indicated that aspirin reduces by one third the rate of VTE recurrence and the rate of major vascular events (a composite outcome made up of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death, in addition to VTE). [63, 64] It also reduces arterial thrombotic events.

Previous
Next:

Diet

No special dietary requirements or restrictions exist. Diet should be as tolerated.

An exception, however, applies to patients on oral warfarin therapy, who must avoid vitamin supplements that contain vitamin K and must limit foods that are high in vitamin K (eg, broccoli, cabbage, red and green lettuce, onion, peppers, spinach, oils, mayonnaise, black and green leaf teas). For the patient on oral warfarin therapy, the diet should remain steady, with no drastic changes in content, in order to facilitate accurate, regular monitoring of the INR. Drastic changes in vitamin K–containing foods or supplements can affect the INR.

Previous
Next:

Activity

Activity in patients with thromboembolism should be limited until anticoagulation has been achieved and the patient is on oral anticoagulant medication. Patients on oral warfarin therapy should avoid activities that could cause trauma.

Previous
Next:

Prevention

Thromboprophylaxis has been reported to reduce the incidence of DVT and fatal PE. Prophylaxis may be achieved with medication or with mechanical devices. Medical prophylaxis should begin either 12 hours before surgery or immediately after surgery and should be continued for 7-10 days. [65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73]

UFH given SC can reduce the incidence of thromboembolism. It must be administered two or three times daily, and bleeding can be a complication. LMWHs have a longer half-life and greater bioavailability than UFH does. The requirement for monitoring is less.

Data from an international, multicenter, randomized, controlled study found that a short-term course of thromboprophylaxis with the anticoagulant enoxaparin was more effective than an extended course of another anticoagulant, apixaban, with significantly fewer major bleeding events. [74]

Apixaban was approved by the FDA in December 2012 to reduce risk of stroke and systemic embolism associated with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Danaparoid, a low-molecular-weight glycosaminoglycan, has been shown to be effective in preventing DVT and PE. It also has been used in patients whose treatment course has been complicated by HIT.

Warfarin is effective for thromboprophylaxis; it causes the depletion of vitamin K–dependent factors in the coagulation cascade. Warfarin requires close monitoring, and bleeding can be a complication. Dose-adjusted therapy should be monitored, keeping the INR in the range of 2.0-3.0.

A randomized, controlled trial comparing dalteparin with aspirin for VTE prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty patients found aspirin to be as effective and safe as dalteparin. [75]

The EPCAT II (Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Comparing Rivaroxaban to Aspirin Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty II) trial randomly assigned patients to receive either aspirin 81 mg/day or rivaroxaban 10 mg/day on postoperative day 6 after an initial 5 days of rivaroxaban 10 mg/day. [76] Patients who underwent knee arthroplasty continued prophylaxis for an additional 9 days, and those who underwent hip arthroplasty continued for an additional 30 days. All patients were followed for 90 days.

The trial showed aspirin to be noninferior to rivaroxaban for VTE prophylaxis after hip or knee arthroplasty. [76] Eleven (0.64%) patients in the aspirin group developed symptomatic proximal DVT or PE during follow-up, compared with 12 (0.70%) in the rivaroxaban group. The combination of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 22 (1.29%) in the aspirin group and 17 (0.99%) in the rivaroxaban group; however, the rate of major bleeding alone was higher in the aspirin group (0.47%) than in the rivaroxaban group (0.29%).

In November 2015, the FDA approved dabigatran for prophylaxis of DVT and PE after hip replacement surgery. [77]

Nonpharmacologic prophylaxis

External pneumatic compression has been shown to be capable of temporarily preventing the reduction in fibrinolytic activity that normally follows surgical operations. Studies have found compression devices to be effective only in patients with head trauma or spinal fracture. In total hip replacement, studies have shown them to be efficacious in preventing distal DVT but not in preventing proximal DVT.

Another method of nonpharmacologic prophylaxis is early ambulation, unless the patient has an absolute contraindication. Studies have demonstrated that both symptomatic and ultrasonographically diagnosed DVT are significantly less common with early ambulation following hip arthroplasty.

A prospective cohort study including 69,950 female nurses found an association between physical inactivity and the incidence of PE in women. The data found that the risk of PE was more than twofold greater in women who spent more time sitting than it was in women who spent less time sitting. Activities that decrease the amount of time sitting may lower the risk of PE in women. [78]

In a randomized, controlled study of 90 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, Izumi et al found that intraoperative transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) had a significant effect with regard to prevention of DVT prophylaxis, preventing both venous stasis and blood hypercoagulability. [79]

Postoperative risk

The results of one study suggested that routine postdischarge prophylaxis should be considered for high-risk patients. The study evaluated the risk of postdischarge VTE in patients who had undergone cancer surgery. Using data from 44,656 patients who underwent surgery for nine cancers, the results showed that VTE occurred post discharge at an overall rate of 33.4%. VTE was significantly more likely after gastrointestinal, lung, prostate, and ovarian/uterine operations. [80]

For patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, the ACCP evidence-based guidelines recommended the use of either LMWH; fondaparinux; dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban (for total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty but not for hip fracture surgery); low-dose UFH; adjusted-dose VKA; aspirin (all grade 1B evidence); or an intermittent pneumatic compression device (grade 1C evidence) for a minimum of 10-14 days rather than no antithrombotic prophylaxis. [81]

Elderly surgical patients are at increased risk for VTE. In September 2017, the European Society of Anesthesiology published guidelines for VTE prophylaxis in this population (see Guidelines). [82]

Prophylactic practice

In a survey of members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, more than 70% of survey participants reported that their primary hospital now mandates prophylaxis for VTE. The survey looked at VTE protocols for lower-extremity total joint surgery. LMWH was considered to be the most efficacious for prophylaxis, but aspirin was considered to be the easiest to use, with the lowest risks of bleeding and wound drainage. Warfarin was the most used agent in hospital prophylaxis, and 90% of respondents targeted an INR of 1.6-2.5. [83]

A randomized, double-blind phase III study comparing rivaroxaban with SC enoxaparin found that the primary outcome of composite of any DVT, nonfatal PE, or death from any cause up to day 17 after surgery occurred in 67 (6.9%) of 965 patients who received oral rivaroxaban 10 mg/day as compared with 97 (10.1%) of 959 patients who were given enoxaparin 30 mg SC every 12 hours for the prevention of VTE after total knee arthroplasty. [84]

Pooled data from four phase III studies comparing rivaroxaban (10 mg/day) with SC enoxaparin (either 40 mg once daily or 30 mg every 12 hours) for VTE after total hip or knee arthroplasty showed that the composite of symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality was  lower in the rivaroxaban group (29/6183 rivaroxaban patients [0.5%] vs 60/6200 enoxaparin patients [1.0%]). This reduction in symptomatic VTE plus all-cause mortality was consistent across all prespecified subgroups. There were no statistically significant differences in major bleeding or nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding. [85]

After reviewing the published literature, the American College of Physicians (ACP) determined that it would not support the use of measures for universal VTE prophylaxis in patients if such measures were performed without regard to risk. [86] It was reported in the study that in nonsurgical patients, heparin prophylaxis had no significant effect on mortality and led to more bleeding and bleeding events, which suggested that it was of little or no benefit overall. In addition, no improvements in clinical outcomes were found with mechanical prophylaxis, which also resulted in an increase in lower-extremity skin damage in stroke patients.

Previous
Next:

Consultations

When PE is suspected, consultation with a pulmonologist may be useful to aid in the diagnosis or to guide therapy. When the intravascular filling defect is so severe that it causes cardiac dysfunction or hypotension, the patient can be best served by transfer to an intensive care setting. Consultation with an intensive care specialist or pulmonologist would be helpful in decision-making regarding thrombolysis and in following the effectiveness of treatment.

If cancer or a hematologic disorder is one of the contributing risk factors, consultation with a hematologist or oncologist may be appropriate.

Previous