External Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction 

Updated: Feb 19, 2020
Author: Christian N Kirman, MD; Chief Editor: Zubin J Panthaki, MD, CM, FACS, FRCSC 



Referenced as one of the most frequently performed aesthetic operations in the world, liposuction has become extremely popular with various modifications of equipment and technique.[1] External ultrasound–assisted liposuction (EUAL) is a technique that requires transcutaneous application of high-frequency ultrasonic fields delivered into wetted tissue, followed by traditional aspirative liposuction, with the goal of improving the mechanical removal of adipose cells.[2, 3]

The use of high-intensity, high-frequency external ultrasound before liposuction has been reported to enhance the ability to extract fat, increase the amount of fat extracted, and decrease patient discomfort during and after liposuction. EUAL, during which the ultrasonic energy is applied through the skin, must be differentiated from internal ultrasound–assisted liposuction (IUAL), during which the ultrasonic energy is applied through a specialized cannula. EUAL is a good option for removal of localized fat in patients with moderate obesity.[4, 5] Recently, EUAL at frequencies of 2-3 MHz and a potency of 3 W has been associated with complete fat tissue disruption, including both adipose cells and collagen networks, making it useful for body contouring, especially in patients with fibrous and inveterate cellulitis.[5, 6]

In 2003, Rohrich et al noted that ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) is a safe and effective method for the treatment of gynecomastia.[7, 8] The technique is particularly efficient in removing dense, fibrous breast tissue in men and produces minimal external scarring. Rohrich and colleagues proposed a new system of classification and graduated treatment, based on glandular versus fibrous hypertrophy and the degree of breast ptosis.

Rohrich's series of 61 patients with gynecomastia demonstrated an overall success rate of 86.9%.[7] In this series of patients, suction-assisted lipectomy was used from 1987-1997 and UAL was used from 1997-2000. UAL was found to be effective in treating most grades of gynecomastia. EUAL is effective in this setting because of its effect not only on fatty tissue but also on fibrous connective tissue, as EUAL leads to loosened cell–to-cell interactions and an altered structure of collagen, allowing for easy of removal of adipose cells.[5]

Other means of liposuction include the following:

  • Suction-assisted liposuction is the traditional method. In this type of liposuction, the surgeon removes fat by inserting a cannula that is connected to a vacuum pressure unit and directing the cannula through tiny incisions into areas to be suctioned.

  • In power-assisted liposuction, a cannula (see the image below) with a back-and-forth motion of the tip passes through tissue to suction out fat and fibrous or scarred tissue with reduced effort.

    Surgeon Vishal Kapoor, MD and a power-assisted lip Surgeon Vishal Kapoor, MD and a power-assisted liposuction cannula. © James C. Mutter / Vishal Kapoor, MD. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.
  • The Vibration Amplification of Sound Energy at Resonance (VASER) System (Sound Surgical Technologies LLC, Louisville, Colo) is another method of liposuction. In VASER-assisted liposuction, intermittent or continuous bursts of ultrasonic energy can be used to break up fat cells, which are then removed by suction. See the images below.

    VASER probes with grooved tips. VASER probes with grooved tips.
    VASER ultrasonic liposuction machine including tum VASER ultrasonic liposuction machine including tumescent infiltrator, ultrasound generator, and suction with some aspirate in container.
  • For information on various liposuction techniques, see the Body Contouring section of the Medscape Reference Plastic Surgery journal.

A study by Milanese et al involving 28 young, normal-weight females found that 10-weeks of low-intensity, low-frequency, localized treatment with external ultrasound decreased subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness. The study, in which the women underwent two 48-minute sessions per week, reported that subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness was significantly reduced bilaterally in the gluteus and thigh areas, with fat mass in the trunk and lower limbs also decreasing.[9]

History of the Procedure

The use of liposuction was first described in 1976 by Georgio and Arpand Fischer.[10] Tumescent liposuction is also called standard liposuction, liposuction, lipoplasty, liposculpture, liposculption, and suction-assisted lipoplasty. This type of liposuction has been performed in the United States since 1982. First, the surgeon instills the fat with tumescent fluid (a solution that contains saline and local anesthetic with epinephrine). Following instillation of tumescent fluid, the fat is aspirated with long thin rods called cannulas. The suction can now be performed through a few small incisions, which can be hidden within natural skin creases. The tumescent technique may reduce blood loss and alleviate pain. The local anesthesia is frequently supplemented with intravenous sedation or general anesthesia. This type of liposuction is frequently performed as an outpatient procedure.

The use of ultrasonic technology has been on rise in all areas of medicine. In 1987, Scuderi et al introduced the use of ultrasound as an emulsifying modality for adipose tissue.[11, 2] In 1992, Zocchi outlined the technique of ultrasonic liposculpturing, which involved 3 fundamental steps: (1) preparation of the areas to be treated with a large infiltration of a special solution, (2) treatment of the areas with ultrasonic energy through special titanium probes, and (3) manual remodeling of the treated areas to eliminate the fluid from the burst adipocytes (fatty acids).[12]

In 1998, Silberg elaborated on the technique of ultrasound-assisted liposuction as the transmission of a high-frequency ultrasonic field sent through the skin.[13] Since then, several reports, including those by Lawrence and Coleman in 1999 and Lawrence and Cox in 2000, have discussed the procedure.[14, 15] In 2008, Ferraro et al demonstrated that increased intensity of ultrasonic energy of 2-3 MHz with EUAL demonstrated complete adipose cellular destruction confirmed by histologic analysis.[5]


Soft tissue injuries, orthopedic trauma, and pain relief for chronic pain conditions all can be treated with external ultrasound. The action of manual liposuction can be time-consuming and physically taxing. In this regard, ultrasound appears to offer the advantage of breaking up adipose tissue to facilitate liposuction and decrease postoperative pain.

With IUAL, areas of skin necrosis and seroma formation can occur. Therefore, interest has been garnered in the application of external ultrasound prior to liposuction. Theoretically, external ultrasound should soften or disrupt adipose tissue and (1) facilitate the task of suctioning adipose tissue, (2) make the patient more comfortable during and after the procedure, and (3) improve the quality of the aspirate by decreasing the amount of blood.[8]



EUAL is not widely used, and the evidence of its effectiveness is conflicting.[14, 15, 16, 1, 5] EUAL at lower intensity appears to be fibrinolytic and facilitates the loosening of cell-to-cell interactions; at higher intensities, it leads to destruction of adipose cell structure.

EUAL is a type of UAL in which the ultrasonic energy is applied from outside the body, through the skin, making the specialized cannula of the IUAL procedure unnecessary. While IUAL can result in skin necrosis and seromas, EUAL can, in theory, avoid this potential complication by applying the ultrasound externally.

EUAL is also potentially useful because (1) the external location of the ultrasound device can lead to less discomfort for the patient during and after the procedure; (2) the external location of the device means the probe does not physically touch internal tissue (blood loss can, therefore, be decreased); (3) it allows superior access through scar tissue; and (4) it is not constrained by internal structures and can, therefore, be used to treat larger areas.


Ultrasound causes tissue destruction via 3 mechanisms: (1) cavitation, (2) micromechanical disruption, and (3) thermal damage. Articles on IUAL largely attribute the destruction to unstable or transient cavitation. Reports on ultrasound suggest that the disruptive biologic effects of external ultrasound are due to micromechanical disruption or tissue heating. Other reports postulate that EUAL loosens adipose cell attachments, facilitating aspiration.

The ultrastructure of cells is affected by ultrasound. It disrupts membranes and affects calcium influx, which can stimulate mast cell degranulation. Ultrasound can induce fibroblast activity and enhance collagen production. It can stimulate endothelial cell activity and new capillary formation in chronically ischemic tissue. These effects make ultrasound useful for the care of chronic wounds, as well. In addition, the manifestations of effects of external ultrasound appear to be directly proportional to the intensity delivered, with simple cellular detachment at 1 MHz to complete adipose cellular destruction at 2-3 MHz.[5]


Patients with localized increased adipose tissue benefit from liposuction. This condition is termed lipodystrophy, and, even if the patient is at or below his or her ideal weight, fatty tissue can be present in excess in specific areas. Overweight patients may also have lipodystrophy, but diet and exercise, rather than large-volume liposuction, are the mainstays of treatment for generalized obesity. The best liposuction results involve healthy patients with good skin elasticity and localized deposits of excessive fat.[17] Good candidates for liposuction should have realistic expectations and should not be obese. Some patients must have multiple procedures if they have more fat than can safely be removed in one operative setting. In rare cases, patients can experience problems with the anesthesia.

Ultrasonic liposuction appears most useful for treating larger or more fibrous areas that would be otherwise difficult with liposuction alone. EUAL allows much easier access through scar tissue. EUAL is especially appropriate for treatment of male breasts and retraction of the skin on the neck. In addition, high-frequency treatment of 2-3 MHz is recommended for treatment of fibrous and inveterate cellulitis.

In 2004, Shi and colleagues reported EUAL performed on 500 patients (595 sites).[18] The volume of anesthetic drugs, the volume of aspirated pure fat, and the body contour variations of every area were recorded at 1-3 months postoperatively. Both volumes were greatest in the waist-abdomen and thigh. The decreased postoperative dimensions at different body sites were then compared and analyzed; all dimensions were decreased to certain degrees. The most obvious decreases were in the severity of obesity and in the waist-abdomen; the decreases in the umbilical circumference and the minimum and maximum waist circumferences tended to be less. However, when the minimum waist circumference was >111 cm (50.45 in), obvious changes occurred in the umbilical region. The upper middle part of the thigh and the upper part of the arm showed larger variations than lower on either limb.

UAL reduced blood loss and pain and resulted in smooth skin without severe complications. Shi and colleagues therefore noted that EUAL is a safe, effective, and easily acceptable procedure for body contouring.[18] They noted that “the body circumference variation may have its intrinsic rule, which, to some extent, is meaningful for conducting clinical inquiry and forecasting the operation results.”[18]

In 2004, Zhang demonstrated that EUAL is a safe, effective, and simple method for liposuction in the upper legs.[19] In this series, 32 patients underwent external ultrasound-assisted tumescent liposuction in the upper legs with local anesthesia. All patients had satisfactory weight reduction and leg shaping. No obvious complications occurred in these cases; all patients recovered smoothly and promptly.

In a study by Gadsen et al, the use of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFA) was used to treat and ablate subcutaneous adipose tissue prior to abdominoplasty cases with histologically proven success. This represents a new potential use for external ultrasound technology as a pretreatment regimen for ablating and remodeling subcutaneous deposits.[20]

Relevant Anatomy

Adipose tissue is the tissue removed during liposuction procedures. The most common areas involved are the abdomen and thighs in women and the abdomen and flanks in men.


See the list below:

  • Patients who are extremely obese or in poor health, especially those with cardiac problems, should not undergo EUAL.

  • Only a limited amount of fat should be removed at each session, as very high volume lipectomy has been associated with development of pulmonary embolus and death.

  • Some warn against performing liposuction around the neck and upper chest because of the possibility of creating depressions or noticeable cavities.

  • Ultrasonic energy can theoretically cause air emboli; this possibility should be considered when selecting sites for the procedure. To date, this injury has not been reported.



Laboratory Studies

See the list below:

  • Basic blood chemistry evaluations (eg, CBC count, prothrombin time/activated partial thromboplastin time) and a sequential multiple analysis of 20 chemical constituents should be performed so that any preexisting renal, hematologic, or hepatic problems can be recognized and accounted for before the procedure.

Other Tests

See the list below:

  • A thorough preoperative evaluation should be performed to address any medical condition and determine the patient's ability to safely undergo a surgical procedure.

  • An ECG should be performed if indicated on thorough preoperative evaluation.

Histologic Findings

In 2000, Lawrence and Cox examined histologic specimens from 19 patients who underwent external ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) and found that the fat membranes were not disrupted and the adipocyte lobules were intact.[15] No differences were noted between the tumescent liposuction aspirated fat pretreated with external ultrasound and that of control samples.

In 2008, Ferraro et al demonstrated that, at 1 MHz, EUAL did not alter the cellular architecture of fat cells, but, at 2 and 3 MHz, massive adipose cellular destruction ensued.[5]



Medical Therapy

Antibiotics (eg, cefazolin) are usually administered 1 hour before the liposuction procedure.

Surgical Therapy

Several companies make ultrasound machines that can be used to break up adipose tissue externally with ultrasonic energy. Examples are the Silberg EUA (Wells Johnson; Tucson, Ariz) and the Rich-Mar 510 (Bernsco; Seattle, Wash). Johnson and Cook used a Rich-Mar XUAL (Rich-Mar; Inola, Okla) with a continuous-wave setting at 1 MHz.

Liposuction is the suctioning of adipose tissue using thin tubes, or cannulas, inserted through tiny incisions in the adipose tissue. The cannula is attached to a flexible tube that leads to a suction machine, and the fat is vacuumed out through these tubes and collected in a large receptacle for measurement of the volume removed.

Prior to the surgery, the patient reviews the informed consent with his or her surgeon, when any questions may be answered and the details of the procedure discussed. The body areas to be addressed are marked, ensuring that both the patient and the surgeon understand which areas will be addressed. Then, the patient is taken to the operating room, where he or she is prepared with povidone-iodine solution (eg, Betadine) or other sterilizing solution.

Next, local anesthesia and epinephrine is injected for the tumescent technique. The two solutions used contain 0.05% or 0.1% lidocaine. The 0.05% solution has 500 mg of lidocaine. The 0.1% has 1000 mg of lidocaine. The tumescent liposuction technique uses local anesthesia along with epinephrine to minimize blood loss and postoperative discomfort. The surgeon can infiltrate anesthetic solution with either a pressure cuff around the bag of tumescent solution or a peristaltic pump and infiltrators. The tumescent local anesthesia technique allows a patient to move intraoperatively into the exact position needed to remove the fat. If many areas are treated, intraoperative sedation or general anesthesia is often used in conjunction with the tumescent anesthetic; this may be safely administered by an anesthesiologist or certified anesthetist.

Lidocaine toxicity must be considered. Patients should be monitored with a pulse oximeter and ECG during the procedure. Oral diazepam or a similar medication is useful to enhance anesthesia. Oral clonidine, given before the procedure, is helpful in patients with high blood pressure. Some clinicians also use small amounts of meperidine (Demerol), promethazine (Phenergan), or midazolam (Versed) to enhance anesthesia.

Preoperative Details

Routine preoperative screening is performed. Marking must be diligently performed prior to tumescence because many contours are lost or altered following its injection.

Intraoperative Details

The external ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL) machine is used to break up adipose tissue before liposuction begins. These machines produce 1 MHz of ultrasound energy in a continuous or pulsed cycle. The maximum power is 30 W or 3 W/cm2. The sound heads provided are 5 or 10 cm. The continuous cycle induces more tissue destruction than the pulsed cycle. Note that that a 1-MHz beam is reduced to half intensity at 48 mm of fat. In 2000, Lawrence and Cox applied external ultrasound at 2-3 W/cm2 in a continuous-wave cycle for 10 minutes to the treatment side.[15]

A coupling gel is used to prevent air interference at the skin-transducer interface. Before the ultrasonic energy is applied, the areas to be treated are infused with tumescent anesthesia. Ultrasound is applied to the treatment areas using circular strokes continuously, usually for 10 minutes on each side. The recommended duration of treatment is 1-2 minutes for each area 1.5 times the size of the transducer face. For most areas, this is 10-15 minutes per treatment area. The transducer must be moved continuously to prevent overheating. After the ultrasound application, standard tumescent liposuction is performed. Note that newer machines have been developed that deliver higher intensity ultrasonic forces of 2-3 MHz, which are associated with greater destruction of adipose cells.

Postoperative Details

Postoperatively, pain control needs should be minimal. Usually, extra-strength acetaminophen is sufficient. Some practitioners continue to administer antibiotics with gram-positive coverage for 7-10 days. Most practitioners apply elastic (eg, Ace) bandages, compression garments, or French tape compression to areas that have been treated to prevent seromas and bruising and to decrease soreness in these areas. Patients are often concerned about postoperative leakage of tumescent fluid from incision sites for up to several hours. Patients should be reassured that such leakage is common.


Patients can engage in noncontact sports immediately as tolerated. They cannot engage in contact sports or high-impact sports for approximately 2 weeks. Compression garments can and should be used postoperatively. Optimally, patients should wear these 12-24 h/d for approximately 2-4 weeks (as tolerated).


Rarely, EUAL can cause bruising, skin burn, and seromas. Skin necrosis, fibrosis, pigmentation alteration, and sensory alteration are also possible. Rarely, skin ulceration and a rubbery feel to edematous tissue have been described. The complications of tumescent liposuction are well described. In rare cases, cardiac problems can occur. Sometimes, surface irregularities and skin laxity can develop after these procedures.

Outcome and Prognosis

In 2000, Mendes described less resistance to the cannula with a more rapid removal of fat; the aspirated tissue removed in this fashion revealed less blood content with intact viable fat cells.[2] Patients reported less pain and discomfort on the areas treated with ultrasound; less swelling and bruising and superior skin shrinkage were also noted in the ultrasound-treated areas. No complications were reported, and Mendes concluded that clinical recovery was enhanced by EUAL. In 1999, Johnson and Cook also achieved excellent results with EUAL.[21] They noted greater cannula maneuverability; an increase in the proportion of supernatant fat observed in the aspirate; and decreases in postoperative ecchymosis, swelling, and discomfort.

Overall, the outcomes and prognoses appear to be good with EUAL. Comparatively, the results of IUAL in areas of fibrous-fatty tissue and for large-volume aspirations are well documented. The learning curve for the IUAL technique is longer than that for the external technique.

Future and Controversies

In 2000, Lawrence and Cox reported that when corrected for the placebo effect, external ultrasound application prior to tumescent liposuction achieved no advantage for doctor or patient.[15] In most cases, the surgeon could detect no difference in the rate of extraction, color of fat, or resistance to the cannula. Most patients reported greater discomfort on the side treated with high-intensity ultrasound compared to the side treated with very low-intensity ultrasound.

In 1999, Lawrence and Coleman reported that EUAL was helpful and effective.[14] Ferraro's 2008 study reports that EUAL is a highly effective noninvasive modality that induces cell-to-cell contact, which leads to loosening of collagen fibers, allowing adipose cells to be removed mechanically with less effort and local tissue damage.[5] At higher frequencies, EUAL causes complete cellular destruction of adipose cells.[5]

Newer methods of delivering external ultrasound energy to target areas continue to be developed. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel noninvasive method to aid in body sculpting and is well tolerated by patients, without the need for anesthetic.[22] A recent study evaluated adipose tissue treated with HIFU and removed 4 weeks later during abdominoplasty, showing damage to the adipose cells and the presence inflammatory cells within the treated area. This could result in decreased adipose tissue in the treated area without the need for more invasive treatments. Further evaluation is needed to assess HIFU short- and long-term efficacy, patient safety, and comparison to other methods of treatment.

In their review of various liposuction techniques, Heymans et al found that vibroliposuction techniques provide the safest, most precise form of lipectomy without the complications associated with IUAL.[1] Future studies must define the exact settings to use with EUAL and which patients will benefit from EUAL. As with most techniques, the success of EUAL is likely operator-dependent; thus, this factor must be evaluated in future studies. EUAL has not yet achieved widespread acceptance or popularity.

For excellent patient education resources, see eMedicineHealth's patient education article Liposuction.