Hartrampf CR Jr. The transverse abdominal island flap for breast reconstruction. A 7- year experience. Clin Plast Surg. 1988 Oct. 15(4):703-16. [Medline].
Rose J, Puckett Y. Breast Reconstruction Free Flaps. StatPearls. 2021 Jan. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Goodenough CJ, Rose J. Breast Transverse Rectus Abdominus Muscle Procedure. StatPearls. 2021 Jan. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Hudson DA. The surgically delayed unipedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1996 Mar. 36(3):238-42; discussion 242-5. [Medline].
Lejour M, Dome M. Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Jun. 87(6):1054-68. [Medline].
Schusterman MA. The free TRAM flap. Clin Plast Surg. 1998 Apr. 25(2):191-5. [Medline].
Selber JC, Fosnot J, Nelson J, Goldstein J, Bergey M, Sonnad S, et al. A prospective study comparing the functional impact of SIEA, DIEP, and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps on the abdominal wall: Part II. Bilateral reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov. 126(5):1438-53. [Medline].
Allen RJ. DIEP versus TRAM for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Jun. 111(7):2478. [Medline].
Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug. 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. [Medline].
Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Feb. 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. [Medline].
Ludolph I, Horch RE, Harlander M, et al. Is there a Rationale for Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Older Patients? A Retrospective Single Center Analysis of Quality of life, Complications and Comorbidities after DIEP or ms-TRAM Flap Using the BREAST-Q. Breast J. 2015 Nov. 21 (6):588-95. [Medline].
Roth FS, Troy JS, Schusterman MA. Transverse dual-perforator fascia-sparing free TRAM flap: technique description. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov. 128(5):1039-42. [Medline].
Zienowicz RJ, May JW Jr. Hernia prevention and aesthetic contouring of the abdomen following TRAM flap breast reconstruction by the use of polypropylene mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Nov. 96(6):1346-50. [Medline].
Shaw WW, Orringer JS, Ko CY. The spontaneous return of sensibility in breasts reconstructed with autologous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997 Feb. 99(2):394-9. [Medline].
Heo JW, Park SO, Jin US. Donor-site morbidities in 615 patients after breast reconstruction using a free muscle-sparing type I transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: a single surgeon experience. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018 Jul 24. 1-8. [Medline].
Uda H, Kamochi H, Sarukawa S, Sunaga A, Sugawara Y, Yoshimura K. Clinical and Quantitative Isokinetic Comparison of Abdominal Morbidity and Dynamics following DIEP versus Muscle-Sparing Free TRAM Flap Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec. 140 (6):1101-9. [Medline].
Golpanian S, Gerth DJ, Tashiro J, Thaller SR. Free Versus Pedicled TRAM Flaps: Cost Utilization and Complications. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Dec. 40 (6):869-76. [Medline].
McNally R, Rimler J, Laurence V, Z Paydar K, A Wirth G. Comparative Perfusion Analysis of Free Muscle-Sparing Versus Pedicle Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) Flaps in Vivo in the Peri-Operative and Late Post-Operative Periods. World J Plast Surg. 2017 May. 6 (2):144-51. [Medline].
Mennie JC, Mohanna PN, O'Donoghue JM, Rainsbury R, Cromwell DA. Donor-Site Hernia Repair in Abdominal Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 7929 Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul. 136 (1):1-9. [Medline].
He WY, El Eter L, Yesantharao P, et al. Complications and Patient-reported Outcomes after TRAM and DIEP Flaps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Oct. 8 (10):e3120. [Medline]. [Full Text].
Jeong W, Lee S, Kim J. Meta-analysis of flap perfusion and donor site complications for breast reconstruction using pedicled versus free TRAM and DIEP flaps. Breast. 2018 Apr. 38:45-51. [Medline].
Kwok AC, Simpson AM, Ye X, Tatro E, Agarwal JP. Immediate Unilateral Breast Reconstruction using Abdominally Based Flaps: Analysis of 3,310 Cases. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Jan. 35 (1):74-82. [Medline].
Moon KC, Baek SO, Yoon ES, Lee BI, Park SH. Predictors affecting complications and aesthetic outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction with free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. Microsurgery. 2019 Feb 22. [Medline].
Chang EI, Chang EI, Soto-Miranda MA, et al. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec. 132(6):1383-91. [Medline].

Media Gallery

Diagram of the blood supply to the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Note that the deep inferior epigastric vessels supply the flap, the primary blood supply to the lower abdomen. The shaded areas of the flap are discarded.
Patient 1. This patient has small breasts and has a small amount of abdominal tissue available. This is the perfect indication for a free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap to maximize the amount of tissue available for reconstruction.
Patient 1. Postoperative view. Note the natural ptosis of the reconstruction and the distinct inframammary fold, not distorted by a muscle pedicle from the abdomen. The patient does not desire nipple-areolar reconstruction.
Patient 2. This patient has a large opposite breast to match and does not desire a breast reduction. A free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap allows a large block of tissue to be transferred, matching the opposite breast.
Patient 2. Postoperative view. The breast envelope has been filled with the free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Note the abdominal improvement, an added benefit of the TRAM procedure. The patient still requires nipple-areolar reconstruction.
Patient 3. Preoperative markings. The patient has a large opposite breast and does not desire breast reduction. Note the large amount of skin that will be removed. A free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) allows a large reconstruction to match the opposite side.
Patient 3. Postoperative view. There is a good volume match, and the resected breast skin has been replaced with abdominal skin.
Patient 3. Postoperative view. In this view, note the natural droop of the reconstruction, unobtainable with breast implants. All of the patient's scars are below her tan lines.

of 8

Sections Free TRAM Breast Reconstruction
Overview
Workup
Treatment
Questions & Answers
Media Gallery
References

Free TRAM Breast Reconstruction Questions & Answers

References

Tables

Contributor Information and Disclosures

What would you like to print?