Microsurgery uses the operating room microscope or high-powered loupe magnification to facilitate the microvascular surgical techniques employed in anastomosing small vessels and nerves.[1] Microsurgical reconstruction is applied to complex reconstructive surgery problems when other options (eg, primary closure, healing by secondary intention, skin grafting, and local or regional flap transfer) are not adequate.
The field of microsurgery began with the introduction of the operating microscope, when Jacobson and Suarez described the anastomosis of blood vessels. In the 1960s, as microsurgical techniques were perfected, increasing success was seen with digital artery repairs and finger replantation. This laid the foundation for microsurgical composite tissue transfer, which became popular in the 1970s.[2]
In the 1980s, an emphasis was placed on improved function with autologous tissue transplantation, which is exemplified by mandibular reconstructions for cancer. Composite grafts consisting of soft tissue and bone aided in stabilizing the mandible, assisted with mastication, and allowed reliable coverage during the postoperative period, when radiation usually was required. Today, microsurgical techniques have become an integral part of the armamentarium for plastic surgeons, allowing for soft-tissue coverage and function after trauma or oncologic resections.
Microsurgery may not be the best solution for all reconstructive dilemmas and usually is not the first choice in the reconstructive ladder. However, it can offer the reconstructive surgeon an important tool for achieving complex reconstruction by proceeding with free tissue transfer from distant sites.[3] Free tissue transfer includes flaps such as the following:
In addition, specific tissue transfers such as neural grafts or vein grafts are also considered examples of free tissue transfer. In specific cases, such as large defects of the face after tumor resection, free tissue transfer may be the best option for closure of the defect.
Reconstructive microsurgery has entered a stage where, because of continued developments in technology and a better understanding of the anatomy, anastomosis of very small vessels (0.3 mm) is possible. These highly challenging procedures are referred to in the literature as supermicrosurgery.[4] They allow anastomosis of perforator flaps such as the medial plantar flap to perforator recipient vessels.[5] Additional applications include complex digit reimplantation and lymphatic anastomosis.
Newer optical and robotic systems are being developed for microsurgery and supermicrosurgery; further study is required.[6, 7]
Although microsurgery continues to develop, the basic principles of microsurgery remain the same:
This article outlines the basics of microsurgery, preoperative planning, specific operative techniques, and postoperative care. In addition, it describes some of the flaps most commonly used for microsurgical reconstruction.
Indications for tissue transfer utilizing microsurgical techniques include the following:
Finger reimplantation or transfer may represent another aspect of this technique.[8] Microsurgery may also be used as a new approach to achieve lymphatic drainage in cases of lymphedema.[9]
The specific indications for microsurgical reconstruction and the particular type of flap used depend on the type of tissue required and the size and location of the defect. Defects can be an isolated tissue type (eg, soft-tissue defects on the dorsum of the hand) or some combination of skin, subcutaneous tissue, nerves, muscle, tendons, cartilage, bone, and mucosa.
Free flaps can be categorized into two different types of transplants: isolated and composite. Isolated tissue transplants include skin, fascia, muscle, nerve, or bone individually. The more common composite tissue transplant represents a more complex flap and provides more than one type of tissue. Such flaps include myocutaneous, osteocutaneous, or innervated myocutaneous flaps.[10]
Historically, reconstruction of a defect was based on a reconstructive ladder, with local and simple procedures being performed before more extensive procedures or distant tissue transfers. Today, the use of free tissue transfer is no longer seen as the apex of the reconstructive ladder. Instead, it is a generalized tool for carrying out complex or composite tissue transfers, for treating wounds with poor healing or inflow, and for addressing situations in which postoperative radiation may play a factor in wound healing. (See Table 1 below.)
Table 1. Examples of Free Tissue Transfer (Open Table in a new window)
Defect Type |
Tissue Defect |
Common Flaps |
Coverage of exposed structures |
Open tibial fractures in distal third of leg |
Latissimus dorsi muscle free flap; gracilis muscle free flap |
Dead space |
Obliteration of maxilla defect after maxillectomy for cancer |
Rectus abdominis muscle free flap |
Tissue defect |
Breast reconstruction |
Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) free flap; deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap; superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) free flap |
Bone and soft defect |
Mandible reconstruction |
Fibula osteocutaneous free flap |
Bone and soft defect |
Infraorbital and maxillary defect |
Parascapular osteocutaneous free flap |
Facial muscle denervation |
Facial paralysis with muscular atrophy |
Gracilis muscle free flap |
Digital amputation |
Thumb amputation |
Great toe composite free flap |
Digestive tract defect |
Esophageal reconstruction |
Jejunum free flap; anterior lateral thigh (ALT) free flap |
Contraindications associated with the patient include any condition that may place his or her life in danger or significantly increase the probability of postoperative flap loss. The time required to harvest and insert a flap is relatively long. Therefore, any medical condition that inhibits the patient’s ability to withstand prolonged anesthesia (eg, severe respiratory disease) is an absolute contraindication. Microsurgical free tissue transfer is absolutely contraindicated in patients who have the following:
Age alone is not a risk factor in the success or failure of free flaps when preexisting medical conditions are not taken into account.[11] However, peripheral vascular disease and renal disease are strong predictors of reconstructive failure and patient morbidity and mortality.[12, 13]
Relative contraindications include any condition that increases the risk of intraoperative or postoperative complications. Common conditions that are not contraindications but can increase the risk of complications include the following:
In general, a thorough review of the patient’s medical history and current conditions is critical in formulating a treatment algorithm and determining optimal timing of surgery.
Tobacco use has been shown to affect cutaneous blood flow, wound healing, and survival of pedicled flaps. The overall effect of cigarette smoke is to promote a thrombogenic state through vasoconstriction of the microvasculature. Surprisingly, the current literature has failed to show any damaging effects of cigarette smoke on free tissue transfer.[14, 15]
Surgical issues include lack of a properly trained surgeon or surgical team. In current practice, this usually is not an issue, because microsurgery is now common and forms a major part of most plastic surgery training programs.
Other surgical issues include limited resources that might inhibit the staff from properly caring for the patient intraoperatively or postoperatively and lack of access to specialized microsurgical instruments.
Vessel injury and regeneration occur through the following steps:
The first step in healing of a fresh arterial or venous anastomosis is the formation of a platelet plug. With intimal injury, exposed collagen triggers platelet adhesion. Platelets aggregate and activate fibrinogen, which adheres to platelets and links them together to form a plug. Fibrinogen is converted to fibrin, strengthening the platelet plug. If the vessel walls are not damaged and the anastomosis is secure, the platelet plug gradually disappears over the first 3-5 days, with the pseudointima forming by day 5. New endothelium covers the anastomotic site 1-2 weeks later.
The critical period of thrombus formation in the anastomosis is the first 3-5 days of healing.[16] The underlying theme of microvascular free flap failures is a result of endothelial disruption with exposure of subendothelial collagen and formation of a platelet plug. If platelet aggregation reaches a critical mass, it will trigger a cascade of events leading to eventual thrombus formation in the vessel.
Skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and bone have different ischemic tolerances. Skin and subcutaneous tissue are relatively resistant to anoxia and can tolerate warm ischemia for 4-6 hours and cold ischemia for as long as 12 hours.[16, 17] Skeletal muscle is less tolerant to ischemia than skin is. Muscle can tolerate warm ischemia for as long as 2 hours; irreversible damage to the microcirculation begins at 6 hours, even under cold ischemia.[18, 19] Bone is more resistant to anoxia and can tolerate up to 24 hours of cold ischemia.[20]
Mathes and Nahai[21] classified flaps as either random or axial on the basis of blood supply. A random flap is perfused by random small blood vessels without a proper name (eg, local bilobed flap). An axial flap is based on a known, named blood vessel or set of blood vessels. Mathes and Nahai classified these flaps as follows:
Preoperative planning includes finding the optimal donor site and designing the flap so as to maximize soft-tissue coverage, functionality, and appearance and to minimize complications. Timing should be considered; early (≤ 72 hr) free-flap reconstruction has been associated with a decreased rate of free-flap failures, infection, and additional procedures, though the majority of these procedures are performed in a delayed timeframe.[22] In oncologic cases, the timing of free flap reconstruction should be coordinated with the oncology team, taking into consideration chemotherapy and radiation treatments.
Preoperative assessment of the patient should include an in-depth review of the patient’s current conditions, past medical history, past surgical history, previous history with anesthesia, and current medications. The social history is important for identifying possible issues with substance or tobacco use, as well as for obtaining a better understanding of the patient’s support network for postoperative care.
The physical examination is used to identify the current defect or to anticipate a presumed defect (in the case of an oncologic procedure). The ability to anticipate the operative defect and plan for appropriate reconstructive repair is imperative for successful restoration of form and function.
Because of the possible long operative and fluid shifts associated with microsurgical cases, a complete blood count (CBC), type and screen or type and cross, coagulation panel to rule out either coagulopathy or a hypercoagulable state, and basic chemistries are routinely ordered preoperatively. Electrocardiography (ECG) is also a part of the routine preoperative workup. Additional laboratory studies and tests such as pulmonary function tests may be necessary, depending on the general health and age of the patient.
Imaging studies are an important part of the preoperative workup for specific defects and reconstructive procedures. However, they are not performed routinely in every case.
Chest radiography is typically part of the routine preoperative workup. Computed tomography (CT) of the head and neck may be useful in understanding the expected defect. In mandibular reconstruction, three-dimensional CT may help visualize the anticipated defect in three dimensions. In lower-extremity reconstruction, angiography is useful for determining the zone of vessel injury and the location of recipient vessels. Lower-extremity angiography is also useful before free fibula harvest in patients who have peripheral vascular disease.
Equipment commonly used in microsurgery includes the following:
Proper positioning of the patient includes the following:
Because of the complexity of microsurgical procedures, adhering to guidelines such as the following can be helpful in achieving a high success rate:
The use of multiple simultaneous free flaps may be an option for head and neck reconstruction in selected patients with defects that involve several tissue types, multiple functional areas, or large volumes.[23]
After the decision has been made to proceed with a microsurgical reconstruction, the optimal flap must be chosen. This decision is based on the following factors:
Perforator flaps involve the dissection of terminal blood vessels into a tissue segment. These flaps not only have gained significant popularity in recent years as a result of a better understanding of the anatomy and blood supply to specific tissue territories but also have revolutionized the field of microsurgery. By dissecting the blood vessels to the flap and sparing the surrounding tissue, large flaps can be harvested with minimal functional loss to the patient. The following three perforator flaps are described in this article:
The following is a list of common, reliable flaps that are used in reconstructive surgery.
The ALT flap is a fasciocutaneous flap that is located over the middle third of the thigh anterior and lateral to the rectus femoris and the vastus lateralis. Although the flap is supplied by musculocutaneous perforators 85% of the time, it can be raised as a perforator flap, with minimal disruption of the underlying musculature. It is usually used for coverage of defects when a relatively thin flap is required, but it can be harvested with parts of the vastus lateralis muscle when a flap with more volume is required.
Characteristics are as follows:
This is a useful and versatile flap with a long vascular pedicle and thin, pliable skin that was widely used in China before becoming popular in the Western literature. It is based on the radial artery and can achieve a pedicle length of 20 cm and a diameter of 2.5 mm. The flap size can reach an area of 10 × 40 cm2.[25]
Raising this flap sacrifices a major artery to the hand; therefore, before harvesting this flap, check that the perfusion to the hand is preserved through the ulnar vascular system. The osteocutaneous flap raises the risk of radius fracture if not carefully harvested. In addition, exposure of the flexor tendons must be avoided by careful preservation of the paratenon and coverage of tendons with surrounding muscle bellies prior to skin grafting.
Characteristics are as follows:
This flap can be harvested as a fasciocutaneous, innervated fasciocutaneous, or deepithelialized subcutaneous fascial flap. It is supplied by the posterior radial collateral vessels. It does not sacrifice a major vessel in the arm and may be harvested in the same upper extremity that requires reconstruction.
The flap may be bulky, and the pedicle may be short (up to 7 cm). The posterior brachial cutaneous nerve (C5-6) innervates the flap when it is harvested as a sensate flap. The donor site may be closed, if laxity is present in the upper arm, or skin grafted. In either case, the donor scar may be conspicuous.
Characteristics are as follows:
The pedicle for this flap is long and reliable. It is a thin, sometimes hairless, skin flap from the upper back and can be deepithelized and used as a subcutaneous fascial flap, pedicled flap, or free flap. However, the scapular flap has the following drawbacks:
Characteristics are as follows:
The groin flap can provide a large skin and subcutaneous tissue territory based on the superficial circumflex iliac artery and vein. It is particularly helpful when thin tissue coverage is required. The flap can be as large as 10 × 25 cm2. A tissue expander can be placed under the deep groin fascia, which can expand the flap and allow direct donor-site closure. The small diameter of the superficial circumflex iliac artery and the variable vascular anatomy make this flap less popular than other free tissue transfers.
Characteristics are as follows:
The SGAP flap is a perforator flap used mainly for breast reconstruction. The abdomen is the most common harvest site for autologous breast reconstruction; however, in some cases (eg, patients who have excessive scarring or are very thin), the abdomen is not an option as a donor site. The gluteal region and the SGAP flap offer alternatives when the abdomen is unavailable as a donor site.
Characteristics are as follows:
This flap is a very reliable flap with large muscle mass that can be harvested with or without a skin paddle. The primary vascular pedicle can be as long as 8 cm. If additional tissue is needed, the latissimus dorsi muscle may be raised with the serratus anterior muscle, a scapular flap, or both on a single pedicle. One drawback is the need for positioning the patient in a lateral decubitus position for harvests.
Characteristics are as follows:
This is a reliable flap with a large muscle mass and skin paddle. The vertically oriented muscle extends between the costal margin and the pubic region and is enclosed by the anterior and posterior rectus sheaths. It has two dominant pedicles, one based on the superior epigastric artery and vein and the other based on the inferior epigastric artery and vein.
The pedicle is large and reliable. The flap may be harvested with the patient in a supine position. One drawback to this flap is the possibility of abdominal hernia after sacrifice of one of the rectus abdominis muscles. Careful closure of the layers of the abdominal wall is critical to prevent this occurrence. Currently, the DIEP flap is becoming increasingly popular as a donor site for breast reconstruction. Its main advantage is the decreased morbidity to the abdominal wall.
Characteristics are as follows:
The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap has become more popular for breast reconstruction, but the presence of superficial epigastric blood vessels that nourish the flap is variable. Although there are advocates of preoperative imaging studies, the true presence of these vessels can only be determined intraoperatively. If they are not found, the surgeon must be prepared to harvest an alternate flap, which in breast reconstruction is more commonly the DIEP flap. Usually, only a hemiabdomen is perfused with the SIEA flap.
Characteristics are as follows:
The gracilis is a thin and flat muscle that lies between the adductor longus and the sartorius anteriorly and the semimembranosus posteriorly. It has a dominant pedicle and several minor pedicles. The dominant pedicle is the ascending branch of the medial circumflex femoral artery and the venae comitantes. This flap is useful for reanimation of facial paralysis or for extremity muscle function. The vascular pedicle is usually short, and the vessels are small. The skin paddle is typically unreliable.
Characteristics are as follows:
The tensor fasciae latae (TFL) flap has one dominant vascular pedicle, which is the ascending branch of the lateral circumflex femoral artery from the profunda femoris and venae comitantes. The muscle may be as large as 15 × 5 cm2, and the skin flap can achieve a size of 7-9 × 22-26 cm2.
Characteristics are as follows:
The omental flap allows for a large volume of pliable tissue; however, harvest requires a laparotomy. The omentum flap is ideal for obliteration of irregular dead space cavities or for provision of thin coverage over an exposed tissue such as bone.
The omentum is considered a visceral structure containing fat and blood vessels within a thin membrane. It extends from the stomach to beyond the transverse colon and covers the anterior aspect of the peritoneal contents. It has two dominant pedicles: (1) right gastroepiploic artery and vein and (2) left gastroepiploic artery and vein. Previous intra-abdominal surgery, which can create extensive omental inflammatory adhesions, may preclude the use of an omental flap.
Characteristics are as follows:
The jejunal flap is reserved for pharyngeal or esophageal reconstruction. The intestinal mucosa does not tolerate ischemia; therefore, revascularization must proceed immediately. Postoperative monitoring may be performed with a sentinel loop of intestine that is exteriorized.
Characteristics are as follows:
This flap offers a large segment of bone that may be recontoured by osteotomies with or without a skin paddle. In patients with abnormal distal extremity pulses, angiography or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the lower extremity is indicated. The skin paddle is reliable when care is taken to preserve the fasciocutaneous perforators.
Characteristics are as follows:
The temporoparietal fascia (TPF) flap is a versatile thin flap with many applications and consistent vascular anatomy with a pedicle of small caliber. It provides a thin sheet of vascularized fascia based on the superficial temporal artery and vein. The temporal muscle fascia lies deep to the TPF over the temporalis muscle. The pedicle length is short, up to 3 cm in length.
Characteristics are as follows:
The great toe flap can be used to reconstruct part of the thumb (see the image below) or as a neurosensory flap. This flap allows composite tissue reconstruction for loss of the thumb without significant loss of function to the foot. However, some patients may not wish to sacrifice a great toe for aesthetic reasons.
Characteristics are as follows:
Surgery always begins with resection of the tumor or the diseased area and proper exploration and preparation of the recipient site. Control of infection and adequate debridement are necessary prior to flap transfer.
The need for free flap reconstruction should be reevaluated intraoperatively. In some instances, reconstruction may be performed by using skin grafts or local flaps, according to the reconstructive ladder.[26]
Doppler ultrasonography (US) is useful for localizing recipient vessels.[27] The recipient artery and vein must be critically evaluated, and the surgeon must be satisfied with inflow and outflow before embarking on flap harvest. A common pitfall is remaining within the zone of injury on a traumatized or irradiated vessel for microanastomosis, which results in higher rates of vessel thrombosis.
The dimensions and tissue needs of the defect are determined, and the choice of flap is made. An important issue is the orientation and the length of the vascular pedicle. The surgeon must measure the length of pedicle needed to reach the recipient vessels and compare that with the pedicle length available.
Performance of microsurgical anastomoses requires meticulous technique and adherence to the following principles:
The vein coupler is increasingly popular and is a useful tool for anastomosing the vein. In the right hands, the coupler is efficient and can help decrease the total operative time.
Final inset of the flap is performed with care to prevent compression of the vascular anastomoses. Occasionally (eg, in head and neck cases), the inset of the flap is done before the anastomosis.
While the patient is under anesthesia, final assessment of flap viability is made by clinical observation, and vascular flow is confirmed with Doppler examination. The location of Doppler signal in the flap is marked with a stitch for postoperative monitoring. Internal Doppler probes are used when the flap is completely buried under the skin.
Loose dressings are applied, with a portion of the flap exposed for postoperative monitoring. Splints, if needed, should also be free of compression. Particular attention should be given to the position of the patient to avoid compression or pulling on the pedicle.
The postoperative ward must be staffed with nurses who are familiar with free flap monitoring and general care for patients who have undergone microsurgery.
Pain is well controlled to prevent pain and anxiety leading to vasoconstriction. Adequate fluid hydration and body temperature are maintained. The location of the free flap is elevated to promote venous drainage and minimize swelling.
Anticoagulation may be used, depending on the operation and surgeon preference. Possible anticoagulant choices include the following:
Free flap monitoring depends on the operation and surgeon preference. The criterion standard for monitoring remains careful clinical examination with an eye to skin color, capillary refill, and flap turgor. Pricking the flap with a needle should result in bright-red blood.[28] Currently, there is no consensus on which method is most effective for monitoring of free flaps, but handheld Doppler US and physical examination remain the standard of care in most institutions. Methods of monitoring the flap include the following:
Vascular compromise includes congestion or ischemia of the flap, and it may develop very quickly or more slowly. When a vascular compromise occurs suddenly, the patient must be taken immediately to the operating room for exploration of the anastomotic site. When the signs of vascular compromise occur more gradually, the following measures should be immediately undertaken:
If these simple maneuvers at the bedside are not successful, immediate reexploration in the operating room is critical.
Postoperative complications include the following: