Pediatric Genu Varum Treatment & Management

Updated: Oct 27, 2021
  • Author: Peter M Stevens, MD; Chief Editor: Jeffrey D Thomson, MD  more...
  • Print

Approach Considerations

Various options are available for intervention, ranging from attempted bracing to osteotomy. Bracing was popular until the mid-1900s, but enthusiasm for this approach largely dissipated as a consequence of problems with brace design and cost, patient noncompliance, and unproven efficacy.

At the other end of the treatment spectrum is osteotomy, which involves cutting the femur, the tibia/fibula, or both, depending upon the level or levels of bony deformity. [12, 13]  However, osteotomies are relatively invasive and fraught with potential complications (eg, failure of fixation, physeal damage, infection, joint stiffness, compartment syndrome, neurovascular injury, over- or undercorrection, and recurrent deformity). [14, 15]  Some of these pathologic varus deformities are bilateral and multilevel, which increases the risk of problems.

Phemister was the first to operate directly on the physis for the purpose of correcting length discrepancy or changing angles. [16, 17]  His technique involved removing and rotating a rectangle of bone spanning the physis so as to create a permanent bone bridge for tethering the physis.

Besides its relatively invasive nature, the main limitation of this procedure is that it is permanent. Whereas other techniques employed fluoroscopy to permit percutaneous drilling and minimize the impact and scars, the permanence of this method necessitates meticulous planning, accurate determination of bone age, and close follow-up to avoid overcorrection. [18, 19, 20]

Guided growth is a minimally invasive and modular method of correcting genu varum in the pediatric patient. The key advantage of this intervention is its temporary and reversible nature. The historical methods of mechanical restraint of a given physis began with Blount in 1949 and were promulgated by others for the latter half of the 20th century. [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27]

However, problems experienced with staples, including migration or breakage and the necessity of premature revision surgery, detracted from the popularity of this approach and led to the development of alternative methods, including the percutaneous transphyseal screw [28]  and, subsequently, the eight-Plate (Orthofix, Verona, Italy). [29, 17, 30]  Alternatives to the eight-Plate that appear to have comparable efficacy but greater cost-effectiveness have been studied. [31, 32]


Medical Therapy

For physiologic genu varum, parental reassurance is required, but no treatment is typically necessary; spontaneous resolution by the age of 2 years is the rule. In borderline cases, continued follow-up is warranted. It has been suggested that some instances of apparent physiologic genu varum in toddlers may actually reflect a vitamin D or bone metabolic disorder. [33]

To resolve pathologic genu varum, some have relied on so-called Forrest Gump above-the-knee braces. However, there are no controlled, randomized trials that support the efficacy of such treatment. Furthermore, the laxity of pediatric collateral ligaments may militate against such a management strategy because the force applied by the braces may be expended upon the ligaments. The cost and restrictive nature of such braces further diminish compliance.

In defined metabolic conditions, such as rickets, medical management is paramount for success. There may be other appropriate measures that should be taken, such as dietary management for celiac sprue, administration of bisphosphonates in select cases of osteopenia, and gene therapy for collagen storage disorders.


Indications and Preparation for Surgery

Indications and contraindications

The natural history of untreated pathologic genu varum is one of inexorable progression and associated gait disturbance. The indications for surgical intervention are partly clinical, based on documented progression, and partly determined by radiographic criteria.

Once the child has achieved independent ambulation, early intervention may enable simpler treatment via guided growth. This method is applicable throughout the growing years and may be repeated as deemed necessary. After skeletal maturity has been reached, corrective osteotomies may be required to correct malalignment.

In advanced cases, both the femur and the tibia/fibula may have to be addressed, preferably before ligamentous laxity complicates matters. Concomitant varus of the proximal femur or the distal tibia/fibula may also warrant correction. The longer the surgeon waits to correct the knees, the more likely it is that these confounding variables will require attention.

There are only two contraindications for surgical correction of genu varum, as follows:

  • Physiologic deformity - Suspected physiologic varus (typically seen in children younger than 2 years) is likely to resolve spontaneously
  • Physeal closure - If a given physis is closed as a result of injury or maturity, guided growth is contraindicated; on occasion, a specific posttraumatic physeal bar may be resected to permit continued growth

The era of rigid physeal constraint (with staples and screws) may be drawing to a close. The advantages of a flexible tension band are evident: more rapid correction and fewer hardware-related problems. However, plate retrieval is still necessary. Perhaps biodegradable implants will be available one day. The challenges related to the control and planned obsolescence of such implants still must be addressed. In the future, guided growth via chemical, thermal, or electrical manipulation or via targeted radiofrequency signaling may become a reality.

Preparation for surgery

The requisite clinical examination should include measurement of the intercondylar distance, limb lengths, torsional profile, and gait observation; preoperative radiographic documentation that includes measurement of the mechanical axis deviation and the femoral and tibial joint-shaft angles is also essential (see Workup).

If there is doubt as to the etiology or natural history of genu varum, it is helpful to repeat the examination at 3- or 6-month intervals, with comparative radiographs as needed, before formulating a treatment plan. Bracing, though advocated by some, is expensive and unwieldy. More important, it may not have a proven beneficial effect on the natural history of a given deformity.

Beware of unilateral or asymmetrical deformities; it is hard to rationalize these away as instances of physiologic genu varum.

It is helpful to document medial displacement of the mechanical axis; progression of this displacement after the age of 2 years serves as a relative indication for surgical intervention. Generally speaking (except in the case of physiologic varus), when the mechanical axis is in medial zone 2, there is a relative indication for intervention, and when it is in zone 3, there is an absolute indication (see the image below).

If knee is divided into quadrants and variations o If knee is divided into quadrants and variations of normal allowed for, mechanical axis should be neutral or at least fall within medial or lateral zone 1. Deviation into zone 2 is relative indication for surgical intervention, and zone 3 is obvious call for action. If physes are open, correction may be gained by guided growth; after skeletal maturity, only choice is corrective osteotomy.

It may be deleterious to correct a pan-genu deformity at one level; doing so will induce an undesirable slope of the knee with late consequences. If there is concomitant varus of the proximal femur or distal tibia, these may have to be addressed as well. Inward torsion of the tibia may actually improve spontaneously after guided growth. Thus, it is safe to defer treatment of perceived torsional deformities pending angular correction. Later, one can always perform a supramalleolar rotational osteotomy, which is safer than a proximal osteotomy.


Guided Growth

Guided growth (temporary hemiepiphysiodesis) may be the treatment of choice for most children with progressive genu varum, even those with “sick physes.” The lateral distal femoral or lateral proximal tibial physes may be temporarily restrained with an eight-Plate. This approach offers proven advantages over the Blount staples that were introduced in the 1940s: Plates are more secure than staples and will not dislodge, and screw breakage is exceedingly rare. This technique may be undertaken in children aged 18 months to 18 years, provided that the physes are open.

The goal of guided growth is to restore the mechanical axis to neutral, thus mitigating the cumulative effects of gravity on the overloaded structures, alleviating the pain and gait disturbance, and helping to protect the knee throughout the growing years. When a reversible technique such as placement of the eight-Plate is employed, the physis will continue to grow during guided growth, and this physeal growth will continue unabated after the implant is removed. [29, 17, 34]

The time to correction ranges from 6 to 24 months, but typically, the mechanical axis is corrected within 12 months of insertion. Obesity and nonidiopathic coronal deformity of the knee have been found to be risk factors for slower angular correction. [35] In most cases, the proximal fibula need not be tampered with.

When the mechanical axis has been restored to neutral, the implants are removed. Subsequent growth should be monitored. Depending on the etiology, there may be recurrent deformity due to rebound growth; this is best managed by repeating the guided growth procedure. Even if repeated (albeit minor) intervention is required, the benefits still outweigh the cost and risks of (sometimes) repeated osteotomies. Consequently, osteotomies can be deferred for subsequent correction of persistent rotational or length issues as necessary.

The steps in the technique are as follows:

  • Place the patient in the supine position, with tourniquet control (optimal); use fluoroscopic imaging
  • Localize the lateral physis (femoral, tibial, or both) with the C-arm, and mark an incision 2-3 cm in length
  • Infiltrate 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine (optional)
  • Split the iliotibial band (femoral); leave the anterior compartment undisturbed (tibial)
  • Preserve the periosteum (if you can lift the tissue with a forceps, you are still safe)
  • Insert a Keith or similar needle into the physis; check the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral view
  • Insert the needle midsagittally (optimal); avoid placing it too far anteriorly (because of the risk of recurvatum)
  • Insert the eight-Plate (12- or 16-mm height), with the needle through the center hole
  • Insert the epiphyseal 1.6-mm smooth guide pin first, then the metaphyseal guide pin; the guide pins need not be parallel but should avoid the physis and the joint
  • Predrill the lateral cortices ( to a depth of 5 mm)
  • Insert the 4.5-mm cannulated self-tapping screws (24 or 32 mm, according to the surgeon’s preference); mixing hardware lengths and colors is permissible
  • Ignore the proximal fibula, unless it is unduly prominent, as may be the case in tibial dysplasia; if you feel compelled to address this structure, a “miniopen” epiphysiodesis may be accomplished with a drill and curette
  • Perform a layered closure of the wound

It is important to keep in mind that these titanium plates, by design, are nonlocking. Their strength is predicated on their ability to serve as a flexible tension band that can bend as the screws reach their maximum divergence (~30°). At maximum divergence, the flexible plate will gradually begin to reverse-bend, permitting further angular correction. Screw length is not highly critical, but screws should not be so long that they violate the far cortex.

Guided growth with the eight-Plate (see the images below) offers a high success rate, with few and minor complications. [36, 37]

At age 5, this boy presented with asymmetrical tib At age 5, this boy presented with asymmetrical tibia vara (Blount disease). Treating surgeon employed guided growth on right and osteotomy of tibia/fibula on left.
At 14-month follow-up, mechanical axis is neutral At 14-month follow-up, mechanical axis is neutral on right, and plate was removed. Mechanical axis was in medial zone 2; this was addressed by insertion of lateral eight-Plate.
After additional 8 months of guided growth, leg st After additional 8 months of guided growth, leg straightened out, and plate was removed. Patient's limb lengths remain equal, and there has been no recurrence of angular deformity. Annual monitoring will continue until maturity: if there is any drift of mechanical axis, guided growth will be repeated.
At 1 year after proximal tibial stapling to correc At 1 year after proximal tibial stapling to correct limb length inequality, this scanogram shows loosening of lateral staples with consequent iatrogenic varus of tibia. Physes are still open.
Full-length view shows mechanical axis deviation i Full-length view shows mechanical axis deviation into medial zone 2; this was not demonstrable on scanogram. Staples were removed and lateral ones replaced with eight-Plate.
At 1 year after guided growth with eight-Plate, me At 1 year after guided growth with eight-Plate, mechanical axis has been restored to neutral. At that time, eight-Plates were employed to accomplish pan-genu epiphysiodesis to correct patient's residual limb length inequality.


In situations that preclude guided growth (physeal closure or skeletal maturity) it may be necessary to cut the femur or the tibia and fibula to accomplish the desired realignment (see the images below). The goal of osteotomy is to realign the extremity and provide a neutral mechanical axis while correcting malrotation and restoring equal limb lengths. However, this procedure comes with significant associated risks and costs. [14, 15]  Furthermore, if there is recurrent deformity, realignment becomes more difficult with each subsequent endeavor.

This 7-year-old boy with Ollier disease presented This 7-year-old boy with Ollier disease presented with complex deformity including varus and outward torsional deformity of right tibia and progressive limb length discrepancy. Whereas guided growth could improve varus, it could not address other two issues. Therefore, he underwent osteotomy and callotasis with Taylor Spatial Frame.
This 4-year-old girl with Job syndrome, which incl This 4-year-old girl with Job syndrome, which includes immunoglobulin deficiency, had osteopenia and developed pathologic fracture of proximal tibia. She then drifted into progressive genu varum. It was felt that guided growth might not work in mechanically compromised environment.
Patient underwent corrective osteotomy of upper ti Patient underwent corrective osteotomy of upper tibia and fibula, supplemented with cast.

Fixation may be achieved with pins incorporated in a cast, with internal plating, or with an external fixator, depending on the clinical setting and the experience and personal preference of the surgeon. During the period when the bone is healing, weightbearing must be deferred, and range of motion (ROM) may be limited. Physical therapy may be useful in mobilizing the patient. Fuller discussions of osteotomy techniques are available in standard orthopedic texts.


Postoperative Care

Depending upon the circumstances, surgical correction of genu varum is typically an outpatient procedure. A soft dressing usually suffices. Crutches may be used as needed for comfort and balance. Immediate ROM exercise and weightbearing are encouraged. Physical therapy is provided as needed for patients who are slow to mobilize. Activities, including sports, may be resumed as tolerated.

Rebound growth and recurrent varus can occur; however, these phenomena are not predictable. Accordingly, the author does not routinely shoot for overcorrection but, rather, informs the parents before the index procedure that the child should be followed after plate removal. If no rebound effect is observed within 12 months of plate removal, then it is unlikely to occur. For rebound deformity that is clinically relevant (medial zone 2 or 3 on the radiograph), guided growth may safely be repeated.



For this meticulous but relatively simple operative procedure, complications are rare. Because minimal dissection is involved, wound-healing problems (eg, hematoma, infection, and dehiscence) are uncommon. If keloid formation is a problem, the scar may be excised at the time of plate removal.

With the switch from staples to the eight-Plate, the problems of hardware migration or fatigue have been solved. By design, the screws diverge with growth; however, this divergence does not necessitate screw exchange. The relatively thin titanium plates conform to the bone and are free to bend with correction.

Because the bone is not divided, there is no need to wait for it to heal before allowing the child to return to normal activities. Guided growth with the eight-Plate does not place the patient at risk for nonunion, delayed union, compartment syndrome, or neurologic damage, all of which have been reported with osteotomy of the distal femur or proximal tibia/fibula.

There are a number of potential and theoretical problems with the use of eight-Plates. Biologic problems include the following:

  • Premature physeal closure – This will not occur if care is taken to preserve the periosteum
  • Rebound growth – This is not so much a reflection of hardware choice as it is a biologic phenomenon (albeit one that is poorly understood); when the parents are informed of this possible sequela, they are rarely upset, because it is readily managed by means of repeat guided growth if it occurs, and repeat guided growth is certainly more acceptable than a repeat osteotomy
  • Overcorrection – This is strictly a matter of noncompliance with follow-up; if overcorrection extends into lateral zone 2 (the lateral quadrant of the knee), plate removal may suffice, whereas if it goes beyond, into lateral zone 3, active correction via application of a medial plate may be warranted; education of parents is the best means of preventing this complication
  • Infection – If a deep wound infection develops, the eight-Plate should be (temporarily) removed

Mechanical problems include the following:

  • Plate breakage – The author has not observed this personally and, so far, has not seen it reported elsewhere
  • Screw migration – This is rare but may occur on occasion; the solution is to redirect the screw percutaneously, under fluoroscopic guidance
  • Screw breakage – This has been reported by some surgeons, invariably (to date) in heavy-set children with Blount disease and always involving the distal screw where it enters the metaphyseal cortex (see the image below); the risk can be lessened by securely retightening both screws after guide-pin removal to minimize any gap between plate and bone; options for revising a broken screw include the use of a solid 4.5-mm screw and the addition of a second plate, as well as, for recalcitrant cases, osteotomy of the tibia/fibula
Whereas complication rate of guided growth with ei Whereas complication rate of guided growth with eight-Plates remains low, there have been isolated cases of broken screws. Each broken screw has been distal (metaphyseal) screw in heavy-set patient with Blount disease. Potential solutions are to insert solid 4.5-mm screw or to add second eight-Plate.

Long-Term Monitoring

Follow-up visits are scheduled for every 3 months. Repeat radiographs are obtained as indicated. Plate removal is carried out when the mechanical axis is neutral or minimally overcorrected into lateral zone 1 (at the surgeon’s discretion).

Follow-up is continued at 6 and 12 months after hardware removal, including a full-length AP radiograph. The parents are shown how to measure the intracondylar distance. The patient is then followed annually until maturity (ideally).