Lipomas are the most common soft-tissue tumor. These slow-growing, benign fatty tumors form soft, lobulated masses enclosed by a thin, fibrous capsule. Although it has been hypothesized that lipomas may rarely undergo sarcomatous change, this event has never been convincingly documented. It is more probable that lipomas are at the benign end of the spectrum of tumors, which, at the malignant end, include liposarcomas (see Pathophysiology).
Because more than half of lipomas encountered by clinicians are subcutaneous in location, most of this article will be devoted to that subgroup. Additional information about other locations (eg, intramuscular, retroperitoneal, gastrointestinal [GI]) will be included as appropriate.
Lipomas are common benign mesenchymal tumors. They may develop in virtually all organs throughout the body. The anatomy depends on the tumor site. Subcutaneous lipomas are usually not fixed to the underlying fascia. The fibrous capsule must be removed to prevent recurrence.
In the GI tract, lipomas present as submucosal fatty tumors. The most common locations include the esophagus, stomach, and small intestine. Symptoms occur from luminal obstruction or bleeding.
Duodenal lipomas are mostly small but may become pedunculated with obstruction of the lumen. They may cause pain, obstructive jaundice, or intussusception in younger patients.[1] Mucosal erosion over the lipoma may lead to severe bleeding (see the image below). Small intestinal lipomas occur mainly in elderly patients. They tend to be pedunculated submucosal lesions. They are more common in the ileum than in the duodenum or jejunum. As with duodenal lipomas, severe hemorrhage or intussusception may occur.
Colonic lipomas are usually discovered on endoscopy. Gentle palpation with a biopsy forceps reveals the soft nature of the submucosal mass. A biopsy specimen of the mucosa may reveal underlying fat, the so-called naked fat sign. As with lipomas in other locations, colonic lipomas may cause pain with obstruction or intussusception.
As noted above, a fatty protrusion of preperitoneal fat termed a "lipoma of the spermatic cord" is a common finding on groin exploration for hernia repair.
Numerous case reports document the presence of lipomas in other, rare locations, with these tumors having been found virtually everywhere in the body.[2, 3, 4, 5, 6] Lipomatous involvement of endocrine organs, including the thyroid, adrenal glands, pancreas, and parathyroid glands, has been described. Maxillofacial lipomas, including intralingual, parotid, orbitonasal, maxillary sinusoidal, and parapharyngeal space masses, have also been documented.
In rare instances, intraosseous and intra-articular involvement occurs. Involvement of the structural components of the mediastinum, including the airways and pleura, has also been reported. Gynecologic lipomas may occur in the uterus, ovaries, and broad ligament. Critical organ involvement of the heart (causing ventricular tachycardia), superior vena cava, brain, and spinal cord may pose a significant clinical challenge.[7, 8]
Mixed histologies, such as angiolipomas and fibrolipomas, are often encountered and are usually benign. Differentiation from liposarcoma may be difficult.
Other fatty tumors include lipoblastomas, hibernomas, atypical lipomatous tumors, and liposarcomas. Lipoblastomas occur almost exclusively in infants and children. They have a benign clinical course and a low recurrence rate after surgical excision. Hibernomas, also rare, derive their name from the morphologic resemblance to the brown fat of hibernating animals. They presumably arise from fat that may occur in the back, hips, or neck in adults and infants. Atypical lipomatous tumors are generally considered to be low-grade sarcomas, with a strong propensity to recurrence but little metastatic potential. Liposarcomas are true mesenchymal malignancies.
Speculation exists regarding a potential link between trauma and subsequent lipoma formation.[9] One theory suggests that trauma-related fat herniation through tissue planes creates so-called pseudolipomas. It has also been suggested that trauma-induced cytokine release triggers pre-adipocyte differentiation and maturation. To date, no definitive link between trauma and lipoma formation has been prospectively demonstrated.
While the exact etiology of lipomas remains uncertain, an association with gene rearrangements of chromosome 12 has been established in cases of solitary lipomas, as has an abnormality in the HMGA2-LPP fusion gene.[10]
Lipomas occur in 1% of the population. Most of these are small subcutaneous tumors that are removed for cosmetic reasons. These subcutaneous lipomas will be considered separately from lipomas in other locations in the discussion below. In the intestine, lipomas constitute 16% of benign, small neoplasms; this percentage is lower than that of leiomyomas (18%) and higher than that of adenomas (14%).
The outcome and prognosis are excellent for benign lipomas. Recurrence is uncommon but may develop if the excision was incomplete.
Pang et al compared outcomes in 238 patients who underwent total or near-total (T/NT) resection for dorsal, transitional, or chaotic spinal cord lipomas (with 16-year follow-up), along with complete reconstruction of the neural placode, with results from 116 patients who underwent partial resection for spinal cord lipomas (with 11-year follow-up).[11, 12]
Although in the T/NT and partial resection groups the rate of immediate symptom stabilization or improvement was similar (more than 95%), the combined cerebrospinal fluid leakage and wound complication rate was only 2.5% for T/NT resections, compared with 6.9% for partial resections. Moreover, the overall progression-free survival probability (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 82.8% for T/NT resection patients at 16 years postoperative, compared with 34.6% for partial resection patients at 10.5 years post operation. Evidence indicated that the superior results in the T/NT resection patients were associated with the fact that lower cord-sac ratios were achieved in these patients than in the partial-resection group.[11, 12]
Lipomas are most often asymptomatic. When they arise from fatty tissue between the skin and deep fascia, typical features include a soft, fluctuant feel; lobulation; and free mobility of overlying skin. A characteristic "slippage sign" may be elicited by gently sliding the fingers off the edge of the tumor. The tumor will be felt to slip out from under, as opposed to a sebaceous cyst or an abscess that is tethered by surrounding induration. The overlying skin is typically normal.
Symptoms in other sites depend on the location and can include the following:
Subcutaneous lipomas are primarily cosmetic issues. Lipomas in other locations may cause luminal obstruction or hemorrhage. The images below show a duodenal lipoma that caused gastrointestinal hemorrhage and required removal.
Lipomas must be differentiated from other masses or tumors.
In the subcutaneous location, the primary differential diagnosis is a sebaceous cyst or an abscess. Sebaceous cysts are also rounded and subcutaneous; they originate in the dermis and reside within the skin at the dermal-epidermal junction. These cysts can be differentiated from lipomas by their characteristic central punctum and the surrounding induration. Treatment requires removal of a small ellipse of overlying skin to avoid entering the cyst. Abscesses typically have overlying induration and erythema. Incision and drainage is the appropriate management.
Hibernomas are uncommon tumors that arise from brown fat. They are also benign but with a slightly greater tendency to bleed during excision and to recur if intralesional excision is performed.
Atypical lipomatous tumors are considered to be well-differentiated liposarcomas. They have a predilection for local recurrence but do not generally metastasize. This diagnosis should be suspected when a fatty tumor is encountered in an intramuscular or retroperitoneal location.
Liposarcomas are malignant tumors that arise from adipocytes. They may recur locally and may metastasize. Fatty tumors of the retroperitoneum or in intramuscular locations should be considered to be potential liposarcomas until proven otherwise.
In the breast, a lipoma will be mammographically radiolucent. It must be differentiated from a similar benign tumor, a mammary hamartoma, and a pseudolipoma (a soft-tissue mass that may surround a small, scirrhous cancer).
Conversely, lipomatous lesions in the adrenal gland that have calcifications on radiologic examinations have been confused with teratoma. Many of these are angiomyolipomas.
In the spermatic cord, a finger of retroperitoneal fat termed a "lipoma of the cord" is frequently encountered during hernia repair. Removal is advocated to allow the internal inguinal ring to be tightened around the cord and to minimize the risk of recurrence of the hernia. During laparoscopic exploration for a palpable inguinal mass, no identifiable peritoneal orifice may be found if the inguinal mass purely consists of a lipoma of the cord.
A study by Yoshiyama et al suggested that the plasma D-dimer level could contribute to the differentiation between lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma, two lesions that are similar in terms of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic characteristics.[13]
For most subcutaneous lipomas, no imaging studies are required.
Lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract may be visible on GI contrast studies (see the image below).
Imaging studies for lipomas in atypical locations (or those for which the differential diagnosis includes sarcoma) include ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).[14]
In a retrospective review of the use of US by two musculoskeletal radiologists to evaluate 714 superficial soft-tissue tumors, Hung et al reported a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 94.3% for lipoma.[15]
When CT is employed, a radiodensity of less than 50 Hounsfield units is indicative of a soft-tissue tumor composed of fat, though no reliable distinction can be made between a benign lipoma and a malignant liposarcoma.[6]
MRI has been recommended as a reliable preoperative investigation.[16, 17, 18, 19, 6] It has been employed in intramuscular lipoma, pediatric lipoblastomas, and others. The findings of intramuscular lipomas, for example, range from small, homogeneous masses to large, inhomogeneous lesions with infiltrative margins. However, like CT, MRI does not allow an absolute, reliable distinction between a lipoma and a liposarcoma.[20] A study by Thornhill suggested that the addition of computer-assisted diagnosis may improve the ability of MRI to make this distinction.[21]
A study by Yang et al found that imaging-based multimodality models using computer-assisted diagnostic models could be effective for discriminating between lipoma and well-differentiated liposarcoma.[22]
Because all lipomas are radiolucent, soft-tissue radiography can be diagnostic, but it is indicated only when the diagnosis is in doubt.
Biopsies are normally not indicated for small subcutaneous lesions, because the entire tumor is usually removed. All imaging techniques have been combined with fine-needle aspiration (FNA); this combination increases the accuracy of diagnosis. Obtaining tissue samples from different tumor components is important, because it provides samples for histopathologic analysis by means of various techniques, including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
Lipomas are benign mesenchymal tumors derived from adipocytes. Several variants have been described, including the following:
FNA biopsies of a lipoblastoma contain multivacuolated lipoblasts, myxoid areas, and a plexiform capillary network.
Lipomas are removed for the following reasons:
Obtain biopsies of large lipomas or of those tethered to fascia to rule out a liposarcoma.
No contraindications for removing a lipoma exist, unless the patient is unfit for surgery or anatomic location makes removal unfeasible (as in the case, for example, of an intraspinal lipoma). Benign lipomas are simply "shelled out," with complete removal of the capsule in an extracapsular plane. This is an inadequate operation for a liposarcoma, and hence, performing an initial biopsy to exclude this lesion may be considered for large fatty tumors or for those in the retroperitoneum or the intramuscular spaces.
Nonoperative therapy includes endoscopic excision of tumors in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract (ie, esophagus, stomach, or duodenum) or the colon. Colonoscopic snare removal has been described but may be associated with perforation if the base is broad. Japanese authors reported a safe technique in which a bipolar snare was used and the mucosa of the defective region was clipped.[23] Otherwise, surgical removal is indicated.
Complete surgical excision with the capsule is advocated to prevent local recurrence, whether the lipoma in question is subcutaneous or intracardiac in origin. These lesions may be lobulated, and it is essential that all lobules be removed.
Specific therapy depends on the location of the tumor.[24]
Subcutaneous lipomas are removed for cosmetic reasons, and hence, a cosmetically pleasing incision should be used.[25] The incision is usually placed directly over the mass and is oriented to lie in a line of skin tension.
Liposuction is an alternative that allows removal of the lipoma through a very small incision, the location of which may be remote from the actual tumor.[26, 27, 28, 29] The lesion may also be approached by means of advanced minimal-access tissue dissection methods, with the use of a dissecting balloon.[30] These latter two methods allow the incision to be placed in an inconspicuous location. For example, axillary incisions may be used to remove lipomas from the back.
Liposuction may be employed more often in small facial lipomas, because favorable aesthetic results have been obtained through strategically placed incisions. Liposuction is indicated for the treatment of medium-sized (4-10 cm) and large (>10 cm) lipomas; in small lipomas, no advantage has been reported, because these tumors can be extracted through small incisions.[26, 27, 28, 29]
Lipoma formation has been reported as an unusual complication of liposuction and has also been found to occur following trauma.[9, 31] The mechanism in these cases is unknown. Research on genetic markers of atypical lipomatous tumors and liposarcomas is ongoing. These tumors have been shown to express receptors for leptin.[32]
For more unusual locations, the method of removal must be tailored to the site and may require the expertise of a consultant, as follows:
Tumors can usually be enucleated. They may recur if not properly removed, which should include removal of the capsule. Hibernomas tend to be highly vascular. Lipomas in other locations may present unique difficulties during removal; for example, in a person presenting with a frontalis-associated subfascial lipoma as a protruding mass on the lateral forehead, the lipoma may be difficult to dissect because of the highly vascular muscle that invests it. Lipomas of the GI tract can frequently be shelled out of their submucosal location.
Overview
What is the pathophysiology of lipomas?
What is the prevalence of lipomas?
What is the prognosis of lipomas?
Presentation
Which physical findings are characteristic of lipomas?
What are the signs and symptoms of lipomas?
What are the possible complications of lipomas?
DDX
Which conditions should be included in the differential diagnoses of lipomas?
Workup
What is the role of D-dimer measurement in the diagnosis of lipomas?
What is the role of imaging studies in the diagnosis of lipomas?
What is the role of biopsy in the diagnosis of lipomas?
Which histologic findings are characteristic of lipomas?
Treatment
What are the indications for lipomas removal?
What is the role of endoscopy in the treatment of lipomas?
What is the role of surgery in the treatment of lipomas?
Which surgical techniques are used in the treatment of lipomas?
What are challenges to the removal of lipomas?