Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
One to four incisions are used in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedures. For drainage of pleural effusions, it is sufficient to use one small incision to accommodate the 10-mm offset scope, evacuate the effusion, and use the talc poudrage and chest tube. For a VATS lobectomy, four incisions have commonly been used, with the largest being about 4 cm long. However, there is growing interest in and acceptance of uniportal approaches to lobectomy in selected patients. [14, 15]
Incisions are made in a triangulated fashion, typically at least 5 cm apart so that the instruments do not cross. (See the image below.) This so-called baseball diamond approach aligns the camera and instruments to manipulate the lung and perform a resection. For VATS thymectomy, a subxiphoid and subcostal arch approach has been described as an alternative to a lateral intercostal approach. [16, 17]

Single-port approaches have been employed for other VATS procedures besides lobectomy. [18] A meta-analysis by Xu et al found that single-port VATS might have certain advantages over three-port VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax, though studies of higher quality and greater scale would be needed to confirm this. [19] Liu et al described five cases in which uniportal VATS parietal pleurectomy proved safe and feasible in patients with complex tuberculous pneumothorax. [20] A study by Jiang et al found that single-port VATS was not inferior to three-port VATS for mediastinal cystectomy. [21]
For single-incision cases, curved instruments are helpful.
Procedural limitations may include difficulty in controlling bleeding and a lack of intraoperative palpation.
Various applications of VATS are illustrated in the images and video below.
Indications for conversion from VATS to thoracotomy
Indications for conversion from VATS to thoracotomy include the following:
-
Inability to achieve single-lung ventilation
-
Extensive pleural adhesions
-
Uncontrolled or significant intraoperative bleeding
-
Inability to identify a target lesion for biopsy
-
Technical difficulties with or primary failure of video equipment and/or endoscopic instruments
A study by Vallance et al found that with increasing experience and expertise, the rate of unplanned conversion from VATS to thoracotomy could be brought down to about 10%. [22]
Complications
Complications may include the following:
-
Persistent air leakage
-
Bleeding from pulmonary vessels [4]
-
Intercostal nerve damage due to insertion of instruments through the ports
-
Complications from single-lung ventilation, including respiratory insufficiency or postoperative reexpansion pulmonary edema
-
Tumor implantation following VATS
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Examination for evidence of metastasis.
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Pleural adhesions on medical thoracoscopy.
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Example of positioning of VATS instruments; three ports are used, with camera in center position of triangle.
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thoracoscopic wedge resection.
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thoracoscopic wedge resection.
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thoracoscopic wedge resection.
-
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Pleural biopsy.