Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) Technique

Updated: Mar 17, 2023
  • Author: Doraid Jarrar, MD; Chief Editor: Zab Mosenifar, MD, FACP, FCCP  more...
  • Print
Technique

Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

One to four incisions are used in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedures. For drainage of pleural effusions, it is sufficient to use one small incision to accommodate the 10-mm offset scope, evacuate the effusion, and use the talc poudrage and chest tube. For a VATS lobectomy, four incisions have commonly been used, with the largest being about 4 cm long. However, there is growing interest in and acceptance of uniportal approaches to lobectomy in selected patients. [14, 15]

Incisions are made in a triangulated fashion, typically at least 5 cm apart so that the instruments do not cross. (See the image below.) This so-called baseball diamond approach aligns the camera and instruments to manipulate the lung and perform a resection. For VATS thymectomy, a subxiphoid and subcostal arch approach has been described as an alternative to a lateral intercostal approach. [16, 17]

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Examp Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Example of positioning of VATS instruments; three ports are used, with camera in center position of triangle.

Single-port approaches have been employed for other VATS procedures besides lobectomy. [18] A meta-analysis by Xu et al found that single-port VATS might have certain advantages over three-port VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax, though studies of higher quality and greater scale would be needed to confirm this. [19] ​Liu et al described five cases in which uniportal VATS parietal pleurectomy proved safe and feasible in patients with complex tuberculous pneumothorax. [20] A study by Jiang et al found that single-port VATS was not inferior to three-port VATS for mediastinal cystectomy. [21]

For single-incision cases, curved instruments are helpful.

Procedural limitations may include difficulty in controlling bleeding and a lack of intraoperative palpation.

Various applications of VATS are illustrated in the images and video below.

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Exami Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Examination for evidence of metastasis.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Pleur Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Pleural adhesions on medical thoracoscopy.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thora Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thoracoscopic wedge resection.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thora Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thoracoscopic wedge resection.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thora Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Thoracoscopic wedge resection.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Pleural biopsy.

Indications for conversion from VATS to thoracotomy

Indications for conversion from VATS to thoracotomy include the following:

  • Inability to achieve single-lung ventilation
  • Extensive pleural adhesions
  • Uncontrolled or significant intraoperative bleeding
  • Inability to identify a target lesion for biopsy
  • Technical difficulties with or primary failure of video equipment and/or endoscopic instruments

A study by Vallance et al found that with increasing experience and expertise, the rate of unplanned conversion from VATS to thoracotomy could be brought down to about 10%. [22]  

Next:

Complications

Complications may include the following:

  • Persistent air leakage
  • Bleeding from pulmonary vessels [4]
  • Intercostal nerve damage due to insertion of instruments through the ports
  • Complications from single-lung ventilation, including respiratory insufficiency or postoperative reexpansion pulmonary edema
  • Tumor implantation following VATS
Previous