TNM Classification for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Staging systems for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been universally adopted. One system implemented is the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor/node/metastasis (TNM) classification system. The TNM classification system takes into account tumor characteristics including size, number, and vascular invasion, as well as lymph node involvement and metastatic disease. [1, 2]
Table 1. TNM Classification for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Open Table in a new window)
Primary tumor (T) |
|
TX |
Primary tumor cannot be assessed |
T0 |
No evidence of primary tumor |
T1 |
Solitary tumor < 2 cm, or >2 cm without vascular invasion |
T1a |
Solitary tumor < 2 cm |
T1b |
Solitary tumor > 2 cm without vascular invasion |
T2 |
Solitary tumor > 2 cm with vascular invasion; or multiple tumors, none > 5 cm |
T3 |
Multiple tumors, at least one of which is > 5 cm |
T4 |
Single tumor or tumors of any size involving a major branch of the portal vein or hepatic vein, or tumor(s) with direct invasion of adjacent organs other than the gallbladder or with perforation of visceral peritoneum |
Regional lymph nodes (N) |
|
NX |
Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed |
N0 |
No regional lymph node metastasis |
N1 |
Regional lymph node metastasis |
Distant metastasis (M) |
|
M0 |
No distant metastasis |
M1 |
Distant metastasis |
Table 2. Anatomic stage/prognostic groups (Open Table in a new window)
Stage |
T |
N |
M |
IA |
T1a |
N0 |
M0 |
IB |
T1b |
N0 |
M0 |
II |
T2 |
N0 |
M0 |
IIIA |
T3 |
N0 |
M0 |
IIIB |
T4 |
N0 |
M0 |
IVA |
Any T |
N1 |
M0 |
IVB |
Any T |
Any N |
M1 |
Table 3. Histologic grade (Open Table in a new window)
Histologic grade (G) |
|
GX |
Grade cannot be accessed |
G1 |
Well differentiated |
G2 |
Moderately differentiated |
G3 |
Poorly differentiated |
G4 |
Undifferentiated |
In addition to the TNM staging for HCC, other systems have been proposed to help guide therapeutic strategies. One of these validated systems is the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging system (BCLC). The BCLC system stratifies HCC patients based on tumor size, extent, liver function, and performance status. The BCLC staging system is thought to be better than other staging systems for determining prognosis, given the inclusion of liver function and performance status. [3, 4]
Table 4. Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging system (Open Table in a new window)
Stage |
Performance Status |
Tumor Stage |
Okuda Stage |
Liver function |
A: Early HCC |
||||
A1 |
0 |
Single, < 5 cm |
I |
No portal hypertension, normal bilirubin |
A2 |
0 |
Single, < 5 cm |
I |
Portal hypertension, normal bilirubin |
A3 |
0 |
Single, < 5 cm |
I |
Portal hypertension, abnormal bilirubin |
A4 |
0 |
3 tumors, < 3 cm |
I-II |
Child-Pugh A-B |
Stage B: Intermediate HCC |
0 |
Large, multinodular |
I-II |
Child-Pugh A-B |
Stage C: Advanced HCC |
1-2 |
Vascular invasion or extrahepatic spread |
I-II |
Child-Pugh A-B |
Stage D: End-Stage HCC |
3-4 |
Any |
I-II |
Child-Pugh C |
Stage A and B: All criteria need to be fulfilled Stage C: At least one of the following criteria needs to be filled: performance status 1-2 or vascular invasion/extrahepatic spread. Stage D: At least one of the following criteria needs to be filled: performance status 3-4 or Okuda Stage III/Child Pugh C. |
Cirrhosis is an important component of HCC staging. Cirrhosis is not only an independent predictor of survival but also guides management decisions and determines candidacy for different therapies. The Child-Pugh score can be used to classify the prognosis based on the degree of cirrhosis and therefore can help in determining operative risk
Another consideration in determining stage and prognosis in patients with HCC is the degree of liver fibrosis. There are many different scoring systems used to determine the degree of liver fibrosis. With one such scoring system, the Ishak fibrosis staging system, stages 1 through 5 had no direct correlation with survival, however, stage 6 was associated with poor overall survival [5]
Table 5. Ishak fibrosis score (Open Table in a new window)
Architectural Change |
Score |
No fibrosis |
0 |
Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa |
1 |
Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, , with or without short fibrous septa |
2 |
Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with occasional portal-to-portal bridging |
3 |
Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging as well as portal-central |
4 |
Marked bridging (portal-to-portal and/or portal-central) with occasional nodule (incomplete cirrhosis) |
5 |
Cirrhosis, probable or definite |
6 |
Questions & Answers
Overview
What is the TNM classification for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)?
What is the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)?
How is the degree of cirrhosis determined in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)?
How is the Ishak fibrosis score used in the staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)?