Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney (MCDK) Imaging
Updated: Apr 07, 2021
Author: John S Wiener, MD, FACS, FAAP; Chief Editor: Eugene C Lin, MD
Practice Essentials
Multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) is a congenital maldevelopment in which the renal cortex is malformed and characterized by numerous cysts of multiple sizes.[1, 2, 3, 4] A dysplastic parenchyma anchors the cysts, the arrangement of which resembles a bunch of grapes. The calyceal drainage system is absent. Typically, MCDK is a unilateral disorder; the bilateral condition is incompatible with life.[5] Furthermore, MCDK with contralateral renal agenesis does not support life.[6] Multicystic dysplastic kidney is the most common cause of an abdominal mass in the newborn and is the most common cystic malformation of the kidney in infants.[7] Genetic aberrations have been detected in some cases.[8]
Several forms of MCDK have been described. The classic type and the less common hydronephrotic type have cysts of various sizes connected by loose, insubstantial fibrous tissue. No functional renal tissue can be identified. The classic type has a random configuration of cysts, whereas the hydronephrotic type presents with a discernible, dilated renal pelvis surrounded by cysts. Some sources identify a third type, known as solid cystic dysplasia. Solid cystic dysplasia is composed of smaller cysts with a greater amount of nonfunctional parenchyma.[9]
MCDK should not be confused with polycystic kidney disease (PCKD) or other renal cystic diseases.[10] Spence recognized MCDK as a distinct entity in 1955.[11] The Urology Section of the American Academy of Pediatrics established the National Multicystic Kidney Registry, which is a large, multicenter, longitudinal database that has helped clarify the appropriate management of MCDK.
MCDK can be associated with ipsilateral ureterocele, which is believed to cause renal malformation due to early obstruction during nephrogenesis.[12] It can occur in a segment of a duplicated kidney or in renal fusion anomalies.[13]
(See the image below.)
Kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) images of an infant with a right multicystic dysplastic kidney demonstrate displacement of bowel loops away from the right abdomen.
Imaging modalities
Ultrasonography is the preferred initial examination.[14] Prenatal ultrasound has been shown to have a diagnostic accuracy of over 90%.[15, 16, 17] Antenatally, MCDK is one of the most common renal anomalies detected during ultrasound examination, with an incidence of between 1 in 1000 and 1 in 4300 live births. The diagnosis of MCDK is often made antenatally, with multiple small cysts becoming evident as early as the 15th week of gestation.[18] In patients with a prenatal presentation, postnatal studies are required to differentiate MCDK from hydronephrosis. A sonogram should be obtained before a neonate is discharged from the nursery when MCDK is suspected. Reduced renal function and relative dehydration of the neonate should have no bearing on the detection of MCDK; therefore, there is no need to delay the initial sonogram.[19, 20, 21]
In a patient with a symptomatic presentation, such as a palpable abdominal mass, abdominal pain, incontinence, and recurrent urinary tract infections, ultrasonography should be the initial study.[22] The ultrasound information provides clues of other urinary tract anomalies, as well as intra-abdominal or retroperitoneal malignancies.
MCDK can be detected on other forms of imaging, but ultrasonography is fast and accurate, and it does not require sedation, radiation, or other interventions. Radionuclide imaging can be used to further differentiate the hydronephrotic form of MCDK from an obstruction in a functioning, severely hydronephrotic kidney. Radionuclide imaging provides information about the function of the involved renal unit and is superior to intravenous pyelography (IVP) in children.
The hydronephrotic form of MCDK can mimic ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), and radionuclide scanning is necessary following ultrasonography to confirm the diagnosis. Technetium-99m (99mTc) mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) and 99mTc dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) studies can demonstrate lack of function in the affected kidney, but MAG-3 studies can also provide information regarding drainage in an obstructed hydronephrotic kidney. Renal function is relatively poor in the first month of life, and radionuclide imaging should be postponed until 1 month of age to avoid false-positive results.
Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) may be indicated in patients with MCDK to evaluate the urinary tract for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and other anomalies. Historically, there was greater emphasis on universal screening for VUR in all cases in order to prevent contralateral renal injury.[23] However, recent trends have seen an ebb in the call for VCUG, particularly in children with a normal contralateral kidney, as high grade VUR is rarely found.[24]
Radiography
Incidental findings on kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) images include displacement of the bowels when the affected kidney is enlarged (see the image below). Also, ringlike calcifications of the cyst walls may be seen on plain images. Retrograde pyelography may demonstrate an atretic or absent ureter.
Kidney, ureter, and bladder (KUB) images of an infant with a right multicystic dysplastic kidney demonstrate displacement of bowel loops away from the right abdomen.
Voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) may be indicated in patients with MCDK to evaluate the urinary tract for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and other anomalies, including an ipsilateral ureterocele, which is found in some cases.[23, 24]
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MCDK can be an incidental finding on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, but MRI is not part of the diagnostic investigation. MRIs show the typical multicystic appearance of MCDK with little or no parenchyma.[25, 26]
(See the images below.)
A T2-weighted MRI scan demonstrates multiple cysts without normal renal parenchyma. A normal left kidney can be seen on the other side of the spine.
A T2-weighted MRI scan of the same patient as in the previous image demonstrates multiple cysts without normal renal parenchyma.
In a study by Jii et al, fetal MRI was found to add additional diagnostic information to prenatal US in the assessment of MCDK. MRI correctly changed the ultrasound diagnosis in 12 of 55 cases. All 55 cases were performed at 1.5 T magnetic resonance unit. MRI sequences, including steady-state free precession (SSFP), single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE), T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences.[26]
Ultrasonography
Prenatal imaging findings (see the images below) include hypoechoic cysts of variable sizes and shapes, interfaces between cysts, a nonmedial location of large cysts, the absence of an identifiable renal sinus, a lack of communication between cysts on sonograms, and minimal surrounding parenchyma.[27] Only 20% of MCDKs have an identifiable reniform shape (compared with 90% of hydronephrotic kidneys). Bilateral MCDK may occur with oligohydramnios as a result of poor urine production. The cysts of MCDK may become enlarged, may shrink, or may involute during fetal life.[19, 20, 21, 17]
Antenatally, MCDK is one of the most common renal anomalies detected during ultrasound examination, with an incidence of between 1 in 1000 and 1 in 4300 live births. The diagnosis of MCDK is often made antenatally, with multiple small cysts becoming evident as early as the 15th week of gestation.[18]
A coronal prenatal sonogram of the retroperitoneum shows both kidneys. The cystic hypoechoic area is the right multicystic kidney. The normal kidney looks slightly hypoechoic and lobulated.
A prenatal sonogram shows the right multicystic dysplastic kidney in a longitudinal view. The spine underlies the affected kidney.
If MCDK is indicated on prenatal sonograms, postnatal ultrasonography (shown in the images below) should be completed before the patient is discharged home from the hospital. The diagnostic criteria for postnatal ultrasonography are the same as those for prenatal ultrasonography. Associated urologic anomalies such as ispilateral ureterocele and fusion anomalies may also be detected.
A longitudinal sonogram of the right kidney shows multiple diffuse hypoechoic renal cysts, without any significant normal renal parenchyma.
A Longitudinal sonogram of the right kidney shows multiple diffuse, hypoechoic renal cysts, without any significant normal renal parenchyma.
Degree of confidence
Ultrasonography is an excellent diagnostic test for MCDK, with a high degree of confidence. An obstructive uropathy with little renal parenchyma can mimic MCDK, but radionuclide studies can provide confirmation of the diagnosis. Autosomal recessive PCKD is not usually mistaken for MCDK, as the cysts in PCKD are too small to be visualized on ultrasonograms, and the parenchyma is generally homogeneously hyperechoic. Other renal cystic diseases typically appear with some functional parenchyma. Hepatic cysts are not seen in association with MCDK.
The greatest source of false-positive errors occurs in the setting of hydronephrosis or UPJO. A reniform shape and/or a large cystic structure in the medial portion of the kidney are more indicative of hydronephrosis than MCDK. Unlike in hydronephrosis, where there is communication with the central renal pelvis, the cysts of the classic form of MCDK do not communicate.
Regarding false-negative results, renal agenesis with nonrenal cystic structures in the retroperitoneum (eg, an adrenal cystic mass) could potentially be mistaken for MCDK.
Nuclear Imaging
Nuclear renograms are used to evaluate the perfusion, function, and drainage of the kidneys, as there is uptake of the radiotracer into a functioning kidney and excretion into the renal pelvis, ureter, and bladder. In the area of the MCDK, a photopenic region is present that represents displaced tissue with background activity only.[19]
(See the images below.)
Initial perfusion images from a nuclear renal scan. Note the normal uptake and concentration of the radiotracer in the left kidney. No uptake or concentration of radiotracer is seen in the right MCDK, leaving a photopenic area in the right renal fossa.
More delayed images from the same renal scanning examination as in the previous image shows a concentration of radiotracer in the normal left kidney and excretion into the left ureter and bladder. Uptake of radiotracer in the right multicystic dysplastic kidney is minimal.
Degree of confidence
Nuclear medicine studies are the best imaging studies for differentiating between MCDK and hydronephrosis; however, severe hydronephrosis with poor renal function may still be difficult to distinguish from MCDK. The similarity may not be clinically relevant because reconstructive surgery is usually not indicated in the setting of poor (ie, < 10-15%) differential function.
MAG-3, diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (DTPA), and dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) are the preferred agents. Tests with these agents are sensitive for detecting renal function, but the anatomic resolution is relatively poor. Other forms of imaging are required to visualize the specific anatomy of the kidney.
False positives/negatives
On a nuclear renogram, anything that impairs the renal circulation, such as a renal artery stenosis or a renal vein thrombosis, appears as a nonfunctioning kidney; nevertheless, the renal parenchyma should appear relatively normal with ultrasonography. In addition, renal agenesis may mimic the nonfunctioning kidney of MCDK, but the tissue is absent on ultrasonograms.
False-negative results may arise in the setting of severe hydronephrosis. In a poorly functioning kidney, the intervention is the same as in MCDK; therefore, discriminating between these 2 disorders may not be imperative.
Author
John S Wiener, MD, FACS, FAAP Professor of Urologic Surgery and Pediatrics, Head, Section of Pediatric Urology, Duke University Medical Center
John S Wiener, MD, FACS, FAAP is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Urological Association, Societies for Pediatric Urology, Society for Fetal Urology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Coauthor(s)
Ana Maria Gaca, MD Assistant Professor, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Duke University Medical Center
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Specialty Editor Board
Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Kieran McHugh, MB, BCh Honorary Lecturer, The Institute of Child Health; Consultant Pediatric Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
Kieran McHugh, MB, BCh is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Royal College of Radiologists
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Chief Editor
Eugene C Lin, MD Attending Radiologist, Teaching Coordinator for Cardiac Imaging, Radiology Residency Program, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine
Eugene C Lin, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Medicine, American College of Radiology, Radiological Society of North America, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Additional Contributors
Lori Lee Barr, MD, FACR, FAIUM Clinical Assistant Professor of Radiology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston School of Medicine; Member, Board of Directors, Austin Radiological Association; Consulting Staff, Seton Health Network, Columbia/St David's Healthcare System, Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin, Georgetown Hospital, St Mark's Medical Center, Cedar Park Regional Medical Center
Lori Lee Barr, MD, FACR, FAIUM is a member of the following medical societies: American Roentgen Ray Society, Association of University Radiologists, Southern Medical Association, Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society, American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology, Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound, Texas Radiological Society, American Association for Women Radiologists, American College of Radiology, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, Radiological Society of North America, Society for Pediatric Radiology
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Acknowledgements
Michaella E Maloney Duke University School of Medicine
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.
Kiyak A, Yilmaz A, Turhan P, Sander S, Aydin G, Aydogan G. Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: single-center experience. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009 Jan. 24(1):99-104. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Schukfeh N, Kuebler JF, Schirg E, Petersen C, Ure BM, Glüer S. Dysplastic kidney and not renal agenesis is the commonly associated anomaly in infants with seminal vesicle cyst. BJU Int. 2009 Mar. 103(6):816-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Singh JK, Kanojia RP, Narasimhan KL. Multicystic dysplastic kidney in children--a need for conservative and long term approach. Indian J Pediatr. 2009 Aug. 76(8):809-12. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Schreuder MF, Westland R, van Wijk JA. Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: a meta-analysis of observational studies on the incidence, associated urinary tract malformations and the contralateral kidney. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009 Jun. 24(6):1810-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Hussain S, Begum N. Multicystic dysplastic disease of kidney in fetus. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2007 Apr-Jun. 19(2):68-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Cardona-Grau D, Kogan BA. Update on Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney. Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Oct. 16 (10):67. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Fu F, Chen F, Li R, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal multicystic dysplastic kidney via high-resolution whole-genome array. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Oct. 31 (10):1693-8. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Lei TY, Fu F, Li R, Yu QX, Du K, Zhang WW, et al. Whole‐exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract detected by ultrasonography. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2020. May 21. doi: 10.1002/pd.5737. Online ahead of print.:[QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Wiener JS. Multicystic dysplastic kidney. Belman AB, King LR, Kramer SA, eds. Clinical Pediatric Urology. 4th ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2002. 633-45.
Levine E, Hartman DS, Meilstrup JW, Van Slyke MA, Edgar KA, Barth JC. Current concepts and controversies in imaging of renal cystic diseases. Urol Clin North Am. 1997 Aug. 24(3):523-43. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Spence HM. Congenital unilateral multicystic kidney: an entity to be distinguished from polycystic kidney disease and other cystic disorders. J Urol. 1955 Dec. 74(6):693-706. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Zerin JM, Baker DR, Casale JA. Single-system ureteroceles in infants and children: imaging features. Pediatr Radiol. 2000. 30:139-46. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Tardáguila Calvo AR, Parente Hernandez A, Angulo Madero JM, Romero Ruiz RM, Rivas Vila S. Multicystic segmentary renal displasia associated to ureterocele and simple renal cysts in a newborn. Arch Esp Urol. 2017. 70:322-323. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Gimpel C, Avni EF, Breysem L, Burgmaier K, Caroli A, Cetiner M, et al. Imaging of Kidney Cysts and Cystic Kidney Diseases in Children: An International Working Group Consensus Statement. Radiology. 2019. 290:769-782. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Scala C, McDonnell S, Murphy F, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Khalil A, Bhide A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of midtrimester antenatal ultrasound for multicystic dysplastic kidneys. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct. 50 (4):464-469. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
Balasundaram M, Chock VY, Wu HY, Blumenfeld YJ, Hintz SR. Predictors of poor neonatal outcomes in prenatally diagnosed multicystic dysplastic kidney disease. J Perinatol. 2018 Jun. 38 (6):658-664. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Ayaz S, Dilli A, Gültekin SS, Ayaz ÜY. Cyst-to-kidney volume ratio in the sonographic diagnosis of unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney in children. Med Ultrason. 2017 Apr 22. 19 (2):159-165. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Psooy K, Collaboration with the Pediatric Urologists of Canada (PUC). Multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) in the neonate: The role of the urologist. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 Jan-Feb. 10 (1-2):18-24. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Whittam BM, Calaway A, Szymanski KM, Carroll AE, Misseri R, Kaefer M, et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of multicystic dysplastic kidney: is a confirmatory nuclear medicine scan necessary?. J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Dec. 10 (6):1059-62. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Sarhan OM, Alghanbar M, Alsulaihim A, Alharbi B, Alotay A, Nakshabandi Z. Multicystic dysplastic kidney: Impact of imaging modality selection on the initial management and prognosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Aug. 10 (4):645-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Sarhan OM, Alghanbar M, Alsulaihim A, Alharbi B, Alotay A, Nakshabandi Z. Multicystic dysplastic kidney: Impact of imaging modality selection on the initial management and prognosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Aug. 10 (4):645-9. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Yadav P, Sureka SK, Ansari MS, Soni R, Lal H. Large Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney Mimicking a Large Cystic Renal Neoplasm. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May. 11 (5):PD03-PD04. [QxMD MEDLINE Link]. [Full Text].
Blachman-Braun R, Camp MM, Becerra MF, et al. Voiding Cystourethrogram in Children With Unilateral Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney: Is It Still necessary?. Urology. 2020 May. 139:156-160. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Blachman-Braun R, Camp MM, Becerra MF, Guevara CG, Velasquez MC, Moscardi PRM, et al. Voiding Cystourethrogram in Children With Unilateral Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney: Is It Still necessary?. Urology. 2020. 139:156-160. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Wood CG 3rd, Stromberg LJ 3rd, Harmath CB, Horowitz JM, Feng C, Hammond NA, et al. CT and MR imaging for evaluation of cystic renal lesions and diseases. Radiographics. 2015 Jan-Feb. 35 (1):125-41. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Ji H, Dong SZ. Magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of foetal multicystic dysplastic kidney. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Nov. 108:128-132. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].
Chaara H, Adadi H, Attar I, et al. [Prenatal diagnosis of multicystic dysplastic kidney: about 18 cases]. Pan Afr Med J. 2019. 33:279. [QxMD MEDLINE Link].