Transureteroureterostomy Treatment & Management

Updated: Aug 15, 2018
  • Author: Bradley Fields Schwartz, DO, FACS; Chief Editor: Edward David Kim, MD, FACS  more...
  • Print

Medical Therapy

No medical substitute for transureteroureterostomy (TUU) exists. This is strictly a surgical issue and is simply one technique available to reconstitute ureteral integrity.


Surgical Therapy

The discussion below addresses TUU performed via the open surgical approach. Although laparoscopic TUU has been described in humans, this approach needs to mature before it can become commonplace, and the infrequency in which laparoscopic TUU is performed represents the most significant obstacle to its maturation. Robotic surgery may have a role in TUU as new robotic techniques develop.


Preoperative Details

Similar to most urologic procedures, TUU may be performed in various ways. The most common involves a transperitoneal midline approach with the patient in the supine position. Flexion of the table, placement of a lumbar roll, or Trendelenburg positioning may aid in exposure and bowel retraction. Standard prophylactic antibiotics are administered 1-2 hours preoperatively; in the case of infected urine, culture-directed therapy is used. Bowel preparation is not necessary unless an ileal ureter is contemplated in the event a TUU cannot be performed. Cystoscopy and stent placement prior to the incision may aid in ureter identification and intraoperative stent positioning.


Intraoperative Details

The retroperitoneum is exposed after the bowel is either packed out of the way or placed in a bowel bag. The ureters are best identified where they cross the iliac vessels anteriorly. The posterior peritoneum is incised using either 2 separate longitudinal incisions or 1 large transverse incision.

The 2 ureters are examined and assessed for mobility and length. If the disease process is bilateral, the most amenable ureter is chosen to implant. The ureter is then mobilized above the diseased portion to the ipsilateral ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) while the periureteric tissue is maintained to preserve its blood supply. Stripping the ureter of this rich source of vascularity places the ureter at great risk of ischemia and subsequent stricture or necrosis. The recipient ureter needs to be mobilized only a short distance (1-4 cm) to limit periureteral trauma.

When the left ureter is transposed, it is passed inferiorly to the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) without kinking or obstruction, or it is passed superiorly to the IMA in a more oblique fashion. The latter route causes the anastomosis to be more proximal on the recipient ureter. Transposing the ureter caudad to the IMA predisposes the ureter to obstruction by the vascular structures. Either method is acceptable as long as the surgeon is aware of the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques.

Once the ureter is transected and brought across the midline in a retroperitoneal tunnel, tension absolutely must be avoided. To gain more distance, the ureter can be mobilized up to the kidney. The recipient ureter can also be mobilized if necessary, taking care to preserve the periureteral tissue. As a final resort, the receiving kidney may be mobilized and nephropexy performed. This maneuver can provide an additional 2-4 cm of length.

When a tension-free anastomosis is ensured, the donor ureter is spatulated 15-20 mm. If an end-to-end procedure is performed, both ureters are spatulated. A 15-mm ureterotomy into the receiving ureter is made so that the donor ureter will drain in a dependent position, usually at a 45º angle.

The ureteroureteral anastomosis may be performed in various methods. A watertight, tension-free anastomosis using absorbable sutures should be performed. Use two 4-0 running absorbable sutures, such as Vicryl or Dexon, starting at each apex and finishing at the contralateral apex. Stenting is decided by the surgeon. The author's practice has been to place 4.8F double pigtail stents up each proximal ureter, through the common distal ureter, and into the bladder. This can be accomplished intraoperatively, similar to that performed during an ileal conduit.

Retroperitonealization of the ureters may limit urine leak into the peritoneal cavity. Caution must be taken not to injure the ureters when this is performed. A drain is placed in the area of the anastomosis and brought out to the abdominal wall through a separate stab incision.


Postoperative Details

The Foley catheter remains for 3-5 days to limit reflux up the stented ureter. The drain is removed a day after the Foley comes out or when drainage significantly diminishes. The stents remain for 4-6 weeks, at which time retrograde ureterography can be performed. If extravasation at the anastomosis occurs, the stents stay in for another 2 weeks. Otherwise, the stents are removed. IVP is performed 4-6 weeks after the stents are removed to rule out silent obstruction and to check the patency of the repair.



IVP is repeated at 6 months, 1 year postoperatively, and then yearly. Renal ultrasonography may be substituted for yearly surveillance, although urine leak may not demonstrate hydronephrosis.

For excellent patient education resources, see eMedicineHealth's patient education article Intravenous Pyelogram.



Assuming meticulous surgical technique and proper patient selection, the complication rate should be less than 5-10%. Complications are classified based on their time of occurrence—intraoperative, postoperative, and long-term. Only complications specifically related to urologic aspects are discussed.

The surgeon must keep in mind the potential for coronary events, pulmonary complications, deep venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism. Intraoperative complications include injury to adjacent structures such as bowel or vascular structures. Care must be taken when the bowel is retracted because lacerations or mesentery injuries may occur. The aorta, inferior vena cava, and iliac vessels are in the operative field and must be identified and spared throughout the procedure. Inadequate ureteral length may be encountered. This may lead to ureteral kinking and subsequent obstruction. Stent malposition can lead to obstruction and eventual breakdown of the anastomosis.

Lastly, a tension-free watertight anastomosis prevents prolonged urinary leakage. Anastomotic leak is the most frequently encountered complication and manifests as increased drain output. The fluid obtained can be measured for creatinine; an elevated level indicates urine. Use of abdominal radiography (kidneys, ureters, and bladder [KUB]) ensures proper stent placement. Prolonged urinary drainage usually resolves within 3-5 days with observation and patience. If anastomotic breakdown has occurred or distal obstruction is present, the drainage persists and evaluation with IVP or CT scan is indicated. Bilateral percutaneous nephrostomy tube drainage may be necessary if the urine leak is prolonged.

The possibility of delayed complications makes long-term follow-up of these patients' cases imperative. Late anastomotic leak may manifest as urinoma formation, fever, ureterocutaneous fistula formation, small-bowel obstruction, or ureterointestinal fistula. Occurrence of any of these problems mandates an evaluation for distal ureteral obstruction. This may be because of stones, recurrent pelvic disease such as malignancy, inflammatory disease, abscess, or radiation injury. Small-bowel obstruction may occur many years after surgery and usually responds to conservative management. Urinary fistulae are treated initially with ureteral stenting and Foley catheterization. Place percutaneous nephrostomy tubes bilaterally if stenting is unsuccessful. Open repair and, finally, nephrectomy are used as last resorts.


Outcome and Prognosis

The outcome and prognosis of patients undergoing transureteroureterostomy (TUU) depends on numerous factors. If the underlying disease process is progressive, then involvement of the common ureter may occur. Patients who have pelvic malignancies and/or a history of radiation therapy have the most potential for failure. As mentioned above, poor surgical technique that leads to prolonged leak, fistula, or stricture is the leading cause of failure in these patients.

A retrospective contemporary series was reported in 2010 with 63 patients undergoing this procedure over a 20-year period. [7] They experienced an approximately 25% complication rate including ureteral stricture, urine leak, and stone disease.

A group from France monitored the cases of 69 patients for a minimum of 1 year at a median of 6 years after TUU was performed. [8] They reported complications in 4 (6.3%) patients, including a urinoma that required open drainage, prolonged urinary leak, common ureteral necrosis, and progressive renal failure in the donor kidney. Long-term follow-up is stressed because 2 of these complications occurred as late as 3 and 4 years postoperatively. In a recent study that compared the performance of 34 TUUs with 67 ileal conduit urinary diversions, TUU favored well in terms of reoperation and early and late complications. [9]

The National Cancer Institute performed TUU in 10 patients for pelvic malignancy. [10] Mean follow-up was 77.9 months (range, 2-191 mo). One patient experienced common ureteral stricture, one patient underwent pyelolithotomy and subsequent nephrectomy, recurrence of disease with ureteral obstruction occurred in one patient, and one patient experienced unilateral disease progression in a case of vasculitis/fibrosis. One patient died of sepsis due to urine leak at the anastomosis, one patient died of myocardial infarction, and 3 patients died of metastatic disease of their primary process. While these results may not appear promising, one must keep in mind the patient population with whom these physicians were working. All 10 patients had extensive pelvic malignancy, with 4 patients receiving radiation therapy and 5 patients receiving chemotherapy.

Recently, a series of 12 patients undergoing multiorgan resection for nonurinary malignancy was reported. [11] Intraoperative ureteral resection necessitated TUU. A follow-up of 15 months demonstrated preserved renal function in 9 of these patients. Cancer recurrence caused obstruction in the remaining 3 patients. The authors concluded that this procedure is safe and effective in this subset of patients.

TUU is one more tool in the urologists' armamentarium that, when performed well, is a successful operation. Patient selection, meticulous attention to detail in the operating room, and long-term follow-up improve the results of this challenging procedure.


Future and Controversies

Transureteroureterostomy (TUU) faces possible extinction as tissue substitutes and tissue-engineering technology improves. Robotic applications to TUU hold promise. Recent FDA approval of a metal stent has provided dwelling times of one year between changes. This may also affect the number of times this procedure is performed. In less-developed parts of the world, TUU may continue to be the only option for significant ureteral stricture in the pelvis.