Hemophilia B Treatment & Management

Updated: Jun 08, 2017
  • Author: Robert A Zaiden, MD; Chief Editor: Srikanth Nagalla, MBBS, MS, FACP  more...
  • Print

Approach Considerations

The treatment of hemophilia may involve management of hemostasis, management of bleeding episodes, use of factor replacement products and medications, treatment of patients with factor inhibitors, and treatment and rehabilitation of patients with hemophilia synovitis.

Treatment of patients with hemophilia ideally should be provided through a comprehensive hemophilia care center. These centers follow a multidisciplinary approach, with specialists in hematology, orthopedics, dentistry, and surgery; nurses; physiotherapists; social workers; and related allied health professionals. Patients treated at comprehensive care clinics have been shown to have better access to care, less morbidity, and better overall outcome.

Ambulatory replacement therapy for bleeding episodes is essential for preventing chronic arthropathy and deformities. Home treatment and infusion by the family or patient is possible in most cases. Prompt and appropriate treatment of hemorrhage is important to prevent long-term complications and disability.

Dose calculations are directed toward achieving a factor IX (FIX) activity level of 30% for most mild hemorrhages, of at least 50% for severe bleeds (eg, from trauma) or for prophylaxis of major dental surgery or major surgery, and 80-100% in life-threatening hemorrhage. Hospitalization is reserved for severe or life-threatening bleeds, such as large soft tissue bleeds; retroperitoneal hemorrhage; and hemorrhage related to head injury, surgery, or dental work.

Patients are treated with prophylaxis or intermittent, on-demand therapy for bleeding events. Prophylaxis has been shown in many studies to prevent or at least reduce the progression of damage to target sites, such as joints. [6, 7] According to a review of six randomized controlled trials, preventative therapy started early in childhood, as compared to on-demand treatment, is able to reduce total bleeds and bleeding into joints resulting in a decrease in overall joint deterioration and an improvement in patient quality of life. [8]

In most developed countries with access to recombinant product, prophylaxis is primary (ie, therapy is started in patients as young as 1 y and continues into adolescence). A cost-benefit analysis indicates that this approach reduces overall factor use and significantly reduces morbidity. [9] In situations in which this is not feasible, secondary prophylaxis (ie, therapy after a target joint has been established to prevent worsening of the joint) is instituted for a defined period. [10, 11]

Dosing is designed to maintain trough levels greater than 2%. With the development of FIX preparations that have extended half-lives, dosing for routine prophylaxis may be as infrequent as every 10 days.

In the future, oral administration of FIX for prophylaxis may become possible, through the use of hydrogel carriers that protect FIX from destruction in the stomach and release it in the intestines. [12] Gene therapy offers the potential for a definitive cure, and has shown promise in small trials in humans. [13]

For related information, see Hemophilia A, Acquired Hemophilia, and Hemophilia C.


Prehospital Care

Prehospital providers should address the emergency ABCs (airway, breathing, circulation) while rapidly transporting the patient to a definitive care facility. In the prehospital setting, providers should do the following:

  • Apply aggressive hemostatic techniques
  • Assist patients capable of self-administered factor therapy
  • Gather focused historical data if the patient is unable to communicate

Emergency Department Care

Before a patient with hemophilia is treated, the following information should be obtained:

  • The type and severity of factor deficiency
  • The nature of the hemorrhage or the planned procedure
  • The patient's previous treatments with blood products
  • Whether inhibitors are present and if so, their probable titer

Use aggressive hemostatic techniques. Correct coagulopathy immediately. Include a diagnostic workup for hemorrhage, but never delay indicated coagulation correction pending diagnostic testing. If possible, draw blood for the coagulation studies (see Workup), including 2 blue-top tubes to be spun and frozen for factor and inhibitor assays.

If admission is indicated, disposition (ICU vs floor) should be based on severity of hemorrhage and potential for morbidity and death. Choose attending service based on etiology of hemorrhage. Hematology/ blood bank/pathology consultation is mandatory.

Further outpatient care for patients with minor hemorrhage (not life threatening) consists of continued hemostatic measures (eg, brief joint immobilization, bandage). Hematologist or primary care physician follow-up care is indicated. The patient should continue factor replacement and monitoring.

If a patient has HIV seroconversion, arrange appropriate outpatient care at a specialty infectious disease clinic, monitor the patient's CD4 count, observe the patient for adverse effects of anti-HIV treatment, and monitor for and treat possible opportunistic infections.


Factor IX Concentrates

Various FIX concentrates are available to treat hemophilia B. Fresh frozen plasma is no longer used in hemophilia because of the lack of safe viral elimination and concerns regarding volume overload. Cryoprecipitate contains no factor IX and is not appropriate for factor IX therapy.

Various purification techniques are used in plasma-based FIX concentrates to reduce or eliminate the risk of viral transmission, including heat treatment, cryoprecipitation, and chemical precipitation. These techniques inactivate viruses such as hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, and HIV. However, the transmission of nonenveloped viruses (eg, parvovirus and hepatitis A virus) and poorly characterized agents (eg, prions) is still a potential problem.

Recombinant FIX products (eg, BeneFIX, Rixubis, Alprolix) are commercially available and have a lower risk of viral contamination. Each of the brands is FDA-approved for control and prevention of bleeding episodes, and for perioperative management in adults and children. Rixubis and Alprolix are also approved for routine prophylaxis in adults and children.

Idelvion, a long-acting recombinant FIX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP, albutrepenonacog alfa) was approved in March 2016 for on-demand control and prevention of bleeding episodes, management of postoperative bleeding, and as prophylaxis to reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes. Approval was based on open-label trials in children and adults (n=90) with severe hemophilia B (FIX activity <2%). Mean trough levels of FIX activity were 20 IU/dL on prophylaxis with rIX-FP 40 IU/kg weekly and 12 IU/dL FIX on prophylaxis with 75 IU/kg every 2 weeks.The switch from on-demand treatment to prophylaxis with rIX-FP resulted in a 100% reduction in median annualized spontaneous bleeding rate and 100% resolution of target joints (P <0.0001). [14]

Rixubis approval for adults was based on a study demonstrating that twice-weekly prophylactic treatment for 6 months achieved a median annualized bleed rate of 2.0 with 43% of patients experiencing no bleeds. [15, 16]

Rebinyn (nonacog beta pegol) is a recombinant glycopegylated FIX with an extended half-life. Pegylation slows removal of FIX from the blood circulation. Rebinyn was approved by the FDA in June 2017 for control and prevention of bleeding episodes and for perioperative management in adults and children. [17]

Doses of FIX concentrate are calculated according to the severity and location of bleeding. Guidelines for dosing are provided in Table 2 below. As a rule, FIX 1 U/kg increases FIX plasma levels by 1%. The reaction half-time is 16 hours.

Target levels by hemorrhage severity are as follows:

  • Mild hemorrhages (ie, early hemarthrosis, epistaxis, gingival bleeding): Maintain a FIX level of 30%
  • Major hemorrhages (ie, hemarthrosis or muscle bleeds with pain and swelling, prophylaxis after head trauma with negative findings on examination): Maintain a FIX level of 50%
  • Life-threatening bleeding episodes (ie, major trauma or surgery, advanced or recurrent hemarthrosis): Maintain a FIX level of 80-90%. Plasma levels are maintained above 40-50% for a minimum of 7-10 days

Table 2. General Guidelines for Factor Replacement for the Treatment of Bleeding in Hemophilia B (Open Table in a new window)

Indication or Site of Bleeding Factor level Desired, % FIX Dose, IU/kg* Comment
Severe epistaxis; mouth, lip, tongue, or dental work 20-50 20-50 Consider aminocaproic acid (Amicar), 1-2 d
Joint (hip or groin) 40 40 Repeat transfusion in 24-48 h
Soft tissue or muscle 20-40 40 No therapy if site small and not enlarging (transfuse if enlarging)
Muscle (calf and forearm) 30-40 40 None
Muscle deep (thigh, hip, iliopsoas) 40-60 40-60 Transfuse, repeat at 24 h, then as needed
Neck or throat 50-80 50-80 None
Hematuria 40 40 Transfuse to 40% then rest and hydration
Laceration 40 40 Transfuse until wound healed
GI or retroperitoneal bleeding 60-80 60-80 None
Head trauma (no evidence of CNS bleeding) 50 50 None
Head trauma (probable or definite CNS bleeding, eg, headache, vomiting, neurologic signs) 100 100 Maintain peak and trough factor levels at 100% and 50% for 14 d if CNS bleeding documented
Trauma with bleeding, surgery 80-100 100 10-14 d

Variations in responses related to patient or product parameters make determinations of factor levels important. These determinations are performed immediately after infusions and thereafter to ensure an adequate response and maintenance levels. Obtain factor assay levels daily before each infusion to establish a stable pattern of replacement regarding the dose and frequency of administration.


Management of Bleeding Episodes by Site

Musculoskeletal bleeding

The most common sites of clinically significant bleeding are joint spaces. Weight-bearing joints in the lower extremities are often target areas for recurrent bleeding. Joint hemorrhage is associated with pain and limitation in the range of motion, which is followed by progressive swelling in the involved joint.

Immobilization of the affected limb and the application of ice packs are helpful in diminishing swelling and pain.

Early infusion upon the recognition of pain may often eliminate the need for a second infusion by preventing the inflammatory reaction in the joint. Prompt and adequate replacement therapy is the key to preventing long-term complications. Cases in which treatment begins late or causes no response may require repeated infusions for 2-3 days.

Do not aspirate hemarthroses unless they are severe and involve significant pain and synovial tension. Some hemarthroses may pose particular problems because they interfere with the blood supply.

Hip joint hemorrhages can be complicated by aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. Administer adequate replacement therapy for at least 3 days.

Deep intramuscular hematomas are difficult to detect and may result in serious muscular contractions. Appropriate and timely replacement therapy is important to prevent such disabilities.

Iliopsoas muscle bleeding may be difficult to differentiate from hemarthrosis of the hip joint. Physical examination usually reveals normal hip rotation but significant limitation of extension.

Ultrasonography in the involved region may reveal a hematoma in the iliopsoas muscle. This condition requires adequate replacement therapy for 10-14 days and a physical therapy regimen that strengthens the supporting musculature.

Closed-compartment hemorrhages pose a significant risk of damaging the neurovascular bundle. These occur in the upper arm, forearm, wrist, and palm of the hand. They cause swelling, pain, tingling, numbness, and loss of distal arterial pulses. Infusion must be aimed at maintaining a normal level of FIX.

Other interventions include elevation of the affected part to enhance venous return and, rarely, surgical decompression.

Oral bleeding

Oral bleeding from the frenulum and bleeding after tooth extractions are not uncommon. Bleeding is aggravated by the increased fibrinolytic activity of the saliva.

Combine adequate replacement therapy with an antifibrinolytic agent (e-aminocaproic acid [EACA]) to neutralize the fibrinolytic activity in the oral cavity.

Topical agents such as fibrin sealant, bovine thrombin, and human recombinant thrombin can also be used. [18]

Hematoma in the pharynx or epiglottic regions frequently results in partial or complete airway obstruction; therefore, it should be treated with aggressive infusion therapy. Such bleeding may be precipitated by local infection or surgery.

Administer prophylactic factor infusion therapy before an oral surgical procedure to prevent the need for further treatment.

GI bleeding

GI bleeds are unusual compared with those associated with von Willebrand disease and, therefore, require an evaluation for an underlying cause. Depending on their location, they may be confused with acute abdomen or appendicitis. Manage GI hemorrhage with repeated or continuous infusions to maintain nearly normal circulating levels of FIX.

Intracranial bleeding

Intracranial hemorrhage is often trauma induced; in the pediatric population, spontaneous intracranial hemorrhages are more common than those related to trauma. If CNS hemorrhage is suspected, immediately begin an infusion prior to radiologic confirmation. Maintain the factor level in the normal range for 7-10 days until a permanent clot is established.

All head injuries must be managed with close observation and investigated by imaging such as CT scanning or MRI. If the patient is not hospitalized, instruct the patient and his or her family regarding the neurologic signs and symptoms of CNS bleeding so that the patient can know when to return for reinfusion.


Treatment of Patients with Inhibitors

Inhibitors are antibodies that neutralize FIX and can render replacement therapy ineffective. FIX inhibitors are less common than FVIII inhibitors; they occur found in only 1-3% of patients with severe hemophilia B. These inhibitors typically appear after the first infusions of FIX concentrate. Patients with FIX inhibitors can have anaphylactic reactions to FIX infusions, and may develop steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome due to immune complex formation; this typically occurs in individuals with complete gene deletions.

The relatively low frequency of FIX inhibitors has lead to a dearth of experience in its treatment. Early hematology consultation for these patients is essential.

Low-titer inhibitors and, occasionally, high-titer inhibitors can be overcome with high doses of FIX concentrate. Recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is indicated for the treatment of patients with bleeding episodes and for the prevention of bleeding in surgical interventions or invasive procedures in patients with inhibitors to FIX. [19]

Activated prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) has shown promise, although it may trigger disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) at doses greater than 200 IU/kg/d. Desensitization and immune-tolerance strategies in those with identified inhibitors have been successful as well.

Recombinant activated FVIIa

Recombinant activated FVIIa (Eptacog Alfa, Novo Seven) is a vitamin K–dependent glycoprotein that is structurally similar to human plasma–derived FVIIa. [20] It is manufactured by using DNA biotechnology. Intravenous recombinant FVIIa has also been studied for treating bleeding episodes and for providing hemostasis during surgery in patients with particular bleeding diathesis.

Recombinant FVIIa is also effective and well tolerated in patients with acquired hemophilia and in those with Glanzmann thrombasthenia.

To date, recombinant activated FVIIa has proven to be relatively free of the risk of antigenicity, thrombogenicity, and viral transmission. However, the cost of this product has precluded its use as prophylaxis in patients with FIX inhibitors; when recombinant activated FVIIa has been used for this indication, select patients have had severe complications related to bleeding.

In pediatric patients, off-label treatment with recombinant FVIIa significantly reduced blood product administration, with 82% of patients subjectively classified as responders. Clinical context and pH values before administration were independently associated with response and 28-day mortality. Thromboembolic adverse events were reported in 5.4% of patients. [21]


Desensitization in nonemergency situations also may be feasible. This therapy includes large doses of FIX along with steroids or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and cyclophosphamide. Success rates of 50-80% have been reported. In life-threatening bleeding, methods to quickly remove the inhibiting antibody have been tried. Examples include vigorous plasmapheresis in conjunction with immunosuppression and infusion of FIX with or without antifibrinolytic therapy.

Immune tolerance induction

In immune tolerance induction (ITI), a person is rendered tolerant to FIX by means of daily exposure to FIX over several months to years. [22] The overall likelihood of success with ITI is 70% ± 10%. In patients with high-titer FIX inhibitors, ITI is less successful than it is in patients with FVIII inhibitors.

First described by Backmann in 1977, ITI has been used, with variations in the dosing schedule for FIX and with or without immunosuppressive therapy. This technique is well established in acquired hemophilia but not in congenital hemophilia.

Rituximab, a chimeric human-mouse monoclonal antibody against CD20, has been used with success in patients with hemophilia B and high titer inhibitors. [23] Reports describe durable complete responses with brief courses of rituximab and prednisone with or without cyclophosphamide in patients with autoimmune hemophilia and inhibitor titers of 5 to more than 200 BU. [24] Rituximab appears to be more effective in treating inhibitors in acquired hemophilia than in hereditary hemophilia. [25, 26]

In several small trials, a 4-week course of weekly rituximab has resulted in durable and complete responses. The addition of prednisone with or without cyclophosphamide has increased response rates.

An international immune tolerance study was started in 2002 to compare the efficiency, morbidity, and cost-effectiveness of low- versus high-dose ITI. For information, please see the study Web site Immune Tolerance Induction Study.


Prophylactic Factor Infusions

Most of the care for children with severe forms of hemophilia now takes place at home, in the community, and at school, allowing children with hemophilia to participate in normal activities that are otherwise impossible. This resulted from the development of prophylactic regimens of factor concentrate infusions that are administered at home, usually by a parent.

The main goal of prophylactic treatment is to prevent bleeding symptoms and organ damage, in particular to joints. Hemophilic arthropathy that results from recurrent or target joint bleeding can be prevented by this method.

Prophylaxis is not universally accepted, with only about one third of children with hemophilia B receiving this treatment modality in the United States. Reasons cited for the lack of acceptance of this modality include need for venous access, factor availability, repeated venipunctures, cost, and others.

Research questions that remain unanswered include when to initiate and stop infusions, dosing, and dose schedule. Tools have now been developed to assess long-treatment effects.

The long-acting recombinant FIX albumin fusion protein (Idelvion) was approved in March 2016. It is approved for prophylaxis to reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes. Adults who respond to once weekly prophylaxis may be switched to a slightly higher dose administered every 2 weeks. Clinical trial results demonstrated a 100% reduction in median annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) and 100% resolution of target joints when subjects switched from on-demand to prophylaxis treatment with rIX-FP (P <0.0001). [14]

In June 2013, the FDA approved the first recombinant coagulation factor IX (Rixubis) specifically indicated for the routine prevention of bleeding in patients with hemophilia B in children and adults. [27, 28] In addition to routine prophylaxis (prevention or reduction in frequency of bleeding episodes), Rixubis is indicated for the control of bleeding episodes and perioperative management in these patients. This purified protein is supplied in single-use vials of freeze-dried powder, and it is injected intravenously after reconstitution with sterile water. For routine prophylaxis, Rixubis is administered twice a week. [27, 28]

Approval of Rixubis was based on a multicenter study of 73 males (age range, 12-65 years) who received the drug for routine prophylaxis or as needed for hemostasis. Patients taking this agent prophylactically had a 75% lower annual rate of bleeding relative to those who had received on-demand therapy. [27, 28] The most common side effects associated with Rixubis in clinical studies included distorted taste, pain in an extremity, and atypical blood test results. Life-threatening anaphylaxis occurred less commonly. [27, 28]

In September 2014, Rixubis was approved for routine prophylactic treatment, control and prevention of bleeding episodes, and perioperative management in children with hemophilia B. Approval was based on the results of a clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of Rixubis among 23 previously-treated male patients aged < 12 years with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B. The patients were treated with a twice-weekly prophylaxis regimen (mean dose 56 IU/kg; mean treatment duration 6 months, mean of 54 exposure days). The median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 2.0 (0.0 for spontaneous bleeds and joint bleeds). Nine patients in the study (39.1%) experienced no bleeds and 23 bleeding episodes (88.5%) were treated with 1-2 infusions. There were no reports of inhibitor development, no severe allergic reactions, and no thrombotic or treatment-related adverse events among the study participants. [16]

The long-acting recombinant Fc fusion factor IX (rFIXFc), Alprolix, was approved by the FDA in March 2014 for patients with hemophilia B. It is the first treatment designed to require less frequent injections for routine prophylaxis. The safety and efficacy were evaluated in a multicenter clinical trial that compared each of 2 prophylactic treatment regimens with on-demand treatment. A total of 123 individuals with severe hemophilia B, aged 12-71 years, were followed for up to 18 months. The studies demonstrated effectiveness in preventing and treating bleeding episodes and during perioperative management of patients undergoing surgical procedures. [29, 30]

In December 2013, the FDA expanded the indication for anti-inhibitor coagulant complex (Feiba NF) to include routine prophylaxis to prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A or B who have developed inhibitors. The approval was based on data from a pivotal Phase III study in which treatment with a prophylactic regimen showed a 72% reduction in median annual bleed rate (ABR) compared to treatment with an on-demand regimen. [31] An earlier study showed a 62% reduction in all bleeding episodes with anti-inhibitor coagulant complex prophylaxis compared with an on-demand regimen. [32]

Assessing adherence to prophylaxis

The Validated Hemophilia Regimen Treatment Adherence Scale–Prophylaxis (VERITAS-Pro) prophylaxis is a patient/parent questionnaire that uses 6 subscales (time, dose, plan, remember, skip, communicate), each containing 4 items, to assess patient adherence to prophylactic hemophilia treatment. In a study of 67 patients with hemophilia, including 53 with severe FVIII deficiency, Duncan et al found a strong correlation between VERITAS-Pro scores and adherence assessments (eg, infusion log entries). [33]


Pain Management

Pain management can be challenging in patients with severe hemophilia. Acute bleeding in joints and soft tissues can be extremely painful. This requires immediate analgesic relief.

Hemophilic chronic arthropathy is associated with pain. Narcotic agents have been used, but frequent use of these drugs may result in addiction. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may be used instead because their effects on platelet function are reversible and because these drugs can be effective in managing acute and chronic arthritic pain. Avoid aspirin because of its irreversible effect on platelet function.

Other analgesics may include acetaminophen in combination with small amounts of codeine or synthetic codeine analogs.



HIV-associated immune thrombocytic purpura is an exceedingly serious complication in patients with hemophilia because it may result in lethal intracranial bleeding. Correct platelet counts to more than 50,000/mL. Steroids are of limited effectiveness, and intravenous immunoglobulin or anti-Rh(D) generally induces transient remissions. Anti-HIV medications and splenectomies may result in long-term improvement of thrombocytopenia.

Allergic reactions are occasionally reported with the use of factor concentrates. Premedication or adjustment of the rate of infusion may resolve the problem.



Do not circumcise male infants born to mothers who are known or thought to be carriers of hemophilia until disease in the infant has been excluded with appropriate laboratory testing. Perform blood assays of FIX with cord blood. When a cord blood sample is not available, obtain a sample from a superficial limb vein; avoid femoral and jugular sites.

Routine immunizations that require injection (eg, diphtheria, tetanus toxoids, and pertussis [DPT] or measles-mumps-rubella [MMR] vaccines) may be given by means of a deep subcutaneous route (rather than deep intramuscular route) with a fine-gauge needle.

Administer the hepatitis B vaccine (now routinely administered to all children) soon after birth to all infants with hemophilia. Administer the hepatitis A vaccine to those individuals with hemophilia and no hepatitis A virus antibody in their serum.

In severe hemophilia, consider prophylactic or scheduled FIX infusions. Prophylactic replacement is used to maintain a measurable FIX level at all times, with the goal of avoiding hemarthrosis and the vicious cycle of repetitive bleeding and inflammation that results in destructive arthritis. [34] This goal is achieved by administering factor 2-3 times a week. The National Hemophilia Foundation has recommended the administration of primary prophylaxis, beginning at age 1-2 years.

Carrier testing may prevent births of individuals with major hemophilia. This testing can be offered to women interested in childbearing who have a family history of hemophilia. Prenatal diagnosis is important even if termination of the pregnancy is not desired because a cesarean delivery may be planned or replacement therapy can be scheduled for the perinatal period.

Phenotypic and genotypic (ie, restriction fragment–length polymorphism) methods have advantages and disadvantages.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis has been used as a possible alternative to prenatal diagnosis in combination with in vitro fertilization to help patients avoid having children with hemophilia or other serious inherited diseases. [35, 36, 37] The genetic diagnosis is made by using single cells obtained during biopsy from embryos before implantation. For this, fluorescence in situ hybridization is used. This technique circumvents pregnancy termination.



Generally, individuals with severe hemophilia should avoid high-impact contact sports and other activities with a significant risk of trauma. However, mounting evidence suggests that appropriate physical activity improves overall conditioning, reduces injury rate and severity, and improving psychosocial functioning.

Patients with severe hemophilia can bleed from any anatomic site after negligible or minor trauma, or they may even bleed spontaneously. Any physical activity may trigger bleeding in soft tissues. Prophylactic factor replacement early in life may help prevent bleeding during activity, as well as helping to prevent chronic arthritic and muscular damage and deformity.


Gene Therapy

With the cloning of FIX and advances in molecular technologies, the possibility of a cure for hemophilia with gene therapy was conceived. Substantial progress has been made in the development of gene therapy for hemophilia B. [38] This advancement reflects technical improvements of existing vector systems and the development of new delivery methods.

Preclinical studies in mice and dogs with hemophilia have resulted in long-term correction of the bleeding disorders and, in some cases, a permanent cure. However, the induction of neutralizing antibodies often precludes stable phenotypic correction.

In addition, the relatively high prevalence of antibodies against adeno-associated virus serotype 8 (AAV8), which is used as a vector, limits enrollment of clinical trial subjects. [39] Lentiviral vectors may offer an alternative to AAV8; Cantore and colleagues reported that gene therapy using lentiviral vectors was well tolerated and provided a stable long-term production of FIX in dogs with hemophilia B. [40]

Human trials have been performed in patients with hemophilia B. Nathwani and colleagues reported sustained long-term expression of therapeutic levels of FIX in 10 men with severe hemophilia B after a single intravenous infusion of an AAV8 vector expressing a codon-optimized factor IX transgene. In all 10 patients, the circulating factor IX rose to 1- 6% of the normal value over a median period of 3.2 years, with observation ongoing. [41]

In this study, four of the seven patients who had been receiving FIX prophylaxis were able to discontinue it.Three different vector doses were used, and responses were dose dependent: five of the six patients who received the highest vector dose had a greater than 90% reduction in their annual bleeding episodes. [41]

Future prospects for RNA repair, use of gene-modified endothelial progenitors, and gene-modified stem-cell therapy are being investigated. Gene transfer for the treatment of hemophilia requires a combination of vector delivery systems, animal models, and clinical models and/or studies to prove its practical utility.



Consultations may be indicated with a hematologist, blood bank, pathologist, or others as indicated by hemorrhagic complications. Early hematology consultation for management of inhibitors is essential. Annual dental evaluation is recommended.

A genetic counselor may be consulted. Genetic testing for hemophilia A is available and must be offered to potential carriers. Prenatal testing is performed by using amniocentesis or chorionic villus biopsy.

Before elective surgery is planned, a hematologist should be consulted to arrange adequate coverage with antihemophilic factors and to arrange close follow-up to ensure that factor levels are sufficient during the operation and in the recovery and healing period.

Consult an orthopedic surgeon in cases of permanent joint deformities resulting from recurrent hemarthrosis in relatively neglected cases or, occasionally, in cases of repetitive bleeding in a single joint despite intensive prophylactic replacement of factor and physiotherapy. Open surgical or arthroscopic synovectomy may decrease bleeding and pain in the affected joint.

Management should be provided in coordination with a comprehensive hemophilia care center.