Cleft Lip Treatment & Management

Updated: Jun 04, 2019
  • Author: Benjamin C Paul, MD; Chief Editor: Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA  more...
  • Print

Surgical Therapy

Depending on the width of the cleft, some centers may perform presurgical orthopedic management to reduce the width of the bony cleft and to align the maxillary arch prior to definitive lip repair. This may be accomplished by using external traction devices or passive orthodontic plates. Surgical lip adhesion may be used for wide clefts as an alternative to presurgical orthopedics. In lip adhesion, the soft tissues of the superior lip are united, essentially converting a wide complete cleft to an incomplete cleft.

Because each cleft is unique, definitive repair of the cleft lip should be individualized. [5] Mirault was among the first to describe the technique of increasing lip length by using a small flap taken from the cleft side. However, this technique did not reconstruct the Cupid's bow. Le Mesurier later described the inset of a rectangular flap from the cleft side into a releasing incision on the noncleft side to create an artificial Cupid's bow. Tennison described the triangular flap to preserve the Cupid's bow. Randall later worked out the geometry of this flap, adding precision and reproducibility to the triangular flap technique. The technique creates an unnatural scar across the philtral column and flattens the philtral dimple. In addition, the triangular flap method does not address the nasal deformity.

Moreover, a study by Wong et al of children with unilateral cleft lip found that at age 5 years, the postoperative vermilion height ratio between the cleft and noncleft sides did not differ significantly between patients whose surgery involved the use of a triangular skin flap (20 children) and those whose operation did not (25 children). [6]

Millard introduced the rotation-advancement technique in 1955, which overcomes many of the pitfalls of earlier techniques. The rotation-advancement technique is the most commonly used method today for the repair of unilateral clefts. The technique preserves the Cupid's bow and the philtral dimple and improves nasal tip symmetry. The rotation-advancement lengthens the lip by means of a rotation incision that releases the medial lip element, allowing the Cupid's bow to rotate downwards into normal position. A small backcut may be used to further increase the length, if needed. The lateral lip element is advanced into the gap created by rotation of the medial element, thus completing reconstruction of the upper lip.

For unilateral cleft lip repair, the most commonly selected techniques include the Millard, Mohler, and Fisher techniques. In the Fisher technique, the newest of these procedures, anatomic subunits are used to plan and carry out reconstruction. Early comparison research indicates that postoperative asymmetry may be reduced by employing subunits in surgical planning. [7]  In time, the Fisher technique's effects on long-term aesthetics, midface growth, and healing will be understood.


Preoperative Details

See the list below:

  • Administer general endotracheal anesthesia.

  • Monitor pulse, respiration, blood pressure (BP), ECG, and temperature.

  • Gently hyperextend the neck to provide optimal exposure.

  • Ensure appropriate padding of pressure points.

  • Ensure corneal protection (eg, lubricant, taping of the eyelids).

  • Place the patient on a warming blanket.


Intraoperative Details

Unilateral cleft repair skin markings

See the image below.

Cleft lip. Cleft lip.

See the list below:

  1. Center of Cupid's bow

  2. Cupid's bow peak at the vermilion-cutaneous junction, noncleft side of the medial element

  3. Proposed Cupid's bow peak, cleft side of medial element

  4. Midline of columella

  5. Alar base, noncleft side

  6. Alar base, cleft side

  7. Proposed Cupid's bow peak, lateral element

  8. Tip of advancement flap

  9. End of backcut

Unilateral repair key points

See the list below:

  • The position of point 3 may be determined by transposing the distance between 1 and 2, such that the distance between 1 and 2 is equal to the distance between 1 and 3.

  • The distance between the alar base and Cupid's bow peak on the noncleft side should equal that on the cleft side, ie, the distance from 2-5 is equal to the distance from 7-6.

  • The difference between the distance from the columellar base to points 2 and 3 represents the deficiency in vertical length that must be gained to level the Cupid's bow. Although the rotation incision allows point 3 to drop inferiorly, some vertical deficiency of the cleft side may remain. The added length may be gained by making a small backcut medial to the philtral column on the noncleft side. The advancement flap derived from the lateral element fills the opening created by the rotation incision and any backcut in the medial element; hence, the distance from 3-5 plus the added length gained by the backcut equals the distance from 6-7. Introduction of a small triangular flap from the lateral element into a small transverse incision in the lower part of the lip may also serve to lengthen the cleft side of the medial element and to improve the contour of the lip. The base width of this flap is equal to the height of the vermilion-cutaneous roll.

  • The rotation incision curves gently from point 3 to the columellar base, hugging the columellar-lip junction, and stops medial to the philtral column on the noncleft side. Crossing the normal philtral column results in an undesirable elongation of the lip on the noncleft side. In the infant with a rectangular philtrum, this incision may be modified as described by Mohler.

  • Place point 7 on the lateral element at a point level with the Cupid's bow peak on the noncleft side (point 2) and where the white roll remains well developed. Placing this point too far laterally produces an unnatural shortening of the lateral lip element, which results in a noticeable imbalance. Placing this point too far medially, where the white roll is poorly developed, results in a noticeable irregularity of the white roll. To gain some extra vertical height, if needed, point 7 may be moved 1 mm laterally and point 3 moved 1 mm medially.

  • The advancement incision curves from point 7 to point 8, then a variable distance to point 9, depending on the amount of rotation needed to correct the flare of the displaced alar base.

  • When possible, line up the point at the junction of the wet and dry vermilion; this point is also called the red line.

Repair of the orbicularis oris

Reorientation and repair of the orbicularis oris muscle bundles are essential for normal lip function and eversion of the lip border. Failure to adequately address the muscle at the time of lip repair results in abnormal motion or contour when pursing the lips and in a characteristic bulge in the lateral lip element. A variety of techniques for reorienting the orbicularis oris muscle fibers in unilateral clefts have been described, although the optimal method of muscle repair remains to be determined. Park advocates careful identification and precise reapproximation of the superficial and deep components of the muscle.

Primary nasal correction

In every case, reconstruct both the lip and the nose at the primary operation. Repair of the lip in infancy while delaying nasal repair until later in childhood is no longer appropriate. Reconstruction of the cleft nasal deformity remains the most challenging aspect of cleft surgery. Principles of primary nasal correction include the following:

  • Wide undermining of the nasal skin on the cleft side, freeing the skin from the underlying nasal skeleton

  • Elevation of the slumped alar cartilage on the cleft side to the normal level using internal or external suspension sutures

  • Medial advancement of the lateral crus and alar base on the cleft side

Bilateral cleft lip repair

Prior to surgical repair, the use of presurgical orthopedic appliances can reduce significant premaxillary protrusion. The premaxillary segment varies considerably in size and in the extent of its protrusion. In incomplete clefts, attachment of the premaxilla to one or both lateral maxillary segments limits premaxillary protrusion. In complete clefts, retroposition of the premaxilla prior to definitive lip repair often is necessary. This procedure may be accomplished through presurgical orthopedics, using external traction devices or passive orthodontic plates. Retroposition of the premaxilla may also be accomplished through surgical lip adhesion. Surgical setback of the premaxilla, a technique popular in the 19th century, is associated with subsequent midfacial growth impairment and should be avoided.

Modifications of the Millard straight-line, banked, forked-flap technique currently are the most widely used methods for repair of bilateral cleft lip. These techniques work well for the repair of complete bilateral clefts and may be modified for the repair of incomplete and/or asymmetrical clefts.

Bilateral cleft lip repair key points

See the list below:

  • The prolabium is always used in reconstruction of the philtrum, even if severely deficient.

  • The prolabial vermilion nearly always is deficient, and the prolabial white roll usually is indistinct. Therefore, in most cases, the prolabial mucosa is turned down to line the buccal alveolar sulcus; the tubercle and white roll are reconstructed using paired white roll–vermilion–orbicularis marginalis flaps from the lateral lip elements brought beneath the prolabium.

  • The prolabium must not be left too wide and should rarely exceed 5-6 mm in width.

  • The orbicularis peripheralis muscle is freed from its abnormal attachments at the alar bases and from the overlying dermis. This allows the muscle to be mobilized and reconstructed over the premaxilla.

  • Anatomic positioning of the alar cartilages is performed at the time of primary lip repair.


Postoperative Details

See the list below:

  • After surgery, feeding is resumed using a soft crosscut nipple.

  • Infants remain hospitalized for intravenous hydration until oral intake is sufficient (usually 24 h).

  • The suture lines are kept clean by gentle application of a dilute hydrogen peroxide solution, and a small amount of antibiotic ointment is applied to the repair 3 times daily and after feeding.

  • If nonresorbing suture material is used, the sutures are removed by the fifth postoperative day.

  • Soft elbow restraints are used for 2-3 weeks to keep the infant from manually disrupting the repair.



Arrangements for suture removal are made prior to or immediately after discharge. All patients require long-term follow-up care. A dedicated multidisciplinary team approach and evaluation in different stages of the patient's life is important. Assess speech, language, hearing, somatic growth, and development regularly. Appropriately assess general dental health. Orthodontic management and secondary surgical procedures, such as bone grafting, are carried out during the school years. Patients with significant midface retrusion may require treatment. Secondary procedures to correct the tip in nasal asymmetry may be performed at school age; however, if the reconstruction involves osteotomy, delay the procedure until the completion of nasal growth (age 16-17 y). Emotional difficulties may emerge because of poor self-esteem during adolescence and should be recognized and addressed early.



Complications following cleft lip repair are unusual. Wound infections following surgery are uncommon and are treated with appropriate antibiotic therapy. Although immediate wound dehiscence is best repaired prior to discharge, treat delayed dehiscence after the scar has settled.


Outcome and Prognosis

Outcome assessment after cleft lip repair is based on lip contour and symmetry, facial growth, and psychological well-being. Major revisional surgery is not usually needed after cleft lip repair. Minor revisions of the vermilion or scar revision may be needed. The most challenging aspect of cleft lip surgery is correction of nasal deformity. Secondary surgery to improve nasal contour and symmetry is commonly required.

A study by Yao et al indicated that in patients with unilateral cleft lip, the chance of an unacceptable postsurgical outcome, in which the vertical lip height discrepancy between the cleft and noncleft sides is greater than 3 mm, is higher when the cleft width ratio (the presurgical cleft width divided by the commissure width) is above 0.5. In study patients, the risk of an unacceptable outcome for those with a cleft width ratio of over 0.5 was 27%, compared with 11% for patients with a ratio of less than 0.5. [8]


Future and Controversies

Recombinant DNA technology has revolutionized the ability to detect molecular defects at the protein and gene level; however, a clear understanding of the molecular basis of clefts has yet to be discovered. Some studies have suggested that several genes may be involved, including transforming growth factor–alpha, retinoic acid receptor–alpha, BCL3, and MSX-1. Future advances in molecular technology and understanding may ultimately lead to improvements in the diagnosis and management of orofacial clefts.

The experimental finding that fetal wounds made early in gestation heal without scar formation sparked an interest in intrauterine repair of the cleft lip. In animal models, evidence supports the fact that surgically created cleft lip and palates heal without scar formation. The molecular basis of such scarless healing is not well understood and remains the subject of intense investigation. At the present time, the risk of preterm labor and fetal loss is too high to justify the use of fetal surgery for the correction of cleft lip.

Neonatal lip repair is controversial. Proponents of neonatal repair cite the potential psychological benefits of bringing home a child with normal appearance; however, this assertion remains unproven. Such early repair may be associated with an increase in perioperative risk.

Controversy exists regarding the use of presurgical orthopedics or lip adhesion. Lip adhesion may be indicated for wide unilateral complete clefts. Those that oppose this technique argue that the scar introduced in the adhesion may interfere with subsequent cheiloplasty. A well-planned and executed lip adhesion may facilitate cleft repair while introducing a fine scar. [9]